Yong Wook Lee

The Japanese challenge to the American neoliberal world order : identity, meaning, and foreign policy

@fmhi:Contents @toc4:List of Tables iii Acknowledgments iii List of Abbreviations iii @toc2:1. The Japanese Challenge to the American Neoliberal World Order 000 2. Alternative Explanations 000 3. Identity and Intention Framework 000 4. Who and What Is Normal in the History of the World Economy? Marxism, Economic Liberalism, and Developmentalism 000 5. Binarization of Economic Development Identities: Japan and the East Asian Miracle 000 6. Japan and the Asian Monetary Fund 000 7. Conclusion: After the Asian Monetary Fund 000 @toc4:Notes 000 Select Bibliography 000 Index 000

The Japanese challenge to neoliberalism: Who and what is ‘normal’ in the history of the world economy?

ABSTRACT Since the end of the Cold War, the US has spearheaded the homogenization of the world economy along neoliberal lines. The US-led neoliberal international order, however, did not go unchallenged. Since the late 1980s, Japan has challenged the foundation of the neoliberal international order by asserting the role of the state in economic development. In the vein of constructivist scholarship with emphasis on the meaning-oriented discursive production of the world that has social effects, I ask the question of what made it possible for Japan to challenge neoliberalism. To answer this question, I examine the Japanese developmentalist discourse to uncover a historically constructed collective meaning that enabled the Japanese challenge to be conceivable as a justificatory foundation. I find a shared, intersubjective meaning called ‘normalcy,’ which the Japanese developmentalists have historically attached to the role of the state in economic development. Here ‘normalcy’ means that state-led economic development has been a normal practice for all the successful industrializers in the history of the world economy. In the eyes of the Japanese developmentalists, what is truly ‘normal’ or ‘universal’ is the proven validity of state-led economic development across time and space. I argue that this shared ‘normalcy’ meaning available in the Japanese developmentalist discourse creates the very possibility of the Japanese challenge.

Soft Power as Productive Power

How does soft power work? What is the relationship between hard power and soft power? What is the relationship between the sources of soft power and the actual practice of soft power? What, then, does it mean to increase soft power as a foreign policy? These are the key questions on soft power that have been hotly debated ever since Nye coined the term “soft power” in a 1990 publication.1 The questions are interrelated, often complicated and conflated.