Xiaocui Wu
University of Oklahoma
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Xiaocui Wu.
Scientific Reports | 2015
Yibo Liu; Jingfeng Xiao; Weimin Ju; Yanlian Zhou; Shaoqiang Wang; Xiaocui Wu
Water use efficiency (WUE) measures the trade-off between carbon gain and water loss of terrestrial ecosystems, and better understanding its dynamics and controlling factors is essential for predicting ecosystem responses to climate change. We assessed the magnitude, spatial patterns, and trends of WUE of China’s terrestrial ecosystems and its responses to drought using a process-based ecosystem model. During the period from 2000 to 2011, the national average annual WUE (net primary productivity (NPP)/evapotranspiration (ET)) of China was 0.79 g C kg−1 H2O. Annual WUE decreased in the southern regions because of the decrease in NPP and the increase in ET and increased in most northern regions mainly because of the increase in NPP. Droughts usually increased annual WUE in Northeast China and central Inner Mongolia but decreased annual WUE in central China. “Turning-points” were observed for southern China where moderate and extreme droughts reduced annual WUE and severe drought slightly increased annual WUE. The cumulative lagged effect of drought on monthly WUE varied by region. Our findings have implications for ecosystem management and climate policy making. WUE is expected to continue to change under future climate change particularly as drought is projected to increase in both frequency and severity.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Yanlian Zhou; Xiaocui Wu; Weimin Ju; Jing M. Chen; Shaoqiang Wang; Huimin Wang; Wenping Yuan; T. Andrew Black; Rachhpal S. Jassal; Andreas Ibrom; Shijie Han; Junhua Yan; Hank A. Margolis; Olivier Roupsard; Yingnian Li; Fenghua Zhao; Gerard Kiely; Gregory Starr; Marian Pavelka; Leonardo Montagnani; Georg Wohlfahrt; Petra D'Odorico; David R. Cook; M. Altaf Arain; Damien Bonal; Jason Beringer; Peter D. Blanken; Benjamin Loubet; Monique Y. Leclerc; Giorgio Matteucci
Light use efficiency (LUE) models are widely used to simulate gross primary production (GPP). However, the treatment of the plant canopy as a big leaf by these models can introduce large uncertainties in simulated GPP. Recently, a two-leaf light use efficiency (TL-LUE) model was developed to simulate GPP separately for sunlit and shaded leaves and has been shown to outperform the big-leaf MOD17 model at six FLUX sites in China. In this study we investigated the performance of the TL-LUE model for a wider range of biomes. For this we optimized the parameters and tested the TL-LUE model using data from 98 FLUXNET sites which are distributed across the globe. The results showed that the TL-LUE model performed in general better than the MOD17 model in simulating 8 day GPP. Optimized maximum light use efficiency of shaded leaves (epsilon(msh)) was 2.63 to 4.59 times that of sunlit leaves (epsilon(msu)). Generally, the relationships of epsilon(msh) and epsilon(msu) with epsilon(max) were well described by linear equations, indicating the existence of general patterns across biomes. GPP simulated by the TL-LUE model was much less sensitive to biases in the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) input than the MOD17 model. The results of this study suggest that the proposed TL-LUE model has the potential for simulating regional and global GPP of terrestrial ecosystems, and it is more robust with regard to usual biases in input data than existing approaches which neglect the bimodal within-canopy distribution of PAR.
Scientific Reports | 2016
Yao Zhang; Xiangming Xiao; Luis Guanter; Sha Zhou; Philippe Ciais; Joanna Joiner; Stephen Sitch; Xiaocui Wu; Julian Nabel; Jinwei Dong; Etsushi Kato; Atul K. Jain; Andy Wiltshire; Benjamin Stocker
Carbon uptake by terrestrial ecosystems is increasing along with the rising of atmospheric CO2 concentration. Embedded in this trend, recent studies suggested that the interannual variability (IAV) of global carbon fluxes may be dominated by semi-arid ecosystems, but the underlying mechanisms of this high variability in these specific regions are not well known. Here we derive an ensemble of gross primary production (GPP) estimates using the average of three data-driven models and eleven process-based models. These models are weighted by their spatial representativeness of the satellite-based solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF). We then use this weighted GPP ensemble to investigate the GPP variability for different aridity regimes. We show that semi-arid regions contribute to 57% of the detrended IAV of global GPP. Moreover, in regions with higher GPP variability, GPP fluctuations are mostly controlled by precipitation and strongly coupled with evapotranspiration (ET). This higher GPP IAV in semi-arid regions is co-limited by supply (precipitation)-induced ET variability and GPP-ET coupling strength. Our results demonstrate the importance of semi-arid regions to the global terrestrial carbon cycle and posit that there will be larger GPP and ET variations in the future with changes in precipitation patterns and dryland expansion.
Scientific Data | 2017
Yao Zhang; Xiangming Xiao; Xiaocui Wu; Sha Zhou; Geli Zhang; Yuanwei Qin; Jinwei Dong
Accurate estimation of the gross primary production (GPP) of terrestrial vegetation is vital for understanding the global carbon cycle and predicting future climate change. Multiple GPP products are currently available based on different methods, but their performances vary substantially when validated against GPP estimates from eddy covariance data. This paper provides a new GPP dataset at moderate spatial (500 m) and temporal (8-day) resolutions over the entire globe for 2000–2016. This GPP dataset is based on an improved light use efficiency theory and is driven by satellite data from MODIS and climate data from NCEP Reanalysis II. It also employs a state-of-the-art vegetation index (VI) gap-filling and smoothing algorithm and a separate treatment for C3/C4 photosynthesis pathways. All these improvements aim to solve several critical problems existing in current GPP products. With a satisfactory performance when validated against in situ GPP estimates, this dataset offers an alternative GPP estimate for regional to global carbon cycle studies.
Remote Sensing | 2015
Xiaocui Wu; Weimin Ju; Yanlian Zhou; Mingzhu He; Beverly E. Law; T. Andrew Black; Hank A. Margolis; Alessandro Cescatti; Lianhong Gu; Leonardo Montagnani; Asko Noormets; Timothy J. Griffis; Kim Pilegaard; Andrej Varlagin; Riccardo Valentini; Peter D. Blanken; Shaoqiang Wang; Huimin Wang; Shijie Han; Junhua Yan; Yingnian Li; Bingbing Zhou; Yibo Liu
The reliable simulation of gross primary productivity (GPP) at various spatial and temporal scales is of significance to quantifying the net exchange of carbon between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. This study aimed to verify the ability of a nonlinear two-leaf model (TL-LUEn), a linear two-leaf model (TL-LUE), and a big-leaf light use efficiency model (MOD17) to simulate GPP at half-hourly, daily and 8-day scales using GPP derived from 58 eddy-covariance flux sites in Asia, Europe and North America as benchmarks. Model evaluation showed that the overall performance of TL-LUEn was slightly but not significantly better than TL-LUE at half-hourly and daily scale, while the overall performance of both TL-LUEn and TL-LUE were significantly better (p < 0.0001) than MOD17 at the two temporal scales. The improvement of TL-LUEn over TL-LUE was relatively small in comparison with the improvement of TL-LUE over MOD17. However, the differences between TL-LUEn and MOD17, and TL-LUE and MOD17 became less distinct at the 8-day scale. As for different vegetation types, TL-LUEn and TL-LUE performed better than MOD17 for all vegetation types except crops at the half-hourly scale. At the daily and 8-day scales, both TL-LUEn and TL-LUE outperformed MOD17 for forests. However, TL-LUEn had a mixed performance for the three non-forest types while TL-LUE outperformed MOD17 slightly for all these non-forest types at daily and 8-day scales. The better performance of TL-LUEn and TL-LUE for forests was mainly achieved by the correction of the underestimation/overestimation of GPP simulated by MOD17 under low/high solar radiation and sky clearness conditions. TL-LUEn is more applicable at individual sites at the half-hourly scale while TL-LUE could be regionally used at half-hourly, daily and 8-day scales. MOD17 is also an applicable option regionally at the 8-day scale.
Tellus B | 2014
Yanlian Zhou; Weimin Ju; Xiaomin Sun; Zhongmin Hu; Shijie Han; T. Andrew Black; Rachhpal S. Jassal; Xiaocui Wu
Seasonal variations of photosynthetic capacity parameters, notably the maximum carboxylation rate, Vcmax, play an important role in accurate estimation of CO2 assimilation in gas-exchange models. Satellite-derived normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and model-data fusion can provide means to predict seasonal variation in Vcmax. In this study, Vcmax was obtained from a process-based model inversion, based on an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), and gross primary productivity, and sensible and latent heat fluxes measured using eddy covariance technique at two deciduous broadleaf forest sites and a mixed forest site. Optimised Vcmax showed considerable seasonal and inter-annual variations in both mixed and deciduous forest ecosystems. There was noticeable seasonal hysteresis in Vcmax in relation to EVI and NDVI from 8 d composites of satellite data during the growing period. When the growing period was phenologically divided into two phases (increasing VIs and decreasing VIs phases), significant seasonal correlations were found between Vcmax and VIs, mostly showing R2>0.95. Vcmax varied exponentially with increasing VIs during the first phase (increasing VIs), but second and third-order polynomials provided the best fits of Vcmax to VIs in the second phase (decreasing VIs). The relationships between NDVI and EVI with Vcmax were different. Further efforts are needed to investigate Vcmax–VIs relationships at more ecosystem sites to the use of satellite-based VIs for estimating Vcmax.
Scientific Reports | 2017
Yaoping Cui; Xiangming Xiao; Yao Zhang; Jinwei Dong; Yuanwei Qin; Russell Doughty; Geli Zhang; Jie Wang; Xiaocui Wu; Yaochen Qin; Shenghui Zhou; Joanna Joiner; Berrien Moore
The gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation in urban areas plays an important role in the study of urban ecology. It is difficult however, to accurately estimate GPP in urban areas, mostly due to the complexity of impervious land surfaces, buildings, vegetation, and management. Recently, we used the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM), climate data, and satellite images to estimate the GPP of terrestrial ecosystems including urban areas. Here, we report VPM-based GPP (GPPvpm) estimates for the world’s ten most populous megacities during 2000–2014. The seasonal dynamics of GPPvpm during 2007–2014 in the ten megacities track well that of the solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) data from GOME-2 at 0.5° × 0.5° resolution. Annual GPPvpm during 2000–2014 also shows substantial variation among the ten megacities, and year-to-year trends show increases, no change, and decreases. Urban expansion and vegetation collectively impact GPP variations in these megacities. The results of this study demonstrate the potential of a satellite-based vegetation photosynthesis model for diagnostic studies of GPP and the terrestrial carbon cycle in urban areas.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018
Wei He; Weimin Ju; Christopher R. Schwalm; Sebastian Sippel; Xiaocui Wu; Qiaoning He; Lian Song; Chunhua Zhang; Jing Li; Stephen Sitch; Nicolas Viovy; Pierre Friedlingstein; Atul K. Jain
This research is funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0600202). C. Zhang is partially funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 41601054).
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing | 2017
Yanlian Zhou; Thomas Hilker; Weimin Ju; Thomas Andrew Black; Jing M. Chen; Xiaocui Wu
Light use efficiency (LUE) models offer an effective way for regional gross primary productivity (GPP) estimation. However, LUE is not easily determined at the landscape level due to its complexity and dependence on various environmental factors. One possible strategy to avoid the requirement for assessing environmental stressors is using the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) to determine LUE via the epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle. Integration of such measurements into GPP models could lead to more realistic GPP estimates of landscape level. Conventional, “one-leaf” LUE models, however, seem less suitable for integration of such remote sensing observations, as optically derived estimates are dependent on the shadow fraction viewed at a given time. Here, we utilize the two-leaf LUE (TL-LUE) model to parameterize LUE from multiangle PRI observations and compare it with MOD17 approach. Significant relationships were found between LUE (LUE, LUEsun, and LUEshaded) and PRI (PRI, PRIsun, and PRIshaded) over 8- and 16-day time steps. Similarly,
Global Change Biology | 2018
Jie Wang; Xiangming Xiao; Yao Zhang; Yuanwei Qin; Russell Doughty; Xiaocui Wu; Rajen Bajgain; Ling Du
R^{2}