Xiangtao Xu
Princeton University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Xiangtao Xu.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014
Kaiyu Guan; Eric F. Wood; David Medvigy; John S. Kimball; Ming Pan; Kelly K. Caylor; Justin Sheffield; Xiangtao Xu; Matthew O. Jones
This paper presents a continental-scale phenological analysis of African savannas and woodlands. We apply an array of synergistic vegetation and hydrological data records from satellite remote sensing and model simulations to explore the influence of rainy season timing and duration on regional land surface phenology and ecosystem structure. We find that (i) the rainy season onset precedes and is an effective predictor of the growing season onset in African grasslands. (ii) African woodlands generally have early green-up before rainy season onset and have a variable delayed senescence period after the rainy season, with this delay correlated nonlinearly with tree fraction. These woodland responses suggest their complex water use mechanisms (either from potential groundwater use by relatively deep roots or stem-water reserve) to maintain dry season activity. (iii) We empirically find that the rainy season length has strong nonlinear impacts on tree fractional cover in the annual rainfall range from 600 to 1800 mm/yr, which may lend some support to the previous modeling study that given the same amount of total rainfall to the tree fraction may first increase with the lengthening of rainy season until reaching an “optimal rainy season length,” after which tree fraction decreases with the further lengthening of rainy season. This nonlinear response is resulted from compound mechanisms of hydrological cycle, fire, and other factors. We conclude that African savannas and deciduous woodlands have distinctive responses in their phenology and ecosystem functioning to rainy season. Further research is needed to address interaction between groundwater and tropical woodland as well as to explicitly consider the ecological significance of rainy season length under climate change.
Global Change Biology | 2018
Rosie A. Fisher; Charles D. Koven; William R. L. Anderegg; Bradley Christoffersen; Michael C. Dietze; Caroline E. Farrior; Jennifer Holm; George C. Hurtt; Ryan G. Knox; Peter J. Lawrence; Jeremy W. Lichstein; Marcos Longo; Ashley M. Matheny; David Medvigy; Helene C. Muller-Landau; Thomas L. Powell; Shawn P. Serbin; Hisashi Sato; Jacquelyn K. Shuman; Benjamin Smith; Anna T. Trugman; Toni Viskari; Hans Verbeeck; Ensheng Weng; Chonggang Xu; Xiangtao Xu; Tao Zhang; Paul R. Moorcroft
Numerous current efforts seek to improve the representation of ecosystem ecology and vegetation demographic processes within Earth System Models (ESMs). These developments are widely viewed as an important step in developing greater realism in predictions of future ecosystem states and fluxes. Increased realism, however, leads to increased model complexity, with new features raising a suite of ecological questions that require empirical constraints. Here, we review the developments that permit the representation of plant demographics in ESMs, and identify issues raised by these developments that highlight important gaps in ecological understanding. These issues inevitably translate into uncertainty in model projections but also allow models to be applied to new processes and questions concerning the dynamics of real-world ecosystems. We argue that stronger and more innovative connections to data, across the range of scales considered, are required to address these gaps in understanding. The development of first-generation land surface models as a unifying framework for ecophysiological understanding stimulated much research into plant physiological traits and gas exchange. Constraining predictions at ecologically relevant spatial and temporal scales will require a similar investment of effort and intensified inter-disciplinary communication.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015
Xiangtao Xu; David Medvigy; Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe
Significance Savannas account for 20% of global land area and support 30% of terrestrial net primary production. The biome is characterized by the coexistence of trees and grasses. Tree abundance strongly influences savanna ecosystem dynamics. Maximum tree abundance in tropical savannas is found to be negatively correlated with rainfall intensity, which remains unexplained. Through combining in situ observations, a biophysical tree–grass competition model, and a stochastic rainfall generator, we present that differentiated tree and grass water use strategies are essential to explain the phenomenon. Our findings show the importance of vegetation physiology in determining tree abundance in the biome and enhance our ability to predict future ecosystem composition and dynamics under global change. Tree abundance in tropical savannas exhibits large and unexplained spatial variability. Here, we propose that differentiated tree and grass water use strategies can explain the observed negative relation between maximum tree abundance and rainfall intensity (defined as the characteristic rainfall depth on rainy days), and we present a biophysical tree–grass competition model to test this idea. The model is founded on a premise that has been well established in empirical studies, namely, that the relative growth rate of grasses is much higher compared with trees in wet conditions but that grasses are more susceptible to water stress and lose biomass more quickly in dry conditions. The model is coupled with a stochastic rainfall generator and then calibrated and tested using field observations from several African savanna sites. We show that the observed negative relation between maximum tree abundance and rainfall intensity can be explained only when differentiated water use strategies are accounted for. Numerical experiments reveal that this effect is more significant than the effect of root niche separation. Our results emphasize the importance of vegetation physiology in determining the responses of tree abundance to climate variations in tropical savannas and suggest that projected increases in rainfall intensity may lead to an increase in grass in this biome.
New Phytologist | 2018
Nate G. McDowell; Craig D. Allen; Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira; Paulo M. Brando; Roel J. W. Brienen; Jeff Chambers; Brad Christoffersen; Stuart J. Davies; Christopher E. Doughty; Alvaro Duque; Fernando Del Bon Espírito-Santo; Rosie A. Fisher; Clarissa G. Fontes; David Galbraith; Devin W. Goodsman; Charlotte Grossiord; Henrik Hartmann; Jennifer Holm; Daniel J. Johnson; Abd Rahman Kassim; Michael Keller; Charles D. Koven; Lara M. Kueppers; Tomo’omi Kumagai; Yadvinder Malhi; Sean M. McMahon; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick Meir; Paul R. Moorcroft; Helene C. Muller-Landau
Tree mortality rates appear to be increasing in moist tropical forests (MTFs) with significant carbon cycle consequences. Here, we review the state of knowledge regarding MTF tree mortality, create a conceptual framework with testable hypotheses regarding the drivers, mechanisms and interactions that may underlie increasing MTF mortality rates, and identify the next steps for improved understanding and reduced prediction. Increasing mortality rates are associated with rising temperature and vapor pressure deficit, liana abundance, drought, wind events, fire and, possibly, CO2 fertilization-induced increases in stand thinning or acceleration of trees reaching larger, more vulnerable heights. The majority of these mortality drivers may kill trees in part through carbon starvation and hydraulic failure. The relative importance of each driver is unknown. High species diversity may buffer MTFs against large-scale mortality events, but recent and expected trends in mortality drivers give reason for concern regarding increasing mortality within MTFs. Models of tropical tree mortality are advancing the representation of hydraulics, carbon and demography, but require more empirical knowledge regarding the most common drivers and their subsequent mechanisms. We outline critical datasets and model developments required to test hypotheses regarding the underlying causes of increasing MTF mortality rates, and improve prediction of future mortality under climate change.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2016
Youmi Oh; Brandon T. Stackhouse; Maggie C. Y. Lau; Xiangtao Xu; Anna T. Trugman; Jonathan M. Moch; T. C. Onstott; Christian Juncher Jørgensen; Ludovica D'Imperio; Bo Elberling; Craig A. Emmerton; Vincent L. St. Louis; David Medvigy
Recent field studies have documented a surprisingly strong and consistent methane sink in arctic mineral soils, thought to be due to high-affinity methanotrophy. However, the distinctive physiology of these methanotrophs is poorly represented in mechanistic methane models. We developed a new model, constrained by microcosm experiments, to simulate the activity of high-affinity methanotrophs. The model was tested against soil core-thawing experiments and field-based measurements of methane fluxes and was compared to conventional mechanistic methane models. Our simulations show that high-affinity methanotrophy can be an important component of the net methane flux from arctic mineral soils. Simulations without this process overestimate methane emissions. Furthermore, simulations of methane flux seasonality are improved by dynamic simulation of active microbial biomass. Because a large fraction of the Arctic is characterized by mineral soils, high-affinity methanotrophy will likely have a strong effect on its net methane flux.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017
Yan Li; Kaiyu Guan; Pierre Gentine; Alexandra G. Konings; Frederick C. Meinzer; John S. Kimball; Xiangtao Xu; William R. L. Anderegg; Nate G. McDowell; Jordi Martínez-Vilalta; David G. Long; Stephen P. Good
The concept of iso/anisohydry describes the degree to which plants regulate their water status, operating from isohydric with strict regulation to anisohydric with less regulation. Though some species-level measures of iso/anisohydry exist at a few locations, ecosystem-scale information is still largely unavailable. In this study, we use diurnal observations from active (Ku-Band backscatter from QuikSCAT) and passive (X-band Vegetation Optical Depth [VOD] from AMSR-E) microwave satellite data to estimate global ecosystem iso/anisohydry. Here, diurnal observations from both satellites approximate predawn and midday plant canopy water contents, which are used to estimate iso/anisohydry. The two independent estimates from radar backscatter and VOD show reasonable agreement at low and mid-latitudes but diverge at high latitudes. Grasslands, croplands, wetlands, and open shrublands are more anisohydric, whereas evergreen broadleaf and deciduous broadleaf forests are more isohydric. The direct validation with upscaled in-situ species iso/anisohydry estimates indicates that the VOD-based estimates have much better agreement than the backscatter-based estimates. The indirect validation with prior knowledge suggests that both estimates are generally consistent in that vegetation water status of anisohydric ecosystems more closely tracks environmental fluctuations of water availability and demand than their isohydric counterparts. However, uncertainties still exist in the iso/anisohydry estimate, primarily arising from the remote sensing data and, to a lesser extent, from the methodology. The comprehensive assessment in this study can help us better understand the robustness, limitation, and uncertainties of the satellite-derived iso/anisohydry estimates. The ecosystem iso/anisohydry has the potential to reveal new insights into spatio-temporal ecosystem response to droughts.
New Phytologist | 2016
Xiangtao Xu; David Medvigy; Jennifer S. Powers; Justin M. Becknell; Kaiyu Guan
Global Change Biology | 2017
Jin Wu; Kaiyu Guan; Matthew Hayek; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; K. T. Wiedemann; Xiangtao Xu; Richard Wehr; Bradley Christoffersen; Guofang Miao; Rodrigo Marques da Silva; Alessandro C. Araújo; Raimundo Cosme Oliviera; Plínio B. Camargo; Russell K. Monson; Alfredo R. Huete; Scott R. Saleska
Environmental Research Letters | 2017
Kara Allen; Juan Manuel Dupuy; Maria G. Gei; Catherine M. Hulshof; David Medvigy; Camila Pizano; Beatriz Salgado-Negret; Christina M. Smith; Annette Trierweiler; Skip J Van Bloem; Bonnie G. Waring; Xiangtao Xu; Jennifer S. Powers
Global Change Biology | 2017
Jin Wu; Shawn P. Serbin; Xiangtao Xu; Loren P. Albert; Min Chen; Ran Meng; Scott R. Saleska; Alistair Rogers