Yuki Ikeno

Impact of sarcopenia on the outcomes of elective total arch replacement in the elderly

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to identify the cut-off value of sarcopenia based on the psoas muscle area index and evaluate early and late outcomes following elective total arch replacement in the elderly. METHODS Sarcopenia was assessed by the psoas muscle area index [defined as the psoas muscle area at the L3 level on computed tomography (cm 2 )/body surface area (m 2 )]. The cut-off value for sarcopenia was defined as > 2 standard deviations below the mean psoas muscle area index value obtained from 464 normal control patients. Between October 1999 and July 2015, 266 patients who were ≥ 65 years and had undergone psoas muscle area index measurement underwent elective total arch replacement. These patients were classified into the sarcopenia (Group S, n  = 81) and non-sarcopenia (Group N, n  = 185) groups. RESULTS The mean age was 76.2 ± 5.6 years in Group S and 75.7 ± 5.7 years in Group N ( P  = 0.553). Hospital mortality was 3.7% (3/81) in Group S and 2.2% (4/185) in Group N ( P  = 0.483). Mean follow-up was 48.3 ± 38.7 months. Five-year survival was significantly worse in Group S (S: 63.2 ± 6.6% vs N: 88.7 ± 2.6%, P  < 0.001). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that sarcopenia significantly predicted poor survival (hazard ratio 2.59; 95% confidence interval 1.27-5.29; P  = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Sarcopenia did not predict hospital death following total arch replacement, but it was negatively associated with overall survival. Sarcopenia can be an additional risk factor to estimate the outcomes of thoracic aortic surgery.

Surgical strategy for the treatment of aortoesophageal fistula

Objective To present a surgical strategy for aortoesophageal fistula (AEF). Methods From October 1999 to May 2017, 27 patients with AEF were treated at Kobe University Hospital. After 9 patients with malignancies or fish bone penetration were excluded, 18 patients who had AEF secondary to aortic lesions were investigated. The mean age was 67.2 ± 10.4 years, and the male/female ratio was 16:2. Twelve patients had a nondissection thoracic aneurysm, and 6 patients had a chronic aortic dissection. Six patients were in shock. Seven patients had a previous thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the descending aorta, 2 patients had descending aorta replacement, 1 had hemiarch replacement, and 2 had total arch replacement. As the first treatment for AEF, 3 patients underwent TEVAR as destination therapy, 3 patients had a bridge TEVAR to open surgery, 1 patient had an extra‐anatomical bypass from the ascending aorta to the abdominal aorta, and 11 patients had an in situ reconstruction of the descending aorta. The esophagus was resected in 16 patients, and an omental flap was installed in 16 patients. Additional procedures were extra‐anatomical bypass in 2 patients and in situ reconstruction of the aorta in 3 patients. Results Hospital mortality was noted in 4 patients (22.2% persistent sepsis, n = 3: pneumonia, n = 1). However, since 2007, only 1 of 13 patients has died (pneumonia). Late death occurred in 5 patients, due to pneumonia, cerebral bleeding, diarrhea, sudden death, and persistent infection. Actuarial survival was 42.4 ± 12.8% at 5 years and freedom from aorta‐related death was 59.4 ± 13.5% at 5 years. Nine patients achieved completed reconstruction of the esophagus 172 ± 57 days after initial surgery. Conclusions Although a comparative study was not performed, 1‐stage surgery consisting of resection of an aneurysm and esophagus, in situ reconstruction of the descending aorta, and omental flap installation provided a better outcome in the treatment for AEF. Bridging TEVAR to the open surgery is a useful adjunct in patients with AEF with hemorrhagic shock. Later reconstruction of the esophagus can be performed in the survivors.

Intraoperative Aortic Root Pressure Study for Quantitative Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation During Valve-Sparing Root Replacement: A Preliminary Report

From the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan. Disclosures: Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support. Received for publication Oct 16, 2017; revisions received March 28, 2018; accepted for publication March 30, 2018; available ahead of print May 12, 2018. Address for reprints: Yutaka Okita, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan (E-mail: yutakaokita@gmail.com). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;156:1399-401 0022-5223/

A case of type A acute aortic dissection with a common carotid trunk

36.00 Copyright 2018 by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.168

Long-term Outcomes of Total Arch Replacement using 4-branched Graft

We present a rare case of common carotid artery with acute type A aortic dissection. A 72-year-old woman underwent emergent aortic arch repair using Antegrade selective cerebral protection. Bottom-tapped cannulae were inserted into three orifices of arch vessels, however, regional cerebral oxygen saturation decreased after rewarming. We found that arch branches were in order from front to back, right subclavian artery, common carotid trunk, and left subcravian artery. The patient complicated stroke in the right middle cerebral artery.

Successful hybrid treatment of a rare case of blunt traumatic rupture of the left atrial basal appendage and aortic arch

Objective: Our study evaluated the long‐term outcomes of total arch replacement using a 4‐branched graft. Methods: From October 1999 to December 2016, 655 patients underwent total arch replacement using a 4‐branched graft (pathology in the 655 patients was distributed as 399 no dissection, 149 acute dissection, and 107 chronic dissection). Two hundred nine patients (31.9%) underwent nonelective surgery. Mean follow‐up term was 5.0 ± 4.1 years and follow‐up rate was 97.1%. Results: Of 655 patients who underwent total arch replacement using a 4‐branched graft, operative mortality occurred in 34 patients (5.2%) and permanent neurologic deficit occurred in 24 patients (3.7%). One hundred ninety late deaths occurred, with 20 aortic event‐related deaths. Overall survival was 73.1% ± 1.9% at 5 years and 54.8% ± 2.7% at 10 years. Multivariate Cox‐hazard regression analysis demonstrated that older age, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, concurrent procedures, permanent neurologic deficit, tracheostomy, and renal failure were significant risk factors for late death. Freedom from repeat operation on the aorta was 98.0% ± 0.7% at 5 years and 93.9% ± 1.8% at 10 years and freedom from additional aortic operation was 87.2% ± 1.5% at 5 years and 77.3% ± 2.7% at 10 years. The incidence of pseudoaneursym was 2.2%. Conclusions: The long‐term outcomes for patients undergoing total arch replacement using 4‐branched graft are favorable. However, even in the late phase, periodic follow‐up is necessary to address subsequent aorta‐related events.

Early and long-term outcomes of open surgery after thoracic endovascular aortic repair†

Despite advances in emergency care and the emergent transportation system, cardiac and aortic ruptures after blunt trauma are associated with high mortality and morbidity. We present a rare case of a 70-year-old man with a ruptured left atrial basal appendage and distal aortic arch after sustaining blunt trauma to the chest during a motor vehicle accident. The patient was transported to our hospital in a state of shock and taken directly to the operating room. Hybrid treatment was performed, including surgical repair of the left atrium under cardiopulmonary bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair, was performed. The patient fully recovered without any complications.

Outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement in acute Type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the early and long-term outcomes of open surgery after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent open surgery following thoracic endovascular aortic repair between October 1999 and July 2017. The mean interval from primary intervention to open surgery was 3.1 ± 3.7 years. Indications for open repair were endoleak in 14 patients, graft infection in 10 patients, false lumen dilatation in 9 patients, retrograde dissection in 5 patients, migration in 1 patient and additional aneurysm in 2 patients. Eight patients underwent emergent surgical conversions. The mean follow-up period was 4.2 ± 4.0 years. RESULTS Descending aortic replacement was performed in 15 patients; thoraco-abdominal aortic repair, in 14 patients; extensive arch to descending aortic replacement, in 5 patients; and total arch replacement, in 7 patients. Six (14.6%) patients died in the hospital. The 5-year survival rate was 73.7 ± 7.2%, and freedom from reintervention was 88.5 ± 6.4%. CONCLUSIONS Early outcomes of open surgical procedures after thoracic endovascular aortic repair were still suboptimal. However, hospital survivors had excellent long-term outcomes.

Direct perfusion of the carotid artery in patients with brain malperfusion secondary to acute aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES To investigate the long-term durability of aortic valves, we reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement with acute Type A aortic dissection. METHODS We included patients who underwent emergent aortic repair for acute Type A aortic dissection at our university hospital between 2000 and 2016. We identified patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement from the included cohort and assessed their survival and long-term valve durability. RESULTS We identified 24 of 328 patients who underwent valve-sparing root replacement (age: mean ± SD 49 ± 11 years; 17 men). All patients underwent reimplantation procedures and 2 had concomitant cusp repairs (central plication). Prolapsed cusps caused by detached commissures in 12 cases were noted and reattached with buttress sutures with or without glue. There was no in-hospital mortality. Median follow-up period was 84 months (range 1-202 months) and survival was 100% at 5 and 10 years. Freedom from moderate or greater aortic insufficiency was 82% ± 10% at 5 years and 65% ± 13% at 10 years. Freedom from aortic valve reoperation was 83% ± 9% at 5 years and 69% ± 12% at 10 years. Valve reoperations were indicated for endocarditis in 1 patient, perforation of the aortic cusp in 1 patient and redetachment of commissures that had been attached with gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue at the initial operations in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS The durability of valve-sparing root replacement in acute aortic dissection was suboptimal. The major cause of late failure was commissure detachment after primary repair with buttress sutures and glue. Gelatin-resorcinol-formaldehyde glue should be avoided for commissural resuspension in patients with acute aortic dissection.