Tsukasa Sakurada

The capsaicin test in mice for evaluating tachykinin antagonists in the spinal cord

A capsaicin test involving peripheral nociception, which produces behaviour similar to that elicited by formalin, is described in mice. Capsaicin was injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into the dorsal surface of a hindpaw and the time the animals spent licking the paw was recorded. Doses of capsaicin of 6.25-1600 ng induced nociception, during a period of 5 min, starting immediately after injection and disappearing completely at 10 min. Intrathecally (i.t.) administered [D-Arg1,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]substance P (spantide), a tachykinin antagonist and [D-Phe7,D-His9]substance P (6-11), a selective antagonist of substance P (SP), inhibited the capsaicin-induced behaviour, in a dose-dependent manner. This licking behaviour was also inhibited by intrathecal administration of SP antiserum but not by somatostatin (SOM) antiserum. Intrathecal pretreatment with capsaicin resulted in a marked reduction of the licking response, following subcutaneous injection of capsaicin into the paw. Capsaicin-induced licking was not affected by intrathecal administration of cyclo[7-aminoheptanoyl-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-(OBz)-Thr], a SOM antagonist and by intrathecal pretreatment with cysteamine, a SOM depletor. This nociceptive test may allow discrimination between SP- and SOM-mediated responses in the spinal cord of the mouse.

Differential involvement of μ-opioid receptor subtypes in endomorphin-1- and -2-induced antinociception

We investigated the role of mu-opioid receptor subtypes in both endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 induced antinociception in mice using supraspinally mediated behavior. With tail pressure as a mechanical noxious stimulus, both intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) and intrathecally (i.t.) injected-endomorphins produced potent and significant antinociceptive activity. Antinociception induced by i.t. and i.c.v. injection of endomorphin-1 was not reversed by pretreatment with a selective mu1-opioid receptor antagonist, naloxonazine (35 mg/kg, s.c.). By contrast, antinociception induced by i.t. and i.c.v. endomorphin-2 was significantly decreased by mu1-opioid receptor antagonist. Antinociception of both i.t. and i.c.v. endomorphin-1 and -2 was completely reversed by pretreatment with beta-funaltrexamine (40 mg/kg, s.c.). The results indicate that endomorphins may produce antinociception through the distinct mu1 and mu2 subtypes of mu-opioid receptor.

Characterization of the hyperalgesic effect induced by intrathecal injection of substance P

Substance P (SP) was administered to awake rats by injection into the lumbar subarachnoid space via an indwelling cannula. Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of substance P produced a dose-related hyperalgesic response in the tail-pressure assay. This hyperalgesic effect peaked at 1 min and returned to control level within 15 min. Tachyphylaxis to the action of substance P was not observed by successive intrathecal injections. The hyperalgesic effect induced by substance P was increased by pretreatment with naloxone and blocked by a large dose of morphine. A synthetic analogue (D-Pro2, D-Trp7,9)-substance P, was not found to block the action of substance P on mechanical responses. These results suggest that substance P apparently produces a direct action on spinal substance P receptors and the antagonistic effect of morphine on the hyperalgesia induced by substance P may be mediated through a postsynaptic mechanism in the spinal cord.

Antinociception induced by CP 96,345, a non-peptide NK-1 receptor antagonist, in the mouse formalin and capsaicin tests

The non-peptide NK-1 receptor antagonist, CP 96,345, has been evaluated for antinociceptive activity in two chemical pain models in the mouse. CP 96,345, injected intrathecally (i.t.) 5 min prior to 2.0% formalin, produced significant antinociception in both the early and late phases of the formalin-induced paw licking procedure. Antinociception could also be observed during the late phase by treatment with CP 96,345 after formalin. In the capsaicin (CAP) test, i.t. injection of CP 96,345 produced a dose-dependent reduction of the paw-licking response at doses much less than antinociceptive doses in the formalin test. Naloxone did not affect antinociception in either test. CP 96,345 evoked a reversible deficit in motor performance as assayed by the rotarod test. The results indicate that i.t. CP 96,345 is antinociceptive in the capsaicin test at doses showing no overt behavioural effects but there is an overlap in doses producing antinociceptive and motor effects in the formalin test.

Characterization of nociceptive responses and spinal releases of nitric oxide metabolites and glutamate evoked by different concentrations of formalin in rats

&NA; A comparison was made of spontaneous nociceptive behaviors elicited by subcutaneous injection of formalin (0.5–10.0%) into the plantar or dorsal surface of the right hindpaw in rats. In the present study, we also examined the effect of paw formalin injection on the release of nitric oxide (NO) metabolites (nitrite/nitrate) and glutamate from the spinal cord in anesthetized rats using a dialysis probe placed in the lumbar subarachnoid space. Two distinct quantifiable behaviors indicative of pain were identified by formalin injected into both regions of the paw. There were no significant alterations in the number of flinches during the early and late phases induced by different regions of formalin injection. However, the early phase licking/biting activity evoked by formalin injection into the plantar surface of the paw was significantly higher than that evoked by formalin injected into the dorsal region. The maximum effect in the early and late phases was produced by 5.0% formalin injection into the dorsal and plantar paw. At a higher concentration (10.0%) of formalin, nociceptive behavioral responses were decreased except for the late phase flinching when injected into the dorsal paw. Injections of formalin (5.0%) into both regions of the paw evoked a biphasic spinal release of nitrite/nitrate with a significant increase during the early phase (0–10 min) and the late phase (30–80 or 90 min). A higher concentration of formalin (10.0%) failed to produce a clear‐cut release of nitrite/nitrate. A significant increase of glutamate was observed in the 0–10 min samples obtained after injection of formalin (5.0%) into the plantar and dorsal surface of the paw, whereas 0.5 and 10.0% formalin induced no substantial release. These results suggest that 5.0% formalin should be used when studying antinociceptive activity of NO‐ and N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate‐related compounds in the formalin test in rats. Formalin injection into the plantar surface of the paw might prove to be useful for evoking the licking/biting response, particularly in the early phase.

Differential antinociceptive effects induced by intrathecally administered endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 in the mouse

Two highly selective mu-opioid receptor agonists, endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2, have been identified and postulated to be endogenous ligands for mu-opioid receptors. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 at doses from 0.039 to 5 nmol dose-dependently produced antinociception with the paw-withdrawal test. The paw-withdrawal inhibition rapidly reached its peak at 1 min, rapidly declined and returned to the pre-injection levels in 20 min. The inhibition of the paw-withdrawal responses to endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 at a dose of 5 nmol observed at 1 and 5 min after injection was blocked by pretreatment with a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c.). The antinociceptive effect of endomorphin-2 was more sensitive to the mu (1)-opioid receptor antagonist, naloxonazine than that of endomorphin-1. The endomorphin-2-induced paw-withdrawal inhibition at both 1 and 5 min after injection was blocked by pretreatment with kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) or the delta(2)-opioid receptor antagonist naltriben (0.6 mg/kg, s.c.) but not the delta(1)-opioid receptor antagonist 7-benzylidine naltrexone (BNTX) (0.6 mg/kg s.c.). In contrast, the paw-withdrawal inhibition induced by endomorphin-1 observed at both 1 and 5 min after injection was not blocked by naloxonazine (35 mg/kg, s.c.), nor-binaltorphimine (10 mg/kg, s.c.), naltriben (0.6 mg/kg, s.c.) or BNTX (0.6 mg/kg s.c.). The endomorphin-2-induced paw-withdrawal inhibition was blocked by the pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin A-(1-17) or [Met(5)]enkephalin, but not by antiserum against dynorphin B-(1-13). Pretreatment with these antisera did not affect the endomorphin-1-induced paw-withdrawal inhibition. Our results indicate that endomorphin-2 given i.t. produces its antinociceptive effects via the stimulation of mu (1)-opioid receptors (naloxonazine-sensitive site) in the spinal cord. The antinociception induced by endomophin-2 contains additional components, which are mediated by the release of dynorphin A-(1-17) and [Met(5)]enkephalin which subsequently act on kappa-opioid receptors and delta(2)-opioid receptors to produce antinociception.

INVOLVEMENT OF NITRIC OXIDE IN SPINALLY MEDIATED CAPSAICIN- AND GLUTAMATE-INDUCED BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSES IN THE MOUSE *

The intrathecal (i.t.) injection of capsaicin (0.1 nmol/mouse) through a lumbar puncture elicited scratching, biting and licking responses. Pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (320 nmol), by i.t. injection, resulted in a significant inhibition of the behavioural response produced by i.t. capsaicin (0.1 nmol/mouse). Similar behavioural responses were induced by i.t. injections of NMDA (0.4 nmol), kainate (0.05 nmol) or AMPA (0.05 nmol), which were all inhibited by co-administration of L-NAME (20-80 nmol). L-Arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) but not D-arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed the inhibitory effect of L-NAME on capsaicin-, NMDA-, kainate- and AMPA-induced behavioural response. Scratching, biting and licking responses induced by tachykinin receptor agonists, substance P, [Sar9,Met(O2)11]substance P, neurokinin A and neurokinin B were not affected by co-administration of L-NAME (40 and 80 nmol). These results suggest that spinal nitric oxide may play a significant role in mechanisms of the behavioural response to capsaicin, probably through the release of glutamate, but not tachykinins.

Differential antagonism of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 spinal antinociception by naloxonazine and 3-methoxynaltrexone

To determine the role of spinal mu-opioid receptor subtypes in antinociception induced by intrathecal (i.t.) injection of endomorphin-1 and -2, we assessed the effects of beta-funaltrexamine (a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist) naloxonazine (a selective antagonist at the mu(1)-opioid receptor) and a novel receptor antagonist (3-methoxynaltrexone) using the paw-withdrawal test. Antinociception of i.t. endomorphins and [D-Ala(2), MePhe(4), Gly(ol)(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO) was completely reversed by pretreatment with beta-funaltrexamine (40 mg/kg s.c.). Pretreatment with a variety of doses of i.t. or s.c. naloxonazine 24 h before testing antagonized the antinociception of endomorphin-1, -2 and DAMGO. Judging from the ID(50) values of naloxonazine, the antinociceptive effect of endomorphin-2 was more sensitive to naloxonazine than that of endomorphin-1 or DAMGO. The selective morphine-6beta-glucuronide antagonist, 3-methoxynaltrexone, which blocked endomorphin-2-induced antinociception at each dose (0.25 mg/kg s.c. or 2.5 ng i.t.) that was inactive against DAMGO, did not affect endomorphin-1-induced antinociception but shifted the dose-response curve of endomorphin-2 3-fold to the right. These findings may be interpreted as indicative of the existence of a novel mu-opioid receptor subtype in spinal sites, where antinociception of morphine-6beta-glucuronide and endomorphin-2 are antagonized by 3-methoxynaltrexone. The present results suggest that endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 may produce antinociception through different subtypes of mu-opioid receptor.

Differential effects of intraplantar capsazepine and ruthenium red on capsaicin-induced desensitization in mice

Intraplantar injection of capsaicin (1.6 microg/paw) into the mouse hindpaw produced an acute paw-licking/biting response. This study was designed (1) to investigate the antinociceptive effects of intraplantar administration of capsazepine, a competitive vanilloid receptor antagonist, and ruthenium red, a noncompetitive antagonist, in the nociceptive licking/biting response induced by intraplantar injection of capsaicin, and (2) to determine whether these compounds were able to prevent capsaicin-induced desensitization in mice. Both capsazepine and ruthenium red produced a dose-dependent reduction in the capsaicin-induced nociceptive response. In licking/biting response to intraplantar capsaicin, ruthenium red was more potent than capsazepine in producing antinociceptive activity as assayed by the capsaicin test. The first injection of capsaicin induced a profound desensitization to the second and third injections of capsaicin at the interval of 15 or 30 min. The capsaicin-induced desensitization was prevented dose-dependently by antinociceptive doses of capsazepine, whereas ruthenium red in doses exhibiting antinociceptive activity was without effect on capsaicin-induced desensitization. The present results suggest that both capsazepine and ruthenium red can produce a local peripheral antinociceptive action, which may be mediated by inhibiting the membrane ion channel activated by capsaicin. In addition, these data suggest that capsazepine may act in the mechanism clearly different from ruthenium red in the capsaicin-induced nociceptive desensitization.

Involvement of Spinal NMDA Receptors in Capsaicin-Induced Nociception

Intraplantar injection of capsaicin into the mouse hindpaw produced an acute nociceptive response. The involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors was examined by intrathecal administration of various excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptor antagonists. The selective and competitive NMDA receptor antagonists, D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphono-valeric acid (APV) and (+/-)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl) propyl-1-phosphoric acid (CPP), were most potent in inhibiting the nociceptive response induced by capsaicin (ED50, 0.23 nmol and 0.12 nmol). The noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) and the non-NMDA antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) had similar effects on the capsaicin-induced nociception (ED50, 2.90 and 7.98 nmol), while ketamine and 7-chlorokynurenic acid were without effect. Ifenprodil, an antagonist at the receptor-coupled polyamine site, showed a significant reduction of the nociceptive response (ED50, 13.8 nmol). The inhibitory effects of APV, CPP, MK-801, and ifenprodil were reversed by co-administration of NMDA. Coadministration of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) or kainate resulted in a marked reduction of CNQX-induced antinociception. The present results suggest that the NMDA receptor plays a key role in spinal nociceptive processing as measured by the capsaicin test in mice. This nociceptive test may be useful for evaluating competitive NMDA antagonists.