T.H. Van Der Kwast

Guía de la EAU sobre el cáncer de próstata. Parte I: cribado, diagnóstico y tratamiento del cáncer clínicamente localizado

OBJECTIVEnOur aim was to present a summary of the 2010 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised cancer of the prostate (PCa).nnnMETHODSnThe working panel performed a literature review of the new data emerging from 2007 to 2010. The guidelines were updated, and level of evidence and grade of recommendation were added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature, which included a search of online databases and bibliographic reviews.nnnRESULTSnA full version is available at the EAU office or Web site (www.uroweb.org). Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population-based screening by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for PCa. A systematic prostate biopsy under ultrasound guidance and local anaesthesia is the preferred diagnostic method. Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy. PSA doubling time in < 3 yr or a biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention. In men with locally advanced PCa in whom local therapy is not mandatory, watchful waiting (WW) is a treatment alternative to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with equivalent oncologic efficacy. Active treatment is mostly recommended for patients with localised disease and a long life expectancy with radical prostatectomy (RP) shown to be superior to WW in a prospective randomised trial. Nerve-sparing RP represents the approach of choice in organ-confined disease; neoadjuvant androgen deprivation demonstrates no improvement of outcome variables. Radiation therapy should be performed with at least 74Gy and 78Gy in low-risk and intermediate/high-risk PCa, respectively. For locally advanced disease, adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior disease-specific and overall survival rates and represents the treatment of choice. Follow-up after local therapy is largely based on PSA, and a disease-specific history with imaging is indicated only when symptoms occur.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing. These EAU guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and put them into clinical practice.

Cellular and Molecular Pathology of Prostate Cancer Precursors

Prostate cancer is usually heterogeneous and multifocal, with diverse clinical and morphologic manifestations. Current understanding of the molecular basis for this heterogeneity is limited, particularly for prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), the only putative precursor which can be identified according to morphologic criteria. However, it is likely that prostatic adenocarcinoma might arise from precursor lesions other than PIN, although these cannot be recognized with certainty at the present time. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the cell-biological and genetic bases for linking PIN and prostatic adenocarcinoma. It is conceivable that a stem cell of basal phenotype, or an amplifying cell, is the target of prostatic carcinogenesis. Prominent genetic heterogeneity is characteristic of both PIN and carcinoma; and multiple foci of PIN arise independently within the same prostate. This observation suggests that a field effect probably underlies prostatic neoplasia. Multiple foci of cancer also often arise independently, lending additional support to this hypothesis. The strong genetic similarities between PIN and cancer strongly suggest that evolution and clonal expansion of PIN, or other precursor lesions, may account for the multifocal etiology of carcinoma. Uncertainties with respect to identification of those precursor lesions which are most likely to progress to invasive and metastatic prostate cancer reinforce the requirement for objective immunohistochemical or molecular biological markers of the aggressive phenotype.

Biopsy diagnosis of intraductal carcinoma is prognostic in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer patients treated by radiotherapy

AIMnWe investigated the prognostic significance of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) in biopsies and transurethral resections prior to external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation.nnnMETHODSnCohort 1 consisted of 118 intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated by radiotherapy, with biochemical relapse as primary end-point (median follow-up 6.5 years). Cohort 2 consisted of 132 high risk patients, enrolled in a phase III randomised trial (EORTC 22863) comparing radiotherapy alone to radiotherapy with long-term androgen deprivation (LTAD) with clinical progression free survival as primary end-point (median follow-up 9.1 years). Presence of IDC-P was identified after central review. Multivariable regression modelling and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed with IDC-P as dichotomous variable.nnnRESULTSnIDC-P was a strong prognosticator for early (<36 months) biochemical relapse (HR 7.3; p = 0.007) in cohort 1 and for clinical disease-free survival in both arms of cohort 2 (radiotherapy arm: HR 3.5; p < 0.0001; radiotherapy plus LTAD arm: HR 2.8, p = 0.018). IDC-P retained significance after stratification for reviewed Gleason score in the radiotherapy arm (HR 2.3; p = 0.03). IDC-P was a strong prognosticator for metastatic failure rate (radiotherapy arm: HR 5.3; p < 0.0001; radiotherapy plus LTAD arm: HR 3.6; p = 0.05).nnnCONCLUSIONSnIDC-P in diagnostic samples of patients with intermediate or high risk prostate cancer is an independent prognosticator of early biochemical relapse and metastatic failure rate after radiotherapy. We suggest that the presence of IDC-P in prostate biopsies should routinely be reported.

Prostate cancer: Trends in incidence, survival and mortality in the Netherlands, 1989–2006

BACKGROUNDnProstate cancer occurrence and stage distribution changed dramatically during the end of the 20th century. This study aimed to quantify and explain trends in incidence, stage distribution, survival and mortality in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2006.nnnMETHODSnPopulation-based data from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry and Causes of Death Registry were used. Annual incidence and mortality rates were calculated and age-adjusted to the European Standard Population. Trends in rates were evaluated by age, clinical stage and differentiation grade.nnnRESULTSn120,965 men were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1989 and 2006. Age-adjusted incidence rates increased from 63 to 104 per 100,000 person-years in this period. Two periods of increasing incidence rates could be distinguished with increases predominantly in cT2-tumours between 1989 and 1995 and predominantly in cT1c-tumours since 2001. cT4/N+/M+-tumour incidence rates decreased from 23 in 1993 to 18 in 2006. The trend towards earlier detection was accompanied by a lower mean age at diagnosis (from 74 in 1989 to 70 in 2006), increased frequency of treatment with curative intent and improved 5-year relative survival. Mortality rates decreased from 34 in 1996 to 26 in 2007.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe increase of prostate cancer incidence in the early 1990s was probably caused by increased prostate cancer awareness combined with diagnostic improvements (transrectal ultrasound, (thin) needle biopsies), but not PSA testing. The subsequent peak since 2001 is probably attributable to PSA testing. The decline in prostate cancer mortality from 1996 onwards may be the consequence of increased detection of cT2-tumours between 1989 and 1995. Unfortunately, data on the use of PSA tests and other prostate cancer diagnostics to support these conclusions are lacking.

Prostatic preneoplasia and beyond

Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous neoplasm both with regard to its development, molecular abnormalities and clinical course. For example, in the United States, 1 in 6 men is diagnosed with prostate cancer whilst only 1 in 34 dies of metastatic disease [A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, T. Murray, J. Xu, M.J. Thun, Cancer Statistics, 2007, CA Cancer J. Clin. 57 (2007) 43-66]. In this review, we summarise novel understandings of the early molecular events in prostatic carcinogenesis that may underlie both the molecular and clinical heterogeneity. Issues covered include those related to stem cells and embryonic signalling, oncogene/tumor suppressor abnormalities, androgen signalling, apoptosis and the nature of tumor-stromal interactions. Emphasis is placed on signalling pathway abnormalities, their causation, consequences and interactions. For example, genomic abnormalities involving the TMPRSS2-ETS and PTEN loci and the resulting signalling effects suggest the importance of genomic instability as a crucial factor in the emergence of this neoplasm. Together with new insights into signalling pathways consequent to abnormalities such as these, a greater understanding of the pathophysiology involved in prostatic carcinogenesis will lead to targeted approaches for both therapy and chemoprevention in the future.

Guía de la EAU sobre el cáncer de próstata. Parte II: tratamiento del cáncer de próstata avanzado, recidivante y resistente a la castración

OBJECTIVESnOur aim is to present a summary of the 2010 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on the treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).nnnMETHODSnThe working panel performed a literature review of the new data emerging from 2007 to 2010. The guidelines were updated, and the levels of evidence (LEs) and/or grades of recommendation (GR) were added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature, which included a search of online databases and bibliographic reviews.nnnRESULTSnLuteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists are the standard of care in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Although LHRH antagonists decrease testosterone without any testosterone surge, their clinical benefit remains to be determined. Complete androgen blockade has a small survival benefit of about 5%. Intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) results in equivalent oncologic efficacy when compared with continuous androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) in well-selected populations. In locally advanced and metastatic PCa, early ADT does not result in a significant survival advantage when compared with delayed ADT. Relapse after local therapy is defined by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values > 0.2 ng/ml following radical prostatectomy (RP) and > 2 ng/ml above the nadir after radiation therapy (RT). Therapy for PSA relapse after RP includes salvage RT at PSA levels < 0.5 ng/ml and salvage RP or cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in radiation failures. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) are of limited importance if the PSA is < 2.5 ng/ml; bone scans and CT can be omitted unless PSA is >20 ng/ml. Follow-up after ADT should include screening for the metabolic syndrome and an analysis of PSA and testosterone levels. Treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) includes second-line hormonal therapy, novel agents, and chemotherapy with docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) every 3 wk. Cabazitaxel as a second-line therapy for relapse after docetaxel might become a future option. Zoledronic acid and denusomab can be used in men with CRPC and osseous metastases to prevent skeletal-related complications.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe knowledge in the field of advanced, metastatic, and CRPC is rapidly changing. These EAU guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and put them into clinical practice. A full version is available at the EAU office or online at www.uroweb.org.

Salvage Radical Prostatectomy Following Primary High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Treatment of Prostate Cancer

PURPOSEnHigh intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of primary prostate cancer is increasing in a subset of men seeking definitive treatment with reduced morbidity. We review outcomes in men undergoing salvage radical prostatectomy after failed whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnProspective data were collected for men presenting with an increasing prostate specific antigen and biopsy proven prostate cancer after high intensity focused ultrasound from 2007 to 2010 who underwent salvage open radical prostatectomy with a 22-month median followup, including prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, pathology results, continence and erectile function.nnnRESULTSnData for 15 men were available, including median age 64 years (IQR 55-69), Gleason score before high intensity focused ultrasound of 6 (8), Gleason score 7 (7), median cores positive 39% (IQR 17%-63%) and median prostate specific antigen 7 ng/ml (IQR 5-8). Whole gland high intensity focused ultrasound achieved median nadir prostate specific antigen 1.1 ng/ml (IQR 0.5-3.1). Biopsy after high intensity focused ultrasound demonstrated Gleason score 6 (in 3 patients), 7 (9) and 8/9 (3), and 42% (IQR 25%-50%) cores positive and a median time from high intensity focused ultrasound to radical prostatectomy of 22 months (IQR 7-26). Perioperative morbidity was limited to 1 transfusion in a patient with a rectal injury. Pathologically extensive periprostatic fibrosis was found with persistent prostate cancer, as pT3 disease (in 9 of 14), Gleason scores 6 (2), 7 (9) and 8 of 9 (4), with focally positive margins in 3 of 11 (pT3a). Postoperative prostate specific antigen was unrecordable in 14 of 15 patients with further treatment in 2. Postoperative continence (more than 12 months of followup) yielded no pad use in 6 of 10 men with universally poor erectile function.nnnCONCLUSIONSnRadical prostatectomy as salvage is feasible for men in whom high intensity focused ultrasound failed, but with a higher morbidity than for primary surgery. Pathology results are alarming given the number of cases with extraprostatic extension yet early followup data suggest acceptable oncologic control. These results should be factored in when counseling men who wish to undergo primary high intensity focused ultrasound.

Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling promotes tumorigenicity and stemness via activation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in bladder cancer

Activation of the sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway controls tumorigenesis in a variety of cancers. Here, we show a role for Shh signaling in the promotion of epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), tumorigenicity, and stemness in the bladder cancer. EMT induction was assessed by the decreased expression of E‐cadherin and ZO‐1 and increased expression of N‐cadherin. The induced EMT was associated with increased cell motility, invasiveness, and clonogenicity. These progression relevant behaviors were attenuated by treatment with Hh inhibitors cyclopamine and GDC‐0449, and after knockdown by Shh‐siRNA, and led to reversal of the EMT phenotype. The results with HTB‐9 were confirmed using a second bladder cancer cell line, BFTC905 (DM). In a xenograft mouse model TGF‐β1 treated HTB‐9 cells exhibited enhanced tumor growth. Although normal bladder epithelial cells could also undergo EMT and upregulate Shh with TGF‐β1 they did not exhibit tumorigenicity. The TGF‐β1 treated HTB‐9 xenografts showed strong evidence for a switch to a more stem cell like phenotype, with functional activation of CD133, Sox2, Nanog, and Oct4. The bladder cancer specific stem cell markers CK5 and CK14 were upregulated in the TGF‐β1 treated xenograft tumor samples, while CD44 remained unchanged in both treated and untreated tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis of 22 primary human bladder tumors indicated that Shh expression was positively correlated with tumor grade and stage. Elevated expression of Ki‐67, Shh, Gli2, and N‐cadherin were observed in the high grade and stage human bladder tumor samples, and conversely, the downregulation of these genes were observed in the low grade and stage tumor samples. Collectively, this study indicates that TGF‐β1‐induced Shh may regulate EMT and tumorigenicity in bladder cancer. Our studies reveal that the TGF‐β1 induction of EMT and Shh is cell type context dependent. Thus, targeting the Shh pathway could be clinically beneficial in the ability to reverse the EMT phenotype of tumor cells and potentially inhibit bladder cancer progression and metastasis.

Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis of candidate genes in urothelial cell carcinomas of upper urinary tract

A subset of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinomas (UUC), arising sporadically or as a manifestation of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, displays microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI tumours are characterized by defective mismatch repair and accumulation of frameshift mutations in numerous genes harbouring repeats in their coding sequences. We have evaluated the incidence of MSI in UUC and the intratumoral distribution of mutations in 13 candidate target genes. A total of 58 unselected UUC were screened for MSI using the panel of five mononucleotide markers recently recommended by the National Cancer Institute for a precise MSI assessment. Four tumours displayed MSI (7%), among which at least three had alterations in the genes MSH3, BAX, MRE11, RAD50. Mutations in genes involved in key cellular pathways (ATR, DNA-PKcs, MBD4, TCF-4, MSH6, and BLM) were further detected. BAX and MRE11 mutations tend to present homogeneously within the three MSI UUC. Immunohistochemistry (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6) showed that loss of mismatch repair protein expression occurred in all MSI UUC defining the gene defect and that MRE11 and RAD50 mutations were associated with their concomitant loss expression. In conclusion, MSI UUC represent a small proportion of UUC in which BAX and MRE11 mutations are frequent and may play a role early in UUC tumorigenesis.

Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)

The histopathological examination of a prostate biopsy is the basis of prostate cancer diagnostics. Prostate cancer grade and extent of cancer in the diagnostic biopsy are important determinants of patient management. Quality of the prostate biopsy and its processing may influence the outcome of the histopathological evaluation. Further, an unambiguous and concise pathology reporting is essential for an appropriate clinical decision process. Since our initial report in 2003, there have been several practice changes, including the increased uptake of follow-up biopsies of patients who are under active surveillance, increasingly taken under guidance of MRI, or who underwent a prostate-sparing therapy. Therefore, we investigated the literature on the current pathology practices and recommendations with regard to prostate biopsy processing and reporting, both at initial diagnosis and in the context of follow-up biopsies in order to update our guidelines on the optimal processing and reporting of prostate biopsies.