Xiaobao Wang
Peking University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Xiaobao Wang.
Physical Review C | 2010
Chong Qi; Xiaobao Wang; Zhen Xiang Xu; R. J. Liotta; R. Wyss; F. R. Xu
In this thesis the properties of unbound nuclei like 12,13Li are studiedby extending the multistep shell model to the complex energy plane. Thenuclei 12Li and 13Li are described starting from the one-particle states in 10Liand two-particle states in 11Li. The ground state of 12Li is found to be anantibound state. No bound or antibound state is found in 13Li. It is alsoshown that the odd proton plays a minor role in these nuclei.This framework is also applied to study the recently proposed spin-alignedproton-neutron pair coupling scheme. For this the MSM is extended to theproton-neutron space as well as the isospin space. In the model, a nonorthogonalbasis is introduced, which allows us to identify simultaneously theroles played by all configurations. The four-particle, six-particle and eightparticlenuclei in the heaviest N = Z region are evaluated using the MSMbasis within the space spanned by the single 0g9/2 hole shell.A novel Monte Carlo representation in the complex energy plane is alsodeveloped for studying nuclear excitations in the continuum. The calculationson realistic potentials show a stable performance and high accuracy in the oneparticleand two-particle cases. This will provide a convenient tool to studyopen systems with many nucleons in the continuum.
Nuclear Physics | 2011
Xiaobao Wang; Chong Qi; F. R. Xu
Abstract The non-relativistic approximation of the quark–meson-coupling model has been discussed and compared with the Skyrme–Hartree–Fock model which includes spin exchanges. Calculations show that the spin-exchange interaction has important effect on the descriptions of finite nuclei and nuclear matter through the Fock exchange. Also in the quark–meson-coupling model, it is the Fock exchange that leads to a nonlinear density-dependent isovector channel and changes the density-dependent behavior of the symmetry energy.
Journal of Physics G | 2015
Xiaobao Wang; G X Dong
In this paper, we revisit the monopole components of effective interactions for the shell model. Without going through specific nuclei or shell gaps, universal roles of central, tensor, and spin–orbit forces can be proved, reflecting the intrinsic features of shell model effective interactions. For monopole matrix elements, even and odd channels of central force often have a canceling effect. However, for the contributions to the shell evolution, its even and odd channels could have both positive or negative contributions, enhancing the role of central force on the shell structure. Tensor force is generally weaker than central force. However, for the effect on shell evolutions, tensor force can dominate or play a competitive role. A different systematics has been discovered between T = 1 and 0 channels. For example, tensor force, well established in the T = 0 channel, becomes uncertain in the T = 1 channel. We calculate the properties of neutron-rich oxygen and calcium isotopes in order to study T = 1 channel interactions further. It is learned that the main improvements of empirical interactions are traced to the central force. For noncentral forces, antisymmetric spin–orbit (ALS) force, originated from manybody perturbations or three-body force, could also play an explicit role. T = 1 tensor forces are less constrained so their effect can differ in different empirical interactions. The influence of tensor force may sometimes be canceled by many-body effects. For T = 0 channels of effective interactions, which is the main source of neutron–proton correlations, central and tensor forces are the leading components. For T = 1 channels, which can act between like-particles, the request for many-body correlations could be more demanding, so that the monopole anomaly of the T = 1 channel might be more serious.
Physics Letters B | 2017
M.D. Sun; Zhenan Liu; Tao Huang; W. Zhang; Jie Wang; X.Y. Liu; B. Ding; Z.G. Gan; L. Ma; Huanming Yang; Z.Y. Zhang; L. Yu; J. Jiang; K Wang; Yanbiao Wang; M. L. Liu; Z. H. Li; J. Li; Xiaobao Wang; H.Y. Lu; Cheng-Jian Lin; L.J. Sun; N.R. Ma; Cenxi Yuan; Wei Zuo; H. Xu; X. H. Zhou; Guoqing Xiao; Chong Qi; Feng-Shou Zhang
Science China-physics Mechanics & Astronomy | 2015
G X Dong; Xiaobao Wang; Shaoying Yu
Physical Review Letters | 2018
Diego Lonardoni; Joseph Carlson; Stefano Gandolfi; J. E. Lynn; K. E. Schmidt; A. Schwenk; Xiaobao Wang
EPJ Web of Conferences | 2014
Xiaobao Wang; G X Dong; F. R. Xu
Science China-physics Mechanics & Astronomy | 2015
Xiaobao Wang; G X Dong
Chinese Science Bulletin | 2014
G X Dong; Xiaobao Wang; Furong Xu; Shaoying Yu
Physical Review C | 2017
T. H. Huang; W. Zhang; M. D. Sun; Zhenan Liu; J. G. Wang; X. Y. Liu; B. Ding; Z. G. Gan; L. Ma; H. B. Yang; Z. Y. Zhang; L. Yu; J. Jiang; K Wang; Y. S. Wang; M. L. Liu; Z. H. Li; J. Q. Li; Xiaobao Wang; H. Y. Lu; Cheng-Jian Lin; L. J. Sun; N. R. Ma; Zhong-Zhou Ren; Feng-Shou Zhang; W. Zou; X. H. Zhou; H. Xu; Gengfu Xiao