Xinbo Wu

Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis was conducted to assess alterations in measures of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), exploring the potential role of DTI as a diagnosis biomarker. A systematic search of all related studies written in English was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane comparing CSM patients with healthy controls. Key details for each study regarding participants, imaging techniques, and results were extracted. DTI measurements, such as fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and mean diffusivity (MD) were pooled to calculate the effect size (ES) by fixed or random effects meta-analysis. 14 studies involving 479 CSM patients and 278 controls were identified. Meta-analysis of the most compressed levels (MCL) of CSM patients demonstrated that FA was significantly reduced (ES -1.52, 95% CI -1.87 to -1.16, P < 0.001) and ADC was significantly increased (ES 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.28, P < 0.001). In addition, a notable ES was found for lowered FA at C2-C3 for CSM vs. controls (ES -0.83, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.570, P < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis revealed that male ratio of CSM patients had a significant effect on reduction of FA at MCL (P = 0.03). The meta-analysis of DTI studies of CSM patients clearly demonstrated a significant FA reduction and ADC increase compared with healthy subjects. This result supports the use of DTI parameters in differentiating CSM patients from health subjects. Future researches are required to investigate the diagnosis performance of DTI in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Significant Improvement of Puncture Accuracy and Fluoroscopy Reduction in Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy With Novel Lumbar Location System: Preliminary Report of Prospective Hello Study

AbstractProspective nonrandomized control study.The study aimed to investigate the implication of the HEs Lumbar LOcation (HELLO) system in improving the puncture accuracy and reducing fluoroscopy in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED).Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy is one of the most popular minimally invasive spine surgeries that heavily depend on repeated fluoroscopy. Increased fluoroscopy will induce higher radiation exposure to surgeons and patients. Accurate puncture in PTED can be achieved by accurate preoperative location and definite trajectory.The HELLO system mainly consists of self-made surface locator and puncture-assisted device. The surface locator was used to identify the exact puncture target and the puncture-assisted device was used to optimize the puncture trajectory. Patients who had single L4/5 or L5/S1 lumbar intervertebral disc herniation and underwent PTED were included the study. Patients receiving the HELLO system were assigned in Group A, and those taking conventional method were assigned in Group B. Study primary endpoint was puncture times and fluoroscopic time, and the secondary endpoint was location time and operation time.A total of 62 patients who received PTED were included in this study. The average age was 45.35 ± 8.70 years in Group A and 46.61 ± 7.84 years in Group B (P = 0.552). There were no significant differences in gender, body mass index, conservative time, and surgical segment between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The puncture time(s) were 1.19 ± 0.48 in Group A and 6.03 ± 1.87 in Group B (P < 0.001). The fluoroscopic times were 14.03 ± 2.54 in Group A and 25.19 ± 4.28 in Group B (P < 0.001). The preoperative location time was 4.67 ± 1.41 minutes in Group A and 6.98 ± 0.94 minutes in Group B (P < 0.001). The operation time was 79.42 ± 10.15 minutes in Group A and 89.65 ± 14.06 minutes in Group B (P = 0.002). The hospital stay was 2.77 ± 0.95 days in Group A and 2.87 ± 1.02 days in Group B (P = 0.702). There were no significant differences in the complication rate between the 2 groups (P = 0.386).The highlight of HELLO system is accurate preoperative location and definite trajectory. This preliminary report indicated that the HELLO system significantly improves the puncture accuracy of PTED and reduces the fluoroscopic time, preoperative location time, as well as operation time. (ChiCTR-ICR-15006730)

Learning curves of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in transforaminal approach at the L4/5 and L5/S1 levels: a comparative study.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the learning curves of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) in a transforaminal approach at the L4/5 and L5/S1 levels.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the first 60 cases at the L4/5 level (Group I) and the first 60 cases at the L5/S1 level (Group II) of PELD performed by one spine surgeon. The patients were divided into subgroups A, B, and C (Group I: A cases 1–20, B cases 21–40, C cases 41–60; Group II: A cases 1–20, B cases 21–40, C cases 41–60). Operation time was thoroughly analyzed.ResultsCompared with the L4/5 level, the learning curve of transforaminal PELD at the L5/S1 level was flatter. The mean operation times of Groups IA, IB, and IC were (88.75±17.02), (67.75±6.16), and (64.85±7.82) min, respectively. There was a significant difference between Groups A and B (P<0.05), but no significant difference between Groups B and C (P=0.20). The mean operation times of Groups IIA, IIB, and IIC were (117.25±13.62), (109.50±11.20), and (92.15±11.94) min, respectively. There was no significant difference between Groups A and B (P=0.06), but there was a significant difference between Groups B and C (P<0.05). There were 6 cases of postoperative dysesthesia (POD) in Group I and 2 cases in Group IIA (P=0.27). There were 2 cases of residual disc in Group I, and 4 cases in Group II (P=0.67). There were 3 cases of recurrence in Group I, and 2 cases in Group II (P>0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the L5/S1 level, the learning curve of PELD in a transforaminal approach at the L4/5 level was steeper, suggesting that the L4/5 level might be easier to master after short-term professional training.中文概要目 的探讨经皮椎间孔镜技术治疗腰4/5 和腰5 骶1 椎间盘突出症学习曲线之间的差异。创新点本文第一次比较了经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰4/5 和腰5/骶1 椎间盘突出症的学习曲线,得出经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰4/5 椎间盘突出症的学习曲线更加陡峭,经过专业化培训更加容易掌握,为初学者提供了指导方向。方 法回顾性分析2011 年6 月至2013 年8 月于上海市第十人民医院行经皮椎间孔镜治疗的120 例腰4/5 和腰5 骶1椎间盘突出症患者的临床资料。120例患者由同一术者实行手术操作,根据突出节段不同分为两组:腰4/5 组(组I)60 例和腰5 骶1组(组II)60 例。每组又分成三个亚组:组IA 1∼20、IB 21∼40、IC 41∼60;组IIA 1∼20、IIB 21∼40、IIC 41∼60。分别记录每位患者的手术时间。结 论实验结果显示:组IA、IB、IC 平均手术时间分别为(88.75±17.02) 、(67.75±6.16) 和(64.85±7.82) min,组IA 与组IB 之间的差异有统计学意义,组IB 与组IC 之间的差异无统计学意义;组IIA、IIB、IIC 平均手术时间分别为(117.25±13.62)、(109.50±11.20)和(92.15±11.94) min,组IIA 与组IIB之间的差异无统计学意义,组IIB 与组IIC 之间的差异有统计学意义。术后8 例患者出现术后感觉减退(POD),其中组I 有6 例,组II 有2 例。术后磁共振成像(MRI)检查有6 例患者有椎间盘残留,其中组I 有2 例,组II 有4 例。术后随访5 例患者复发,其中组I 有3 例,组II 有2 例,但差异无统计学意义。与腰5 骶1 学习曲线相比,经皮椎间孔镜治疗腰4/5 椎间盘突出的学习曲线更加陡峭,经过专业化培训更加容易掌握。

Morphometric analysis of the working zone for posterolateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy based on magnetic resonance neurography.

Study Design: A magnetic resonance neurography (MRN)-based morphometric analysis of the working zone for posterolateral endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) procedures on 32 health volunteers. Objective: The purpose is to utilize MRN as a noninvasive evaluation of the Kambin’s working zone, and further to analyze operative safety of the PELD procedures. Summary of Background Data: Intraoperative nerve root injuries of PELD procedures occur relative to the Kambin’s triangular working zone, which has been described previously based on formalin-fixed cadaver studies. However, the investigation in living individuals is not known. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate the dimensions of the working zone on both coronal and sagittal plane by radiologic assessments. Materials and Methods: MRN images of 32 health volunteers (average age 26.8 y; 18 men, 14 women) were analyzed from L1–L2 to L5–S1. On the coronal plane, we measured the distance from the superior endplate to the nerve root exiting from the dura (distance a), the distance from lateral aspect of the dura to the medial aspect of the nerve root along the superior endplate (distance b), and the angle between the nerve root and plane of the corresponding disk (angle &agr;). On the transversal plane, the vertical distance from the upper facet surface to the exiting nerve root at the lower/upper disk margin level (distance c/d) was also measured. Results: On the coronal plane, distance a was 16.69±5.07 mm (range, 6.60–26.10 mm), distance b was 13.64±2.52 mm (range, 9.30–21.20 mm), angle &agr; was 55.45±7.14 degrees (range, 40.00–73.00 degrees). Distance c on the transversal plane was 5.01±2.66 mm (range, 1.30–13.10 mm) and distance d was 1.99±1.26 mm (range, 0.70–7.80 mm). All these measurements increased as the spine level went down. Conclusions: The study indicated that MRN was a feasible noninvasive tool to evaluate the anatomic dimensions in the Kambin’s working zone. Before PELD, radiologic measurements of this working zone were recommended to perform a safer procedure.

Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with or without reduction: A comparative study.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the patient-reported outcomes and radiographic assessment of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis with reduction versus in situ fusion. Patients receiving MI-TLIF with reduction were assigned as Group A, and those without reduction were assigned as Group B. Radiographic fusion was assessed using Bridwells grading criteria. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcomes including visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale and improvement rate were analyzed. There were 41 patients in Group A and 37 patients in Group B. The mean follow-up was 30.78±14.15months in Group A and 28.95±10.75months in Group B (p=0.525). There were no significant differences in hospital stay (p=0.261), estimated blood loss (p=0.639), blood transfusion (p=0.336), operation time (p=0.762) and complications (p=1.00) between the two groups. Radiographic fusion rate was 92.68% (38/41) in Group A, and 81.08% (30/37) in Group B (p=0.110). Significant differences were observed in either 3-month or last follow-up JOA, VAS, and ODI compared with preoperative JOA, VAS, and ODI, respectively (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in JOA, VAS, and ODI between the two groups whenever preoperatively, or 3-month postoperatively, or at the last follow-up (p>0.05). According to MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rate was 85.37% in Group A and 86.49% in Group B (p=0.983). MI-TLIF is an effective and satisfactory surgical technique to manage degenerative spondylolisthesis regardless of reduction or not, so routine reduction may not be a requirement in MI-TLIF for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Gender difference in mobile phone use and the impact of digital device exposure on neck posture

Abstract This cross-sectional study aimed to identify gender differences in the cervical postures when young adults were using mobile phones, as well as the correlations between the postures and the digital devices use (computer and mobile phone). Questionnaires regarding the habits of computer and mobile phone use were administrated to 429 subjects aged from 17 to 33 years old (19.75 ± 2.58 years old). Subjects were instructed to stand habitually and use a mobile phone as in daily life; the sagittal head and cervical postures were measured by head flexion, neck flexion angle and gaze angle. Male participants had a significantly larger head flexion angle (96.41° ± 12.23° vs. 93.57° ± 12.62°, p  =  0.018) and neck flexion angle (51.92°  ±  9.55° vs. 47.09° ± 9.45°, p  <  0.001) than females. There were significant differences in head (F  =  3.62, p  =  0.014) and neck flexion (F  =  3.99, p  =  0.009) between different amounts of computer use. Practitioner Summary: We investigated possible gender differences in head and neck postures of young adults using mobile phones, as well as the potential correlations between these postures and digital device use. We found that males displayed larger head and neck flexion angles than females, which were associated with the amount of computer use.

Surgical Outcome of Two-Level Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Far-Migrated Disc Herniation

Objective. To describe the two-level percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) technique in transforaminal approach for highly migrated disc herniation and investigate its clinical outcomes. Methods. A total of 22 consecutive patients with highly migrated lumbar disc herniation were enrolled for the study from June 2012 to February 2014. Results. There were 12 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 41.1 (range 23–67) years. The mean follow-up period was 18.05 (range 14–33) months. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the clinical outcome at the final follow-up was excellent in 14, good in 6, and fair in 2 patients and the satisfactory rate (excellent and good) was 90.9%. The improvements in VAS and ODI were statistically significant. One patient had recurrent herniation in 18 months after the first surgery and underwent open discectomy. One patient showed symptoms of postoperative dysesthesia (POD), but the POD symptom was transient and partial remission was achieved in two months after conservative treatment. Conclusion. Two-level PELD in transforaminal approach can be a safe and effective procedure for highly migrated disc herniation.

Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

The aim of this study was to directly compare the clinical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in three-level lumbar spinal stenosis. This retrospective study involved a total of 60 patients with three-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent MIS-TLIF or PLIF from January 2010 to February 2012. Back and leg visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scale were used to assess the pain, disability, and health status before surgery and postoperatively. In addition, the operating time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were also recorded. There were no significant differences in back VAS, leg VAS, ODI, SF-36, fusion condition, and complications at 12-month follow-up between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, significantly less blood loss and shorter hospital stay were observed in MIS-TLIF group (P < 0.05). Moreover, patients undergoing MIS-TLIF had significantly lower back VAS than those in PLIF group at 6-month follow-up (P < 0.05). Compared with PLIF, MIS-TLIF might be a prior option because of noninferior efficacy as well as merits of less blood loss and quicker recovery in treating three-level lumbar spinal stenosis.