Yosuke Kato

Anticipation of umbistoma in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection: Ileostomy and ostomy closure

Objective: The use of laparoscopic surgery for rectal disease is expected to provide good cosmetic benefits for patients postoperatively. However, this expectation is significantly reduced when a diverting ileostomy is created. We present a new technique that reduces the size of the skin wound by constructing a diverting ileostomy in the umbilicus. This procedure, diverting umbilical ileostomy (umbistoma) does not require special tools for its construction and closure. Methods: Twenty-nine patients underwent treatment with umbilical diverting stoma, including five women and 24 men, with a mean age of 70 years (range: 40-88 years). At the time of ostomy closure, a new umbilicus was formed by subcutaneously suturing the wound to the fascia. In addition, we did not close the new umbilical upper and lower spaces, so as to allow open drainage of the healing wound. Results: All procedures were completed successfully without any perioperative complications. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the umbilical diverting stoma could provide improved safety and cosmetic advantages in laparoscopic rectal resection.

Laparoscopic repair of a large perineal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: A case report: Repair of a large perineal hernia

A 75‐year‐old woman underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Four months after abdominoperineal resection, the patient complained of a perineal bulge and urination disorder. Abdominal CT showed protrusion of the small intestine and bladder to the perineum. The patient underwent laparoscopic hernia repair with mesh. The size of the hernial orifice was 7.0 × 9.0 cm, and it had no solid rim. The mesh was tacked ventrally to the pectineal ligament and dorsally to the sacrum, and then sutured on the lateral side. The hernia has not recurred 10 months after the operation. Laparoscopic repair is a good treatment choice for secondary perineal hernia and fixing the mesh to the pectineal ligament, and the sacrum prevents the mesh from sagging.

Laparoscopic versus Open stoma creation: A retrospective analysis

Objectives: This study aimed to compare open stoma (OS) creation with laparoscopic stoma (LS) creation considering the operation time, blood loss, time of oral intake, and complications. We also compared multiport LS and single-incision laparoscopic stoma (SILS) creation. Methods: We reviewed the demographic data, diagnosis, indications, operation time, blood loss, time of oral intake, operative procedure, and complications of 50 patients who underwent stoma creation between April 2014 and April 2016. Results: The mean blood loss was significantly lower in the LS group (7.85±18.4 ml) than in the OS group (38.1±73.2 ml; P=0.02). There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of the operation time (LS, 72.1±32.7 min; OS, 61.2±31.2 min; P=0.23) or time of oral intake (LS, 1.0±0 days; OS, 1.91±2.71 days; P=0.17). Peristomal skin problems occurred in 11 patients (47.8%) in the OS group and 5 patients (18.5%) in the LS group. There were no statistically significant differences between the SILS and multiport LS groups, considering the operation time, amount of bleeding, and time of oral intake. Conclusions: LS is comparable with OS in terms of operation time and time of oral intake and may cause lesser blood loss. Considering its advantages, LS is a useful approach for patients requiring biopsies or intra-abdominal inspection. SILS is a minimally invasive technique, suitable for patients in whom the stoma site is preoperatively decided.