Yildiz

Accumulation of glucosylceramide in murine testis, caused by inhibition of beta-glucosidase 2: implications for spermatogenesis.

One of the hallmarks of male germ cell development is the formation of a specialized secretory organelle, the acrosome. This process can be pharmacologically disturbed in C57BL/6 mice, and thus infertility can be induced, by small molecular sugar-like compounds (alkylated imino sugars). Here the biochemical basis of this effect has been investigated. Our findings suggest that in vivo alkylated imino sugars primarily interact with the non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase. This enzyme cleaves glucosylceramide into glucose and ceramide, is sensitive to imino sugars in vitro, and has been characterized as β-glucosidase 2 (GBA2). Imino sugars raised the level of glucosylceramide in brain, spleen, and testis, in a dose-dependent fashion. In testis, multiple species of glucosylceramide were similarly elevated, those having long acyl chains (C16–24), as well as those with very long polyunsaturated acyl chains (C28–30:5). Both of these GlcCer species were also increased in the testes from GBA2-deficient mice. When considering that the very long polyunsaturated sphingolipids are restricted to germ cells, these results indicate that in the testis GBA2 is present in both somatic and germ cells. Furthermore, in all mouse strains tested imino sugar treatment caused a rise in testicular glucosylceramide, even in a number of strains, of which the males remain fertile after drug administration. Therefore, it appears that acrosome formation can be derailed by accumulation of glucosylceramide in an extralysosomal localization, and that the sensitivity of male germ cells to glucosylceramide is genetically determined.

The non-lysosomal beta-glucosidase GBA2 is a non-integral membrane-associated protein at the ER and Golgi

Background: The β-glucosidase GBA2 degrades glucosylceramide (GlcCer) outside the lysosomes. Results: GBA2 is not an integral membrane protein but rather is membrane-associated at the ER and Golgi. Conclusion: GBA2 is located in a key position for a lysosome-independent route of GlcCer-dependent signaling. Significance: Understanding the localization and enzymatic properties of GBA2 is crucial for investigating the role of non-lysosomal glucosylceramide in Gaucher disease pathology. GBA1 and GBA2 are both β-glucosidases, which cleave glucosylceramide (GlcCer) to glucose and ceramide. GlcCer is a main precursor for higher order glycosphingolipids but might also serve as intracellular messenger. Mutations in the lysosomal GBA1 underlie Gaucher disease, the most common lysosomal storage disease in humans. Knocking out the non-lysosomal GBA2 in mice results in accumulation of GlcCer outside the lysosomes in various tissues (e.g. testis and liver) and impairs sperm development and liver regeneration. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. To reveal the physiological function of GBA2 and, thereby, of the non-lysosomal GlcCer pool, it is important to characterize the localization of GBA2 and its activity in different tissues. Thus, we generated GBA2-specific antibodies and developed an assay that discriminates between GBA1 and GBA2 without the use of detergent. We show that GBA2 is not, as previously thought, an integral membrane protein but rather a cytosolic protein that tightly associates with cellular membranes. The interaction with the membrane, in particular with phospholipids, is important for its activity. GBA2 is localized at the ER and Golgi, which puts GBA2 in a key position for a lysosome-independent route of GlcCer-dependent signaling. Furthermore, our results suggest that GBA2 might affect the phenotype of Gaucher disease, because GBA2 activity is reduced in Gba1 knock-out fibroblasts and fibroblasts from a Gaucher patient. Our results provide the basis to understand the mechanism for GBA2 function in vivo and might help to unravel the role of GBA2 during pathogenesis of Gaucher disease.

CD40ligand‐expressing dendritic cells induce regression of hepatocellular carcinoma by activating innate and acquired immunity in vivo

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen‐presenting cells able to prime T‐cells against tumor‐associated antigens (TAA), but their potential to induce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) regression is still limited. CD40/CD40L interaction is essential for DC activation and induction of antigen‐specific T‐cells. In this study, transduction of TAA‐pulsed DC with a CD40L‐encoding adenovirus (Ad‐CD40L) was used to improve the immune response induced by DC toward HCC. Bone marrow–derived DC from C3H/HeNcrl mice were cultured with granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor and interleukin‐4. On day 6, tumor‐lysate pulsed DCs were infected with adenoviruses. HCCs were induced by inoculation of mice with Hepa129‐cells subcutaneously. When tumor‐volume was 100 to 400 mm3, DCs were injected intratumorally, subcutaneously, or intravenously. Ad‐CD40L transduction exerted CD40/CD40L interactions between DCs, increasing DC immunostimulation with up‐regulation of CD80/CD86‐ and interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) expression. Intratumoral injection of CD40L‐DC was superior to intravenous or subcutaneous treatments, yielding tumor elimination in almost 70% of mice. Moreover, all tumor‐free animals were protected against hepatic tumor cell rechallenge. In a preventive setting, subcutaneous injection of CD40L‐expressing DCs protected 50% of mice for more than 3 months toward tumor cell challenge. The induced immune response seemed to be dependent on cross‐priming with Th1‐lymphocytes in the lymph nodes, because transduced DCs were redetected in lymphoid tissues. In addition, immunohistochemistry of tumors indicated a significant tumor infiltration with CD4+, CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells. Tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes were tumor‐specific, as shown in interferon‐gamma (IFN‐γ) enzyme‐linked immunosorbent spot and T‐cell proliferation assays. Conclusion: Transduction of DCs with Ad‐CD40L increases significantly the stimulatory capacity of DCs. Intratumoral injection of DCs activates both acquired and innate immunity, inducing complete regression of established tumors and long‐term immunity against tumor recurrence. This approach improves the antitumoral potential of DCs. (HEPATOLOGY 2008.)

1-O-acylceramides are natural components of human and mouse epidermis

The lipid-rich stratum corneum functions as a barrier against pathogens and desiccation inter alia by an unbroken meshwork of extracellular lipid lamellae. These lamellae are composed of cholesterol, fatty acids, and ceramides (Cers) in an equimolar ratio. The huge class of skin Cers consists of three groups: group I, “classical” long and very long chain Cers; group II, ultra-long chain Cers; and group III, ω-esterified ultra-long chain Cers, which are esterified either with linoleic acid or with cornified envelope proteins and are required for the water permeability barrier. Here, we describe 1-O-acylceramides as a new class of epidermal Cers in humans and mice. These Cers contain, in both the N- and 1-O-position, long to very long acyl chains. They derive from the group I of classical Cers and make up 5% of all esterified Cers. Considering their chemical structure and hydrophobicity, we presume 1-O-acylceramides to contribute to the water barrier homeostasis. Biosynthesis of 1-O-acylceramides is not dependent on lysosomal phospholipase A2. However, glucosylceramide synthase deficiency was followed by a 7-fold increase of 1-O-acylceramides, which then contributed 30% to all esterified Cers. Furthermore, loss of neutral glucosylceramidase resulted in decreased levels of a 1-O-acylceramide subgroup. Therefore, we propose 1-O-acylceramides to be synthesized at endoplasmic reticulum-related sites.

Functional and genetic characterization of the non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase 2 as a modifier for Gaucher disease

BackgroundGaucher disease (GD) is the most common inherited lysosomal storage disorder in humans, caused by mutations in the gene encoding the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase (GBA1). GD is clinically heterogeneous and although the type of GBA1 mutation plays a role in determining the type of GD, it does not explain the clinical variability seen among patients. Cumulative evidence from recent studies suggests that GBA2 could play a role in the pathogenesis of GD and potentially interacts with GBA1.MethodsWe used a framework of functional and genetic approaches in order to further characterize a potential role of GBA2 in GD. Glucosylceramide (GlcCer) levels in spleen, liver and brain of GBA2-deficient mice and mRNA and protein expression of GBA2 in GBA1-deficient murine fibroblasts were analyzed. Furthermore we crossed GBA2-deficient mice with conditional Gba1 knockout mice in order to quantify the interaction between GBA1 and GBA2. Finally, a genetic approach was used to test whether genetic variation in GBA2 is associated with GD and/ or acts as a modifier in Gaucher patients. We tested 22 SNPs in the GBA2 and GBA1 genes in 98 type 1 and 60 type 2/3 Gaucher patients for single- and multi-marker association with GD.ResultsWe found a significant accumulation of GlcCer compared to wild-type controls in all three organs studied. In addition, a significant increase of Gba2-protein and Gba2-mRNA levels in GBA1-deficient murine fibroblasts was observed. GlcCer levels in the spleen from Gba1/Gba2 knockout mice were much higher than the sum of the single knockouts, indicating a cross-talk between the two glucosylceramidases and suggesting a partially compensation of the loss of one enzyme by the other. In the genetic approach, no significant association with severity of GD was found for SNPs at the GBA2 locus. However, in the multi-marker analyses a significant result was detected for p.L444P (GBA1) and rs4878628 (GBA2), using a model that does not take marginal effects into account.ConclusionsAll together our observations make GBA2 a likely candidate to be involved in GD etiology. Furthermore, they point to GBA2 as a plausible modifier for GBA1 in patients with GD.

Beta‐glucosidase 2 knockout mice with increased glucosylceramide show impaired liver regeneration

Glycolipids have been shown to serve specialized functions in cell signalling, proliferation and differentiation processes, which are all important during liver regeneration. We previously generated beta‐glucosidase 2 (GBA2) knockout mice that accumulate the glycolipid glucosylceramide in various tissues, including the liver. The present study addressed the role of GBA2‐deficiency and subsequent glucosylceramide accumulation in liver regeneration.

Accumulation of Glucosylceramide in the Absence of the Beta-Glucosidase GBA2 Alters Cytoskeletal Dynamics

Glycosphingolipids are key elements of cellular membranes, thereby, controlling a variety of cellular functions. Accumulation of the simple glycosphingolipid glucosylceramide results in life-threatening lipid storage-diseases or in male infertility. How glucosylceramide regulates cellular processes is ill defined. Here, we reveal that glucosylceramide accumulation in GBA2 knockout-mice alters cytoskeletal dynamics due to a more ordered lipid organization in the plasma membrane. In dermal fibroblasts, accumulation of glucosylceramide augments actin polymerization and promotes microtubules persistence, resulting in a higher number of filopodia and lamellipodia and longer microtubules. Similar cytoskeletal defects were observed in male germ and Sertoli cells from GBA2 knockout-mice. In particular, the organization of F-actin structures in the ectoplasmic specialization and microtubules in the sperm manchette is affected. Thus, glucosylceramide regulates cytoskeletal dynamics, providing mechanistic insights into how glucosylceramide controls signaling pathways not only during sperm development, but also in other cell types.

Beta-glucosidase 1 (GBA1) is a second bile acid β-glucosidase in addition to β-glucosidase 2 (GBA2). Study in β-glucosidase deficient mice and humans

Beta-glucosidase 1 (GBA1; lysosomal glucocerebrosidase) and β-glucosidase 2 (GBA2, non-lysosomal glucocerebrosidase) both have glucosylceramide as a main natural substrate. The enzyme-deficient conditions with glucosylceramide accumulation are Gaucher disease (GBA-/- in humans), modelled by the Gba-/- mouse, and the syndrome with male infertility in the Gba2-/- mouse, respectively. Before the leading role of glucosylceramide was recognised for both deficient conditions, bile acid-3-O-β-glucoside (BG), another natural substrate, was viewed as the main substrate of GBA2. Given that GBA2 hydrolyses both BG and glucosylceramide, it was asked whether vice versa GBA1 hydrolyses both glucosylceramide and BG. Here we show that GBA1 also hydrolyses BG. We compared the residual BG hydrolysing activities in the GBA1-/-, Gba1-/- conditions (where GBA2 is the almost only active β-glucosidase) and those in the Gba2-/- condition (GBA1 active), with wild-type activities, but we used also the GBA1 inhibitor isofagomine. GBA1 and GBA2 activities had characteristic differences between the studied fibroblast, liver and brain samples. Independently, the hydrolysis of BG by pure recombinant GBA1 was shown. The fact that both GBA1 and GBA2 are glucocerebrosidases as well as bile acid β-glucosidases raises the question, why lysosomal accumulation of glucosylceramide in GBA1 deficiency, and extra-lysosomal accumulation in GBA2 deficiency, are not associated with an accumulation of BG in either condition.

Knock-Out of β-Glucosidase 2 Has No Influence on Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis

Background/Aims: The non-lysosomal glucosylceramidase, β-glucosidase (Gba2), hydrolyzes glucosylceramide to glucose and ceramide (Cer). Cer is a potent second-messenger lipid that plays an important role in signaling cascades involved in apoptosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Gba2 knock-out (Gba2–/–) affects the extent of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Methods: Acute colitis was induced in wild-type (WT) and Gba2–/– mice by administration of 2% DSS in drinking water. After 7 days, mice underwent colonoscopy and were sacrificed. Results: Both DSS-treated WT (n = 10) and Gba2–/– (n = 12) mice showed elevated histological and endoscopic scores compared to respective H2O controls (n = 9 each). However, no significant differences between the DSS groups were detected. Flow cytometric analysis of propidium iodide staining, cleavage of caspases-3 and -8, indicative for apoptosis, as well as Cer levels were not altered in DSS-treated WT or Gba2–/– mice. Gba2–/– resulted in slightly decreased expression of glucocerebrosidase (Gba1) as well as in upregulation of proteins being involved in cellular regeneration, such as STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription), JNK and iNOS, upon DSS treatment. Conclusion: We demonstrate that Gba2–/– does not affect the extent of DSS-induced inflammation in mice, however, it might be involved in tissue regeneration in response to toxic agents.

High β-glucosidase (GBA) activity not attributable to GBA1 and GBA2 in live normal and enzyme-deficient fibroblasts may emphasise the role of additional GBAs.

Abstract Beta-glucosidases (GBA) include GBA1, GBA2 and other β-glucosidases (non-GBA1-2). GBA1 is a lysosomal and GBA2 an extra-lysosomal enzyme. GBA1- and GBA2-deficient genetic conditions, with different phenotypes, are glucosylceramide (GC; the main GBA substrate) accumulating diseases. To study the activity profile of GBA, live fibroblasts were loaded with radioactive GC. The GC metabolism was measured in wild-type, GBA1-deficient (Gaucher disease) and GBA2-deficient (Gba2-/- mouse) cells. The differences found allowed the prediction of marked proportions of GBA1, GBA2, and particularly non-GBA1-2 (probably including GBA3, a cytosolic β-glucosidase) activity for wild-type cells. The high proportion of non-GBA1-2 suggests an important role of these enzymes.