Yasuto Takahashi
Kobe University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yasuto Takahashi.
NCAR Technical Report | 2012
David L. Williamson; Michael Blackburn; Brian J. Hoskins; Kensuke Nakajima; Wataru Ohfuchi; Yasuto Takahashi; Yoshi-Yuki Hayashi; Hisashi Nakamura; Masaki Ishiwatari; John L. McGregor; Volkmar Wirth; Helmut Frank; P. Bechthold; Nils P. Wedi; Hirofumi Tomita; Masaki Satoh; Ming Zhao; Isaac M. Held; Max J. Suarez; Myong-In Lee; Masahiro Watanabe; Masahide Kimoto; Yimin Liu; Zaizhi Wang; Andrea Molod; Kavirajan Rajendran; Akio Kitoh; R. A. Stratton
This Atlas presents statistical analyses of the simulations submitted to the Aqua-Planet Experiment (APE) data archive. The simulations are from global Atmospheric General Circulation Models (AGCM) applied to a water-covered earth. The AGCMs include ones actively used or being developed for numerical weather prediction or climate research. Some are mature, application models and others are more novel and thus less well tested in Earth-like applications. The experiment applies AGCMs with their complete parameterization package to an idealization of the planet Earth which has a greatly simplified lower boundary that consists of an ocean only. It has no land and its associated orography, and no sea ice. The ocean is represented by Sea Surface Temperatures (SST) which are specified everywhere with simple, idealized distributions. Thus in the hierarchy of tests available for AGCMs, APE falls between tests with simplified forcings such as those proposed by Held and Suarez (1994) and Boer and Denis (1997) and Earth-like simulations of the Atmospheric Modeling Intercomparison Project (AMIP, Gates et al., 1999). Blackburn and Hoskins (2013) summarize the APE and its aims. They discuss where the APE fits within a modeling hierarchy which has evolved to evaluate complete models and which provides a link between realistic simulation and conceptual models of atmospheric phenomena. The APE bridges a gap in the existing hierarchy. The goals of APE are to provide a benchmark of current model behaviors and to stimulate research to understand the cause of inter-model differences., APE is sponsored by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) joint Commission on Atmospheric Science (CAS), World Climate Research Program (WCRP) Working Group on Numerical Experimentation (WGNE). Chapter 2 of this Atlas provides an overview of the specification of the eight APE experiments and of the data collected. Chapter 3 lists the participating models and includes brief descriptions of each. Chapters 4 through 7 present a wide variety of statistics from the 14 participating models for the eight different experiments. Additional intercomparison figures created by Dr. Yukiko Yamada in AGU group are available at http://www.gfd-dennou.org/library/ape/comparison/. This Atlas is intended to present and compare the statistics of the APE simulations but does not contain a discussion of interpretive analyses. Such analyses are left for journal papers such as those included in the Special Issue of the Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan (2013, Vol. 91A) devoted to the APE. Two papers in that collection provide an overview of the simulations. One (Blackburn et al., 2013) concentrates on the CONTROL simulation and the other (Williamson et al., 2013) on the response to changes in the meridional SST profile. Additional papers provide more detailed analysis of the basic simulations, while others describe various sensitivities and applications. The APE experiment data base holds a wealth of data that is now publicly available from the APE web site: http://climate.ncas.ac.uk/ape/. We hope that this Atlas will stimulate future analyses and investigations to understand the large variation seen in the model behaviors.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2011
Ko-ichiro Sugiyama; Kensuke Nakajima; Masatsugu Odaka; Masaki Ishiwatari; Kiyoshi Kuramoto; Y. Morikawa; Seiya Nishizawa; Yasuto Takahashi; Yoshi-Yuki Hayashi
Geoscientific Model Development | 2011
Masaki Ishiwatari; Eizi Toyoda; Y. Morikawa; Shin-ichi Takehiro; Youhei Sasaki; Seiya Nishizawa; Masatsugu Odaka; N. Otobe; Yasuto Takahashi; Kensuke Nakajima; Takeshi Horinouchi; M. Shiotani; Yoshi-Yuki Hayashi
Japan Geoscience Union | 2016
Takashi Mikami; Yasuto Takahashi; Kiyoshi Kuramoto
Japan Geoscience Union | 2016
Masanori Onishi; George Hashimoto; Kiyoshi Kuramoto; Yoshiyuki O. Takahashi; Masaki Ishiwatari; Yasuto Takahashi; Yoshi-Yuki Hayashi
Japan Geoscience Union | 2015
Masanori Onishi; George Hashimoto; Kiyoshi Kuramoto; Yoshiyuki O. Takahashi; Masaki Ishiwatari; Yasuto Takahashi; Yoshi-Yuki Hayashi
Japan Geoscience Union | 2015
Yasuto Takahashi; George Hashimoto; Masaki Ishiwatari; Yoshiyuki O. Takahashi; Ko-ichiro Sugiyama; Masanori Onishi; Kiyoshi Kuramoto
Japan Geoscience Union | 2014
Masanori Onishi; George Hashimoto; Kiyoshi Kuramoto; Yoshiyuki O. Takahashi; Yasuto Takahashi; Masaki Ishiwatari; Yoshi-Yuki Hayashi
Japan Geoscience Union | 2014
Kohji Tsumura; Ko Arimatsu; Eiichi Egami; Yutakla Hayano; Chikatoshi Honda; Jun Kimura; Kiyoshi Kuramoto; Shuji Matsuura; Yosuke Minowa; Kensuke Nakajima; Taishi Nakamoto; Mai Shirahata; Jason Surace; Yasuto Takahashi; Takehiko Wada
Japan Geoscience Union | 2014
Yasuto Takahashi; George Hashimoto; Masaki Ishiwatari; Yoshiyuki O. Takahashi; Masanori Onishi; Kiyoshi Kuramoto