Akihiko Yonezawa

Differential antagonism of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 spinal antinociception by naloxonazine and 3-methoxynaltrexone

To determine the role of spinal mu-opioid receptor subtypes in antinociception induced by intrathecal (i.t.) injection of endomorphin-1 and -2, we assessed the effects of beta-funaltrexamine (a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist) naloxonazine (a selective antagonist at the mu(1)-opioid receptor) and a novel receptor antagonist (3-methoxynaltrexone) using the paw-withdrawal test. Antinociception of i.t. endomorphins and [D-Ala(2), MePhe(4), Gly(ol)(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO) was completely reversed by pretreatment with beta-funaltrexamine (40 mg/kg s.c.). Pretreatment with a variety of doses of i.t. or s.c. naloxonazine 24 h before testing antagonized the antinociception of endomorphin-1, -2 and DAMGO. Judging from the ID(50) values of naloxonazine, the antinociceptive effect of endomorphin-2 was more sensitive to naloxonazine than that of endomorphin-1 or DAMGO. The selective morphine-6beta-glucuronide antagonist, 3-methoxynaltrexone, which blocked endomorphin-2-induced antinociception at each dose (0.25 mg/kg s.c. or 2.5 ng i.t.) that was inactive against DAMGO, did not affect endomorphin-1-induced antinociception but shifted the dose-response curve of endomorphin-2 3-fold to the right. These findings may be interpreted as indicative of the existence of a novel mu-opioid receptor subtype in spinal sites, where antinociception of morphine-6beta-glucuronide and endomorphin-2 are antagonized by 3-methoxynaltrexone. The present results suggest that endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 may produce antinociception through different subtypes of mu-opioid receptor.

Differential antagonism of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 supraspinal antinociception by naloxonazine and 3-methylnaltrexone

To determine if different subtypes of mu-opioid receptors were involved in antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2, the effect of pretreatment with various mu-opioid receptor antagonists beta-funaltrexamine, naloxonazine and 3-methylnaltrexone on the inhibition of the paw-withdrawal induced by endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) were studied in ddY male mice. The inhibition of the paw-withdrawal induced by i.c.v. administration of endomorphin-1, endomorphin-2 or DAMGO was completely blocked by the pretreatment with a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (40 mg/kg), indicating that the antinociception induced by all these peptides are mediated by the stimulation of mu-opioid receptors. However, naloxonazine, a mu1-opioid receptor antagonist pretreated s.c. for 24h was more effective in blocking the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2, than by endomorphin-1 or DAMGO given i.c.v. Pretreatment with a selective morphine-6 beta-glucuronide blocker 3-methylnaltrexone 0.25mg/kg given s.c. for 25 min or co-administration of 3-methylnaltrexone 2.5 ng given i.c.v. effectively attenuated the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 given i.c.v. and co-administration of 3-methylnaltrexone shifted the dose-response curves for endomorphin-2 induced antinociception to the right by 4-fold. The administration of 3-methylnaltrexone did not affect the antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 or DAMGO given i.c.v. Our results indicate that the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 is mediated by the stimulation of subtypes of mu-opioid receptor, which is different from that of mu-opioid receptor subtype stimulation by endomorphin-1 and DAMGO.

New therapy for neuropathic pain.

Neuropathic pain is one of the worst painful symptoms in clinic. It contains nerve-injured neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, chronic inflammatory pain, cancer pain, and postherpes pain, and is characterized by a tactile allodynia and hyperalgesia. Neuropathic pain, especially the nerve-injured neuropathy, the diabetic neuropathy, and the cancer pain, is opioid resistant pain. Since the downregulation of mu-opioid receptors is observed in dorsal spinal cord, morphine and fentanyl could not provide marked antihyperalgesic/antiallodynic effects in the course neuropathic pain states. The downregulation of mu-opioid receptors is suggested to be mediated through the activation of NMDA receptors. Moreover, at the neuropathic pain states, the increased expression of voltage-dependent Na+ channels and Ca2+ channels are observed. Based on the above information concerned with the pathophysiology of neural changes in neuropathic pain states, new drug treatments for neuropathic pain, using ketamine, methadone, and gabapentin, have been developed. These drugs show remarkable effectiveness against hyperalgesia and allodynia during neuropathic pain states. Oxycodone is a mu-opioid receptor agonist, which has different pharmacological profiles with morphine. The remarkable effectiveness of oxycodone for neuropathic pain provides the possibility that mu-opioid receptor agonists, which have different pharmacological profile with morphine, can be used for the management of neuropathic pain.

Effect of spinal nitric oxide inhibition on capsaicin-induced nociceptive response

Pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NG-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) or intrathecally (i.t.), produced a significant antinociception in the mouse assessed by the capsaicin-induced paw licking procedure. Varying the administration time of an effective dose of L-NAME (160nmol, i.t.) resulted in a significant decrease of the brief nociceptive behavioral response induced by capsaicin, even when L-NAME was given 2 hr before capsaicin. L-NAME, injected i.p. or i.t., produced a dose-related reduction in paw licking in the second phase of the formalin (2.0%) response without affecting the first phase. L-Arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) but not D-arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME in the capsaicin test. Antinociceptive effect of L-NAME, injected i.p. or i.t., was more potent in the second phase response of formalin-induced paw licking than in capsaicin-induced nociceptive response. The inhibitory action of L-NAME was reversed by L-arginine but not D-arginine in the second phase response. L-Arginine alone was without affecting capsaicin- and formalin-induced nociceptive responses. These results suggest that spinal nitric oxide (NO) may be involved in the mechanisms of capsaicin-induced brief nociceptive stimuli, but not in the first, acute phase of the formalin-induced response in mice.

Characterization of p-chloroamphetamine-induced penile erection and ejaculation in anesthetized rats.

Methodological shortcomings present in elicitation of male sexual reflexes in anesthetized animals. The present study has demonstrated, however, that intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of p-chloroamphetamine (PCA), an indirect serotonin (5-HT) agonist, elicited simultaneously both penile erection and ejaculation in anesthetized rats. PCA (2.5-10.0 mg/kg, i.p.) caused an intermittent cluster of genital responses consisting of penile erection, glans erections, and penile cups, which closely resembles the response observed during the ex copula tests in unanesthetized rats. Measurements of intracavernous penile pressure showed that rhythmic changes in penile pressure were produced by PCA, together with glans erections and penile cups. PCA also caused a frequent ejaculations and the weighing of ejaculate accumulated over 0.5 hr was increased in a bell-shaped pattern, and the maximum effect was observed at 5.0 mg/kg. Pretreatment with p-chlorophenylalanine, a serotonin (5-HT)-synthesis inhibitor, significantly inhibited the expression of PCA-induced penile erection and ejaculation, while acute spinal transection at thoracic level did not affect the sexual responses. These results indicate that PCA-induced penile erection and ejaculation in anesthetized rats are mainly produced by the release of 5-HT, which is limited to the lower spinal cord and/or the peripheral sites. Furthermore, the sexual responses can be easily and reliably elicited by administration of PCA, which may be useful for the study of the mechanisms underlying male sexual functions.

Involvement of the histaminergic system in the nociceptin-induced pain-related behaviors in the mouse spinal cord.

Abstract Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of nociceptin elicited a behavioral response mainly consisting of biting and licking, which were eliminated by the i.t. co‐administration of opioid receptor‐like‐1 (ORL‐1) receptor antagonists. The behavioral response induced by nociceptin was characteristically similar to that by i.t.‐administered histamine, and was attenuated by i.t. co‐administration of the H1 receptor antagonists, but not by the H2 receptor antagonists, whereas the H3 receptor antagonist promoted the nociceptin‐induced behavior. H1 receptor knockout (H1R‐KO) mice did not show the nociceptin‐induced nociceptive behavior, which was observed in wild‐type mice. Pretreatment with a histamine antiserum or a histidine decarboxylase inhibitor resulted in a significant reduction of the response to nociceptin. The previous studies showed that NK1 receptor antagonists and a novel substance P (SP)‐specific antagonist given i.t. could reduce the behavioral response to nociceptin and histamine. On the other hand, the nociceptive response induced by nociceptin, but not histamine, was completely attenuated by the i.t. co‐administration of agonists for GABAA and GABAB receptors. In contrast, the antagonists for GABAA and GABAB receptors injected i.t. showed same nociceptive response with nociceptin and histamine, and their nociceptive responses were significantly blocked by the i.t. co‐administration of the H1 receptor antagonists, but not H2 receptor antagonists or ORL‐1 receptor antagonists. The present results suggest that the activation of the ORL‐1 receptor by nociceptin may induce the disinhibition of histaminergic neuron and enhance the release of histamine, which subsequently acts on the H1 receptor located on the SP‐containing neurons to produce the spinal cord‐mediated nociceptive response.

Ejaculatory response induced by a 5-HT2 receptor agonist m-CPP in rats: Differential roles of 5-HT2 receptor subtypes

It has been reported that systemic administration of m-CPP (1-[3-chlorophenyl] piperazine hydrochloride), a 5-HT(2) receptor agonist, produces a 5-HT(2C) receptor-mediated penile erections and self-grooming in rats. In the present study, we examined the ability of m-CPP to induce ejaculation in rats and determined which 5-HT(2) receptor subtypes may be involved in the m-CPP-induced ejaculation. The ejaculatory response was assessed by weighing the seminal materials accumulated over 30 min. In Experiment 1, systemic administration of m-CPP (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a dose-dependent increase in both the incidence of ejaculation and the weight of the seminal materials. The inverted U-shaped dose-response effects of m-CPP on penile erection and genital grooming were also observed, with maximum effects at 0.6 mg/kg. Pretreatment with SB242084 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist, dose-dependently attenuated the ejaculatory response induced by m-CPP (3.0 mg/kg). The proejaculatory effect of m-CPP was also attenuated by ketanserin (0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist, whereas SB204741 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), a selective 5-HT(2B) receptor antagonist, significantly potentiated the m-CPP-induced ejaculatory response. Penile erection and genital grooming induced by m-CPP (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) was only blocked by SB242084. In Experiment 2 (termed as corset test), in rats fitted with a corset at the thoracic level to prevent the loss of seminal materials by genital grooming, the proejaculatory effect of m-CPP was more efficiently detected than in the non-fitted animals: the ED(50) value for inducing ejaculation was reduced to less than 50% of the ED(50) in non-fitted animals. In this test, the proejaculatory effect of m-CPP (0.6 mg/kg, i.p.) was completely blocked by SB242084 (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), whereas ketanserin (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) or SB204741 (0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the m-CPP -induced ejaculation. From these observations, it is suggested that the 5-HT(2) receptor agonist m-CPP at low doses (0.3-1.0 mg/kg) possesses the proejaculatory as well as proerectile effects in rats that are primarily associated with the activation of 5-HT(2C) receptors, and that the activation of 5-HT2B receptors may produce an inhibitory effect on ejaculation induced by a high dose (3.0 mg/kg) of m-CPP. Furthermore, the results of the present study also indicate that the corset test employed in this study may be useful for detecting the proejaculatory effect of the compounds.

Antinociceptive effect of spinally injected l-NAME on the acute nociceptive response induced by low concentrations of formalin

The formalin test has been proposed as an animal model of pain produced by tissue injury. Although biphasic nociceptive responses to formalin injection have been well documented, low concentrations (0.125 and 0.5%) of formalin injected into the mouse hindpaw produced only the phasic (acute) paw-licking response, lasting the first 5 min after the formalin injection. To explore the involvement of nitric oxide (NO) in the spinal cord and peripheral system during the acute phase of the formalin test, we examined the effect of intrathecal (i.t.) or intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of L-N(G)-nitro arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a NO synthase inhibitor in mice. Pretreatment with L-NAME (160 nmol), injected i.t., resulted in a significant inhibition of the paw-licking response induced by 0.125 and 0.5% of formalin. L-Arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) but not D-arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME on the acute nociceptive response induced by low concentrations of formalin. The i.pl. injection of L-NAME (160 nmol) produced a significant decrease of the late (tonic) phase response evoked by 2.0% formalin without affecting the early (acute) phase response. Similar results have been reported in the case of i.t. injected L-NAME as assayed by the 2.0% formalin test. L-NAME (160 nmol), injected into the plantar paw, gave no significant effect on the acute nociceptive response induced by a low concentration of formalin (0.125%). These results suggest that NO in the spinal cord may be involved in not only the late phase response of the formalin (2.0%)-induced paw-licking, but also at least the acute phase response induced by low concentrations (0.125 and 0.5%) of formalin, while peripheral NO has little effect on the early (acute) phase nociceptive response evoked by formalin (0.125--2.0%) injection.

Possible involvement of dynorphin A release via μ1-opioid receptor on supraspinal antinociception of endomorphin-2

It has been demonstrated that the antinociception induced by i.t. or i.c.v. administration of endomorphins is mediated through mu-opioid receptors. Moreover, though endomorphins do not have appreciable affinity for kappa-opioid receptors, pretreatment with the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine markedly blocks the antinociception induced by i.c.v.- or i.t.-injected endomorphin-2, but not endomorphin-1. These evidences propose the hypothesis that endomorphin-2 may initially stimulate the mu-opioid receptors, which subsequently induces the release of dynorphins acting on kappa-opioid receptors to produce antinociception. The present study was performed to determine whether the release of dynorphins by i.c.v.-administered endomorphin-2 is mediated through mu-opioid receptors for producing antinociception. Intracerebroventricular pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin A, but not dynorphin B or alpha-neo-endorphin, and s.c. pretreatment with kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine dose-dependently attenuated the antinociception induced by i.c.v.-administered endomorphin-2, but not endomorphin-1 and DAMGO. The attenuation of endomorphin-2-induced antinociception by pretreatment with antiserum against dynorphin A or nor-binaltorphimine was dose-dependently eliminated by additional s.c. pretreatment with a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine or a selective mu1-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine at ultra low doses, which are inactive against micro-opioid receptor agonists in antinociception, suggesting that endomorphin-2 stimulates distinct subclass of micro1-opioid receptor that induces the release of dynorphin A acting on kappa-opioid receptors in the brain. It concludes that the antinociception induced by supraspinally administered endomorphin-2 is in part mediated through the release of endogenous kappa-opioid peptide dynorphin A, which is caused by the stimulation of distinct subclass of micro1-opioid receptor.

Inhibitory effect of intracerebroventricularly-administered [d-Arg2, β-Ala4]-dermorphin (1–4) on gastrointestinal transit

The inhibitory effect of intracerebroventricularly-administered [D-Arg(2), beta-Ala(4)]-dermorphin (1-4) (TAPA), a highly selective mu(1)-opioid receptor agonist, on mouse gastrointestinal transit was compared with that of morphine and [D-Ala(2), N-methyl-Phe(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO). When administered intracerebroventricularly 5 min before the oral injection of charcoal meal, TAPA (10-100 pmol), morphine (0.25-4 nmol), and DAMGO (20-80 pmol) dose-dependently inhibited gastrointestinal transit of charcoal. The inhibitory effect of each mu-opioid receptor agonist was completely antagonized by naloxone, a nonselective opioid receptor antagonist. The inhibitory effects of morphine and DAMGO were significantly antagonized by both beta-funaltrexamine, a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist, and naloxonazine, a selective mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist. In contrast, the inhibitory effect of TAPA was not affected at all by beta-funaltrexamine, naloxonazine, nor-binaltorphimine (a selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist), or naltrindole (a selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist). These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of TAPA on gastrointestinal transit may be mediated through an opioid receptor mechanism different from that of morphine and DAMGO.