Yutaka Naka

Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, suppresses CXCL5 and SDF-1 and does not accelerate intestinal neoplasia formation in ApcMin/+ mice fed a high-fat diet

The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and intestinal neoplasia has been shown epidemiologically. A high-fat diet (HFD) is also known to promote insulin resistance, which is a risk factor for intestinal neoplasia. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are used in the clinic for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and also to prolong the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). However, since the intestinotrophic hormone GLP-2 and chemokines, such as CXCL5 and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), are also substrates of DPP-4, DPP-4 inhibitors may increase the risk of intestinal carcinogenesis. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a DPP-4 inhibitor on intestinal tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+ mice fed a HFD. Six-week-old male ApcMin/+ mice were randomized to either a normal diet (10 kcal% fat) group, a HFD (60 kcal% fat) group, or a HFD group treated with sitagliptin (STG). The mice were euthanized nine weeks after the start of treatment. Daily treatment with STG did not increase number of intestinal tumors in the HFD group; however, this increase was not statistically significant. The mucosal concentration of total GLP-2 was significantly increased in the HFD group. The chemokine protein array showed elevated plasma concentrations of CXCL5 and SDF-1 in the HFD group. The administration of STG significantly suppressed the levels of plasma CXCL5 and SDF-1 in mice fed a HFD. Since CXCL5 expression is increased in patients with type 2 diabetes, and GLP-2, CXCL5 and SDF-1 are associated with tumor progression, DPP-4 inhibition may have potential as an agent for decreasing the risk of cancer in obese or diabetic patients.

Cytomegalovirus infection in ulcerative colitis assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction: risk factors and effects of immunosuppressants

We investigated the risk factors of and appropriate treatment for cytomegalovirus colitis in patients with ulcerative colitis, using quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis to detect cytomegalovirus in the colonic mucosa. Between February 2013 and January 2017, patients with exacerbated ulcerative colitis who were admitted to our hospital were consecutively enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. Patients were evaluated for cytomegalovirus using serology (antigenemia) and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses of the colonic mucosa, which were sampled during colonoscopy. Of 86 patients, 26 (30.2%) had positive quantitative polymerase chain reaction results for cytomegalovirus; only 4 were also positive for antigenemia. The ages of the cytomegalovirus DNA-positive patients were significantly higher than those of negative patients (p = 0.002). The mean endoscopic score of cytomegalovirus DNA-positive patients was significantly higher than that of cytomegalovirus DNA-negative patients. Treatment with combined immunosuppressants was associated with an increased risk of cytomegalovirus. Fourteen of 15 (93.3%) cytomegalovirus DNA-positive patients who were negative for antigenemia showed a clinical response to treatment with additional oral tacrolimus, without ganciclovir. cytomegalovirus reactivation in active ulcerative colitis is associated with age and combined immunosuppressant therapy. Because additional treatment with tacrolimus was effective, patients who are negative for antigenemia and cytomegalovirus DNA-positive colonic mucosa may recover without antiviral therapy.