A Eldib

Dosimetric characteristics of an electron multileaf collimator for modulated electron radiation therapy

Modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT) has been proven as an effective way to deliver conformal dose distributions to shallow tumors while sparing distal critical structures and surrounding normal tissues. It had been shown that a dedicated electron multileaf collimator (eMLC) is necessary to reach the full potential of MERT. In this study, a manually‐driven eMLC for MERT was investigated. Percentage depth dose (PDD) curves and profiles at different depths in a water tank were measured using ionization chamber and were also simulated using the Monte Carlo method. Comparisons have been performed between PDD curves and profiles collimated using the eMLC and conventional electron applicators with similar size of opening. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for all electron energies available (6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 20 MeV) on a Varian 21EX accelerator. Monte Carlo simulation results were compared with measurements which showed good agreement (<%1mm). The simulated dose distributions resulting from multiple static electron fields collimated by the eMLC agreed well with measurements. Further studies were carried out to investigate the properties of abutting electron beams using the eMLC, as it is an essential issue that needs to be addressed for optimizing the MERT outcome. A series of empirical formulas for abutting beams of different energies have been developed for obtaining the optimum gap sizes, which can highly improve the target dose uniformity. PACS numbers: 87.53.Wz, 87.53.Hv

Measurement and Monte Carlo simulation for energy‐ and intensity‐modulated electron radiotherapy delivered by a computer‐controlled electron multileaf collimator

The dosimetric advantage of modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) has been explored by many investigators and is considered to be an advanced radiation therapy technique in the utilization of electrons. A computer‐controlled electron multileaf collimator (MLC) prototype, newly designed to be added onto a Varian linac to deliver MERT, was investigated both experimentally and by Monte Carlo simulations. Four different electron energies, 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV, were employed for this investigation. To ensure that this device was capable of delivering the electron beams properly, measurements were performed to examine the electron MLC (eMLC) leaf leakage and to determine the appropriate jaw positioning for an eMLC‐shaped field in order to eliminate a secondary radiation peak that could otherwise appear outside of an intended radiation field in the case of inappropriate jaw positioning due to insufficient radiation blockage from the jaws. Phase space data were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and recorded at the plane just above the jaws for each of the energies (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV). As an input source, phase space data were used in MC dose calculations for various sizes of the eMLC shaped field (10×10 cm2, 3.4×3.4 cm2, and 2×2 cm2) with respect to a water phantom at source‐to‐surface distance (SSD)=94cm, while the jaws, eMLC leaves, and some accessories associated with the eMLC assembly as well were modeled as modifiers in the calculations. The calculated results were then compared with measurements from a water scanning system. The results showed that jaw settings with 5 mm margins beyond the field shaped by the eMLC were appropriate to eliminate the secondary radiation peak while not widening the beam penumbra; the eMLC leaf leakage measurements ranged from 0.3% to 1.8% for different energies based on in‐phantom measurements, which should be quite acceptable for MERT. Comparisons between MC dose calculations and measurements showed agreement within 1%/1mm based on percentage depth doses (PDDs) and off‐axis dose profiles for a range of field sizes for each of the electron energies. Our current work has demonstrated that the eMLC and other relevant components in the linac were correctly modeled and simulated via our in‐house MC codes, and the eMLC is capable of accurately delivering electron beams for various eMLC‐shaped field sizes with appropriate jaw settings. In the next stage, patient‐specific verification with a full MERT plan should be performed. PACS number: 87.55.ne

Investigation of the clinical potential of scattering foil free electron beams

Electron beam therapy has been an important radiation therapy modality for many decades. Studies have been conducted recently for more efficient and advanced delivery of electron beam radiation therapy. X-ray contamination is a common problem that exists with all of the advanced electron beam therapy techniques such as Bolus Electron conformal therapy, segmented electron conformal therapy, and modulated electron arc therapy. X-ray contamination could add some limitations to the advancement and clinical utility of those electron modalities. It was previously shown in the literature that the scattering foil is one of the major accelerator parts contributing to the generation of bremsstrahlung photons. Thus, in this work we investigate the dosimetric characteristics of scattering foil free (SFF) electron beams and the feasibility of using those beams for breast cancer boosts. The SFF electron beams were modeled and simulated using the Monte Carlo method. CT scans of six previously treated breast patients were used for the treatment plan generation utilizing our in-house Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system. Electron boost plans with conventional beams and the SFF beams were generated, respectively, for all patients. A significant reduction of the photon component was observed with the removal of the primary scattering foil for beam energies higher than 12 MeV. Flatness was greatly affected but the difference in flatness between conventional and SFF beams was much reduced for small cone sizes, which were often used clinically for breast boosts. It was found that the SFF electron beams could deliver high-quality dose distributions as conventional electron beams for boost treatments of the breast with an added advantage of a further reduced dose to the lung and the heart.

Feasibility of replacing patient specific cutouts with a computer-controlled electron multileaf collimator

A motorized electron multileaf collimator (eMLC) was developed as an add-on device to the Varian linac for delivery of advanced electron beam therapy. It has previously been shown that electron beams collimated by an eMLC have very similar penumbra to those collimated by applicators and cutouts. Thus, manufacturing patient specific cutouts would no longer be necessary, resulting in the reduction of time taken in the cutout fabrication process. Moreover, cutout construction involves handling of toxic materials and exposure to toxic fumes that are usually generated during the process, while the eMLC will be a pollution-free device. However, undulation of the isodose lines is expected due to the finite size of the eMLC. Hence, the provided planned target volume (PTV) shape will not exactly follow the beams-eye-view of the PTV, but instead will make a stepped approximation to the PTV shape. This may be a problem when the field edge is close to a critical structure. Therefore, in this study the capability of the eMLC to achieve the same clinical outcome as an applicator/cutout combination was investigated based on real patient computed tomographies (CTs). An in-house Monte Carlo based treatment planning system was used for dose calculation using ten patient CTs. For each patient, two plans were generated; one with electron beams collimated using the applicator/cutout combination; and the other plan with beams collimated by the eMLC. Treatment plan quality was compared for each patient based on dose distribution and dose-volume histogram. In order to determine the optimal position of the leaves, the impact of the different leaf positioning strategies was investigated. All plans with both eMLC and cutouts were generated such that 100% of the target volume receives at least 90% of the prescribed dose. Then the percentage difference in dose between both delivery techniques was calculated for all the cases. The difference in the dose received by 10% of the volume of the target was showing a mean percentage difference of 1.57%± 1.65, while the difference in the dose received by 99% of the volume was showing a mean percentage difference of 1.08%± 0.78. The mean percentage volume of Lung receiving a percentage dose equal to or greater than 20% of the prescribed dose was found to be 8.55%± 7.3 and 8.67%± 7 for the eMLC and applicator/cutout combination delivery methods respectively. Results have shown that target coverage and critical structure sparing can be effectively achieved by electron beams collimated with the eMLC. Positioning the eMLC leaves in such a way to avoids shielding any part of the projected treatment volume is most conservative and would be the recommended method to define the actual leaf position for the eMLC defined field. More optimal leaf positions can be achieved in shaping the same treatment field through the interplay of different leaf positioning strategies. We concluded that the eMLC represents an effective time saving and pollution-free device that can completely replace patient specific cutouts.

MO-FG-CAMPUS-JeP3-05: Evaluation of 4D CT-On-Rails Target Localization Methods for Free Breathing Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)

PURPOSE Liver SBRT patients unable to tolerate breath-hold for radiotherapy are treated free-breathing with image guidance. Target localization using 3D CBCT requires extra margins to accommodate the respiratory motion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of 4D CT-on-rails in target localization for free-breathing liver SBRT. METHODS A Siemens SOMATOM CT-on-Rails 4D with Anzai Pressure Belt system was used both as the simulation and the localization CT. Fiducial marker was placed close to the center of the target prior to the simulation. Amplitude based sorting was used in the scan. Eight or sixteen phases of reconstructed CT sets (depends on breathing pattern) can be sent to Velocity to create the maximum intensity projection (MIP) image set. Target ITV and fiducial ITV were drawn based on the MIP image. In patient localization, a 4D scan was taken with the same settings as the sim scan. Images were registered to match fiducial ITVs. RESULTS Ten liver cancer patients treated for 50Gy over 5 fractions, with amplitudes of breathing motion ranging from 4.3-14.5 mm, were analyzed in this study. Results show that the Intra & inter fraction variability in liver motion amplitude significantly less than the baseline inter-fraction shifts in liver position. 90% of amplitude change is less than 3 mm. The differences in the D99 and D95 GTV dose coverage between the 4D CT-on-Rails and the CBCT plan were small (within 5%) for all the selected cases. However, the average PTV volume by using the 4D CT-on-Rails is 37% less than the CBCT PTV volume. CONCLUSION Simulation and Registration using 4D CT-on-Rails provides accurate target localization and is unaffected by larger breathing amplitudes as seen with 3D CBCT image registration. Localization with 4D CT-on-Rails can significantly reduce the PTV volume with sufficient tumor.

MO‐G‐213AB‐05: Beam Simulation and Measurement for Energy‐Intensity Modulated Electron Radiotherapy (MERT) with a Computer‐Controlled Electron Multileaf Collimator Device

Purpose: To verify an add‐on computer‐controlled multileaf collimator (eMLC) device on a Varian linac capable of delivering accurate dose for energy‐intensity modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT). Methods: The eMLC has 27 pairs of tungsten leaves (tongue and groove design to reduce intraleaf leakage)with 0.56cm width and 2cm thickness, providing a field size as large as 15 cm × 15 cm defined at 94cm SSD. Measurements were done to determine the appropriate jaw setting for an eMLC shaped field, mainly to reduce the leaf leakage outside the eMLC shaped field. The phase space data were acquired by Monte Carlo(MC) simulations for electron beams of energies 6, 9, 12 and 15 MeV, respectively and used as an input source in MCdose calculations in a phantom. MC calculated PDDs and dose profiles were compared with measurements for large fields (e.g. 10 cm × 10 cm) and small fields (e.g. 3.4 cm × 3.4 cm). The eMLC leakage for various energies was measured both in‐air and in phantom (at dmax) as a ratio of doses with the eMLC closed and completely open. Results: With the jaw position at 0.5 cm beyond the edge of the eMLC shaped field, it was showed to best eliminate the interleaf leakage, especially for high energies, e.g. 15 MeV. The average leaf leakage ranged from 0.3% (6 MeV) to 2.3% (15 MeV), which were consistent with lower in‐phantom values than in‐air values. MC calculated PDDs and dose profiles generally agreed with measurements to within 2mm/2%. Conclusions: This eMLC device is capable of delivering energy and intensity modulated electron beams accurately with acceptable leaf leakage for advanced MERT treatment.

SU‐E‐T‐576: Investigation of Combining Modulated Electron Beams with Intensity Modulated Photons for Radiation Therapy of Breast Cases

PURPOSE Modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT) can offer significant advantages for breast treatments over conventional radiotherapy in terms of sparing distal critical structures. While intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has the advantage of achieving better dose homogeneity inside the target combining both MERT and IMRT will be the ideal scenario. The Aim of the present study is to investigate the possibility of further improving breast radiation therapy using combined MERT/IMRT treatment technique. METHODS Accurate modeling of a prototype motorized electron multileaf collimator was verified in a separate study. In this work treatment planning was performed by an in house Monte Carlo based inverse planning system. Dose deposition coefficients were calculated using MCPLAN and utilizing real patients CTs. Optimization is then conducted based on an equivalent uniform dose objective function. MERT and IMRT plans were created for different patients. RESULTS The clinical beneficial outcome for MERT either alone or combined with IMRT was investigated based on isodose distributions and dose volume histograms. It is shown that MERT can give similar dose distributions as IMRT in some cases. For some cases, MERT could be advantageous whenever more skin dose was required. In some cases MERT can be identified as the best option. It was found that MERT compared to IMRT could introduce hot spots inside the target. However this was resolved in combined MERT/IMRT treatment. Dose uniformity can be restored with a reduction in the maximum lung and heart received dose. CONCLUSION MERT can improve treatment plan quality for many breast patients. In some cases better results can be obtained with a combined MERT/IMRT treatment, where a homogeneous dose in the target can be achieved with an improvement in the DVH of critical structures. This work has been supported by a UICC American Cancer Society Beginning Investigators Fellowship funded by the American Cancer Society.

TH‐D‐AUD B‐04: Developing Hardware and Software Tools for Advanced Mixed Beam Radiotherapy

Purpose: Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) provides excellent lateral dose conformity while energy‐ and intensity‐modulated electron therapy (MBRT) can spare distal critical structures for shallow targets. This work aims to combine IMRT and MERT for advanced mixed beam therapy (MBRT) of breast and head and neck cancers.Method and Materials: We have acquired a motorized electron‐specific multileaf collimator (eMLC) for accurate beam delivery for both conventional electron therapy and MERT. The eMLC is retractable to provide large apertures for efficient photon and electron beamdelivery for MBRT. Extensive measurements were performed to verify dose distributions collimated by the eMLC and to validate MBRT treatment plans. Monte Carlo based dose calculation, treatment optimization and leaf sequencing algorithms were investigated for efficient and accurate beam delivery. This technique is being implemented clinically for scalp, head and neck, and breast treatment through pilot studies that are specially designed for dose escalation and hypofractionation. Results: The eMLC provides similar electron beam characteristics to that obtained with a conventional electron applicator/cutout. The leakage is 1.8% for 16MeV electron beams and is less than 1% for other lower electron energies. A typical MERT has a 2–3 modulation‐scaling factor, which results in a maximum 5% leakage dose that is similar to that from IMRT. The measurement results agreed with the planned dose distributions to 3%/3mm for both uniform and heterogeneous phantoms. Conclusion: We have developed a MBRT system for the treatment of shallow targets that consists of hardware tools and software tools for accurate and efficient beam delivery. The technique is being implemented clinically for partial breast, scalp and head and neck treatments.

A treatment planning comparison between a novel rotating gamma system and robotic linear accelerator based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy

To compare the dosimetric parameters of a novel rotating gamma ray system (RGS) with well-established CyberKnife system (CK) for treating malignant brain lesions. RGS has a treatment head of 16 cobalt-60 sources focused to the isocenter, which can rotate 360° on the ring gantry and swing 35° in the superior direction. We compared several dosimetric parameters in 10 patients undergoing brain stereotactic radiosurgery including plan normalization, number of beams and nodes for CK and shots for RGS, collimators used, estimated treatment time, D 2 cm and conformity index (CI) among two modalities. The median plan normalization for RGS was 56.7% versus 68.5% (p  =  0.002) for CK plans. The median number of shots from RGS was 7.5 whereas the median number of beams and nodes for CK was 79.5 and 46. The median collimators diameter used was 3.5 mm for RGS as compared to 5 mm for CK (p  =  0.26). Mean D 2 cm was 5.57 Gy for CyberKnife whereas it was 3.11 Gy for RGS (p  =  0.99). For RGS plans, the median CI was 1.4 compared to 1.3 for the CK treatment plans (p  =  0.98). The average minimum and maximum doses to optic chiasm were 21 and 93 cGy for RGS as compared to 32 and 209 cGy for CK whereas these were 0.5 and 364 cGy by RGS and 18 and 399 cGy by CK to brainstem. The mean V12 Gy for brain predicting for radionecrosis with RGS was 3.75 cm3 as compared to 4.09 cm3 with the CK (p  =  0.41). The dosimetric parameters of a novel RGS with a ring type gantry are comparable with CyberKnife, allowing its use for intracranial lesions and is worth exploring in a clinical setting.

SU-F-T-524: Investigation of the Dosimertric Benefits of Interchangeable Source Size of a Novel Rotating Gamma System

PURPOSE Tremendous technological developments were made for conformal therapy techniques with linear accelerators, while less attention was paid to cobalt-60 units. The aim of the current study is to explore the dosimetric benefits of a novel rotating gamma ray system enhanced with interchangeable source sizes and multi-leaf collimator (MLC). MATERIAL AND METHODS CybeRT is a novel rotating gamma ray machine with a ring gantry that ensures an iso-center accuracy of less than 0.3 mm. The new machine has a 70cm source axial distance allowing for improved penumbra compared to conventional machines. MCBEAM was used to simulate Cobalt-60 beams from the CybeRT head, while the MCPLAN code was used for modeling the MLC and for phantom/patient dose calculation. The CybeRT collimation will incorporate a system allowing for interchanging source sizes. In this work we have created phase space files for 1cm and 2cm source sizes. Evaluation of the system was done by comparing CybeRT beams with the 6MV beams in a water phantom and in patient geometry. Treatment plans were compared based on isodose distributions and dose volume histograms. RESULTS Profiles for the 1cm source were comparable to that from 6MV in the order of 6mm for 10×10 cm2 field size at the depth of maximum dose. This could ascribe to Cobalt-60 beams producing lowerenergy secondary electrons. Although, the 2cm source have a larger penumbra however it could be still used for large targets with proportionally increased dose rate. For large lung targets, the difference between cobalt and 6MV plans is clinically insignificant. Our preliminary results showed that interchanging source sizes will allow cobalt beams for volumetric arc therapy of both small lesions and large tumors. CONCLUSION The CybeRT system will be a cost effective machine capable of performing advanced radiation therapy treatments of both small tumors and large target volumes.