Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Xianyu Wen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Xianyu Wen.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Prognostic Implication of M2 Macrophages Are Determined by the Proportional Balance of Tumor Associated Macrophages and Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Microsatellite-Unstable Gastric Carcinoma.

Kyung-Ju Kim; Xianyu Wen; Han-Kwang Yang; Woo Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang

Tumor associated macrophages are major inflammatory cells that play an important role in the tumor microenvironment. In this study, we investigated the prognostic significance of tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) in MSI-high gastric cancers using immunohistochemistry. CD68 and CD163 were used as markers for total infiltrating macrophages and M2-polarized macrophages, respectively. The density of CD68+ or CD163+ TAMs in four different areas (epithelial and stromal compartments of both the tumor center and invasive front) were analyzed in 143 cases of MSI-high advanced gastric cancers using a computerized image analysis system. Gastric cancers were scored as “0” or “1” in each area when the density of CD68+ and CD163+ TAMs was below or above the median value. Low density of CD68+ or CD163+ macrophages in four combined areas was closely associated with more frequent low-grade histology and the intestinal type tumor of the Lauren classification. In survival analysis, the low density of CD163+ TAMs was significantly associated with poor disease-free survival. In multivariate survival analysis, CD163+ TAMs in four combined areas, stromal and epithelial compartments of both tumor center and invasive front were independent prognostic indicator in MSI-high gastric cancers. In addition, the density of CD163+ TAMs correlated with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Our results indicate that the high density of CD163+ TAMs is an independent prognostic marker heralding prolonged disease-free survival and that the prognostic implication of CD163+ TAMs might be determined by the proportional balance of TAMs and TILs in MSI-high gastric cancers.


British Journal of Cancer | 2016

Adverse prognostic impact of the CpG island methylator phenotype in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Yongjun Cha; Kyung-Ju Kim; Sae-Won Han; Ye Young Rhee; Jeong Mo Bae; Xianyu Wen; Nam-Yun Cho; Daewon Lee; Kyung-Hun Lee; Tae Yong Kim; Do-Youn Oh; Seock-Ah Im; Yung-Jue Bang; Kyu Joo Park; Gyeong Hoon Kang; Tae-You Kim

Background:The association between the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and clinical outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear. We investigated the prognostic impact of CIMP in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy.Methods:Eight CIMP-specific promoters (CACNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3, SOCS1, CDKN2A, CRABP1, and MLH1) were examined. The CIMP status was determined by the number of methylated promoters as high (⩾5), low (1–4), and negative (0).Results:A total of 153 patients were included (men/women, 103/50; median age, 61 years; range, 22–80 years). The CIMP status was negative/low/high in 77/ 69/7 patients, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was significantly different among the three CIMP groups, with median values of 35.7, 22.2, and 9.77 months for the negative, low, and high groups, respectively (P<0.001). For patients treated with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin first-line chemotherapy (N=128), OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly different among the three CIMP groups; the median OS was 37.9, 23.8, and 6.77 months for the negative, low, and high groups, respectively (P<0.001), while the median PFS was 9.97, 7.87, and 1.83 months, respectively (P=0.002). Response rates were marginally different among the three CIMP groups (53.4% vs 45.1% vs 16.7%, respectively; P=0.107). For patients treated with fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan second-line chemotherapy (N=86), only OS showed a difference according to the CIMP status, with median values of 20.4, 13.4, and 2.90 months for the negative, low, and high groups, respectively (P<0.001).Conclusions:The CIMP status is a negative prognostic factor for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy.


British Journal of Cancer | 2017

Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system

Jeong Mo Bae; Jung Ho Kim; Yoonjin Kwak; Daewon Lee; Yongjun Cha; Xianyu Wen; Tae Hun Lee; Nam-Yun Cho; Kyu Joo Park; Sae Won Han; Hye Seung Lee; Tae-You Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang

Background:Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of molecular carcinogenic pathways. Based on recent findings regarding the multiple serrated neoplasia pathway, we revised an eight-marker panel for a new CIMP classification system.Methods:1370 patients who received surgical resection for CRCs were classified into three CIMP subtypes (CIMP-N: 0–4 methylated markers, CIMP-P1: 5–6 methylated markers and CIMP-P2: 7–8 methylated markers). Our findings were validated in a separate set of high-risk stage II or stage III CRCs receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (n=950).Results:A total of 1287/62/21 CRCs cases were classified as CIMP-N/CIMP-P1/CIMP-P2, respectively. CIMP-N showed male predominance, distal location, lower T, N category and devoid of BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P1 showed female predominance, proximal location, advanced TNM stage, mild decrease of CK20 and CDX2 expression, mild increase of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-P2 showed older age, female predominance, proximal location, advanced T category, markedly reduced CK20 and CDX2 expression, rare KRAS mutation, high frequency of CK7 expression, BRAF mutation, MSI and MLH1 methylation. CIMP-N showed better 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; HR=0.47; 95% CI: 0.28–0.78) in discovery set and better 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS; HR=0.50; 95% CI: 0.29–0.88) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1. CIMP-P2 showed marginally better 5-year CSS (HR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.07–1.22) in discovery set and marginally better 5-year RFS (HR=0.21, 95% CI: 0.05–0.92) in validation set compared with CIMP-P1.Conclusions:CIMP subtypes classified using our revised system showed different clinical outcomes, demonstrating the heterogeneity of multiple serrated precursors of CIMP-positive CRCs.


Human Pathology | 2016

Are clinicopathological features of colorectal cancers with methylation in half of CpG island methylator phenotype panel markers different from those of CpG island methylator phenotype–high colorectal cancers?

Jeong Mo Bae; Ye-Young Rhee; Kyung Ju Kim; Xianyu Wen; Young Seok Song; Nam-Yun Cho; Jung Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang

CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-high (CIMP-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) is defined when a tumor shows methylation at greater than or equal to 60% of CIMP panel markers. Although CRCs with methylation at 50% of panel markers are classified as CIMP-low/CIMP-0 tumors, little is known regarding the clinicopathological and molecular features of CRCs with methylation at 4/8 panel markers (4/8 methylated markers) and whether they are akin to CIMP-H or CIMP-low/CIMP-0 CRCs in terms of their clinicopathological or molecular features. A total of 1164 cases of surgically resected CRC were analyzed for their methylation status in 8 CIMP panel markers, and the frequencies of various clinicopathological and molecular features were compared between CRCs with 0/8, 1/8 to 3/8, 4/8, and 5/8 to 8/8 methylated markers. CRCs with 4/8 methylated markers were closer to CRCs with 5/8 to 8/8 methylated markers in terms of sex distribution, mucin production, serration, nodal metastasis, CK7 expression, CK20 loss, and CDX2 loss frequencies and overall survival rate. CRCs with methylation at 4/8 markers were closer to CRCs with 1/8 to 3/8 methylated markers in terms of less frequent right colon location and poor differentiation. CRCs with 4/8 methylated markers showed the shortest overall survival time compared with CRCs with 0/8, 1/8 to 3/8, 4/8, or 5/8 to 8/8 methylated markers. In terms of clinicopathological and molecular features, CRCs with 4/8 methylated markers appeared to be closer to CIMP-H than to CIMP-low/CIMP-0 and would thus be better classified as CIMP-H if the CRCs require classification into either CIMP-H or CIMP-low/CIMP-0.


Journal of pathology and translational medicine | 2017

Overexpression of POSTN in Tumor Stroma Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator of Colorectal Cancer

Hyeon Jeong Oh; Jeong Mo Bae; Xianyu Wen; Nam-Yun Cho; Jung Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang

Background Tumor microenvironment has recently drawn attention in that it is related with tumor prognosis. Cancer-associated fibroblast also plays a critical role in cancer invasiveness and progression in colorectal cancers. Periostin (POSTN), originally identified to be expressed in osteoblasts and osteoblast-derived cells, is expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts in several tissue types of cancer. Recent studies suggest an association between stromal overexpression of POSTN and poor prognosis of cancer patients. Methods We analyzed colorectal cancer cases for their expression status of POSTN in tumor stroma using immunohistochemistry and correlated the expression status with clinicopathological and molecular features. Results High level of POSTN expression in tumor stroma was closely associated with tumor location in proximal colon, infiltrative growth pattern, undifferentiated histology, tumor budding, luminal necrosis, and higher TNM stage. High expression status of POSTN in tumor stroma was found to be an independent prognostic parameter implicating poor 5-year cancer-specific survival and 5-year progression-free survival. Conclusions Our findings suggest that POSTN overexpression in tumor stroma of colorectal cancers could be a possible candidate marker for predicting poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancers.


Human Pathology | 2017

Prognostic significance of stromal GREM1 expression in colorectal cancer

Bo Gun Jang; Hye Sung Kim; Weon Young Chang; Jeong Mo Bae; Hyeon Jeong Oh; Xianyu Wen; Seorin Jeong; Nam Yun Cho; Woo Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang

Cancer-associated fibroblasts are the dominant cell population in the cancer stroma. Gremlin 1 (GREM1), an antagonist of the bone morphogenetic protein pathway, is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts in a variety of human cancers. However, its biological significance for cancer patients is largely unknown. We applied RNA in situ hybridization to evaluate the prognostic value of stromal GREM1 expression in a large cohort of 670 colorectal cancers (CRCs). Overall, GREM1 expression in CRCs was lower than that of the matched normal mucosa, and GREM1 expression had a strong positive correlation with BMI1 and inverse correlations with EPHB2 and OLFM4. RNA in situ hybridization localized the GREM expression to smooth muscle cells of the muscularis mucosa and fibroblasts around crypt bases and in the submucosal space of a normal colon. In various colon polyps, epithelial GREM1 expression was exclusively observed in traditional serrated adenomas. In total, 44% of CRCs were positive for stromal GREM1, which was associated with decreased lymphovascular invasion, a lower cancer stage, and nuclear β-catenin staining. Stromal GREM1 was significantly associated with improved recurrence-free and overall survival, although it was not found to be an independent prognostic marker in multivariate analyses. In addition, for locally advanced stage II and III CRC, it was associated with better, stage-independent clinical outcomes. In summary, CRCs are frequently accompanied by GERM1-expressing fibroblasts, which are closely associated with low lymphovascular invasion and a better prognosis, suggesting stromal GREM1 as a potential biomarker and possible candidate for targeted therapy in the treatment of CRCs.


Histopathology | 2018

The distribution of intratumoral macrophages correlates with molecular phenotypes and impacts prognosis in colorectal carcinoma

Young Hoon Kim; Xianyu Wen; Jeong M Bae; Jung H Kim; Nam-Yun Cho; Gyeong Hoon Kang

The role of tumour‐associated macrophages (TAMs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains elusive. In this study, we aimed to examine the correlation between TAMs, clinicopathological features, tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and prognosis in CRC by the use of image analysis.


BMC Cancer | 2017

Tumoral LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with poor survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Seorin Jeong; Kyoungbun Lee; Xianyu Wen; Young Hoon Kim; Nam-Yun Cho; Ja-June Jang; Gyeong Hoon Kang

BackgroundDNA methylation changes occurring in cancer cells are featured with both promoter CpG island hypermethylation and diffuse genomic hypomethylation. Long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) is repeated in an interspersed manner with an estimated 500,000 copies per genome. LINE-1 has its CpG sites of the 5′ untranslated region methylated heavily in normal cells and undergoes demethylation in association with cancerization. However, little information is available regarding LINE-1 hypomethylation and its prognostic implication in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas.MethodsA total of 172 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas were analyzed for their methylation levels at four CpG sites of LINE-1 using bisulfite pyrosequencing. We examined the relation between tumoral LINE-1 methylation level and clinicopathological features, including survival.ResultsTumor differentiation, lymphatic invasion, and T stage were associated with a low average methylation level of LINE-1 at the four CpG sites; LINE-1 methylation level tended to be lower in high-grade differentiation, lymphatic emboli, and higher T stage. LINE-1 hypomethylation was significantly linked with lower cancer-specific survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and was found to be an independent prognostic parameter.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that tumoral LINE-1 hypomethylation could be a molecular biomarker heralding poor prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our findings need to be validated in further study.


International Journal of Biological Markers | 2018

Intratumoral immune cells expressing PD-1/PD-L1 and their prognostic implications in cancer: a meta-analysis

Young Hoon Kim; Xianyu Wen; Nam Yun Cho; Gyeong Hoon Kang

Background: The prognostic value of immune cells expressing programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cancer are controversial, and the potential differential impact of using tissue microarrays and whole tissue sections to assess the positivity of immune cells has not been addressed. Methods: The current study included 30 eligible studies with 7251 patients that evaluated the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes expressing PD-1/PD-L1 and overall survival and disease-free survival, or progression-free survival. Subgroup analysis was based on the tissue type of cancer and the type of tissue sampling (tissue microarray or whole tissue section). Results: In the meta-analysis, PD-1-positive and PD-L1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes had a positive effect on disease-free survival or progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.732; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.565, 0.947; and HR 0.727; 95% CI 0.584, 0.905, respectively). PD-L1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes had a positive impact on overall survival in studies using tissue microarray (HR 0.586; 95% CI 0.476, 0.721), but had a poor impact when only whole tissue sections were considered (HR 1.558; 95% CI 1.232, 1.969). Lung cancer was associated with good overall survival and disease-free survival (HR 0.639; 95% CI 0.491, 0.831; and HR 0.693; 95% CI 0.538, 0.891, respectively) for PD-1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and colorectal cancer showed favorable disease-free survival (HR 0.471; 95% CI 0.308, 0.722) for PD-L1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusion: Immune cells expressing PD-1 and PD-L1 within tumors are associated with the prognosis. However, the correlation may vary among different tumor types and by the type of tissue sampling used for the assessment.


Gastric Cancer | 2018

Combinatory low methylation statuses of SAT-α and L1 are associated with shortened survival time in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Young Hoon Kim; Xianyu Wen; Seorin Jeong; Nam-Yun Cho; Woo Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang

BackgroundL1 and SAT-α are repetitive DNA elements that undergo demethylation in association with cancerization. Unlike L1 hypomethaylation, nothing is known regarding the prognostic implication of SAT-α hypomethylation alongside L1 hypomethaylaton in gastric cancers.MethodsFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from 492 cases of advanced gastric cancer were analyzed to determine their L1 and SAT-α methylation status using pyrosequencing methylation assay.ResultsL1 and SAT-α methylation statuses were correlated with clinicopathological parameters, including survival. L1 or SAT-α methylation levels were lower in gastric cancers with venous invasion or nodal metastasis than those without. L1 methylation was lower in gastric cancers with lymphatic emboli than in those with no lymphatic emboli, but was higher in gastric cancers with perineural invasion than in those with no perineural invasion. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that both tumoral L1 and SAT-α hypomethylations were found to correlate independently with OS (HR = 1.477; 95% CI 1.079–2.021 and HR = 1.394; 95% CI 1.011–1.922, respectively) and RFS (HR = 1.477; 95% CI 1.090–2.001 and HR = 1.516; 95% CI 1.106–2.078, respectively). Combined L1 and SAT-α hypomethylation turned out to correlate independently with OS (HR = 2.003; 95% CI 1.268–3.164) and RFS (HR = 2.226; 95% CI 1.411–3.510).ConclusionNot only tumoral L1 hypomethylation, but also tumoral SAT-α hypomethylation was found to be independent prognostic parameters in patients with advanced gastric cancer. SAT-α methylation status can be used to further divide gastric cancers with L1 hypomethylation into subsets of gastric cancers with better and worse prognosis.

Collaboration


Dive into the Xianyu Wen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nam-Yun Cho

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeong Mo Bae

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jung Ho Kim

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Young Hoon Kim

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nam Yun Cho

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Seorin Jeong

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tae-You Kim

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ye-Young Rhee

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Young Seok Song

Seoul National University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge