Xue-Mei You

Adjuvant therapy options following curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review of randomized trials

AIMS Numerous postoperative therapies for preventing recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been reported, but their efficacy remains controversial and knowledge about adverse effects is limited. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to gain a comprehensive picture of the efficacy and risks of these therapies. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched through July 2011. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS A total of 2989 patients from 28 RCTs involving 10 postoperative therapies were included. For interferon therapy, the estimated RR for the 2-year recurrence rate was 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97, P = 0.02) and the overall survival (OS) was 1.15 (95% CI 1.07-1.22, P < 0.001). Postoperative therapy with the vitamin K2 analog did not lead to a significant reduction in the 1-year recurrence rate, with a pooled RR of 0.60 (95% CI 0.28-1.27, P = 0.18). However, it did slightly improve the 1-year OS, with a pooled RR of 1.03 (95% CI 1.00-1.05, P = 0.03). Transarterial chemotherapy with or without embolization, adoptive immunotherapy and heparanase inhibitor PI-88 therapy may delay tumor recurrence. The effects of acyclic retinoid, lipiodol-iodine-131 and tumor vaccine treatment were promising but require further study. All postoperative therapies except interferon administered intramuscularly were well tolerated by the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS Use of adjuvant interferon is definitely associated with an increase in OS. Postoperative therapies involving acyclic retinoid, lipidol-iodine-131, or tumor vaccine may improve the OS of patients with HCC after curative treatment.

Epidermal growth factor gene polymorphism and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Background Hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex process that may be influenced by many factors, including polymorphism in the epidermal growth factor (EGF) gene. Previous work suggests an association between the EGF 61*A/G polymorphism (rs4444903) and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of several studies covering a large population to address this controversy. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Data were abstracted independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between EGF 61*A/G polymorphism and susceptibility to HCC. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Results Eight studies were chosen in this meta-analysis, involving 1,304 HCC cases (1135 Chinese, 44 Caucasian and 125 mixed) and 2,613 controls (1638 Chinese, 77 Caucasian and 898 mixed). The EGF 61*G allele was significantly associated with increased risk of HCC based on allelic contrast (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.16–1.44, p<0.001), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.39–2.29, p<0.001) and a recessive genetic model (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.16–1.54, p<0.001), while patients carrying the EGF 61*A/A genotype had significantly lower risk of HCC than those with the G/A or G/G genotype (A/A vs. G/A+G/G, OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53–0.83, p<0.001). Conclusion The 61*G polymorphism in EGF is a risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis while the EGF 61*A allele is a protective factor. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Adoptive immunotherapy for postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review.

The high risk of recurrence in post‐operative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) highlights the need for an effective adjuvant treatment. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of adjuvant adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) for post‐operative HCC patients. Electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases) and manual searches were conducted throughout May 2011 to identify RCTs evaluating postoperative AIT for patients with HCC. Methodological quality was assessed in accordance with the QUOROM statement. Four RCTs totalling 423 patients met the eligibility criteria. All RCTs reported significantly improved disease‐free survival rate or reduced recurrence rate after treating with adjuvant AIT (p < 0.05). The overall survival rates of AIT group are slightly higher than those of the control group in one study. Moreover, AIT was a safe treatment, with fever as the main adverse effects. This study adds to the evidence that postoperative HCC patients treated with adjuvant AIT show an improvement in disease‐free survival rate or recurrence rate.

Systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of conventional and drug‐eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) is widely used for treating patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A variation on the technique based on drug‐eluting beads (DEB‐TACE) has recently entered the clinic, but trials of its safety and efficacy have given conflicting results. This systematic review aimed to gain a current, comprehensive picture of how DEB‐TACE compares with cTACE.

Hepatic resection is safe and effective for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension.

Background & Aims Official guidelines do not recommend hepatic resection (HR) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal hypertension (PHT). This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of HR for patients with HCC and PHT. Methods Mortality and survival after HR were analyzed retrospectively in a consecutive sample of 1738 HCC patients with PHT (n = 386) or without it (n = 1352). To assess the robustness of findings, we repeated the analysis using propensity score-matched analysis. We also comprehensively searched the PubMed database for studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of HR for patients with HCC and PHT. Results The 90-day mortality rate was 6.7% among those with PHT and 2.1% among those without it (P<.001). Patients without PHT had a survival benefit over those with PHT at 1, 3, and 5 years (96% vs 90%, 75% vs 67%, 54% vs 45%, respectively; P = .001). In contrast, PHT was not associated with worse short- or long-term survival when only propensity score-matched pairs of patients and those with early-stage HCC or those who underwent minor hepatectomy were included in the analysis (all P>.05). Moreover, the recurrence rates were similar between the two groups. Consistent with our findings, all 9 studies identified in our literature search reported HR to be safe and effective for patients with HCC and PHT. Conclusions HR is safe and effective in HCC patients with PHT and preserved liver function. This is especially true for patients who have early-stage HCC or who undergo minor hepatectomy.

Historical Comparison of Overall Survival after Hepatic Resection for Patients With Large and/or Multinodular Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

AbstractThe present study compared the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) in patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and those with multinodular tumor and examined how that efficacy has changed over time in a large medical center.The intermediate stage of HCC comprises a highly heterogeneous patient population. Moreover, official guidelines have different views on the suitability of HR to treat such patients.A consecutive sample of 927 patients with preserved liver function and large and/or multinodular HCC who were treated by initial HR were divided into 3 groups: those with a single tumor ≥5 cm in diameter (n = 588), 2 to 3 tumors with a maximum diameter >3 cm (n = 225), or >3 tumors of any diameter (n = 114). Hospital mortality and overall survival (OS) in each group were compared for the years 2000 to 2007 and 2008 to 2013.Patients with >3 tumors showed the highest incidence of hospital mortality of all groups (P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that OS varied across the 3 groups as follows: single tumor > 2 to 3 tumors > 3+ tumors (all P < 0.05). OS at 5 years ranged from 24% to 41% in all 3 groups for the period 2000 to 2007, and from 35% to 46% for the period 2008 to 2013. OS was significantly higher during the more recent 6-year period in the entire patient population, those with single tumor, and those with 3+ tumors (all P < 0.05). However, in patients with 2 to 3 tumors, OS was only slightly higher during the more recent 6-year period (P = 0.084).Prognosis can vary substantially for these 3 types of HCC. Patients with >3 tumors show the highest hospital mortality and lowest OS after HR. OS has been improving for all 3 types of HCC at our medical center as a consequence of improvements in surgical technique and perioperative management.

Meta-Analysis of Microsomal Epoxide Hydrolase Gene Polymorphism and Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background Hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex process that may be influenced by many factors, including polymorphism in microsomal epoxide hydrolase (mEH). Previous work suggests an association between the Tyr113His and His139Arg mEH polymorphisms and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results have been inconsistent. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between Tyr113His and His139Arg mEH polymorphism and susceptibility to HCC. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Results Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1,696 HCC cases and 3,600 controls. The 113His- mEH allele was significantly associated with increased risk of HCC based on allelic contrast (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04–1.75, p = 0.02), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07–2.54, p = 0.02) and a recessive genetic model (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.21–1.96, p<0.001), while individuals carrying the Arg139Arg mEH genotype had no association with increased or decreased risk of HCC. Conclusion The 113His- allele polymorphism in mEH may be a risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis, while the mEH 139Arg- allele may not be a risk or protective factor. There is substantial evidence that mEH polymorphisms interact synergistically with other genes and the environment to modulate risk of HCC. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.

Preoperative Ratio of Neutrophils to Lymphocytes Predicts Postresection Survival in Selected Patients With Early or Intermediate Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Abstract This study aims to clarify the prognostic value of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after potentially curative hepatic resection (HR). The prognostic value of the NLR for HCC patients has not been definitely reviewed by large studies, especially for those with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. A consecutive sample of 963 HCC patients who underwent potentially curative HR was classified as having low or high NLR using a cut-off value of 2.81. Overall survival (OS) and tumor recurrence were compared for patients with low or high NLR across the total population, as well as in subgroups of patients in BCLC stages 0/A, B, or C. Clinicopathological parameters, including NLR, were evaluated to identify risk factors of OS and tumor recurrence after potentially curative hepatic resection. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model or subdistribution hazard regression model. Multivariate analyses showed that NLR (>2.81), tumor number (>3), incomplete capsule, serum albumin (⩽35 g/L), alanine transaminase activity (>40 U/L), and macrovascular invasion were risk factors for low OS, whereas NLR (>2.81), tumor size (>5 cm), alpha fetal protein concentration (>400 ng/L), and macrovascular invasion were risk factors for low tumor recurrence. NLR > 2.81 was significantly associated with poor OS and tumor recurrence in the total patient population (both P < 0.001), as well as in the subgroups of patients in BCLC stages 0/A or B (all P < 0.05). Moreover, those with high NLR were associated with low OS (P = 0.027), and also with slightly higher tumor recurrence than those with low NLR for the subgroups in BCLC stage B (P = 0.058). Neither association, however, was observed among patients with BCLC stage C disease. NLR may be an independent predictor of low OS and tumor recurrence after potentially curative HR in HCC patients in BCLC stages 0/A or B.

Tumor stage and primary treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma at a large tertiary hospital in China: A real-world study

The current clinical reality of tumor stages and primary treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is poorly understood. This study reviewed the distribution of tumor stages and primary treatment modalities among a large population of patients with primary HCC. Medical records of patients treated between January 2003 and October 2013 for primary HCC at our tertiary hospital in China were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 6241 patients were analyzed. The distribution of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages was as follows: stage 0/A, 28.9%; stage B, 16.2%; stage C, 53.6%; stage D, 1.3%. The distribution of Hong Kong Liver Cancer (HKLC) stages was as follows: stage I, 8.4%; stage IIa, 1.5%; stage IIb, 29.0%; stage IIIa, 10.0%; stage IIIb, 33.6%; stage IVa, 3.4%; stage IVb, 2.5%; stage Va, 0.2%; stage Vb, 11.4%. The most frequent therapy was hepatic resection for patients with BCLC-0/A/B disease, and transarterial chemoembolization for patients with BCLC-C disease. Both these treatments were the most frequent for patients with HKLC I to IIIb disease, while systemic chemotherapy was the most frequent first-line therapy for patients with HKLC IVa or IVb disease. The most frequent treatment for patients with HKLC Va/Vb disease was traditional Chinese medicine. In conclusion, Prevalences of BCLC-B and -C disease, and of HKLC I to IIIb disease, were relatively high in our patient population. Hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization were frequent first-line therapies.

Efficacy of hepatic resection vs transarterial chemoembolization for solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM To compare the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with solitary huge (≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Records were retrospectively analyzed of 247 patients with solitary huge HCC, comprising 180 treated by HR and 67 by TACE. Long-term overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate analysis. These analyses were performed using all patients in both groups and/or 61 pairs of propensity score-matched patients from the two groups. RESULTS OS at 5 years was significantly higher in the HR group than the TACE group, across all patients (P = 0.002) and across propensity score-matched pairs (36.4% vs 18.2%, P = 0.039). The two groups showed similar postoperative mortality and morbidity. Multivariate analysis identified alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL, presence of vascular invasion and TACE treatment as independent predictors of poor OS. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that HR can be safe and more effective than TACE for patients with solitary huge HCC.