Yasufumi Uwahodo

Mechanism of action of aripiprazole predicts clinical efficacy and a favourable side-effect profile

The antipsychotic efficacy of aripiprazole is not generally associated with extrapyramidal symptoms, cardiovascular effects, sedation or elevations in serum prolactin that characterize typical or atypical antipsychotics. The aim of this study was to clarify the mechanism of action of aripiprazole that underlies its favourable clinical profiles. The preclinical efficacy and side-effect profiles of aripiprazole were evaluated usingseveral pharmaco-behavioural test systems in mice and rats, both in vivo and ex vivo, and compared with those of other conventional and atypical antipsychotics. Each of the antipsychotics induced catalepsy and inhibited apomorphine-induced stereotypy. The catalepsy liability ratios for these drugs were 6.5 for aripiprazole, 4.7 for both olanzapine and risperidone. The ptosis liability ratios for aripiprazole, olanzapine and risperidone were 14, 7.2 and 3.3, respectively. Aripiprazole slightly increased DOPA accumulation in the forebrain of reserpinised mice, reduced 5-HTP accumulation at the highest dose and exhibited a weaker inhibition of 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyl-tryptamine-induced head twitches. Aripiprazole did not inhibit physostigmine- or norepinephrine-induced lethality in rats. In conclusion, aripiprazole shows a favourable preclinical efficacy and side-effect profile compared to a typical antipsychotics. This profile may result from its high affinity partialagonist activity at D2 and 5-HT1A receptors and its antagonism of 5-HT2A receptors.

Antidepressant-like responses to the combined sigma and 5-HT1A receptor agonist OPC-14523

The antidepressant-like activity of a novel compound, OPC-14523, was investigated in comparison with the conventional antidepressants, fluoxetine and imipramine. OPC-14523 bound with nanomolar affinities to sigma receptors (IC(50)=47-56 nM), the 5-HT(1A) receptor (IC(50)=2.3 nM), and the 5-HT transporter (IC(50)=80 nM). OPC-14523 inhibited the in vitro reuptake of 3H-5-HT (IC(50)=27 nM), but it showed very weak inhibitory activity on 3H-NE and 3H-DA reuptake. OPC-14523 did not inhibit MAO A or B activities or muscarinic receptors. A single oral administration of OPC-14523 produced a marked antidepressant-like effect in the forced swimming test (FST) with rats (ED(50)=27 mg/kg) and mice (ED(50)=20mg/kg) without affecting the general locomotor activity. In contrast, fluoxetine and imipramine each required at least four days of repeated dosing to show this activity. The acute activity of OPC-14523 was blocked by pretreatment with the sigma receptor antagonist NE-100 or the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100635. The induction of flat body posture by OPC-14523 was blocked by the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist NAN-190, and forebrain 5-HT biosynthesis was attenuated by OPC-14523 at behaviorally effective doses. In contrast, OPC-14523, unlike fluoxetine, failed to inhibit 5-HT reuptake at oral doses below 100mg/kg. Thus, the acute antidepressant-like action of OPC-14523 is achieved by the combined stimulation of sigma and 5-HT(1A) receptors without inhibition of 5-HT reuptake in vivo.

Diminished catalepsy and dopamine metabolism distinguish aripiprazole from haloperidol or risperidone.

Catalepsy and changes in striatal and limbic dopamine metabolism were investigated in mice after oral administration of aripiprazole, haloperidol, and risperidone. Catalepsy duration decreased with chronic (21 day) aripiprazole compared with acute (single dose) treatment across a wide dose range, whereas catalepsy duration persisted with chronic haloperidol treatment. At the time of maximal catalepsy, acute aripiprazole did not alter neostriatal dopamine metabolite/dopamine ratios or homovanillic acid (HVA) levels, and produced small increases in dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC). Effects were similar in the olfactory tubercle. Dopamine metabolism was essentially unchanged in both regions after chronic aripiprazole. Acute treatments with haloperidol or risperidone elevated DOPAC, HVA, and metabolite/dopamine ratios in both brain areas and these remained elevated with chronic treatment. The subtle effects of aripiprazole on striatal and limbic dopamine metabolism, and the decrease in catalepsy with chronic administration, illustrate fundamental differences in dopamine neurochemical actions and behavioral sequelae of aripiprazole compared to haloperidol or risperidone.

Cognitive dysfunction and histological findings in rats with chronic-stage contusion and diffuse axonal injury

The Morris water maze (MWM) technique is well known as a prominent method of evaluating learning acquisition and memory retention impairments in rats. We previously reported on a modified fluid percussion device that is able to consistently produce experimental cortical contusion (CC) and diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in separate groups of rats. The purpose of the present protocol is to evaluate the differences in learning acquisition and memory retention impairments between these two types of injured rats in the chronic stage using the MWM technique. CC and DAI rats are respectively induced by lateral and midline fluid percussion. We also compare the histological differences between these two different types of traumatic brain injury. The results show statistically significant differences in learning acquisition impairment between the sham and CC rats and between the sham and DAI rats. However, a difference in memory retention impairment was expected to be seen only between the sham and DAI rats. Histologically, the loss of CA3 pyramidal cells in the hippocampus was observed ipsilaterally in the CC and bilaterally in DAI. Neuronal cell loss was observed in bilaterally in layer II of the entorhinal cortex in DAI, but not in CC.

Evaluation of learning and memory dysfunction and histological findings in rats with chronic stage contusion and diffuse axonal injury

We previously reported a modified fluid percussion device capable of consistently producing experimental cortical contusion (CC) and diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in separate groups of rats by lateral and midline fluid percussion, respectively. The purpose of the present study was to compare the differences in learning acquisition and memory retention impairments between these two types of injured rats in the chronic stage using the Morris water maze technique. We also compared the histological differences between these two different types of traumatic brain injury. The results showed a statistically significant difference in learning acquisition impairment between the sham and CC rats and also between the sham and DAI rats. However, a significant difference in memory retention impairment was observed only between the sham and DAI rats. Histologically, the neuronal cell loss of CA3 pyramidal cells in the hippocampus was observed on the ipsilateral side in the CC and bilaterally in DAI. The neuronal cell loss was seen in bilateral entorhinal cortex layer II in DAI, but it was not seen in CC. From these results, we speculate that the marked cell loss in the hippocampus CA3 region in both CC and DAI rats was related to the impairment of spatial learning acquisition. The marked cell loss in entorhinal cortex layer II in DAI rats may be one of the important factors in the impairment of spatial memory retention.

The attenuating effect of carteolol hydrochloride, a β-adrenoceptor antagonist, on neuroleptic-induced catalepsy in rats

Abstract It is known that β-adrenoceptor antagonists are effective in the treatment of akathisia, one of the extrapyramidal side effects that occur during neuroleptic treatment. Neuroleptic-induced catalepsy, a model of neuroleptic-induced extrapyramidal side effects, was considered suitable as a model for predicting neuroleptic-induced akathisia in humans, although neuroleptic-induced catalepsy was not considered a specific test for neuroleptic-induced akathisia. Therefore, the effects of carteolol, a β-adrenoceptor antagonist, on haloperidol-induced catalepsy in rats were behaviorally studied and compared with those of propranolol and biperiden, a muscarinic receptor antagonist. Carteolol, as well as propranolol and biperiden, inhibited the haloperidol-induced catalepsy. The inhibitory effect of carteolol was almost comparable to that of propranolol, but was weaker than that of biperiden. Carteolol did not evoke postsynaptic dopamine receptor-stimulating behavioral signs such as stereotypy and hyperlocomotion in rats. Carteolol did not antagonize the inhibitory effects of haloperidol on apomorphine-induced stereotypy and locomotor activity in rats. In addition, carteolol did not evoke 5-HT1A receptor-stimulating behavioral signs such as flat body posture and forepaw treading and did not inhibit 5-hydroxytryptophan-induced head twitch in rats. Finally, carteolol did not inhibit physostigmine-induced lethality in rats. These results strongly suggest that carteolol improves haloperidol-induced catalepsy via its β-adrenoceptor antagonistic activity and is expected to be effective in the treatment of akathisia without attenuating neuroleptic-induced antipsychotic effects due to its postsynaptic dopamine receptor antagonistic activity.