Yelena Kryukova

Wild-Type and Mutant HCN Channels in a Tandem Biological-Electronic Cardiac Pacemaker

Background— Biological pacemakers (BPM) implanted in canine left bundle branch function competitively with electronic pacemakers (EPM). We hypothesized that BPM engineered with the use of mE324A mutant murine HCN2 (mHCN2) genes would improve function over mHCN2 and that BPM/EPM tandems confer advantage over either approach alone. Methods and Results— In cultured neonatal rat myocytes, activation midpoint was −46.9 mV in mE324A versus −66.1 mV in mHCN2 (P<0.05). mE324A manifested a positive shift of voltage dependence of gating kinetics of activation and deactivation compared with mHCN2 (P<0.05) in myocytes as well as Xenopus oocytes. In intact dogs in complete atrioventricular block, saline (control), mHCN2, or mE324A virus was injected into left bundle branch, and EPM were implanted (VVI 45 bpm). Twenty-four–hour ECGs were monitored for 14 days. With EPM discontinued, there was no difference in duration of overdrive suppression among groups. However, basal heart rates in controls were less than those in mHCN2, which did not differ from those in E324A (45 versus 57 versus 53 bpm; P<0.05). When spontaneous rate fell below 45 bpm, EPM intervened at that rate, triggering 83% of beats in control, contrasting (P<0.05) with 26% (mHCN2) and 36% (mE324A). On day 14, epinephrine (1 &mgr;g/kg per minute IV) induced a 50% heart rate increase in all mE324A, one third of mHCN2, and one fifth of control (P<0.05 mE324A versus control or mHCN2). Conclusions— mE324A induces faster, more positive pacemaker current activation than mHCN2 and stable, catecholamine-sensitive rhythms in situ that compete with EPM comparably but more catecholamine responsively than mHCN2. BPM/EPM tandems function reliably, reduce the number of EPM beats, and confer sympathetic responsiveness to the tandem.

MiRP1 modulates HCN2 channel expression and gating in cardiac myocytes.

MinK-related protein (MiRP1 or KCNE2) interacts with the hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotidegated (HCN) family of pacemaker channels to alter channel gating in heterologous expression systems. Given the high expression levels of MiRP1 and HCN subunits in the cardiac sinoatrial node and the contribution of pacemaker channel function to impulse initiation in that tissue, such an interaction could be of considerable physiological significance. However, the functional evidence for MiRP1/HCN interactions in heterologous expression studies has been accompanied by inconsistencies between studies in terms of the specific effects on channel function. To evaluate the effect of MiRP1 on HCN expression and function in a physiological context, we used an adenovirus approach to overexpress a hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged MiRP1 (HAMiRP1) and HCN2 in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes, a cell type that expresses both MiRP1 and HCN2 message at low levels. HA-MiRP1 co-expression with HCN2 resulted in a 4-fold increase in maximal conductance of pacemaker currents compared with HCN2 expression alone. HCN2 activation and deactivation kinetics also changed, being significantly more rapid for voltages between –60 and –95 mV when HA-MiRP1 was co-expressed with HCN2. However, the voltage dependence of activation was not affected. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that expressed HA-MiRP1 and HCN2, as well as endogenous MiRP1 and HCN2, co-assemble in ventricular myocytes. The results indicate that MiRP1 acts as a β subunit for HCN2 pacemaker channel subunits and alters channel gating at physiologically relevant voltages in cardiac cells.

HCN2/SkM1 Gene Transfer Into Canine Left Bundle Branch Induces Stable, Autonomically Responsive Biological Pacing at Physiological Heart Rates

OBJECTIVES This study sought to test the hypothesis that hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN)-based biological pacing might be improved significantly by hyperpolarizing the action potential (AP) threshold via coexpression of the skeletal muscle sodium channel 1 (SkM1). BACKGROUND Gene-based biological pacemakers display effective in vivo pacemaker function. However, approaches used to date have failed to manifest optimal pacemaker properties, defined as basal beating rates of 60 to 90 beats/min, a brisk autonomic response achieving maximal rates of 130 to 160 beats/min, and low to absent electronic backup pacing. METHODS We implanted adenoviral SkM1, HCN2, or HCN2/SkM1 constructs into left bundle branches (LBB) or left ventricular (LV) epicardium of atrioventricular-blocked dogs. RESULTS During stable peak gene expression on days 5 to 7, HCN2/SkM1 LBB-injected dogs showed highly stable in vivo pacemaker activity superior to SkM1 or HCN2 alone and superior to LV-implanted dogs with regard to beating rates (resting approximately 80 beats/min; maximum approximately 130 beats/min), no dependence on electronic backup pacing, and enhanced modulation of pacemaker function during circadian rhythm or epinephrine infusion. In vitro isolated LV of dogs overexpressing SkM1 manifested a significantly more negative AP threshold. CONCLUSIONS LBB-injected HCN2/SkM1 potentially provides a more clinically suitable biological pacemaker strategy than other reported constructs. This superiority is attributable to the more negative AP threshold and injection into the LBB.

Ca 2+ -Stimulated Adenylyl Cyclase AC1 Generates Efficient Biological Pacing as Single Gene Therapy and in Combination With HCN2

Background— Biological pacing performed solely via HCN2 gene transfer in vivo results in relatively slow idioventricular rates and only moderate autonomic responsiveness. We induced biological pacing using the Ca2+-stimulated adenylyl cyclase AC1 gene expressed alone or in combination with HCN2 and compared outcomes with those with single-gene HCN2 transfer. Methods and Results— We implanted adenoviral HCN2, AC1, or HCN2/AC1 constructs into the left bundle branches of atrioventricular-blocked dogs. During steady-state gene expression (days 5–7), differences between AC1, HCN2/AC1, and HCN2 alone were evident in basal beating rate, escape time, and dependence on electronic backup pacing. In HCN2, AC1, and HCN2/AC1, these parameters were as follows: basal beating rate: 50±1.5, 60±5.0, and 129±28.9 bpm (P<0.05 for HCN2/AC1 versus HCN2 or AC1 alone), respectively; escape time: 2.4±0.2, 1.3±0.2, and 1.1±.0.4 seconds (P<0.05 for AC1 and HCN2/AC1 versus HCN2); and percent electronic beats: 34±8%, 2±1%, and 6±2% (P<0.05 for AC1 and HCN2/AC1 versus HCN2). Instantaneous (SD1) and long-term (SD2) heart rate variability and circadian rhythm analyzed via 24-hour Holter recordings showed a shift toward greater sensitivity to parasympathetic modulation in animals injected with AC1 and a high degree of sympathetic modulation in animals injected with HCN2/AC1. Conclusion— AC1 or HCN2/AC1 overexpression in left bundle branches provides highly efficient biological pacing and greater sensitivity to autonomic modulation than HCN2 alone.

Biological pacemakers in canines exhibit positive chronotropic response to emotional arousal

BACKGROUND Biological pacemakers based on the HCN2 channel isoform respond to beta-adrenergic and muscarinic stimulation, suggesting a capacity to respond to autonomic input. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate autonomic response to emotional arousal in canines implanted with murine HCN2-based biological pacemakers using gene therapy. METHODS An electronic pacemaker was implanted with its lead in the right ventricular apical endocardium (VVI 35 bpm). An adenoviral HCN2/GFP construct (Ad-HCN2, n = 7) or saline (control, n = 5) was injected into the left bundle branch on day 2 after radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node to induce complete atrioventricular block. Emotional arousal was achieved by presenting food following an overnight fast. Autonomic control was evaluated with Poincaré plots of R-R(N) against R-R(N+1) intervals to characterize heart rate variability (HRV) and with continuous RR interval assessment via 24-hour ambulatory ECG. The 24-hour ECG and Poincaré plot shape were analyzed. RESULTS During day 1 after biological pacemaker implantation, Poincaré HRV parameters and RR intervals were unchanged with food presentation. However, on day 7, food presentation was accompanied by an increase in HRV (SD1, p < 0.07, and SD2, p < 0.05) and shortening of RR interval (P < .05) in dogs with Ad-HCN2 but not in controls. CONCLUSION This is the first demonstration that biological pacemakers are capable of responding to natural arousal stimuli to elicit appropriate chronotropic responses, a potential advantage over electronic pacemakers.

Expression of Skeletal Muscle Sodium Channel (Nav1.4) or Connexin32 Prevents Reperfusion Arrhythmias in Murine Heart

AIMS acute myocardial ischaemia induces a decrease in resting membrane potential [which leads to reduction of action potential (AP) V(max)] and intracellular acidification (which closes gap junctions). Both contribute to conduction slowing. We hypothesized that ventricular expression of the skeletal muscle Na(+) channel, Nav1.4 (which activates fully at low membrane potentials), or connexin32 (Cx32, which is less pH-sensitive than connexin43) would support conduction and be antiarrhythmic. We tested this hypothesis in a murine model of ischaemia and reperfusion arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS empty adenovirus (Sham) or adenoviral constructs expressing either SkM1 (gene encoding Nav1.4) or Cx32 genes were injected into the left ventricular wall. Four days later, ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred during reperfusion following a 5 min coronary occlusion. In Nav1.4- and Cx32-expressing mice, VT incidence and duration were lower than in Sham (P < 0.05). In vitro multisite microelectrode mapping was performed in the superfused right ventricular wall. To simulate ischaemic conditions, [K(+)] in solution was increased to 10 mmol/L and/or pH was decreased to 6.0. Western blots revealed Cx32 and Nav1.4 expression in both ventricles. Nav1.4 APs showed higher V(max) and conduction velocity (CV) than Shams at normal and elevated [K(+)]. Exposure of tissue to acid solution reduced intracellular pH to 6.4. There was no difference in CV between Sham and Cx32 groups in control solution. Acid solution slowed CV in Sham (P < 0.05) but not in Cx32. CONCLUSION Nav1.4 or Cx32 expression preserved normal conduction in murine hearts and decreased the incidence of reperfusion VT.

Ca2+-activated adenylyl cyclase 1 introduces Ca2+-dependence to beta-adrenergic stimulation of HCN2 current.

Previous observations show that β-adrenergic modulation of pacemaker current (I(f)) in sinoatrial node (SAN) cells is impaired by disruption of normal Ca(2+)-homeostasis with ryanodine or BAPTA. Recently, the presence of Ca(2+)-activated adenylyl cyclase (AC) 1 was reported in SAN, and was proposed as a possible mechanism of Ca(2+)-dependence of β-adrenergic modulation. However, direct evidence that pacemaker (HCN) channels can be regulated by Ca(2+)-activated AC and that such regulation introduces Ca(2+) dependence, is lacking. Here we co-expressed AC1 or AC6 with HCN2 in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes, which lack AC1. Although both isoforms have equivalent expression level and ability to interact with HCN2, only AC1 increases intracellular cAMP content, accelerates spontaneous beating rate and modifies HCN2 biophysics. Measured HCN2 current in the AC1 group activated ~10mV more positive than in GFP or AC6. The β-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol induced a further positive shift under control conditions, but failed to do so after pretreatment with the Ca(2+) chelator BAPTA. In the AC6 group, isoproterenol shifted the HCN2 activation relation to a similar extent in the absence and presence of BAPTA. Thus, AC1 but not AC6 over-expression introduces Ca(2+)-sensitivity to the β-adrenergic response of HCN2. These results demonstrate physical and functional interaction between AC isoforms and the HCN2 pacemaker channel and support a key role of Ca(2+) activated AC1 as a molecular mechanism in Ca(2+)-dependent modulation of β-adrenergic response of heart rate.

In vitro characterization of HCN channel kinetics and frequency dependence in myocytes predicts biological pacemaker functionality

The pacemaker current, mediated by hyperpolarization‐activated cyclic nucleotide‐gated (HCN) channels, contributes to the initiation and regulation of cardiac rhythm. Previous experiments creating HCN‐based biological pacemakers in vivo found that an engineered HCN2/HCN1 chimeric channel (HCN212) resulted in significantly faster rates than HCN2, interrupted by 1–5 s pauses. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the differences in HCN212 and HCN2 in vivo functionality as biological pacemakers, we studied newborn rat ventricular myocytes over‐expressing either HCN2 or HCN212 channels. The HCN2‐ and HCN212‐over‐expressing myocytes manifest similar voltage dependence, current density and sensitivity to saturating cAMP concentrations, but HCN212 has faster activation/deactivation kinetics. Compared with HCN2, myocytes expressing HCN212 exhibit a faster spontaneous rate and greater incidence of irregular rhythms (i.e. periods of rapid spontaneous rate followed by pauses). To explore these rhythm differences further, we imposed consecutive pacing and found that activation kinetics of the two channels are slower at faster pacing frequencies. As a result, time‐dependent HCN current flowing during diastole decreases for both constructs during a train of stimuli at a rapid frequency, with the effect more pronounced for HCN2. In addition, the slower deactivation kinetics of HCN2 contributes to more pronounced instantaneous current at a slower frequency. As a result of the frequency dependence of both instantaneous and time‐dependent current, HCN2 exhibits more robust negative feedback than HCN212, contributing to the maintenance of a stable pacing rhythm. These results illustrate the benefit of screening HCN constructs in spontaneously active myocyte cultures and may provide the basis for future optimization of HCN‐based biological pacemakers.

SkM1 and Cx32 improve conduction in canine myocardial infarcts yet only SkM1 is antiarrhythmic

AIMS Reentry accounts for most life-threatening arrhythmias, complicating myocardial infarction, and therapies that consistently prevent reentry from occurring are lacking. In this study, we compare antiarrhythmic effects of gene transfer of green fluorescent protein (GFP; sham), the skeletal muscle sodium channel (SkM1), the liver-specific connexin (Cx32), and SkM1/Cx32 in the subacute canine infarct. METHODS AND RESULTS Immediately after ligation of the left anterior descending artery, viral constructs were implanted in the epicardial border zone (EBZ). Five to 7 days later, efficient restoration of impulse propagation (narrow QRS and local electrogram duration) occurred in SkM1, Cx32, and SkM1/Cx32 groups (P< 0.05 vs. GFP). Programmed electrical stimulation from the EBZ induced sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 15/22 GFP dogs vs. 2/12 SkM1, 6/14 Cx32, and 8/10 SkM1/Cx32 (P< 0.05 SkM1 vs. GFP). GFP, SkM1, and SkM1/Cx32 had predominantly polymorphic VT/VF, whereas in Cx32 dogs, monomorphic VT predominated (P< 0.05 for Cx32 vs. GFP). Tetrazolium red staining showed significantly larger infarcts in Cx32- vs. GFP-treated animals (P< 0.05). CONCLUSION Whereas SkM1 gene transfer reduces the incidence of inducible VT/VF, Cx32 therapy to improve gap junctional conductance results in larger infarct size, a different VT morphology, and no antiarrhythmic efficacy.

Effect of Skeletal Muscle Na+ Channel Delivered Via a Cell Platform on Cardiac Conduction and Arrhythmia Induction

Background— In depolarized myocardial infarct epicardial border zones, the cardiac sodium channel is largely inactivated, contributing to slow conduction and reentry. We have demonstrated that adenoviral delivery of the skeletal muscle Na+ channel (SkM1) to epicardial border zones normalizes conduction and reduces induction of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. We now studied the impact of canine mesenchymal stem cells (cMSCs) in delivering SkM1. Methods and Results— cMSCs were isolated and transfected with SkM1. Coculture experiments showed cMSC/SkM1 but not cMSC alone and maintained fast conduction at depolarized potentials. We studied 3 groups in the canine 7d infarct: sham, cMSC, and cMSC/SkM1. In vivo epicardial border zones electrograms were broad and fragmented in sham, narrower in cMSCs, and narrow and unfragmented in cMSC/SkM1 (P<0.05). During programmed electrical stimulation of epicardial border zones, QRS duration in cMSC/SkM1 was shorter than in cMSC and sham (P<0.05). Programmed electrical stimulation–induced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation was equivalent in all groups (P>0.05). Conclusion— cMSCs provide efficient delivery of SkM1 current. The interventions performed (cMSCs or cMSC/SkM1) were neither antiarrhythmic nor proarrhythmic. Comparing outcomes with cMSC/SkM1 and viral gene delivery highlights the criticality of the delivery platform to SkM1 antiarrhythmic efficacy.