Achamveedu Gopakumar
University of Jena
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Achamveedu Gopakumar.
Physical Review D | 2008
Mark Hannam; S. Husa; Bernd Brügmann; Achamveedu Gopakumar
We compare results from numerical simulations of spinning binaries in the ‘‘orbital hang-up’’ case, where the binary completes at least nine orbits before merger, with post-Newtonian results using the approximants Taylor T1, T4, and Et. We find that, over the ten cycles before the gravitational-wave frequency reaches M! ¼ 0:1, the accumulated phase disagreement between numerical relativity (NR) and 2.5 post-Newtonian (PN) results is less than three radians, and is less than 2.5 radians when using 3.5PN results. The amplitude disagreement between NR and restricted PN results increases with the black holes’ spin, from about 6% in the equal-mass case to 12% when the black holes’ spins are Si=M 2 ¼ 0:85. Finally, our results suggest that the merger waveform will play an important role in estimating the spin from such inspiral waveforms.
Physical Review D | 2006
Thibault Damour; Achamveedu Gopakumar
During the coalescence of binary black holes, gravitational waves carry linear momentum away from the source, which results in the recoil of the center of mass. Using the effective one body approach, which includes nonperturbative resummed estimates for the damping and conservative parts of the compact binary dynamics, we compute the recoil during the late inspiral and the subsequent plunge of nonspinning black holes of comparable masses moving in quasicircular orbits. Further, using a prescription that smoothly connects the plunge phase to a perturbed single black hole, we obtain an estimate for the total recoil associated with the binary black hole coalescence. We show that the crucial physical feature which determines the magnitude of the terminal recoil is the presence of a burst of linear-momentum flux emitted slightly before coalescence. When using the most natural expression for the linear-momentum flux during the plunge, together with a Taylor-expanded
The Astrophysical Journal | 2010
Mauri J. Valtonen; Seppo Mikkola; David Merritt; Achamveedu Gopakumar; Harry J. Lehto; T. Hyvönen; Hayden Rampadarath; R. Saunders; M. Basta; R. Hudec
(v/c{)}^{4}
Physical Review D | 2004
Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer; Achamveedu Gopakumar; Gerhard Schäfer
correction factor, we find that the maximum value of the terminal recoil is
Physical Review D | 2005
Christian Königsdörffer; Achamveedu Gopakumar
ensuremath{sim}74text{ }text{ }mathrm{km}/mathrm{s}
Physical Review D | 2004
Thibault Damour; Achamveedu Gopakumar; Bala R. Iyer
and occurs for
Physical Review D | 2008
Achamveedu Gopakumar; Mark Hannam; S. Husa; Bernd Brügmann
ensuremath{eta}=({m}_{1}{m}_{2})/({m}_{1}+{m}_{2}{)}^{2}ensuremath{simeq}0.2
Physical Review D | 2006
Christian Königsdörffer; Achamveedu Gopakumar
, i.e., for a mass ratio
Physical Review D | 2005
Achamveedu Gopakumar; Christian Königsdörffer
{m}_{2}/{m}_{1}ensuremath{simeq}0.38
Physical Review D | 2016
Sashwat Tanay; Achamveedu Gopakumar; Maria Haney
. Away from this optimal mass ratio, the recoil velocity decreases approximately proportionally to the scaling function