Yunyao Li
University of Maryland, College Park
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Yunyao Li.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Megan M. Bela; M. C. Barth; Owen B. Toon; Alan Fried; Cameron R. Homeyer; Hugh Morrison; Kristin A. Cummings; Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; Dale J. Allen; Qing Yang; Paul O. Wennberg; John D. Crounse; Jason M. St. Clair; Alex P. Teng; Daniel W. O'Sullivan; L. Gregory Huey; Dexian Chen; Xiaoxi Liu; D. R. Blake; Nicola J. Blake; Eric C. Apel; Rebecca S. Hornbrook; F. Flocke; Teresa L. Campos; Glenn S. Diskin
We examine wet scavenging of soluble trace gases in storms observed during the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) field campaign. We conduct high-resolution simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) of a severe storm in Oklahoma. The model represents well the storm location, size, and structure as compared with Next Generation Weather Radar reflectivity, and simulated CO transport is consistent with aircraft observations. Scavenging efficiencies (SEs) between inflow and outflow of soluble species are calculated from aircraft measurements and model simulations. Using a simple wet scavenging scheme, we simulate the SE of each soluble species within the error bars of the observations. The simulated SEs of all species except nitric acid (HNO_3) are highly sensitive to the values specified for the fractions retained in ice when cloud water freezes. To reproduce the observations, we must assume zero ice retention for formaldehyde (CH_2O) and hydrogen peroxide (H_2O_2) and complete retention for methyl hydrogen peroxide (CH_3OOH) and sulfur dioxide (SO_2), likely to compensate for the lack of aqueous chemistry in the model. We then compare scavenging efficiencies among storms that formed in Alabama and northeast Colorado and the Oklahoma storm. Significant differences in SEs are seen among storms and species. More scavenging of HNO_3 and less removal of CH_3OOH are seen in storms with higher maximum flash rates, an indication of more graupel mass. Graupel is associated with mixed-phase scavenging and lightning production of nitrogen oxides (NO_x), processes that may explain the observed differences in HNO_3 and CH_3OOH scavenging.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Alan Fried; M. C. Barth; Megan M. Bela; Petter Weibring; Dirk Richter; James G. Walega; Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; Eric C. Apel; Rebecca S. Hornbrook; Alan J. Hills; Daniel D. Riemer; Nicola J. Blake; D. R. Blake; Jason R. Schroeder; Zhengzhao Johnny Luo; J. H. Crawford; J. R. Olson; S. Rutledge; Daniel P. Betten; M. I. Biggerstaff; Glenn S. Diskin; G. W. Sachse; Teresa L. Campos; F. Flocke; Andrew J. Weinheimer; C. A. Cantrell; I. B. Pollack; J. Peischl; Karl D. Froyd
We have developed semi-independent methods for determining CH2O scavenging efficiencies (SEs) during strong midlatitude convection over the western, south-central Great Plains, and southeastern regions of the United States during the 2012 Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Study. The Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) was employed to simulate one DC3 case to provide an independent approach of estimating SEs and the opportunity to study CH2O retention in ice when liquid drops freeze. Measurements of CH2O in storm inflow and outflow were acquired on board the NASA DC-8 and the NSF/National Center for Atmospheric Research Gulfstream V (GV) aircraft employing cross-calibrated infrared absorption spectrometers. This study also relied heavily on the nonreactive tracers i-/n-butane and i-/n-pentane measured on both aircraft in determining lateral entrainment rates during convection as well as their ratios to ensure that inflow and outflow air masses did not have different origins. Of the five storm cases studied, the various tracer measurements showed that the inflow and outflow from four storms were coherently related. The combined average of the various approaches from these storms yield remarkably consistent CH2O scavenging efficiency percentages of: 54% ± 3% for 29 May; 54% ± 6% for 6 June; 58% ± 13% for 11 June; and 41 ± 4% for 22 June. The WRF-Chem SE result of 53% for 29 May was achieved only when assuming complete CH2O degassing from ice. Further analysis indicated that proper selection of corresponding inflow and outflow time segments is more important than the particular mixing model employed.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017
Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; Dale J. Allen; M. C. Barth; Megan M. Bela; Kristin A. Cummings; Lawrence D. Carey; Retha M. Mecikalski; Alexandre O. Fierro; Teresa L. Campos; Andrew J. Weinheimer; Glenn S. Diskin; Michael I. Biggerstaff
Deep convective transport of surface moisture and pollution from the planetary boundary layer to the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere affects the radiation budget and climate. This study analyzes the deep convective transport in three different convective regimes from the 2012 Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) field campaign: May 21st Alabama airmass thunderstorms, May 29th Oklahoma supercell severe storm, and June 11th mesoscale convective system (MCS). Lightning data assimilation within the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) is utilized to improve the simulations of storm location, vertical structure and chemical fields. Analysis of vertical flux divergence shows that deep convective transport in the May 29th supercell case is the strongest per unit area while transport of boundary layer insoluble trace gases is relatively weak in the MCS and airmass cases. The weak deep convective transport in the strong MCS is unexpected and is caused by the injection into low levels of mid-level clean air by a strong rear inflow jet. In each system, the magnitude of tracer vertical transport is more closely related to the vertical distribution of mass flux density than the vertical distribution of trace gas mixing ratio. Finally, the net vertical transport is strongest in high composite reflectivity regions and dominated by upward transport.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018
Megan M. Bela; M. C. Barth; Owen B. Toon; Alan Fried; Conrad L. Ziegler; Kristin A. Cummings; Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; Cameron R. Homeyer; Hugh Morrison; Qing Yang; Retha M. Mecikalski; Lawrence D. Carey; Michael I. Biggerstaff; Daniel P. Betten; A. Addison Alford
Deep convective transport of gaseous precursors to ozone (O3) and aerosols to the upper troposphere is affected by liquid phase and mixed-phase scavenging, entrainment of free tropospheric air and aqueous chemistry. The contributions of these processes are examined using aircraft measurements obtained in storm inflow and outflow during the 2012 Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) experiment combined with high-resolution (dx ≤ 3 km) WRF-Chem simulations of a severe storm, an air mass storm, and a mesoscale convective system (MCS). The simulation results for the MCS suggest that formaldehyde (CH2O) is not retained in ice when cloud water freezes, in agreement with previous studies of the severe storm. By analyzing WRF-Chem trajectories, the effects of scavenging, entrainment, and aqueous chemistry on outflow mixing ratios of CH2O, methyl hydroperoxide (CH3OOH), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are quantified. Liquid phase microphysical scavenging was the dominant process reducing CH2O and H2O2 outflow mixing ratios in all three storms. Aqueous chemistry did not significantly affect outflow mixing ratios of all three species. In the severe storm and MCS, the higher than expected reductions in CH3OOH mixing ratios in the storm cores were primarily due to entrainment of low-background CH3OOH. In the air mass storm, lower CH3OOH and H2O2 scavenging efficiencies (SEs) than in the MCS were partly due to entrainment of higher background CH3OOH and H2O2. Overestimated rain and hail production in WRF-Chem reduces the confidence in ice retention fraction values determined for the peroxides and CH2O.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018
Megan M. Bela; M. C. Barth; Owen B. Toon; Alan Fried; Conrad L. Ziegler; Kristin A. Cummings; Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; Cameron R. Homeyer; Hugh Morrison; Qing Yang; Retha M. Mecikalski; Lawrence D. Carey; Michael I. Biggerstaff; Daniel P. Betten; A. Addison Alford
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2018
Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; M. C. Barth; M. M. Bela; K. A. Cummings; Dale J. Allen
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017
Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; Dale J. Allen; M. C. Barth; Megan M. Bela; Kristin A. Cummings; Lawrence D. Carey; Retha M. Mecikalski; Alexandre O. Fierro; Teresa L. Campos; Andrew J. Weinheimer; Glenn S. Diskin; Michael I. Biggerstaff
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Alan Fried; M. C. Barth; Megan M. Bela; Petter Weibring; Dirk Richter; James G. Walega; Yunyao Li; K. E. Pickering; Eric C. Apel; Rebecca S. Hornbrook; Alan J. Hills; Daniel D. Riemer; Nicola J. Blake; D. R. Blake; Jason R. Schroeder; Zhengzhao Johnny Luo; J. H. Crawford; J. R. Olson; S. Rutledge; Daniel P. Betten; M. I. Biggerstaff; Glenn S. Diskin; G. W. Sachse; Teresa L. Campos; F. M. Flocke; Andrew J. Weinheimer; C. A. Cantrell; I. B. Pollack; J. Peischl; Karl D. Froyd
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Megan M. Bela; M. C. Barth; Owen B. Toon; Alan Fried; Cameron R. Homeyer; Hugh Morrison; Kristin A. Cummings; Yunyao Li; Kenneth E. Pickering; Dale J. Allen; Qing Yang; Paul O. Wennberg; John D. Crounse; Jason M. St. Clair; Alex P. Teng; Daniel W. O'Sullivan; L. Gregory Huey; Dexian Chen; Xiaoxi Liu; D. R. Blake; Nicola J. Blake; Eric C. Apel; Rebecca S. Hornbrook; F. Flocke; Teresa L. Campos; Glenn S. Diskin
97th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting | 2016
Kristin A. Cummings; Kenneth E. Pickering; M. C. Barth; Megan M. Bela; Yunyao Li; Dale J. Allen; Eric C. Bruning; Donald R. MacGorman; Steven A. Rutledge; B. Basarab; B. Fuchs; I. B. Pollack; T. B. Ryerson; Lawrence D. Carey; F. Flocke; Teresa L. Campos; Andrew J. Weinheimer; Glenn S. Diskin