Yuki Hosono

Vitiligo in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma treated with nivolumab: A case report

Nivolumab, an anti-programmed cell death-1 protein monoclonal antibody, is effective for treating patients with late-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab induce various kinds of immune-related adverse events, including vitiligo. Vitiligo has been reported in patients with melanoma but not lung cancer. We describe a 75-year-old man with lung adenocarcinoma, stage 4 with pleural and pericardial effusion, that progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Subsequently, he was treated with nivolumab as second-line therapy. After 6days of administering nivolumab, he developed vitiligo suddenly on the trunk of his body. Except for vitiligo, his physical examination was normal, and treatment with nivolumab was well tolerated. Therefore, this treatment was continued without further development or expansion of vitiligo. A computed tomography scan showed a reduction in the size of the lung nodule and stabilization of the pleural and pericardial effusion. This is the first case of vitiligo associated with the use of nivolumab in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma.

Case series of pleomorphic carcinomas of the lung treated with nivolumab

Pleomorphic carcinoma (PC) of the lung is a rare type of non‐small cell lung cancer, exhibiting aggressive behavior and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A previous study reported that PCs expressed high levels of PD‐L1, suggesting the potential efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these tumors. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of three patients with PC of the lung treated with nivolumab: a 59‐year‐old woman (Case 1), a 66‐year‐old man (Case 2), and an 83‐year‐old man (Case 3). PD‐L1 was highly expressed in their tumor cells. Two cases showed a partial response with long progression‐free survival. However, in Case 2, brain and bone metastases progressed during nivolumab treatment in spite of high PD‐L1 expression. This case series indicates that nivolumab is effective to some extent for PC of the lung. However, the clinical course of patients treated with nivolumab should be carefully observed, even when PD‐L1 is highly expressed.

Three Cases of Idiopathic Diffuse Pulmonary Ossification

Diffuse pulmonary ossification (DPO) is an uncommon diffuse lung disease characterized by metaplastic bone formation in the lung parenchyma and is rarely diagnosed in life. While DPO usually occurs as a secondary disease, idiopathic cases are extremely rare. We describe three cases of idiopathic DPO, two of which were definitively diagnosed by surgical lung biopsy. One case was observed in a 43-year-old man with a history of recurrent pneumothorax who developed pneumothorax after the surgical biopsy. Few reports have described cases of DPO with recurrent pneumothorax; however, pneumothorax should be considered as a potential complication when such patients are encountered.

Post-progression survival after cessation of treatment with nivolumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study

Objectives The effectiveness of treatment after cessation of nivolumab in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well investigated. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical benefit of post-nivolumab treatment in such patients. Materials and methods A retrospective review was conducted on patients who received treatment after cessation of nivolumab due to disease progression or adverse events at the Toneyama National Hospital between January 2016 and April 2017. Results Among 64 patients treated with nivolumab, 26 patients received treatment after cessation of nivolumab due to disease progression (n = 21) or adverse events (n = 5). The median age of the patients was 68 years and 19 patients were male. Nineteen patients had performance status (PS) 1 or less at initiation of post-nivolumab treatment. Four, 20, and 2 patients were treated with platinum doublets, a single agent, and molecular targeting agents, respectively. Response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival of first-line post-nivolumab treatment were 34.6% (9 patients), 73.1% (19 patients), and 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7–5.2), respectively. Adverse events (≥ grade 3) and treatment cessation were observed in 57.7% (15 patients) and 19.2% (5 patients), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for the majority of patient characteristics between the groups with (n = 26) and without post-nivolumab treatment. However, PS at cessation of nivolumab and post-progression survival (PPS) after cessation of nivolumab (median PPS: 12.6 vs. 1.4 months, 95% CI: 3.8–14.7 vs. 0.4–2.2) were significantly different between the groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed significant correlation of PS at cessation of nivolumab (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13–0.87) and post-nivolumab treatment (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.08–0.43) with prolonged PPS after nivolumab. Conclusion Median post-progression survival in patients with advanced NSCLC who received post-nivolumab treatment was approximately 1 year.

Radiation Pneumonitis with Eosinophilic Alveolitis in a Lung Cancer Patient

A 59-year-old woman suffering from dry cough and dyspnea was admitted to our hospital. She had undergone concurrent chemo-radiotherapy five months earlier. Chest computed tomography revealed bilateral ground-glass opacities extending outside the irradiated lung field. Her eosinophil numbers were increased in both the peripheral blood and the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; therefore, she was diagnosed with radiation pneumonitis accompanied by eosinophilic alveolitis. Steroid therapy promptly improved the pneumonitis. Radiation pneumonitis accompanied by eosinophilic alveolitis extending outside the irradiated field is rare. Bronchoalveolar lavage is useful for a diagnosis, and steroid therapy is effective for treatment.

Febrile neutropenia with bacterial paronychia

The symptoms of infection can be minimal or absent in patients with febrile neutropenia at first. The focal site of infection, which may be the main cause of a fever or be a complication of neutropenia, can develop as neutrophils increase during the clinical course of febrile neutropenia.