Yasuko Gotake

Strategies for the treatment of aorto-oesophageal fistula

OBJECTIVES Presenting a surgical strategy for aorto-oesophageal fistula (AEF). METHODS From October 1999 to August 2013, 16 patients with AEF were treated at Kobe University Hospital. The mean age was 65.5 ± 10.2 years, and the male/female ratio was 13/3. Eight patients had non-dissecting thoracic aneurysm, 3 had chronic aortic dissection, 5 had oesophageal cancer and 1 had fish bone penetration. Five patients were in shock. Four patients had previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the descending aorta and 1 had hemi-arch replacement. As treatment for AEF, 8 patients underwent TEVAR, 2 had a bridge TEVAR to open surgery, 2 had extra-anatomical bypass (EAB) and 5 had in situ reconstruction of the descending aorta. The oesophagus was resected in 8 patients, and an omental flap was installed in 7 patients. For the 4 most recent cases, simultaneous resection of the aorta and oesophagus, in situ reconstruction of the descending aorta using rifampicin-soaked Dacron graft and omental flap installation were performed. RESULTS Hospital mortality was noted in 4 patients (25.0%; persistent sepsis n = 3 and pneumonia n = 1). However, since 2007, only 1 of 5 patients died (pneumonia). All patients with oesophageal cancer died during follow-up. Two patients underwent oesophageal reconstruction using a pedicled colon graft and one is on the waiting list for oesophageal reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS Bridging TEVAR is a useful adjunct in treating AEF patients with shock. One-stage surgery consisting of resection of the aneurysm and oesophagus, in situ reconstruction of the descending aorta and omental flap installation provided a better outcome in the AEF surgical strategy compared with conservative treatment.

Surgical strategy for the treatment of aortoesophageal fistula

Objective To present a surgical strategy for aortoesophageal fistula (AEF). Methods From October 1999 to May 2017, 27 patients with AEF were treated at Kobe University Hospital. After 9 patients with malignancies or fish bone penetration were excluded, 18 patients who had AEF secondary to aortic lesions were investigated. The mean age was 67.2 ± 10.4 years, and the male/female ratio was 16:2. Twelve patients had a nondissection thoracic aneurysm, and 6 patients had a chronic aortic dissection. Six patients were in shock. Seven patients had a previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the descending aorta, 2 patients had descending aorta replacement, 1 had hemiarch replacement, and 2 had total arch replacement. As the first treatment for AEF, 3 patients underwent TEVAR as destination therapy, 3 patients had a bridge TEVAR to open surgery, 1 patient had an extra‐anatomical bypass from the ascending aorta to the abdominal aorta, and 11 patients had an in situ reconstruction of the descending aorta. The esophagus was resected in 16 patients, and an omental flap was installed in 16 patients. Additional procedures were extra‐anatomical bypass in 2 patients and in situ reconstruction of the aorta in 3 patients. Results Hospital mortality was noted in 4 patients (22.2% persistent sepsis, n = 3: pneumonia, n = 1). However, since 2007, only 1 of 13 patients has died (pneumonia). Late death occurred in 5 patients, due to pneumonia, cerebral bleeding, diarrhea, sudden death, and persistent infection. Actuarial survival was 42.4 ± 12.8% at 5 years and freedom from aorta‐related death was 59.4 ± 13.5% at 5 years. Nine patients achieved completed reconstruction of the esophagus 172 ± 57 days after initial surgery. Conclusions Although a comparative study was not performed, 1‐stage surgery consisting of resection of an aneurysm and esophagus, in situ reconstruction of the descending aorta, and omental flap installation provided a better outcome in the treatment for AEF. Bridging TEVAR to the open surgery is a useful adjunct in patients with AEF with hemorrhagic shock. Later reconstruction of the esophagus can be performed in the survivors.

Comparison of Volumetric and Diametric Analysis in Endovascular Repair of Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES The aim was to evaluate computed tomography angiography (CTA) volumetric and diametric analysis after endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAAs) and its correlation with and applicability for clinical follow up. METHODS Fifty-four consecutive endovascular repairs for DTAA were retrospectively evaluated from 2008 to 2014. All patients underwent pre-operative CTA and at least one post-operative CTA at 6 months. Fifty-four pre-operative and 137 post-operative CTAs were evaluated (using the Ziosoft 2 software) to analyze the aneurysm and thrombus volume, the maximum aneurysm diameter, and their changes at the last follow up CTA (mean 30.5 months; range 6.5-66.4 months). A statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation between diameter and volume changes, as well as association with endoleaks. The cut off point to predict endoleaks was determined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The predictive accuracy of volume change versus diameter change for Type I endoleak was analyzed. RESULTS The mean pre-operative aneurysm diameter, aneurysm volume, and thrombus volume were 56.7 ± 11.7 mm, 145.8 ± 120.0 mL, and 48.8 ± 54.8 mL, respectively. Within the observational period, a mean decrease of -27.9 ± 30.5% in the aortic volume and -15.9 ± 15.4% in diameter was observed. Correlation between aneurysm diameter and volume changes was good (r = 0.854). Volume and diameter changes were significantly different between groups with and without endoleaks (volume change 16.9 ± 38.8% vs. -35.6 ± 23.1%, p < .001; diameter change 8.0 ± 12.1% vs. -18.8 ± 14.3%, p < .001). A pre-operative thrombus volume percentage of <11.3% and increase in aneurysm volume +11.6% were predictive factors for Type II and Type I endoleak, respectively. The accuracy of a >10% volume increase in predicting a Type I endoleak was higher (accuracy 96.3%, sensitivity 75%, and specificity 98%) than a >5 mm diameter increase (accuracy 92.6%, sensitivity 25%, and specificity 98%). CONCLUSIONS CT volumetric analysis is a more reliable modality for predicting endoleaks after endovascular repair for DTAA than diameter analysis.

Which technique of cusp repair is durable in reimplantation procedure

OBJECTIVES We aimed to ascertain the durability of cusp repair techniques used in reimplantation procedures. METHODS Between 2000 and 2015, 249 patients (mean age, 49 ± 17 years) with aortic insufficiency underwent the reimplantation procedure. The pathology was acute aortic dissection in 24 and non-dissection in 225 patients. Preoperative aortic regurgitation (AR) was absent in 9, 1+ in 19, 2+ in 20, 3+ in 71 and 4+ in 120 patients. The mean aortic root and ascending aortic diameters were 47 ± 9 mm and 38 ± 7 mm, respectively. The following techniques of cusp repair were used: none (83), central plication (130), free margin reinforcement (57) and patch repair (19). Annual echocardiography was performed. Freedom from moderate aortic insufficiency and aortic valve reoperation were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors influencing the freedom from moderate or severe AR were calculated by proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS Mean follow-up period was 56  ±  44 months. Freedom from moderate or severe AR was 82%±3% and 77% ± 4% at 5 and 8 years, respectively, whereas freedom from aortic valve reoperation was 93%±8% and 87% ± 3% at 5 and 8 years, respectively. Recurrent AR and infection were causes of reoperation in 13 and 3 patients, respectively. Preoperative cusp prolapse, technique of free margin reinforcement used and patch repair were significant factors for recurrent AR by proportional hazard analysis. Central plication was not a significant factor for recurrent AR. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative cusp prolapse was a risk factor, whereas central plication was not a risk factor for recurrent AR. Free margin reinforcement had a positive effect, whereas patch repair had a negative effect on aortic valve durability.

Successful hybrid treatment of a rare case of blunt traumatic rupture of the left atrial basal appendage and aortic arch

Despite advances in emergency care and the emergent transportation system, cardiac and aortic ruptures after blunt trauma are associated with high mortality and morbidity. We present a rare case of a 70-year-old man with a ruptured left atrial basal appendage and distal aortic arch after sustaining blunt trauma to the chest during a motor vehicle accident. The patient was transported to our hospital in a state of shock and taken directly to the operating room. Hybrid treatment was performed, including surgical repair of the left atrium under cardiopulmonary bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair, was performed. The patient fully recovered without any complications.

Early and long-term outcomes of open surgery after thoracic endovascular aortic repair†

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the early and long-term outcomes of open surgery after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent open surgery following thoracic endovascular aortic repair between October 1999 and July 2017. The mean interval from primary intervention to open surgery was 3.1 ± 3.7 years. Indications for open repair were endoleak in 14 patients, graft infection in 10 patients, false lumen dilatation in 9 patients, retrograde dissection in 5 patients, migration in 1 patient and additional aneurysm in 2 patients. Eight patients underwent emergent surgical conversions. The mean follow-up period was 4.2 ± 4.0 years. RESULTS Descending aortic replacement was performed in 15 patients; thoraco-abdominal aortic repair, in 14 patients; extensive arch to descending aortic replacement, in 5 patients; and total arch replacement, in 7 patients. Six (14.6%) patients died in the hospital. The 5-year survival rate was 73.7 ± 7.2%, and freedom from reintervention was 88.5 ± 6.4%. CONCLUSIONS Early outcomes of open surgical procedures after thoracic endovascular aortic repair were still suboptimal. However, hospital survivors had excellent long-term outcomes.

Coil Migration to the Duodenum 1 Year Following Embolisation of a Ruptured Giant Common Hepatic Artery Aneurysm

Introduction Transcatheter arterial embolisation is often performed for the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Here, the case of a patient who developed the rare complication of coil migration into the intestinal tract is reported, and a review of the literature is presented. Case report A 30 year old woman with a ruptured giant common hepatic artery aneurysm, who had been treated with transarterial coil embolisation 1 year previously, was admitted to hospital complaining of passing the coils on defecation. Abdominal Xray and gastroscopy showed the migration of the coils through a duodenal fistula. Open repair was performed with the coils successfully removed and the duodenal fistula closed with omentopexy. At the 3 year follow up, there were no signs or symptoms of complications. Conclusion Based on observations from this case, although coil migration to the intestinal tract is exceedingly rare, aneurysm rupture with enteric fistula can lead to coil migration.

Impact of delirium on postoperative frailty and long term cardiovascular events after cardiac surgery

Background Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and critical complication after cardiac surgery. However, the relationship between POD and postoperative physical frailty and the effect of both on long-term clinical outcomes have not been fully explored. Objective We aimed to examine the associations among POD, postoperative frailty, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Design This was a prospective cohort study. Methods We studied 329 consecutive patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The intensive care delirium screening checklist was used to assess POD. Postoperative frailty was defined by handgrip strength and walking speed. Patients were subsequently followed-up to detect MACE. Results POD was present in 13.2%, while the incidence of postoperative frailty was 27.0%. POD was independently associated with development of postoperative frailty (adjusted odds ratio = 2.98). During follow-up, MACE occurred in 14.1% of all participants. On multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis, POD (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 3.36), postoperative frailty (HR = 2.21), postoperative complications (HR = 1.54), and left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 0.95) were independently associated with increased risk of MACE. Limitations It is a single-center study with a risk of bias. We did not investigate follow up cognitive function. Conclusions POD was a predictor of postoperative frailty after cardiac surgery. Both postoperative frailty and POD were associated with the incidence of MACE, while POD was the stronger predictor of MACE. Thus, POD and frailty play critical roles in the risk stratification of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.