Yoshiro Tamegai

Endoscopic mucosal resection of the colon: the Japanese technique.

Early colorectal neoplasms, especially flat-type and depressed-type lesions, should be treated with an EMR technique. In general because depressed-type lesions, in contrast to flat-type or protruded-type lesions, tend to invade the submucosa rapidly, they ought to be treated by EMR at an early stage. Histopathologically in the case of lesions that only minimally invade the submucosa without vessel invasion (sm1a and sm1b without vessel invasion), a treatment can be completed with EMR. Massive submucosal invasive cancers ought to be resected by surgical treatment because of the risk of recurrence or metastasis. In addition, pit pattern diagnosis with magnifying colonoscopy is useful to determine a therapeutic method for colonic neoplasms. Lesions with the type VN pit pattern represent malignancy and usually invade the submucosa massively, so it is better to treat them surgically from the outset. Endoscopic mucosal resection should be conducted under fully controlled endoscopy to prevent complications. EMR is a superior therapeutic method and will be performed frequently in the future. It is necessary for colonoscopists to determine a suitable therapy for each colorectal neoplastic lesion. They also need to master the EMR technique in the correct manner.

MULTICENTER QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY ON THE CURRENT SITUATION OF COLORECTAL ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION IN JAPAN

In order to understand the current use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of colorectal tumors in Japan, we administered a questionnaire survey to 1356 institutions all over the country. The subject of the survey was colorectal ESD performed from January 2000 to September 2008. Among the 1356 institutions, 391 (28.8%) responded to the questionnaire, and colorectal ESD was currently being performed in 194 institutions. The 194 institutions were almost equally distributed in Japan, that is, colorectal ESD has been performed all over the country. Among these 194 institutions, the procedure had been performed in 100 or more cases in 22 (11.3%) institutions and in 50–99 cases in 18 institutions (9.3%). The knives used in colorectal ESD were the Hook knife, Flush knife, and Flex knife. The average time required for colorectal ESD was 92.2 min, the rate of complete en bloc resection was 83.8%, the perforation rate was 4.8%, and no case of death from complications was reported.

Risk factors for bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms

AIM To investigate the risk factors for delayed bleeding following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) treatment for colorectal neoplasms. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 317 consecutive patients with 325 lesions who underwent ESD for superficial colorectal neoplasms at our hospital from January 2009 to June 2013. Delayed post-ESD bleeding was defined as bleeding that resulted in overt hematochezia 6 h to 30 d after ESD and the observation of bleeding spots as confirmed by repeat colonoscopy or a required blood transfusion. We analyzed the relationship between risk factors for delayed bleeding following ESD and the following factors using univariate and multivariate analyses: age, gender, presence of comorbidities, use of antithrombotic drugs, use of intravenous heparin, resected specimen size, lesion size, lesion location, lesion morphology, lesion histology, the device used, procedure time, and the presence of significant bleeding during ESD. RESULTS Delayed post-ESD bleeding was found in 14 lesions from 14 patients (4.3% of all specimens, 4.4% patients). Patients with episodes of delayed post-ESD bleeding had a mean hemoglobin decrease of 2.35 g/dL. All episodes were treated successfully using endoscopic hemostatic clips. Emergency surgery was not required in any of the cases. Blood transfusion was needed in 1 patient (0.3%). Univariate analysis revealed that lesions located in the cecum (P = 0.012) and the presence of significant bleeding during ESD (P = 0.024) were significantly associated with delayed post-ESD bleeding. The risk of delayed bleeding was higher for larger lesion sizes, but this trend was not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis revealed that lesions located in the cecum (OR = 7.26, 95%CI: 1.99-26.55, P = 0.003) and the presence of significant bleeding during ESD (OR = 16.41, 95%CI: 2.60-103.68, P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for delayed post-ESD bleeding. CONCLUSION Location in the cecum and significant bleeding during ESD predispose patients to delayed post-procedural bleeding. Therefore, careful and additional management is recommended for these patients.

New technique of en bloc resection of colorectal tumor using laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperatively (laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery - colorectal).

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Various factors make complete en bloc resection by endoscopic techniques alone of some laterally spreading colorectal tumors difficult or unsafe. Drawing on recent radical developments in endoscopic and laparoscopic techniques for managing colorectal lesions, we aimed to develop a safe resection procedure by using a combination of laparoscopy and endoscopy. We have named this procedure laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative colorectal surgery. PATIENTS: We have performed this procedure on 3patients who had laterally spreading colorectal tumors. The factors contraindicating endoscopic submucosal dissection were submucosal fibrosis because of previous endoscopic mucosal resection in 1 patient and multiple surrounding diverticula in 2 patients. TECHNIQUE: The patient is placed under general anesthesia and 5 ports are inserted. Following confirmation of the tumor location by endoscopy and laparoscopy, the colon wall at this site is exposed. First, a mucosa-to-submucosa dissection circumferential to the lesion with an appropriate safety margin is performed endoscopically. Complete full-thickness dissection and excision is then performed by using ultrasonic activating scissors, endoscopy, and laparoscopy cooperatively. The excised lesion is withdrawn intraluminally with endoscopic forceps. The opened colon is then closed with laparoscopic linear staplers. RESULTS: The mean operating time and blood loss in this series were 205 minutes and 13 mL. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Histological examination revealed tubular adenomas with severe dysplasia and adequate surgical margins in all cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative colorectal surgery involves removal of a minimal length of colon and is a feasible procedure for en bloc resection of some colonic lateral spreading tumors that would be difficult to resect endoscopically.

Diagnosis of laterally spreading tumors (LST) in the rectum and selection of treatment: Characteristics of each of the subclassifications of LST in the rectum

In recent years, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has often been used for the treatment of laterally spreading tumors (LST) of the rectum. The present study was carried out with the aim of clarifying the characteristics of each of the subtypes of LST in the rectum that are often treated by ESD.

Efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in patients with radiation-induced rectal ulcers: Report of five cases

For decades, hyperbaric oxygen therapy has been considered a treatment option in patients with chronic radiation‐induced proctitis after pelvic radiation therapy. Refractory cases of chronic radiation‐induced proctitis include ulceration, stenosis, and intestinal fistulas with perforation. Appropriate treatment needs to be given. In the present study, we assessed the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in five patients with radiation‐induced rectal ulcers. Significant improvement and complete ulcer resolution were observed in all treated patients; no side‐effects were reported. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy has a low toxicity profile and appears to be highly effective in patients with radiation‐induced rectal ulcers. However, hyperbaric oxygen therapy alone failed to improve telangiectasia and easy bleeding in four of the five patients; these patients were further treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC). Although hyperbaric oxygen therapy may be effective in healing patients with ulcers, it seems inadequate in cases with easy bleeding. Altogether, these data suggest that combination therapy with hyperbaric oxygen therapy and APC may be an effective and safe treatment strategy in patients with radiation‐induced rectal ulcers.