Yu-Cheng Hsieh

Dosage of statin, cardiovascular comorbidities, and risk of atrial fibrillation: A nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND Statin has potential protective effects against atrial fibrillation. Clinically, there is a need to predict the atrial fibrillation protective effects in statin-treated patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate if cardiovascular co-morbidities or cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs) of statin use could predict statin efficacy in atrial fibrillation prevention. METHODS Patients aged ≥ 50 years were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Medical records of 171,885 patients were used in this study, and 40,001 (23.3%) of the patients received statin therapy (≥ 28 cDDDs). Risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in statin users and non-users (<28 cDDDs) was estimated. RESULTS During the 9-year follow-up period, 6049 patients experienced new-onset atrial fibrillation. Overall, statin therapy reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation by 28% (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.77). There was a dose-response relationship between statin use and the risk of atrial fibrillation. The adjusted HRs for atrial fibrillation were 1.04, 0.85, and 0.50 when cDDDs ranged from 28 to 90, 91 to 365, and more than 365, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that statin use was more beneficial in patients with higher CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc scores than those with a score of 0 (P value for interaction<0.001). The therapy provided no obvious beneficial effect in those with a CHADS2 score of 0, a CHA2DS2VASc score of 0, or cDDDs less than 91. CONCLUSIONS Statin therapy reduces the risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in a dose-dependent manner, and is beneficial in patients with cardiovascular co-morbidities.

Statin therapy reduces the risk of ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and mortality in heart failure patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

the drug. Therefore, one should always have in mind that during treatment of systemic inflammatory, neoplastic or hematological diseases with monoclonal antibodies the production of anti-drug antibodies is a reality. These antibodies can cause hypersensitivity reactions, worsen overt or incipient heart failure [11] and induce myocardial infarction manifesting as Kounis syndrome [3]. The authors of this manuscript have certified that they comply with the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology.

Fulminant myocarditis in an adult with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1 influenza) infection

The worldwide outbreak of pandemic influenza A (H1N1 influenza) infection in 2009 caused numerous hospitalizations and deaths resulting from severe complications such as pneumonia, sepsis, and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Fulminant myocarditis caused by H1N1 infection has been reported in children but rarely in adults. We present an adult who contracted H1N1 infection followed by fulminant myocarditis. Early implementation of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation support in conjunction with a specific anti-influenza viral medication (Oseltamivir) led to the patients complete recovery from cardiogenic shock in 2 weeks.

Resistant Hypertension, Patient Characteristics, and Risk of Stroke

Background Little is known about the prognosis of resistant hypertension (RH) in Asian population. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of RH in Taiwanese patients with hypertension, and to ascertain whether patient characteristics influence the association of RH with adverse outcomes. Methods and Results Patients aged ≥45 years with hypertension were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Medical records of 111,986 patients were reviewed in this study, and 16,402 (14.6%) patients were recognized as having RH (continuously concomitant use of ≥3 anti-hypertensive medications, including a diuretic, for ≥2 years). Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndrome, and stroke [included both fatal and nonfatal events]) in patients with RH and non-RH was analyzed. A total of 11,856 patients experienced MACE in the follow-up period (average 7.1±3.0 years). There was a higher proportion of females in the RH group, they were older than the non-RH (63.1 vs. 60.5 years) patients, and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular co-morbidities. Overall, patients with RH had higher risks of MACE (adjusted HR 1.17; 95%CI 1.09–1.26; p<0.001). Significantly elevated risks of stroke (10,211 events; adjusted HR 1.17; 95%CI 1.08–1.27; p<0.001), especially ischemic stroke (6,235 events; adjusted HR 1.34; 95%CI 1.20–1.48; p<0.001), but not all-cause mortality (4,594 events; adjusted HR 1.06; 95%CI 0.95–1.19; p = 0.312) or acute coronary syndrome (2,145 events; adjusted HR 1.17; 95%CI 0.99–1.39; p = 0.070) were noted in patients with RH compared to those with non-RH. Subgroup analysis showed that RH increased the risks of stroke in female and elderly patients. However, no significant influence was noted in young or male patients. Conclusions Patients with RH were associated with higher risks of MACE and stroke, especially ischemic stroke. The risks were greater in female and elderly patients than in male or young patients.

Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor, and Risks of Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Abstract Both angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) have protective effects against atrial fibrillation (AF). The differences between ARB and ACEI in their effects on the primary prevention of AF remain unclear. This study compared ARB and ACEI in combined antihypertensive medications for reducing the risk of AF in patients with hypertension, and determined which was better for AF prevention in a nationwide cohort study. Patients aged ≥55 years and with a history of hypertension were identified from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Medical records of 25,075 patients were obtained, and included 6205 who used ARB, 8034 who used ACEI, and 10,836 nonusers (no ARB or ACEI) in their antihypertensive regimen. Cox regression models were applied to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for new-onset AF. During an average of 7.7 years’ follow-up, 1619 patients developed new-onset AF. Both ARB (adjusted HR: 0.51, 95% CI 0.44–0.58, P < 0.001) and ACEI (adjusted HR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.47–0.59, P < 0.001) reduced the risk of AF compared to nonusers. Subgroup analysis showed that ARB and ACEI were equally effective in preventing new-onset AF regardless of age, gender, the presence of heart failure, diabetes, and vascular disease, except for those with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). ARB prevents new-onset AF better than ACEI in patients with a history of stroke or TIA (log-rank P = 0.012). Both ARB and ACEI reduce new-onset AF in patients with hypertension. ARB prevents AF better than ACEI in patients with a history of prior stroke or TIA.

Short-term Follow-up Results of Drug-eluting Stenting in Premature Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Multiple Atherosclerotic Risk Factors

Background: Premature coronary artery disease (CAD) is a special entity with a strong link to familial hypercholesterolemia, family history of premature CAD, or multiple coexistent atherosclerotic risk factors. Drug‐eluting stenting (DES), including paclitaxel‐eluting stenting (PES) and sirolimus‐eluting stenting (SES), has been proven to have a lower restenotic rate. However, to date, few studies have investigated the clinical and angiographic results of DES in premature CAD patients. Methods: Between February 2004 and October 2005, premature CAD patients, defined as those younger than 50 years ofage, who were treated with DES in our medical center were all retrospectively enrolled. Their baseline clinical characteristics, clinical outcome and angiographic follow‐up results were analyzed. Results: A total of 26 patients (M/F: 23/3) were enrolled, with a mean age of 44 ±6 years (range, 24–50 years). Conventional atherosclerotic risk factors were prevalent in this study group, including diabetes mellitus (35%), hypertension (35%), hyperlipidemia (54%) and smoking (73%). Moreover, there was 1 homozygous and 1 heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia case in our study group. In terms of angiographic results, there were 40 target lesions in 34 target vessels. Forty DES (39 PES, 1 SES) were implanted with a median stent diameter of 3 mm and median length of 24 mm. The clinical follow‐up was counted up to May 2006, with a mean follow‐up duration of 540 ±168 days; 11 (42%) patients had a second angiogram during the follow‐up period (200 ±98 days after DES). None of the patients had target lesion revascularization (TLR). In addition, there was no difference in TLR or stent thrombosis between patients with or without acute coronary syndrome. Conclusion: Based on our single‐center experience, DES had good short‐term follow‐up results for a premature CAD group with diverse and multiple atherosclerotic risk factors.

Age and CHADS2 Score Predict the Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockers on Primary Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers have potential protective effects against atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to determine if patient characteristics and underlying co-morbidities could predict the efficacy of RAS blockers in AF prevention. Patients aged ≥ 45 years with hypertension were identified from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. After propensity-score matching, a total of 22,324 patients were included in this study. Risk of new-onset AF in RAS blockers users and non-users was estimated. During up to 10 years of follow-up, 1,475 patients experienced new-onset AF. Overall, RAS blockers reduced the risk of AF by 36% (adjusted HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.71; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that RAS blockers use was beneficial for AF prevention in patients aged ≥ 55 years or with a CHADS2 score of 1, 2, or 3. The therapy provided no obvious beneficial effect for AF prevention in those aged less than 55 years or with a CHADS2 score ≥ 4. In conclusion, RAS blockers reduced the risk of new-onset AF in patients aged ≥ 55 years or with a CHADS2 score of 1, 2, or 3, but not in patients aged less than 55 years or with a CHADS2 score ≥ 4.

Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation: Guided by CHADS2/CHA2DS2VASc Score.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The anti-arrhythmic effect of statins on AF prevention appears to be highly significant in most clinical studies. However, some discrepancies do exist among different clinical studies. Different clinical settings and types of stains used may explain these differences between trials. The CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc scoring systems have been used for stroke risk stratification in AF patients. The recent study suggested that these scores can also be used to guide statin therapy for AF prevention. Patients with higher scores had a higher risk of developing AF and gained more benefits from statins therapy than those with lower scores. This review article focused on the ability of these scores to predict AF prevention by statins.

Acute massive pulmonary embolism after radiofrequency catheter ablation: A rare complication after a common procedure

A 41-year-old man received an electrophysiological study (EPS) and radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) in our hospital. Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) with hypotension developed 9 hours after these procedures. After emergent pulmonary angiography and catheter-directed intrathrombus urokinase infusion and clot breaking, the patient recovered well. This case suggests that life-threatening PE may occur in patients who receive EPS, RFCA, or both. An adequate observation time after RFCA and clinical alertness are necessary for immediate diagnosis and treatment. Emergent catheter-directed therapy may be of benefit in some patients with acute massive PE.

Rhythm control better prevents stroke and mortality than rate control strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation - A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of stroke and mortality. However, rhythm control strategy did not reduce cardiovascular risks in short-term studies. We hypothesize that rhythm control better prevents stroke and mortality than rate control in AF patients over a long-term period. METHODS AF patients aged ≥18 years were identified from Taiwan National Insurance Database. Patients using anti-arrhythmia drugs to control rhythm at a >30 defined daily dose (DDD) were defined as the rhythm control group. Patients who used rate control medications for >30 DDDs constituted the rate control group. Multivariate Cox hazards regression model was used to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke and mortality. RESULTS A total of 11,968 AF patients were enrolled, and 2850 of them (654 in rhythm control group; 2196 in rate control group) were analyzed. During a 6.3 ± 3.7 years follow-up, a total of 1101 MACE occurred. Compared to rate control group, rhythm control group displayed a lower rate of ischemic stroke (adjusted HR: 0.65, p = 0.002) and mortality (adjusted HR: 0.81, p = 0.009). The rhythm control group showed a lower incidence of MACE than that of the rate control group (adjusted HR: 0.82, p = 0.009). The reduction of stroke (p = 0.004), mortality (p = 0.006), and MACE (p = 0.007) risk was observed particularly in rhythm control patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥3. CONCLUSIONS In patients with AF, rhythm control better prevents MACE risk than rate control over a long-term period, particularly in those at high risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥3) for stroke.