Xing Ye
Duke University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Xing Ye.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013
Alan P. Venook; Donna Niedzwiecki; Margarita Lopatin; Xing Ye; Mark Lee; Paula N. Friedman; Wendy L. Frankel; Kim M. Clark-Langone; Carl Millward; Steven Shak; Richard M. Goldberg; Najjia N. Mahmoud; Robert S. Warren; Richard L. Schilsky; Monica M. Bertagnolli
PURPOSE A greater understanding of the biology of tumor recurrence should improve adjuvant treatment decision making. We conducted a validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score (RS), a quantitative assay integrating stromal response and cell cycle gene expression, in tumor specimens from patients enrolled onto Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9581. PATIENTS AND METHODS CALGB 9581 randomly assigned 1,713 patients with stage II colon cancer to treatment with edrecolomab or observation and found no survival difference. The analysis reported here included all patients with available tissue and recurrence (n = 162) and a random (approximately 1:3) selection of nonrecurring patients. RS was assessed in 690 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples with quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction by using prespecified genes and a previously validated algorithm. Association of RS and recurrence was analyzed by weighted Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Continuous RS was significantly associated with risk of recurrence (P = .013) as was mismatch repair (MMR) gene deficiency (P = .044). In multivariate analyses, RS was the strongest predictor of recurrence (P = .004), independent of T stage, MMR, number of nodes examined, grade, and lymphovascular invasion. In T3 MMR-intact (MMR-I) patients, prespecified low and high RS groups had average 5-year recurrence risks of 13% (95% CI, 10% to 16%) and 21% (95% CI, 16% to 26%), respectively. CONCLUSION The 12-gene RS predicts recurrence in stage II colon cancer in CALGB 9581. This is consistent with the importance of stromal response and cell cycle gene expression in colon tumor recurrence. RS appears to be most discerning for patients with T3 MMR-I tumors, although markers such as grade and lymphovascular invasion did not add value in this subset of patients.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Charles S. Fuchs; Donna Niedzwiecki; Harvey J. Mamon; Joel E. Tepper; Xing Ye; Richard Swanson; Peter C. Enzinger; Daniel G. Haller; Tomislav Dragovich; Steven R. Alberts; Georg A. Bjarnason; Christopher G. Willett; Leonard L. Gunderson; Richard M. Goldberg; Alan P. Venook; David H. Ilson; Eileen M. O’Reilly; Kristen K. Ciombor; David J. Berg; Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt; Robert J. Mayer
Purpose After curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, Intergroup Trial 0116 (Phase III trial of postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy for high risk gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Demonstrated superior survival for patients who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy with bolus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) compared with surgery alone. CALGB 80101 (Alliance; Phase III Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemoradiation After Resection of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma) assessed whether a postoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen that replaced FU plus LV with a potentially more active systemic therapy could further improve overall survival. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and May 2009, 546 patients who had undergone a curative resection of stage IB through IV (M0) gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative FU plus LV before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (FU plus LV arm) or postoperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional FU (ECF) before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (ECF arm). Results With a median follow-up duration of 6.5 years, 5-year overall survival rates were 44% in the FU plus LV arm and 44% in the ECF arm ( Plogrank = .69; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.24 comparing ECF with FU plus LV). Five-year disease-free survival rates were 39% in the FU plus LV arm and 37% in the ECF arm ( Plogrank = .94; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20). In post hoc analyses, the effect of treatment seemed to be similar across all examined patient subgroups. Conclusion After a curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, postoperative chemoradiotherapy using a multiagent regimen of ECF before and after radiotherapy does not improve survival compared with standard FU and LV before and after radiotherapy.
Cancer Gene Therapy | 2006
Ren Xw; Matthew H. Liang; Meng X; Xing Ye; Hongxia Ma; Yanting Zhao; Guo J; Cai N; Hong Chen; Ye Sl; Frank B. Hu
We constructed a novel hepatocellular carcinoma-specific conditionally replicative adenovirus (CRAd). This adenovirus, designated Ad.HS4.AFP.E1A/TRAIL, expresses E1A to mediate viral replication and TRAIL to enhance HCC-killing efficacy under the control of a modified AFP promoter. An insulator HS-4 was placed in front of the AFP promoter to enhance the fidelity of the heterologous promoter. This virus was shown to have specific cytolytic activity in AFP-expressing HCC cells in vitro. Furthermore, the replication efficiency of Ad.HS4.AFP.E1A/TRAIL correlated well with AFP expression of the host cells, showing a 100-fold and 1 000 000-fold decrease in the low-and non-AFP-expressing HCC cells, respectively, compared to the high AFP-expressing HCC cells. An increase in mRNA of TRAIL and the elevated Caspase-3 activity were also observed in Ad.HS4.AFP.E1A/TRAIL-infected HCC cells. These results indicated that TRAIL expression from the viral vector activated the Caspase-3 enzymatic capacity and the HCC cells were sensitive to TRAIL. In vivo, Ad.HS4.AFP.E1A/TRAIL effectively prevented the growth of low AFP-expressing BEL-7404 xenografts. These results indicate that Ad.HS4.AFP.E1A/TRAIL could provide a new strategy of gene therapy for HCC.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Brendan J. Guercio; Kaori Sato; Donna Niedzwiecki; Xing Ye; Leonard Saltz; Robert J. Mayer; Rex B. Mowat; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B. Benson; Daniel Atienza; Michael Messino; Hedy L. Kindler; Alan P. Venook; Frank B. Hu; Shuji Ogino; Kana Wu; Walter C. Willett; Edward Giovannucci; Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt; Charles S. Fuchs
PURPOSE Observational studies have demonstrated increased colon cancer recurrence in states of relative hyperinsulinemia, including sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and increased dietary glycemic load. Greater coffee consumption has been associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes and increased insulin sensitivity. The effect of coffee on colon cancer recurrence and survival is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS During and 6 months after adjuvant chemotherapy, 953 patients with stage III colon cancer prospectively reported dietary intake of caffeinated coffee, decaffeinated coffee, and nonherbal tea, as well as 128 other items. We examined the influence of coffee, nonherbal tea, and caffeine on cancer recurrence and mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Patients consuming 4 cups/d or more of total coffee experienced an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for colon cancer recurrence or mortality of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.99), compared with never drinkers (Ptrend = .002). Patients consuming 4 cups/d or more of caffeinated coffee experienced significantly reduced cancer recurrence or mortality risk compared with abstainers (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.91; Ptrend = .002), and increasing caffeine intake also conferred a significant reduction in cancer recurrence or mortality (HR, 0.66 across extreme quintiles; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.93; Ptrend = .006). Nonherbal tea and decaffeinated coffee were not associated with patient outcome. The association of total coffee intake with improved outcomes seemed consistent across other predictors of cancer recurrence and mortality. CONCLUSION Higher coffee intake may be associated with significantly reduced cancer recurrence and death in patients with stage III colon cancer.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Peter C. Enzinger; Barbara Burtness; Donna Niedzwiecki; Xing Ye; Kathe Douglas; David H. Ilson; Victoria M. Villaflor; Steven J. Cohen; Robert J. Mayer; Alan P. Venook; Al B. Benson; Richard M. Goldberg
PURPOSE To determine the optimal chemotherapy backbone for testing in future US cooperative group studies for metastatic esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Cetuximab was added to each treatment arm based on promising preclinical data. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated metastatic esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion fluorouracil (ECF), irinotecan plus cisplatin (IC), or FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and bolus and infusional fluorouracil). All treatment programs included cetuximab once per week. The primary end point was response rate. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and safety. As prespecified, primary and secondary analyses were conducted only among patients with adenocarcinoma. RESULTS This study randomly assigned 245 patients, including 222 with adenocarcinoma. Among patients with adenocarcinoma, response rate was 60.9% (95% CI, 47.9 to 72.8) for ECF plus cetuximab, 45.0% (95% CI, 33.0 to 57.0) for IC plus cetuximab, and 54.3% (95% CI, 42.0 to 66.2) for FOLFOX plus cetuximab. Median overall survival was 11.6, 8.6, and 11.8 months; median progression-free survival was 7.1, 4.9, and 6.8 months; and median time to treatment failure was 5.6, 4.3, and 6.7 months for each of these arms, respectively. FOLFOX plus cetuximab required fewer treatment modifications compared with ECF plus cetuximab and IC plus cetuximab (P = .013), and fewer patients were removed from treatment because of an adverse event or experienced treatment-related death. CONCLUSION In combination with cetuximab, ECF and FOLFOX had similar efficacy, but FOLFOX was better tolerated. Although differences were nonsignificant, IC plus cetuximab seemed to be the least effective and most toxic of the three regimens tested.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Donna Niedzwiecki; Wendy L. Frankel; Alan P. Venook; Xing Ye; Paula N. Friedman; Richard M. Goldberg; Robert J. Mayer; Thomas A. Colacchio; Jude M. Mulligan; Timothy Davison; Eamonn J. O'Brien; Peter Kerr; Patrick G. Johnston; Richard D. Kennedy; D. Paul Harkin; Richard L. Schilsky; Monica M. Bertagnolli; Robert S. Warren; Federico Innocenti
PURPOSE Conventional staging methods are inadequate to identify patients with stage II colon cancer (CC) who are at high risk of recurrence after surgery with curative intent. ColDx is a gene expression, microarray-based assay shown to be independently prognostic for recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival in CC. The objective of this study was to further validate ColDx using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens collected as part of the Alliance phase III trial, C9581. PATIENTS AND METHODS C9581 evaluated edrecolomab versus observation in patients with stage II CC and reported no survival benefit. Under an initial case-cohort sampling design, a randomly selected subcohort (RS) comprised 514 patients from 901 eligible patients with available tissue. Forty-nine additional patients with recurrence events were included in the analysis. Final analysis comprised 393 patients: 360 RS (58 events) and 33 non-RS events. Risk status was determined for each patient by ColDx. The Self-Prentice method was used to test the association between the resulting ColDx risk score and RFI adjusting for standard prognostic variables. RESULTS Fifty-five percent of patients (216 of 393) were classified as high risk. After adjustment for prognostic variables that included mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, ColDx high-risk patients exhibited significantly worse RFI (multivariable hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.5; P < .01). Age and MMR status were marginally significant. RFI at 5 years for patients classified as high risk was 82% (95% CI, 79% to 85%), compared with 91% (95% CI, 89% to 93%) for patients classified as low risk. CONCLUSION ColDx is associated with RFI in the C9581 subsample in the presence of other prognostic factors, including MMR deficiency. ColDx could be incorporated with the traditional clinical markers of risk to refine patient prognosis.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Michael Fuchs; Kaori Sato; Donna Niedzwiecki; Xing Ye; Leonard Saltz; Robert J. Mayer; Rex B. Mowat; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B. Benson; Daniel Atienza; Michael Messino; Hedy L. Kindler; Alan P. Venook; Shuji Ogino; Kana Wu; Walter C. Willett; Edward Giovannucci; Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
Background In colon cancer patients, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and high dietary glycemic load have been associated with increased risk of cancer recurrence. High sugar-sweetened beverage intake has been associated with obesity, diabetes, and cardio-metabolic diseases, but the influence on colon cancer survival is unknown. Methods We assessed the association between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption on cancer recurrence and mortality in 1,011 stage III colon cancer patients who completed food frequency questionnaires as part of a U.S. National Cancer Institute-sponsored adjuvant chemotherapy trial. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with Cox proportional hazard models. Results Patients consuming ≥2 servings of sugar-sweetened beverages per day experienced an adjusted HR for disease recurrence or mortality of 1.67 (95% CI, 1.04–2.68), compared with those consuming <2 servings per month (P trend = 0.02). The association of sugar-sweetened beverages on cancer recurrence or mortality appeared greater among patients who were both overweight (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2) and less physically active (metabolic equivalent task-hours per week <18) (HR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.29–3.81, P trend = 0.0025). Conclusion Higher sugar-sweetened beverage intake was associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer recurrence and mortality in stage III colon cancer patients.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer | 2013
Justin Y. Jeon; Kaori Sato; Donna Niedzwiecki; Xing Ye; Leonard Saltz; Robert J. Mayer; Rex B. Mowat; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B. Benson; Devin Wigler; Daniel Atienza; Michael Messino; Hedy L. Kindler; Alan P. Venook; Charles S. Fuchs; Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
BACKGROUND The impact of physical activity on survival outcomes in patients with recurrent colon cancer has not been studied. We tested the association between the level of postdiagnosis physical activity and survival outcomes of patients with recurrent colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective observational study of 237 patients with stage III colon cancer who had recurrence of disease. Physical activity was measured approximately 6 months after the completion of therapy (14 months after surgical resection) but before detection of recurrent disease. The primary end point of the study was survival time after recurrence. RESULTS The hazard ratio comparing patients who reported at least 18 metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours per week of physical activity with those engaging in < 3 MET hours per week was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.11). Increasing total MET hours of physical activity per week was associated with a borderline statistical significance trend for improved survival after recurrence (P = .052). The benefit of physical activity on survival was not significantly modified by sex, body mass index (BMI), number of positive lymph nodes, age, baseline performance status, adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, or recurrence-free survival period. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the association of physical activity with survival outcome of patients with recurrent colon cancer. Although the association exceeded our predefined P trend < .05 for statistical significance, these findings warrant further studies of physical activity in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.
Annals of Oncology | 2017
M. A. Fuchs; Chen Yuan; Kaori Sato; Donna Niedzwiecki; Xing Ye; Leonard Saltz; Robert J. Mayer; Rex B. Mowat; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B. Benson; Daniel Atienza; Michael Messino; Hedy L. Kindler; Alan P. Venook; Federico Innocenti; Robert S. Warren; Monica M. Bertagnolli; Shuji Ogino; Edward Giovannucci; E. Horvath; Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt; Kimmie Ng
Background Observational studies suggest that higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25(OH)D) are associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer and improved survival of colorectal cancer patients. However, the influence of vitamin D status on cancer recurrence and survival of patients with stage III colon cancer is unknown. Patients and methods We prospectively examined the influence of post-diagnosis predicted plasma 25(OH)D on outcome among 1016 patients with stage III colon cancer who were enrolled in a National Cancer Institute-sponsored adjuvant therapy trial (CALGB 89803). Predicted 25(OH)D scores were computed using validated regression models. We examined the influence of predicted 25(OH)D scores on cancer recurrence and mortality (disease-free survival; DFS) using Cox proportional hazards. Results Patients in the highest quintile of predicted 25(OH)D score had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for colon cancer recurrence or mortality (DFS) of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.86), compared with those in the lowest quintile (Ptrend = 0.005). Higher predicted 25(OH)D score was also associated with a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival and overall survival (Ptrend = 0.01 and 0.0004, respectively). The benefit associated with higher predicted 25(OH)D score appeared consistent across predictors of cancer outcome and strata of molecular tumor characteristics, including microsatellite instability and KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and TP53 mutation status. Conclusion Higher predicted 25(OH)D levels after a diagnosis of stage III colon cancer may be associated with decreased recurrence and improved survival. Clinical trials assessing the benefit of vitamin D supplementation in the adjuvant setting are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00003835.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Temidayo Fadelu; Sui Zhang; Donna Niedzwiecki; Xing Ye; Leonard Saltz; Robert J. Mayer; Rex B. Mowat; Renaud Whittom; Alexander Hantel; Al B. Benson; Daniel Atienza; Michael Messino; Hedy L. Kindler; Alan P. Venook; Shuji Ogino; Kimmie Ng; Kana Wu; Walter C. Willett; Edward Giovannucci; Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt; Ying Bao; Charles S. Fuchs
Purpose Observational studies have reported increased colon cancer recurrence and mortality in patients with states of hyperinsulinemia, including type 2 diabetes, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and high glycemic load diet. Nut intake has been associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance. However, the effect of nut intake on colon cancer recurrence and survival is not known. Patients and Methods We conducted a prospective, observational study of 826 eligible patients with stage III colon cancer who reported dietary intake on food frequency questionnaires while enrolled onto a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, we assessed associations of nut intake with cancer recurrence and mortality. Results After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, compared with patients who abstained from nuts, individuals who consumed two or more servings of nuts per week experienced an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.92; Ptrend = .03) and an HR for overall survival of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.74; Ptrend = .01). In subgroup analysis, the apparent benefit was confined to tree nut intake (HR for disease-free survival, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.85; Ptrend = .04; and HR for overall survival, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.82; Ptrend = .04). The association of total nut intake with improved outcomes was maintained across other known or suspected risk factors for cancer recurrence and mortality. Conclusion Diets with a higher consumption of nuts may be associated with a significantly reduced incidence of cancer recurrence and death in patients with stage III colon cancer.