Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where A. V. Filippenko is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by A. V. Filippenko.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1999

Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae

S. Perlmutter; G. Aldering; G. Goldhaber; Robert Andrew Knop; Peter E. Nugent; P. G. Castro; S. E. Deustua; S. Fabbro; Ariel Goobar; Donald E. Groom; I. M. Hook; A. G. Kim; M. Y. Kim; Julia C. Lee; N. J. Nunes; R. Pain; Carlton R. Pennypacker; Robert Michael Quimby; C. Lidman; Richard S. Ellis; M. J. Irwin; Richard G. McMahon; Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente; Nancy A. Walton; Bradley E. Schaefer; B. J. Boyle; A. V. Filippenko; Thomas Matheson; Andrew S. Fruchter; Nino Panagia

We report measurements of the mass density, Omega_M, and cosmological-constant energy density, Omega_Lambda, of the universe based on the analysis of 42 Type Ia supernovae discovered by the Supernova Cosmology Project. The magnitude-redshift data for these SNe, at redshifts between 0.18 and 0.83, are fit jointly with a set of SNe from the Calan/Tololo Supernova Survey, at redshifts below 0.1, to yield values for the cosmological parameters. All SN peak magnitudes are standardized using a SN Ia lightcurve width-luminosity relation. The measurement yields a joint probability distribution of the cosmological parameters that is approximated by the relation 0.8 Omega_M - 0.6 Omega_Lambda ~= -0.2 +/- 0.1 in the region of interest (Omega_M 0) = 99%, including the identified systematic uncertainties. The best-fit age of the universe relative to the Hubble time is t_0 = 14.9{+1.4,-1.1} (0.63/h) Gyr for a flat cosmology. The size of our sample allows us to perform a variety of statistical tests to check for possible systematic errors and biases. We find no significant differences in either the host reddening distribution or Malmquist bias between the low-redshift Calan/Tololo sample and our high-redshift sample. The conclusions are robust whether or not a width-luminosity relation is used to standardize the SN peak magnitudes.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1997

Measurements of the Cosmological Parameters

S. Perlmutter; Silvia Gabi; G. Goldhaber; A. Goobar; D. E. Groom; I. M. Hook; A. G. Kim; M. Y. Kim; J. C. Lee; R. Pain; Carlton R. Pennypacker; I. A. Small; Richard S. Ellis; Richard G. McMahon; B. J. Boyle; P. S. Bunclark; D. L. Carter; M. J. Irwin; Karl Glazebrook; H. Newberg; A. V. Filippenko; Thomas Matheson; Michael A. Dopita; Warrick J. Couch

We have developed a technique to systematically discover and study high-redshift supernovae that can be used to measure the cosmological parameters. We report here results based on the initial seven of more than 28 supernovae discovered to date in the high-redshift supernova search of the Supernova Cosmology Project. We find an observational dispersion in peak magnitudes of ? -->MB=0.27; this dispersion narrows to ?MB, corr=0.19 after correcting the magnitudes using the light-curve width-luminosity relation found for nearby (z ? 0.1) Type Ia supernovae from the Cal?n/Tololo survey (Hamuy et al.). Comparing light-curve width-corrected magnitudes as a function of redshift of our distant (z = 0.35-0.46) supernovae to those of nearby Type Ia supernovae yields a global measurement of the mass density, ?M


The Astrophysical Journal | 2007

\Omega

William Michael Wood-Vasey; Gajus A. Miknaitis; Christopher W. Stubbs; Saurabh W. Jha; Adam G. Riess; Peter Marcus Garnavich; Robert P. Kirshner; C. A. Aguilera; Andrew Cameron Becker; J. W. Blackman; Stephane Blondin; Peter M. Challis; Alejandro Clocchiatti; A. Conley; Ricardo Alberto Covarrubias; Tamara M. Davis; A. V. Filippenko; Ryan J. Foley; Arti Garg; Malcolm Stuart Hicken; Kevin Krisciunas; Bruno Leibundgut; Weidong Li; Thomas Matheson; Antonino Miceli; Gautham S. Narayan; G. Pignata; Jose Luis Palacio Prieto; A. Rest; Maria Elena Salvo

{r M}


Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2014

and

M. Betoule; Richard Kessler; J. Guy; Jennifer J. Mosher; D. Hardin; Rahul Biswas; P. Astier; P. El-Hage; M. Konig; S. E. Kuhlmann; John P. Marriner; R. Pain; Nicolas Regnault; C. Balland; Bruce A. Bassett; Peter J. Brown; Heather Campbell; R. G. Carlberg; F. Cellier-Holzem; D. Cinabro; A. Conley; C. B. D'Andrea; D. L. DePoy; Mamoru Doi; Richard S. Ellis; S. Fabbro; A. V. Filippenko; Ryan J. Foley; Joshua A. Frieman; D. Fouchez

-->=0.88 -->+ 0.69?0.60 for a ? = 0 cosmology. For a spatially flat universe (i.e., ?M + ?? = 1), we find ?M


The Astrophysical Journal | 1998

\Lambda

Peter Marcus Garnavich; Robert P. Kirshner; Peter M. Challis; John L. Tonry; R. L. Gilliland; Ryan Christopher Smith; Alejandro Clocchiatti; Alan Hodgdon Diercks; A. V. Filippenko; Mario Hamuy; Craig J. Hogan; Bruno Leibundgut; Mark M. Phillips; David J. Reiss; Adam G. Riess; Brian Paul Schmidt; Robert A. Schommer; Jason Spyromilio; Christopher W. Stubbs; Nicholas B. Suntzeff; Lisa A. Wells

{r M}


Nature | 2006

from the First 7 Supernovae at z >= 0.35

E. Pian; Paolo A. Mazzali; N. Masetti; P. Ferrero; Sylvio Klose; Eliana Palazzi; Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz; S. E. Woosley; C. Kouveliotou; J. S. Deng; A. V. Filippenko; Ryan J. Foley; J. P. U. Fynbo; D. A. Kann; Weidong Li; J. Hjorth; K. Nomoto; Ferdinando Patat; Daniel Sauer; Jesper Sollerman; Paul M. Vreeswijk; E. W. Guenther; A. Levan; Paul T. O'Brien; Nial R. Tanvir; R. A. M. J. Wijers; Christophe Dumas; Olivier R. Hainaut; Diane S. Wong; Dietrich Baade

-->=0.94 -->+ 0.34?0.28 or, equivalently, a measurement of the cosmological constant, ??=0.06 -->+ 0.28?0.34 ( < 0.51 at the 95% confidence level). For the more general Friedmann-Lema?tre cosmologies with independent ?M and ??, the results are presented as a confidence region on the ?M-?? plane. This region does not correspond to a unique value of the deceleration parameter q0. We present analyses and checks for statistical and systematic errors and also show that our results do not depend on the specifics of the width-luminosity correction. The results for ??-versus-?M are inconsistent with ?-dominated, low-density, flat cosmologies that have been proposed to reconcile the ages of globular cluster stars with higher Hubble constant values.


Nature | 1999

Observational constraints on the nature of dark energy : First cosmological results from the essence supernova survey

J. S. Bloom; S. R. Kulkarni; S. G. Djorgovski; A.C. Eichelberger; Patrick Cote; John P. Blakeslee; S. C. Odewahn; Fiona A. Harrison; Dale A. Frail; A. V. Filippenko; Douglas C. Leonard; Adam G. Riess; Hyron Spinrad; D. Stern; Andrew J. Bunker; Arjun Dey; B. Grossan; S. Perlmutter; R. A. Knop; I. M. Hook; M. Feroci

We present constraints on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter, w = P/(rho c(2)), using 60 SNe Ia fromthe ESSENCE supernova survey. We derive a set of constraints on the nature of the dark energy assuming a flat universe. By including constraints on (Omega(M), w) from baryon acoustic oscillations, we obtain a value for a static equation-of-state parameter w = -1:05(-0.12)(+0: 13) (stat 1 sigma) +/- 0: 13 (sys) and Omega(M) = 0:274(-0.020)(+0:033) (stat 1 sigma) with a bestfit chi(2)/dof of 0.96. These results are consistent with those reported by the Supernova Legacy Survey from the first year of a similar program measuring supernova distances and redshifts. We evaluate sources of systematic error that afflict supernova observations and present Monte Carlo simulations that explore these effects. Currently, the largest systematic with the potential to affect our measurements is the treatment of extinction due to dust in the supernova host galaxies. Combining our set of ESSENCE SNe Ia with the first-results Supernova Legacy Survey SNe Ia, we obtain a joint constraint of w = -1:07(-0: 09)(+0:09) (stat 1 sigma) +/- 0: 13 ( sys), Omega(M) 0:267(-0:028)(+0:028) (stat 1 sigma) with a best-fit chi(2)/dof of 0.91. The current global SN Ia data alone rule out empty (Omega(M) = 0), matter-only Omega(M) = 0: 3, and Omega(M) = 1 universes at > 4.5 sigma. The current SN Ia data are fully consistent with a cosmological constant.


Nature | 2009

Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples

Avishay Gal-Yam; Paolo A. Mazzali; Eran O. Ofek; Peter E. Nugent; S. R. Kulkarni; Mansi M. Kasliwal; Robert Michael Quimby; A. V. Filippenko; S. B. Cenko; Ryan Chornock; Roni Waldman; D. Kasen; Edward C. Beshore; Andrew J. Drake; R. C. Thomas; J. S. Bloom; Dovi Poznanski; Adam A. Miller; Ryan J. Foley; Jeffrey M. Silverman; Iair Arcavi; Richard S. Ellis; J. S. Deng

Aims. We present cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of type Ia supernova (SN Ia) observations obtained by the SDSS-II and SNLS collaborations. The dataset includes several low-redshift samples (z< 0.1), all three seasons from the SDSS-II (0.05 <z< 0.4), and three years from SNLS (0.2 <z< 1), and it totals 740 spectroscopically confirmed type Ia supernovae with high-quality light curves. Methods. We followed the methods and assumptions of the SNLS three-year data analysis except for the following important improvements: 1) the addition of the full SDSS-II spectroscopically-confirmed SN Ia sample in both the training of the SALT2 light-curve model and in the Hubble diagram analysis (374 SNe); 2) intercalibration of the SNLS and SDSS surveys and reduced systematic uncertainties in the photometric calibration, performed blindly with respect to the cosmology analysis; and 3) a thorough investigation of systematic errors associated with the SALT2 modeling of SN Ia light curves. Results. We produce recalibrated SN Ia light curves and associated distances for the SDSS-II and SNLS samples. The large SDSS-II sample provides an effective, independent, low-z anchor for the Hubble diagram and reduces the systematic error from calibration systematics in the low-z SN sample. For a flat ΛCDM cosmology, we find Ωm =0.295 ± 0.034 (stat+sys), a value consistent with the most recent cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurement from the Planck and WMAP experiments. Our result is 1.8σ (stat+sys) different than the previously published result of SNLS three-year data. The change is due primarily to improvements in the SNLS photometric calibration. When combined with CMB constraints, we measure a constant dark-energy equation of state parameter w =−1.018 ± 0.057 (stat+sys) for a flat universe. Adding baryon acoustic oscillation distance measurements gives similar constraints: w =−1.027 ± 0.055. Our supernova measurements provide the most stringent constraints to date on the nature of dark energy.


The Astronomical Journal | 1992

Constraints on Cosmological Models from Hubble Space Telescope Observations of High-z Supernovae

A. V. Filippenko; M. W. Richmond; David Branch; C. M. Gaskell; W. Herbst; C. H. Ford; R. R. Treffers; Thomas Matheson; Luis C. Ho; Arjun Dey; Wallace L. W. Sargent; T. A. Small; W. van Breugel

We have coordinated Hubble Space Telescope (HST) photometry with ground-based discovery for three supernovae: Type Ia supernovae near z ≈ 0.5 (SN 1997ce, SN 1997cj) and a third event at z = 0.97 (SN 1997ck). The superb spatial resolution of HST separates each supernova from its host galaxy and leads to good precision in the light curves. We use these light curves and relations between luminosity, light-curve shape, and color calibrated from low-z samples to derive relative luminosity distances that are accurate to 10% at z ≈ 0.5 and 20% at z = 1. When the HST sample is combined with the distance to SN 1995K (z = 0.48), analyzed by the same precepts, we find that matter alone is insufficient to produce a flat universe. Specifically, for Ωm+ΩΛ = 1, Ωm is less than 1 with more than 95% confidence, and our best estimate of Ωm is -0.1±0.5 if ΩΛ = 0. Although this result is based on a very small sample whose systematics remain to be explored, it demonstrates the power of HST measurements for high-redshift supernovae.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2007

An optical supernova associated with the X-ray flash XRF 060218

Gajus A. Miknaitis; G. Pignata; A. Rest; William Michael Wood-Vasey; Stephane Blondin; Peter M. Challis; Robert Connon Smith; Christopher W. Stubbs; Nicholas B. Suntzeff; Ryan J. Foley; Thomas Matheson; John L. Tonry; C. A. Aguilera; J. W. Blackman; Andrew Cameron Becker; Alejandro Clocchiatti; Ricardo Alberto Covarrubias; Tamara M. Davis; A. V. Filippenko; Arti Garg; Peter Marcus Garnavich; Malcolm Stuart Hicken; Saurabh W. Jha; Kevin Krisciunas; Robert P. Kirshner; Bruno Leibundgut; Weidong Li; Antonino Miceli; Gautham S. Narayan; Jose Luis Palacio Prieto

Long-duration γ-ray bursts (GRBs) are associated with type Ic supernovae that are more luminous than average and that eject material at very high velocities. Less-luminous supernovae were not hitherto known to be associated with GRBs, and therefore GRB–supernovae were thought to be rare events. Whether X-ray flashes—analogues of GRBs, but with lower luminosities and fewer γ-rays—can also be associated with supernovae, and whether they are intrinsically ‘weak’ events or typical GRBs viewed off the axis of the burst, is unclear. Here we report the optical discovery and follow-up observations of the type Ic supernova SN 2006aj associated with X-ray flash XRF 060218. Supernova 2006aj is intrinsically less luminous than the GRB–supernovae, but more luminous than many supernovae not accompanied by a GRB. The ejecta velocities derived from our spectra are intermediate between these two groups, which is consistent with the weakness of both the GRB output and the supernova radio flux. Our data, combined with radio and X-ray observations, suggest that XRF 060218 is an intrinsically weak and soft event, rather than a classical GRB observed off-axis. This extends the GRB–supernova connection to X-ray flashes and fainter supernovae, implying a common origin. Events such as XRF 060218 are probably more numerous than GRB–supernovae.

Collaboration


Dive into the A. V. Filippenko's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W.-D. Li

Iowa State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ryan J. Foley

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey M. Silverman

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. S. Bloom

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Weidong Li

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Bradley Cenko

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel A. Perley

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge