Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where A. Kirkevåg is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by A. Kirkevåg.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 1998

Intercomparison of models representing direct shortwave radiative forcing by sulfate aerosols

Olivier Boucher; Stephen E. Schwartz; Thomas P. Ackerman; T. L. Anderson; B. Bergstrom; B. Bonnel; Petr Chýlek; Arne Dahlback; Y. Fouquart; Qiang Fu; Rangasayi N. Halthore; James M. Haywood; Trond Iversen; Seiji Kato; S. Kinne; A. Kirkevåg; K. R. Knapp; A. Lacis; Istvan Laszlo; Michael I. Mishchenko; Seth Nemesure; V. Ramaswamy; D. L. Roberts; P. B. Russell; Michael E. Schlesinger; Graeme L. Stephens; Richard Wagener; M. Wang; J. Wong; Fanglin Yang

The importance of aerosols as agents of climate change has recently been highlighted. However, the magnitude of aerosol forcing by scattering of shortwave radiation (direct forcing) is still very uncertain even for the relatively well characterized sulfate aerosol. A potential source of uncertainty is in the model representation of aerosol optical properties and aerosol influences on radiative transfer in the atmosphere. Although radiative transfer methods and codes have been compared in the past, these comparisons have not focused on aerosol forcing (change in net radiative flux at the top of the atmosphere). Here we report results of a project involving 12 groups using 15 models to examine radiative forcing by sulfate aerosol for a wide range of values of particle radius, aerosol optical depth, surface albedo, and solar zenith angle. Among the models that were employed were high and low spectral resolution models incorporating a variety of radiative transfer approximations as well as a line-by-line model. The normalized forcings (forcing per sulfate column burden) obtained with the several radiative transfer models were examined, and the discrepancies were characterized. All models simulate forcings of comparable amplitude and exhibit a similar dependence on input parameters. As expected for a non-light-absorbing aerosol, forcings were negative (cooling influence) except at high surface albedo combined with small solar zenith angle. The relative standard deviation of the zenith-angle-averaged normalized broadband forcing for 15 models was 8% for particle radius near the maximum in this forcing (∼0.2 μm) and at low surface albedo. Somewhat greater model-to-model discrepancies were exhibited at specific solar zenith angles. Still greater discrepancies were exhibited at small particle radii, and much greater discrepancies were exhibited at high surface albedos, at which the forcing changes sign; in these situations, however, the normalized forcing is quite small. Discrepancies among the models arise from inaccuracies in Mie calculations, differing treatment of the angular scattering phase function, differing wavelength and angular resolution, and differing treatment of multiple scattering. These results imply the need for standardized radiative transfer methods tailored to the direct aerosol forcing problem. However, the relatively small spread in these results suggests that the uncertainty in forcing arising from the treatment of radiative forcing of a well-characterized aerosol at well-specified surface albedo is smaller than some of the other sources of uncertainty in estimates of direct forcing by anthropogenic sulfate aerosols and anthropogenic aerosols generally.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2012

Application of the CALIOP layer product to evaluate the vertical distribution of aerosols estimated by global models: AeroCom phase i results

Brigitte Koffi; Michael Schulz; François-Marie Bréon; Jan Griesfeller; David M. Winker; Yves Balkanski; Susanne E. Bauer; Terje K. Berntsen; Mian Chin; William D. Collins; Frank Dentener; Thomas Diehl; Richard C. Easter; Steven J. Ghan; Paul Ginoux; Sunling Gong; Larry W. Horowitz; Trond Iversen; A. Kirkevåg; Dorothy M. Koch; M. Krol; Gunnar Myhre; P. Stier; Toshihiko Takemura

[1] The CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) layer product is used for a multimodel evaluation of the vertical distribution of aerosols. Annual and seasonal aerosol extinction profiles are analyzed over 13 sub-continental regions representative of industrial, dust, and biomass burning pollution, from CALIOP 2007–2009 observations and from AeroCom (Aerosol Comparisons between Observations and Models) 2000 simulations. An extinction mean height diagnostic (Za) is defined to quantitatively assess the models’ performance. It is calculated over the 0–6 km and 0–10 km altitude ranges by weighting the altitude of each 100 m altitude layer by its aerosol extinction coefficient. The mean extinction profiles derived from CALIOP layer products provide consistent regional and seasonal specificities and a low inter-annual variability. While the outputs from most models are significantly correlated with the observed Za climatologies, some do better than others, and 2 of the 12 models perform particularly well in all seasons. Over industrial and maritime regions, most models show higher Za than observed by CALIOP, whereas over the African and Chinese dust source regions, Za is underestimated during Northern Hemisphere Spring and Summer. The positive model bias in Za is mainly due to an overestimate of the extinction above 6 km. Potential CALIOP and model limitations, and methodological factors that might contribute to the differences are discussed.


Tellus A | 2008

Aerosol-climate interactions in the CAM-Oslo atmospheric GCM and investigation of associated basic shortcomings

Øyvind Seland; Trond Iversen; A. Kirkevåg; Trude Storelvmo

The paper discusses some challenges in aerosol-climate modelling. CAM-Oslo, extended from NCAR-CAM3, employs an aerosol module for sea-salt, dust, sulphate, black carbon (BC) and particulate organic matter (OM). Primary aerosol size-distributions are modified by condensation, coagulation and wet-phase processes. Aerosol optics and cloud droplet numbers use look-up tables constructed from first principles. Ground level sulphate and sea-salt are generally well modelled, BC and OM are slightly underestimated (uncertain), and dust is considerably (factor ∼2) underestimated. Since non-desert dust, nitrate, anthropogenic secondary organics, and biological particles are omitted, aerosol optical depths (0.12) are underestimated by 10–25%. The underestimates are large in areas with biomass burning and soil dust. The direct and indirect forcing of aerosol increments since pre-industrial time are estimated at +0.031 Wm−2 and −1.78 Wm−2, respectively. Although the total absorption AOD probably is slightly underestimated, the BC contributes to DRF with double strength compared to the AeroCom average. Main reasons for this include: internal BC-mixing (+0.2 Wm−2), accumulation mode BC-agglomerates (+0.05 Wm−2), assumed aitken-mode OM-BC mixture (+0.1 Wm−2), large BC fraction (36%) above 500 hPa, and high low-level cloudiness. Using a prognostic CDNC and process parametrized CCN activation instead of assuming CDNC are equal to CCN, the indirect forcing is 36% smaller.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2016

Fast and Slow Precipitation Responses to Individual Climate Forcers: A PDRMIP Multimodel Study

Bjørn H. Samset; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Timothy Andrews; G. Faluvegi; D. Fläschner; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Drew T. Shindell; Keith P. Shine; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis

Precipitation is expected to respond differently to various drivers of anthropogenic climate change. We present the first results from the Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP), where nine global climate models have perturbed CO2, CH4, black carbon, sulfate, and solar insolation. We divide the resulting changes to global mean and regional precipitation into fast responses that scale with changes in atmospheric absorption and slow responses scaling with surface temperature change. While the overall features are broadly similar between models, we find significant regional intermodel variability, especially over land. Black carbon stands out as a component that may cause significant model diversity in predicted precipitation change. Processes linked to atmospheric absorption are less consistently modeled than those linked to top-of-atmosphere radiative forcing. We identify a number of land regions where the model ensemble consistently predicts that fast precipitation responses to climate perturbations dominate over the slow, temperature-driven responses.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2017

PDRMIP: A Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project—Protocol and Preliminary Results

Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Bjørn H. Samset; Øivind Hodnebrog; Jana Sillmann; Siv G. Aalbergsjø; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; G. Faluvegi; D. Fläschner; Trond Iversen; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Drew T. Shindell; Keith P. Shine; Camilla Weum Stjern; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis; Francis W. Zwiers

As the global temperature increases with changing climate, precipitation rates and patterns are affected through a wide range of physical mechanisms. The globally averaged intensity of extreme precipitation also changes more rapidly than the globally averaged precipitation rate. While some aspects of the regional variation in precipitation predicted by climate models appear robust, there is still a large degree of inter-model differences unaccounted for. Individual drivers of climate change initially alter the energy budget of the atmosphere leading to distinct rapid adjustments involving changes in precipitation. Differences in how these rapid adjustment processes manifest themselves within models are likely to explain a large fraction of the present model spread and needs better quantifications to improve precipitation predictions. Here, we introduce the Precipitation Driver and Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP), where a set of idealized experiments designed to understand the role of different climate forcing mechanisms were performed by a large set of climate models. PDRMIP focuses on understanding how precipitation changes relating to rapid adjustments and slower responses to climate forcings are represented across models. Initial results show that rapid adjustments account for large regional differences in hydrological sensitivity across multiple drivers. The PDRMIP results are expected to dramatically improve our understanding of the causes of the present diversity in future climate projections.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014

Remote sensing of aerosols in the Arctic for an evaluation of global climate model simulations.

Paul Glantz; Andreas Herber; Trond Iversen; Johannes Karlsson; A. Kirkevåg; Marion Maturilli; Øyvind Seland; Kerstin Stebel; Hamish Struthers; Matthias Tesche; Larry W. Thomason

In this study Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aqua retrievals of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) at 555 nm are compared to Sun photometer measurements from Svalbard for a period of 9 years. For the 642 daily coincident measurements that were obtained, MODIS AOT generally varies within the predicted uncertainty of the retrieval over ocean (ΔAOT = ±0.03 ± 0.05 · AOT). The results from the remote sensing have been used to examine the accuracy in estimates of aerosol optical properties in the Arctic, generated by global climate models and from in situ measurements at the Zeppelin station, Svalbard. AOT simulated with the Norwegian Earth System Model/Community Atmosphere Model version 4 Oslo global climate model does not reproduce the observed seasonal variability of the Arctic aerosol. The model overestimates clear-sky AOT by nearly a factor of 2 for the background summer season, while tending to underestimate the values in the spring season. Furthermore, large differences in all-sky AOT of up to 1 order of magnitude are found for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 model ensemble for the spring and summer seasons. Large differences between satellite/ground-based remote sensing of AOT and AOT estimated from dry and humidified scattering coefficients are found for the subarctic marine boundary layer in summer. KEY POINTS Remote sensing of AOT is very useful in validation of climate models.


Journal of Climate | 2017

Future Response of Temperature and Precipitation to Reduced Aerosol Emissions as Compared with Increased Greenhouse Gas Concentrations

Juan C. Acosta Navarro; Annica M. L. Ekman; Francesco S. R. Pausata; Anna Lewinschal; Vidya Varma; Øyvind Seland; Michael Gauss; Trond Iversen; A. Kirkevåg; Ilona Riipinen; Hans-Christen Hansson

AbstractExperiments with a climate model (NorESM1) were performed to isolate the effects of aerosol particles and greenhouse gases on surface temperature and precipitation in simulations of future climate. The simulations show that by 2025–49 a reduction of aerosol emissions from fossil fuels following a maximum technically feasible reduction (MFR) scenario could lead to a global and Arctic warming of 0.26 and 0.84 K, respectively, as compared with a simulation with fixed aerosol emissions at the level of 2005. If fossil fuel emissions of aerosols follow a current legislation emissions (CLE) scenario, the NorESM1 model simulations yield a nonsignificant change in global and Arctic average surface temperature as compared with aerosol emissions fixed at year 2005. The corresponding greenhouse gas effect following the representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) emission scenario leads to a global and Arctic warming of 0.35 and 0.94 K, respectively. The model yields a marked annual average northward shi...


Geophysical Research Letters | 2017

Microphysical explanation of the RH‐dependent water affinity of biogenic organic aerosol and its importance for climate

Narges Rastak; Aki Pajunoja; J. C. Acosta Navarro; J. Ma; Mijung Song; Daniel G. Partridge; A. Kirkevåg; Y. Leong; Weiwei Hu; Nathan Taylor; Andrew T. Lambe; K. Cerully; A. Bougiatioti; Pengfei Liu; Radovan Krejci; Tuukka Petäjä; Carl J. Percival; P. Davidovits; D. R. Worsnop; Annica M. L. Ekman; Athanasios Nenes; S. Martin; Jose L. Jimenez; Don R. Collins; David Topping; Allan K. Bertram; Andreas Zuend; Annele Virtanen; Ilona Riipinen

Abstract A large fraction of atmospheric organic aerosol (OA) originates from natural emissions that are oxidized in the atmosphere to form secondary organic aerosol (SOA). Isoprene (IP) and monoterpenes (MT) are the most important precursors of SOA originating from forests. The climate impacts from OA are currently estimated through parameterizations of water uptake that drastically simplify the complexity of OA. We combine laboratory experiments, thermodynamic modeling, field observations, and climate modeling to (1) explain the molecular mechanisms behind RH‐dependent SOA water‐uptake with solubility and phase separation; (2) show that laboratory data on IP‐ and MT‐SOA hygroscopicity are representative of ambient data with corresponding OA source profiles; and (3) demonstrate the sensitivity of the modeled aerosol climate effect to assumed OA water affinity. We conclude that the commonly used single‐parameter hygroscopicity framework can introduce significant error when quantifying the climate effects of organic aerosol. The results highlight the need for better constraints on the overall global OA mass loadings and its molecular composition, including currently underexplored anthropogenic and marine OA sources.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

Rapid Adjustments Cause Weak Surface Temperature Response to Increased Black Carbon Concentrations

Camilla Weum Stjern; Bjørn H. Samset; Gunnar Myhre; Piers M. Forster; Øivind Hodnebrog; Timothy Andrews; Olivier Boucher; G. Faluvegi; Trond Iversen; M. Kasoar; Viatcheslav V. Kharin; A. Kirkevåg; Jean-Francois Lamarque; D. Olivié; Thomas Richardson; Dilshad Shawki; Drew T. Shindell; Christopher J. Smith; Toshihiko Takemura; Apostolos Voulgarakis

We investigate the climate response to increased concentrations of black carbon (BC), as part of the Precipitation Driver Response Model Intercomparison Project (PDRMIP). A tenfold increase in BC is simulated by 9 global coupled-climate models, producing a model-median effective radiative forcing (ERF) of 0.82 (ranging from 0.41 to 2.91) Wm-2, and a warming of 0.67 (0.16 to 1.66) K globally and 1.24 (0.26 to 4.31) K in the Arctic. A strong positive instantaneous radiative forcing (median of 2.10 Wm-2 based on five of the models) is countered by negative rapid adjustments (-0.64 Wm-2 for the same five models), which dampen the total surface temperature signal. Unlike other drivers of climate change, the response of temperature and cloud profiles to the BC forcing is dominated by rapid adjustments. Low-level cloud amounts increase for all models, while higher-level clouds are diminished. The rapid temperature response is particularly strong above 400 hPa, where increased atmospheric stabilization and reduced cloud cover contrast the response pattern of the other drivers. In conclusion, we find that this substantial increase in BC concentrations does have considerable impacts on important aspects of the climate system. However, some of these effects tend to offset one another, leaving a relatively small global warming of 0.47 K per Wm-2 - about 20 % lower than the response to a doubling of CO2. Translating the tenfold increase in BC to the present-day impact of anthropogenic BC (given the emissions used in this work) would leave a warming of merely 0.07 K.


Journal of Climate | 2015

A Standardized Global Climate Model Study Showing Unique Properties for the Climate Response to Black Carbon Aerosols

M. Sand; Trond Iversen; Patrik Bohlinger; A. Kirkevåg; I. A. Seierstad; Øyvind Seland; Asgeir Sorteberg

AbstractThe climate response to an abrupt increase of black carbon (BC) aerosols is compared to the standard CMIP5 experiment of quadrupling CO2 concentrations in air. The global climate model NorESM with interactive aerosols is used. One experiment employs prescribed BC emissions with calculated concentrations coupled to atmospheric processes (emission-driven) while a second prescribes BC concentrations in air (concentration-driven) from a precalculation with the same model and emissions, but where the calculated BC does not force the climate dynamics. The difference quantifies effects of feedbacks between airborne BC and other climate processes. BC emissions are multiplied with 25, yielding an instantaneous top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiative forcing (RF) comparable to the quadrupling of atmospheric CO2. A radiative kernel method is applied to estimate the different feedbacks.In both BC runs, BC leads to a much smaller surface warming than CO2. Rapid atmospheric feedbacks reduce the BC-induced TOA forcing...

Collaboration


Dive into the A. Kirkevåg's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trond Iversen

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Øyvind Seland

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven J. Ghan

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Olivié

Norwegian Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge