A.R. Zlotta
University Health Network
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A.R. Zlotta.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases | 2015
L-M Wong; Sarah Ferrara; Shabbir M.H. Alibhai; Andrew Evans; T Van der Kwast; Greg Trottier; Narhari Timilshina; A. Toi; Girish Kulkarni; Robert J. Hamilton; A.R. Zlotta; Neil Fleshner; A. Finelli
Background:To examine whether diagnostic biopsy (B1), for patients on active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer, performed at an outside referral centre (external) compared with our in-house tertiary center (internal), increased the risk of re-classification on the second (confirmatory) biopsy (B2).Methods:Patients on AS were identified from our tertiary center database (1997–2012) with PSA<10, Gleason sum (GS) ⩽6, clinical stage ⩽cT2, ⩽3 positive cores, <50% of single core involved, age ⩽75 years and having a B2. Patients who had <10 cores at B1 and delay in B2 >24u2009mo were excluded. Depending on center where B1 was performed, men were dichotomized to internal or external groups. All B2 were performed internally. Multivariate logistic regression examined if external B1 was a predictor of re-classification at B2.Results:A total of 375 patients were divided into external (n=71, 18.9%) and internal groups (n=304, 81.1%). At B2, more men in the external group re-classified (26.8%) compared with the internal group (13.8%)(P=0.008). On multivariate analysis, external B1 predicted grade-related re-classification (odds ratio (OR) 4.14, confidence interval (CI) 2.01–8.54, P<0.001) and volume-related re-classification (OR 3.43, CI 1.87–6.25, P<0.001). Other significant predictors for grade-related re-classification were age (OR 2.13 per decade, CI 1.32–3.57, P<0.001), PSA density (OR 2.56 per unit, CI 1.44–4.73, P<0.001), maximum % core involvement (OR 1.04 per percentage point, CI 1.01–1.09, P=0.02) and time between B1 and B2 (OR 1.43 per 6 months, CI 1.21–1.71, P<0.001).Conclusion:At our institution, patients on AS who had their initial B1 performed externally were more likely to have adverse pathological features and re-classify on internal B2.
Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) | 2016
Peter J. Boström; John Thoms; Jenna Sykes; Omer Ahmed; Andrew Evans; B.W. G. van Rhijn; Tuomas Mirtti; O. Stakhovskyi; Matti Laato; David Margel; M. Pintilie; Cynthia Kuk; M. Milosevic; A.R. Zlotta; Robert G. Bristow
Background: Tumour hypoxia, which is frequent in many cancer types, is associated with treatment resistance and poor prognosis. The role of hypoxia in surgically treated bladder cancer (BC) is not well described. We studied the role of hypoxia in two independent series of urothelial bladder cancers treated with radical cystectomy. Methods: 279 patients from the University Hospital Network (UHN), Toronto, Canada, and Turku University, Finland were studied. Hypoxia biomarkers (HIF1-α, CAIX, GLUT-1) and proliferation marker Ki-67 were analyzed with immunohistochemistry using defined tissue microarrays. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to investigate prognostic role of the factors. Results: In univariate analyses, strong GLUT-1 positivity and a high Ki-67 index were associated with poor survival. In multivariate model containing clinical prognostic variables, GLUT-1 was an independent prognostic factor associated with worse disease-specific survival (HR 2.9, 95% CI 0.7–12.6, Wald pu200a=u200a0.15 in the Toronto cohort and HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3–7.5, Wald pu200a=u200a0.0085 in the Turku cohort). Conclusion: GLUT-1 is frequently upregulated and is an independent prognostic factor in surgically treated bladder cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential role of hypoxia-based and targeted therapies in hypoxic bladder tumours.
Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2018
Wassim Kassouf; Armen Aprikian; Fred Saad; Rodney H. Breau; Girish Kulkarni; David M. Guttman; Ken Bagshaw; Jonathan I. Izawa; Libni Eapen; Adrian Fairey; Alan So; Scott North; Ricardo Rendon; Srikala S. Sridhar; Fadi Brimo; Peter Chung; Darrel Drachenberg; Yves Fradet; Niels Jacobsen; Christopher Morash; Bobby Shayegan; Geoffrey Gotto; A.R. Zlotta; Neil Fleshner; D. Robert Siemens; Peter C. Black
In the January-February 2016 issue of the Canadian Urological Association Journal, a multidisciplinary committee published a white paper entitled, “Recommendations for the improvement of bladder cancer quality of care in Canada: A consensus document reviewed and endorsed by Bladder Cancer Canada (BCC), Canadian Urologic Oncology Group (CUOG), and Canadian Urological Association (CUA), December 2015.”1 The paper was produced in response to concerns regarding the variability in management and outcomes of patients with bladder cancer throughout centres and geographical areas in Canada. The final paper contents were the result of consensus deliberations during a two-day meeting that took place in late 2014. In November 2016, another multidisciplinary committee consisting largely of the same members convened the second “BCC-CUA-CUOG Bladder Cancer Quality of Care Meeting 2016.” The focus was on patient journey and optimizing management. The following document is a summary of the proceedings of this meeting. The objectives for the meeting were as follows: 1. Patient journey To discuss unmet needs in bladder cancer care from the patient perspective. 2. Optimizing management To select the top 10–15 indicators of bladder cancer quality of care and establish benchmarks; To develop a score card for measurement of bladder cancer quality of care; To address complex bladder cancer management from a training perspective; To identify bladder cancer centres of expertise across Canada using refined criteria; To discuss the establishment of a bladder cancer research network of excellence.
European Urology Supplements | 2014
Thomas Hermanns; Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel; Andrea J. Savio; Bimal Bhindi; Darko Zdravic; C. Kuk; Aidan P. Noon; Ricardo Rendon; David Waltregny; Kirk C. Lo; T.H. van der Kwast; A. Finelli; Neil Fleshner; A.R. Zlotta; B. Bapat
1Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2Mount Sinai Hospital, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Toronto, Canada, 3University Health Network, Dept. of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 4Mount Sinai Hospital, Dept. of Surgery, Division of Urology, Toronto, Canada, 5Dalhousie University, Dept. of Urology, Halifax, Canada, 6University of Liege, Dept. of Urology, Liege, Belgium, 7University Health Network, Dept. of Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Tijdschrift voor Urologie | 2012
B.W.G. van Rhijn; T.C.M. Zuiverloon; S. Shariat; C. Abbas; Peter J. Boström; E. Boevé; H. Roshani; C. Bangma; J. van der Hoeven; Eric H. Oomens; B. Bapat; Neil Fleshner; R. Ashfaq; A. Van Leenders; M.A.S. Jewett; Y. Lotan; A.R. Zlotta; T.H. Van Der Kwast; E.C. Zwarthoff
Introductie De selectie van patiënten met een laagrisicoprostaatcarcinoom (PCa) voor active surveillance (AS) is gebaseerd op klinisch stadium, PSA en TRUS-geleide biopsiecriteria. Grootste beperking van een dergelijke benadering is de potentiële onderschatting van de werkelijke gecombineerde gleasonscore en het pathologisch stadium. Doel van onze serie is te evalueren in hoeverre de pathologie bij radicale prostatectomie (RP) bij kandidaten voor AS overeenkomt met de preoperatieve klinische en pathologische stadiëring.
European Urology Supplements | 2012
A. Finelli; Greg Trottier; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Robert Sowerby; A.R. Zlotta; Lenny Radomski; Narhari Timilshina; Andrew Evans; T.H. Van Der Kwast; A. Toi; M.A.S. Jewett; J. Trachtenberg; Neil Fleshner
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) have been shown to prevent prostate cancer in two large randomized controlled trials. No prior work has shown the effect of 5ARIs on those already diagnosed with low risk prostate cancer. Our goal was to determine the effect of 5ARIs on pathologic progression in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. METHODS: This was a single institution retrospective cohort study comparing men taking a 5ARI versus no 5ARI while on active surveillance for prostate cancer. All men had at least two biopsies. Inclusion criteria for active surveillance were PSA 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T1c/T2a, Gleason score 6, and 3 cores positive with no more than 50% of a core involved at initial diagnostic biopsy. Pathologic progression was evaluated and defined as Gleason score 6, or maximum core involvement 50% or 3 cores positive on a follow-up prostate biopsy. Univariate, multivariate and Kaplan-Meir analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 288 men on active surveillance met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 38.5 months (IQR 23.6– 59.4) with 93 men (32%) experiencing pathologic progression and 96 men (33%) abandoning active surveillance. Men taking a 5ARI experienced a lower rate of pathologic progression (18.6% vs 36.7%, p 0.004) and were less likely to abandon active surveillance (20% vs 37.6%, p 0.006). The median time to progression was longer in the 5ARI group (42.5 months) compared to the non-5ARI group (31.5 months; p 0.026). On multivariate analysis, lack of 5ARI use was most strongly associated with pathologic progression (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.5–5.9) followed by age and baseline maximum percentage involvement of any biopsy core. CONCLUSIONS: 5ARIs were associated with a significantly lower rate of pathologic progression and abandonment of active surveillance.
European Urology Supplements | 2009
C. Mir; S.F. Shariat; T.H. Van Der Kwast; Raheela Ashfaq; Yair Lotan; Sean C. Skeldon; S. Hanna; Sultan Alkhateeb; D. Kakiashvili; B. Van Rhijn; Juan Morote; Neil Fleshner; M.A.S. Jewett; A.R. Zlotta
S143 only in the Triton-insoluble fraction. Under non-reducing conditions, PRDX 1 and 6 were found as bands of high molecular weight (>170 kDa) in spermatozoa incubated with 0.35-5 mM H2O2 (strong oxidative stress). PRDX 6 became a strong single band due to a mild oxidative stress (0.05 mM H2O2, a condition that promotes sperm capacitation). H2O2 (0.35-5 mM) caused a decrease of the signal for PRDX 4 and 5 compared to non-treated cells. Conclusion: PRDXs are present in human spermatozoa and differentially modified by oxidative stress. These results suggest a role of PRDXs as antioxidants and as potential modulators of H2O2 action in human spermatozoa.
European Urology Supplements | 2014
Bimal Bhindi; Muhammad Mamdani; Girish Kulkarni; A. Finelli; R.J. Hamiton; J. Trachtenberg; A.R. Zlotta; A. Toi; Andrew Evans; T.H. van der Kwast; Neil Fleshner
European Urology Supplements | 2014
Thomas Hermanns; Yanliang Wei; B. Bindi; Raj Satkunasivam; Paul Athanasopoulos; P.J. Bostrom; C. Kuk; Arnoud J. Templeton; S. S. Sridhar; T.H. van der Kwast; Peter Chung; Robert G. Bristow; M. Milosevic; Neil Fleshner; M.A.S. Jewett; A.R. Zlotta; Girish Kulkarni
European Urology Supplements | 2011
B. Van Rhijn; P.J. Bostrom; S.F. Shariat; A. Finelli; Arthur I. Sagalowsky; Neil Fleshner; B. Bapat; Hannes Kortekangas; Raheela Ashfaq; Tuomas Mirtti; M.A.S. Jewett; Yair Lotan; Th. H. van der Kwast; A.R. Zlotta