Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Adriaan Moelker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Adriaan Moelker.


European Radiology | 2012

Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Marcus C. de Jong; Tessa S. S. Genders; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Adriaan Moelker; M. G. Myriam Hunink

ObjectivesTo determine and compare the diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), using conventional coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard.MethodsWe searched Medline and Embase for literature that evaluated stress MPI for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced echocardiography (ECHO), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET).ResultsAll pooled analyses were based on random effects models. Articles on MRI yielded a total of 2,970 patients from 28 studies, articles on ECHO yielded a sample size of 795 from 10 studies, articles on SPECT yielded 1,323 from 13 studies. For CAD defined as either at least 50xa0%, at least 70xa0% or at least 75xa0% lumen diameter reduction on CCA, the natural logarithms of the diagnostic odds ratio (lnDOR) for MRI (3.63; 95xa0% CI 3.26–4.00) was significantly higher compared to that of SPECT (2.76; 95xa0% CI 2.28–3.25; Pu2009=u20090.006) and that of ECHO (2.83; 95xa0% CI 2.29–3.37; Pu2009=u20090.02). There was no significant difference between the lnDOR of SPECT and ECHO (Pu2009=u20090.52).ConclusionOur results suggest that MRI is superior for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD compared with ECHO and SPECT. ECHO and SPECT demonstrated similar diagnostic performance.Key Points• MRI can assess myocardial perfusion.• MR perfusion diagnoses coronary artery disease better than echocardiography or SPECT.• Echocardiography and SPECT have similar diagnostic performance.• MRI can save coronary artery disease patients from more invasive tests.• MRI and SPECT show evidence of publication bias, implying possible overestimation.


Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2016

Coronary CT Angiography for Suspected ACS in the Era of High-Sensitivity Troponins: Randomized Multicenter Study.

Admir Dedic; Marisa M. Lubbers; Jeroen Schaap; Jeronymus Lammers; Evert J. Lamfers; Benno J. Rensing; Richard L. Braam; Hendrik M. Nathoe; Johannes C. Post; Tim Nielen; Driek Beelen; Marie-Claire le Cocq d’Armandville; Pleunie P.M. Rood; Carl Schultz; Adriaan Moelker; Mohamed Ouhlous; Eric Boersma; Koen Nieman

BACKGROUNDnIt is uncertain whether a diagnostic strategy supplemented by early coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is superior to contemporary standard optimal care (SOC) encompassing high-sensitivity troponin assays (hs-troponins) for patients suspected of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED).nnnOBJECTIVESnThis study assessed whether a diagnostic strategy supplemented by early CCTA improves clinical effectiveness compared with contemporary SOC.nnnMETHODSnIn a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial, we enrolled patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of an ACS at the ED of 5 community and 2 university hospitals in the Netherlands. Exclusion criteria included the need for urgent cardiac catheterization and history of ACS or coronary revascularization. The primary endpoint was the number of patients identified with significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization within 30 days.nnnRESULTSnThe study population consisted of 500 patients, of whom 236 (47%) were women (mean age 54 ± 10 years). There was no difference in the primary endpoint (22 [9%] patients underwent coronary revascularization within 30 days in the CCTA group and 17 [7%] in the SOC group [p = 0.40]). Discharge from the ED was not more frequent after CCTA (65% vs. 59%, p = 0.16), and length of stay was similar (6.3 h in both groups; p = 0.80). The CCTA group had lower direct medical costs (€337 vs. €511, p < 0.01) and less outpatient testing after the index ED visit (10 [4%] vs. 26 [10%], p < 0.01). There was no difference in incidence of undetected ACS.nnnCONCLUSIONSnCCTA, applied early in the work-up of suspected ACS, is safe and associated with less outpatient testing and lower costs. However, in the era of hs-troponins, CCTA does not identify more patients with significant CAD requiring coronary revascularization, shorten hospital stay, or allow for more direct discharge from the ED. (Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Computed Tomography Angiography [BEACON]; NCT01413282).


Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | 2011

Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pregnant women: cross-sectional analysis of physiological parameters throughout pregnancy and the impact of the supine position.

Alexia Rossi; Jérôme Cornette; Mark R. Johnson; Yusuf Karamermer; Tirza Springeling; Petra Opic; Adriaan Moelker; Gabriel P. Krestin; Eric A.P. Steegers; Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink; Robert-Jan van Geuns

BackgroundThere are physiological reasons for the effects of positioning on hemodynamic variables and cardiac dimensions related to altered intra-abdominal and intra-thoracic pressures. This problem is especially evident in pregnant women due to the additional aorto-caval compression by the enlarged uterus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of postural changes on cardiac dimensions and function during mid and late pregnancy using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).MethodsHealthy non-pregnant women, pregnant women at 20th week of gestation and at 32nd week of gestation without history of cardiac disease were recruited to the study and underwent CMR in supine and left lateral positions. Cardiac hemodynamic parameters and dimensions were measured and compared between both positions.ResultsFive non-pregnant women, 6 healthy pregnant women at mid pregnancy and 8 healthy pregnant women at late pregnancy were enrolled in the study. In the group of non-pregnant women left ventricular (LV) cardiac output (CO) significantly decreased by 9% (p = 0.043) and right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic volume (EDV) significantly increased by 5% (p = 0.043) from the supine to the left lateral position. During mid pregnancy LV ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), left atrium lateral diameter and left atrial supero-inferior diameter increased significantly from the supine position to the left lateral position: 8%, 27%, 5% and 11%, respectively (p < 0.05). RV EDV, SV and right atrium supero-inferior diameter significantly increased from the supine to the left lateral position: 25%, 31% and 13% (p < 0.05), respectively. During late pregnancy a significant increment of LV EF, EDV, SV and CO was observed in the left lateral position: 11%, 21%, 35% and 24% (p < 0.05), respectively. Left atrial diameters were significantly larger in the left lateral position compared to the supine position (p < 0.05). RV CO was significantly increased in the left lateral position compared to the supine position (p < 0.05).ConclusionsDuring pregnancy positional changes affect significantly cardiac hemodynamic parameters and dimensions. Pregnant women who need serial studies by CMR should be imaged in a consistent position. From as early as 20 weeks the left lateral position should be preferred on the supine position because it positively affects venous return, SV and CO.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2012

Clinical outcome and morphologic analysis after endovascular aneurysm repair using the Excluder endograft

Frederico Bastos Gonçalves; An Jairam; Michiel T. Voûte; Adriaan Moelker; Ellen V. Rouwet; Sander Ten Raa; Johanna M. Hendriks; Hence J.M. Verhagen

OBJECTIVEnLong-term follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is very scarce, and doubt remains regarding the durability of these procedures. We designed a retrospective cohort study to assess long-term clinical outcome and morphologic changes in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) treated by EVAR using the Excluder endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz).nnnMETHODSnFrom 2000 to 2007, 179 patients underwent EVAR in a tertiary institution. Clinical data were retrieved from a prospective database. All patients treated with the Excluder endoprosthesis were included. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans were retrospectively analyzed preoperatively, at 30 days, and at the last follow-up using dedicated tridimensional reconstruction software. For patients with complications, all remaining CTAs were also analyzed. The primary end point was clinical success. Secondary end points were freedom from reintervention, sac growth, types I and III endoleak, migration, conversion to open repair, and AAA-related death or rupture. Neck dilatation, renal function, and overall survival were also analyzed.nnnRESULTSnIncluded were 144 patients (88.2% men; mean age, 71.6 years). Aneurysms were ruptured in 4.9%. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification was III/IV in 61.8%. No patients were lost during a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range, 3.1-6.4; maximum, 11.2 years). Two patients died of medical complications ≤ 30 days after EVAR. The estimated primary clinical success rates at 5 and 10 years were 63.5% and 41.1%, and secondary clinical success rates were 78.3% and 58.3%, respectively. Sac growth was observed in 37 of 142 patients (26.1%). Cox regression showed type I endoleak during follow-up (hazard ratio, 3.74; P = .008), original design model (hazard ratio, 3.85; P = .001), and preoperative neck diameter (1.27 per mm increase, P = .006) were determinants of sac growth. Secondary interventions were required in 32 patients (22.5%). The estimated 10-year rate of AAA-related death or rupture was 2.1%. Overall life expectancy after AAA repair was 6.8 years.nnnCONCLUSIONSnEVAR using the Excluder endoprosthesis provides a safe and lasting treatment for AAA, despite the need for maintained surveillance and secondary interventions. At up to 11 years, the risk of AAA-related death or postimplantation rupture is remarkably low. The incidences of postimplantation sac growth and secondary intervention were greatly reduced after the introduction of the low-permeability design in 2004.


European Radiology | 2013

Ascending aorta dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: a prospective CMR study

Alexia Rossi; Denise van der Linde; Sing Chien Yap; Thomas Lapinskas; Sharon W. Kirschbaum; Tirza Springeling; Maarten Witsenburg; Judith Cuypers; Adriaan Moelker; Gabriel P. Krestin; Arie P.J. van Dijk; Mark R. Johnson; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the natural progression of aortic dilatation and its association with aortic valve stenosis (AoS) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV).MethodsProspective study of aorta dilatation in patients with BAV and AoS using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Aortic root, ascending aorta, aortic peak velocity, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and mass were assessed at baseline and at 3-year follow-up.ResultsOf the 33 enrolled patients, 5 needed surgery, while 28 patients (17 male; mean age: 31u2009±u20098xa0years) completed the study. Aortic diameters significantly increased at the aortic annulus, sinus of Valsalva and tubular ascending aorta levels (Pu2009<u20090.050). The number of patients with dilated tubular ascending aortas increased from 32xa0% to 43xa0%. No significant increase in sino-tubular junction diameter was observed. Aortic peak velocity, ejection fraction and myocardial mass significantly increased while the early/late filling ratio significantly decreased at follow-up (Pu2009<u20090.050). The progression rate of the ascending aorta diameter correlated weakly with the aortic peak velocity at baseline (R2u2009=u20090.16, Pu2009=u20090.040).ConclusionBAV patients with AoS showed a progressive increase of aortic diameters with maximal expression at the level of the tubular ascending aorta. The progression of aortic dilatation correlated weakly with the severity of AoS.Key Points• Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect.n • BAV patients have an increased risk of developing aortic valve stenosis (AoS).n • BAV patients have an increased risk of developing thoracic aorta dilatation.n • The severity of aortic stenosis is correlated to the progression of aortic dilatation.n • Cardiac magnetic resonance can rapidly assess patients with a bicuspid aortic valve.


Medical Physics | 2017

Semiautomated registration of pre‐ and intraoperative CT for image‐guided percutaneous liver tumor ablation interventions

Gokhan Gunay; Manh Ha Luu; Adriaan Moelker; Theo van Walsum; Stefan Klein

Purpose In CT‐guided liver tumor ablation interventions, registration of a preoperative contrast‐enhanced CT image to the intraoperative CT image is hypothesized to improve guidance. This is a highly challenging registration task due to differences in patient poses and large deformations, and therefore high registration errors are expected. In this study, our objective is to develop a method that enables users to locally improve the registration where the registration fails, with minimal user interaction. Methods The method is based on a conventional nonrigid intensity‐based registration framework, extended with a novel point‐to‐surface penalty. The point‐to‐surface penalty serves to improve the alignment of the liver boundary, while requiring minimal user interaction during the intervention: annotating some points on the liver surface at those regions where the conventional registration seems inaccurate. Results The method is evaluated on 18 clinical datasets. It improves registration accuracy compared with the conventional nonrigid registration in terms of average surface distance (from 2.75 to 2.05 mm) and target registration error (from 6.92 to 5.8 mm). Conclusions In this study, we introduce a semiautomated registration algorithm that improves the accuracy of image registration.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2018

Persistent symptom relief after revascularization in patients with single-artery chronic mesenteric ischemia

Louisa J. van Dijk; Leon M. Moons; Desirée van Noord; Adriaan Moelker; Hence J.M. Verhagen; Marco J. Bruno; Ellen V. Rouwet

Objective An isolated stenosis of the celiac artery (CA) or the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is frequently detected in patients with abdominal complaints. The dilemma is whether these patients suffer from chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) and whether they will benefit from revascularization. We evaluated the long‐term clinical success rates for single CA or SMA revascularization in patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and confirmed mucosal ischemia. Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 59 consecutive patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and a single atherosclerotic mesenteric artery stenosis who were referred to our tertiary care institution between 2006 and 2010 for standardized diagnostic workup of CMI, including measurement of mucosal ischemia with visible light spectroscopy or gastric‐jejunal tonometry. Patients with multidisciplinary consensus diagnosis of CMI underwent surgical or endovascular revascularization. The primary outcome was clinical response to revascularization, defined as relief of presenting symptoms as experienced by the patient. Results Consensus diagnosis of CMI was obtained in 37 of 59 patients. Isolated CA stenosis was present in 30 of 37 patients (81%) and isolated SMA stenosis in seven patients. After a mean follow‐up of 5.0 ± 3.0 years, 27 of 37 patients (73%) experienced sustained symptom relief after revascularization. Response was not related to lesion localization (CA, 73%; SMA, 71%; P = .919). Conclusions Revascularization of the CA or SMA provides persistent symptom relief in 73% of patients diagnosed with CMI due to single atherosclerotic mesenteric artery stenosis. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.


Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2017

Clinical significance of mesenteric arterial collateral circulation in patients with celiac artery compression syndrome

André S. van Petersen; Jeroen J. Kolkman; Dick Gerrits; Job van der Palen; Clark J. Zeebregts; Robert H. Geelkerken; Marco J. Bruno; L.J.D. van Dijk; Adriaan Moelker; Maikel P. Peppelenbosch; Hence J.M. Verhagen; Juliëtte T.M. Blauw; R.H. Geelkerken; J.J. Kolkman; A.S. van Petersen; Olaf J. Bakker

Objective: Although extensive collateral arterial circulation will prevent ischemia in most patients with stenosis of a single mesenteric artery, mesenteric ischemia may occur in these patients, for example, in patients with celiac artery compression syndrome (CACS). Variation in the extent of collateral circulation may explain the difference in clinical symptoms and variability in response to therapy; however, evidence is lacking. The objective of the study was to classify the presence of mesenteric arterial collateral circulation in patients with CACS and to evaluate the relation with clinical improvement after treatment. Methods: Collateral mesenteric circulation was classified on the basis of angiographic findings. Collaterals were categorized in three groups: no visible collaterals (grade 0), collaterals seen on selective angiography only (grade 1), and collaterals visible on nonselective angiography (grade 2). Surgical release of the celiac artery in patients with suspected CACS was performed by arcuate ligament release. Clinical success after surgical revascularization was defined as an improvement in abdominal pain. Results: Between 2002 and 2013, there were 135 consecutive patients with suspected CACS who were operated on. In 129 patients, preoperative angiograms allowed classification of collateral circulation. Primary assisted anatomic success was 93% (120/129). In patients with grade 0 collaterals, clinical success was 81% (39 of 48 patients); with grade 1 collaterals, 89% (25 of 28 patients); and with grade 2 collaterals, 52% (23 of 44 patients; P < .001). Conclusions: Patients with CACS and with extensive collateral mesenteric arterial circulation are less likely to benefit from arcuate ligament release than are patients without this type of collateral circulation. The classification of the extent of mesenteric collateral circulation may predict and guide shared decision‐making in patients with CACS.


Best Practice & Research in Clinical Gastroenterology | 2017

Vascular imaging of the mesenteric vasculature

Louisa J. van Dijk; André S. van Petersen; Adriaan Moelker

Imaging of the mesenteric vasculature is crucial in diagnosing vascular disease of the gastro-intestinal tract such as acute or chronic mesenteric ischemia caused by arterial stenosis, embolism or thrombosis, mesenteric vein thrombosis and mesenteric aneurysm or dissection. The reference standard for imaging of the mesenteric vasculature is digital subtraction angiography. However, modalities as duplex ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography are developing rapidly and may provide accurate imaging non-invasively. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the anatomic resolution, clinical application, emerging techniques and future perspectives of these four radiological modalities for imaging of the mesenteric vasculature.


The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology | 2018

Endoscopic versus percutaneous biliary drainage in patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Robert J.S. Coelen; Eva Roos; Jimme K. Wiggers; Marc G. Besselink; Carlijn I. Buis; Olivier R. Busch; Cornelis H.C. Dejong; Otto M. van Delden; Casper H.J. van Eijck; Paul Fockens; Dirk J. Gouma; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Michiel W. de Haan; Jeanin E. van Hooft; Jan N. M. IJzermans; G Matthijs Kater; Jan J. Koornstra; Krijn P. van Lienden; Adriaan Moelker; Steven W.M. Olde Damink; Jan-Werner Poley; Robert J. Porte; Rogier J. De Ridder; Joanne Verheij; Victor van Woerden; Erik A. J. Rauws; Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf; Thomas M. van Gulik

BACKGROUNDnIn patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, biliary drainage is recommended to treat obstructive jaundice and optimise the clinical condition before liver resection. Little evidence exists on the preferred initial method of biliary drainage. We therefore investigated the incidence of severe drainage-related complications of endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.nnnMETHODSnWe did a multicentre, randomised controlled trial at four academic centres in the Netherlands. Patients who were aged at least 18 years with potentially resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma requiring major liver resection, and biliary obstruction of the future liver remnant (defined as a bilirubin concentration of >50 μmol/L [2·9 mg/dL]), were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive endoscopic biliary drainage or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage through the use of computer-generated allocation. Randomisation, done by the trial coordinator, was stratified for previous (attempted) biliary drainage, the extent of bile duct involvement, and enrolling centre. Patients were enrolled by clinicians of the participating centres. The primary outcome was the number of severe complications between randomisation and surgery in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered at the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4243.nnnFINDINGSnFrom Sept 26, 2013, to April 29, 2016, 261 patients were screened for participation, and 54 eligible patients were randomly assigned to endoscopic biliary drainage (n=27) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (n=27). The study was prematurely closed because of higher mortality in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group (11 [41%] of 27 patients) than in the endoscopic biliary drainage group (three [11%] of 27 patients; relative risk 3·67, 95% CI 1·15-11·69; p=0·03). Three of the 11 deaths among patients in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group occurred before surgery. The proportion of patients with severe preoperative drainage-related complications was similar between the groups (17 [63%] patients in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group vs 18 [67%] in the endoscopic biliary drainage group; relative risk 0·94, 95% CI 0·64-1·40). 16 (59%) patients in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group and ten (37%) patients in the endoscopic biliary drainage group developed preoperative cholangitis (p=0·1). 15 (56%) patients required additional percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage after endoscopic biliary drainage, whereas only one (4%) patient required endoscopic biliary drainage after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.nnnINTERPRETATIONnThe study was prematurely stopped because of higher all-cause mortality in the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage group. Post-drainage complications were similar between groups, but the data should be interpreted with caution because of the small sample size. The results call for further prospective studies and reconsideration of indications and strategy towards biliary drainage in this complex disease.nnnFUNDINGnDutch Cancer Foundation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Adriaan Moelker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hence J.M. Verhagen

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert-Jan van Geuns

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Admir Dedic

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexia Rossi

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benno J. Rensing

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cornelis Verhoef

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ellen V. Rouwet

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Boersma

Erasmus University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriel P. Krestin

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gokhan Gunay

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge