Kensuke Kisara

Antinociception induced by CP 96,345, a non-peptide NK-1 receptor antagonist, in the mouse formalin and capsaicin tests

The non-peptide NK-1 receptor antagonist, CP 96,345, has been evaluated for antinociceptive activity in two chemical pain models in the mouse. CP 96,345, injected intrathecally (i.t.) 5 min prior to 2.0% formalin, produced significant antinociception in both the early and late phases of the formalin-induced paw licking procedure. Antinociception could also be observed during the late phase by treatment with CP 96,345 after formalin. In the capsaicin (CAP) test, i.t. injection of CP 96,345 produced a dose-dependent reduction of the paw-licking response at doses much less than antinociceptive doses in the formalin test. Naloxone did not affect antinociception in either test. CP 96,345 evoked a reversible deficit in motor performance as assayed by the rotarod test. The results indicate that i.t. CP 96,345 is antinociceptive in the capsaicin test at doses showing no overt behavioural effects but there is an overlap in doses producing antinociceptive and motor effects in the formalin test.

INVOLVEMENT OF NITRIC OXIDE IN SPINALLY MEDIATED CAPSAICIN- AND GLUTAMATE-INDUCED BEHAVIOURAL RESPONSES IN THE MOUSE *

The intrathecal (i.t.) injection of capsaicin (0.1 nmol/mouse) through a lumbar puncture elicited scratching, biting and licking responses. Pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (320 nmol), by i.t. injection, resulted in a significant inhibition of the behavioural response produced by i.t. capsaicin (0.1 nmol/mouse). Similar behavioural responses were induced by i.t. injections of NMDA (0.4 nmol), kainate (0.05 nmol) or AMPA (0.05 nmol), which were all inhibited by co-administration of L-NAME (20-80 nmol). L-Arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) but not D-arginine (600 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed the inhibitory effect of L-NAME on capsaicin-, NMDA-, kainate- and AMPA-induced behavioural response. Scratching, biting and licking responses induced by tachykinin receptor agonists, substance P, [Sar9,Met(O2)11]substance P, neurokinin A and neurokinin B were not affected by co-administration of L-NAME (40 and 80 nmol). These results suggest that spinal nitric oxide may play a significant role in mechanisms of the behavioural response to capsaicin, probably through the release of glutamate, but not tachykinins.

Involvement of Spinal NMDA Receptors in Capsaicin-Induced Nociception

Intraplantar injection of capsaicin into the mouse hindpaw produced an acute nociceptive response. The involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors was examined by intrathecal administration of various excitatory amino acid (EAA) receptor antagonists. The selective and competitive NMDA receptor antagonists, D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphono-valeric acid (APV) and (+/-)-3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl) propyl-1-phosphoric acid (CPP), were most potent in inhibiting the nociceptive response induced by capsaicin (ED50, 0.23 nmol and 0.12 nmol). The noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (MK-801) and the non-NMDA antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) had similar effects on the capsaicin-induced nociception (ED50, 2.90 and 7.98 nmol), while ketamine and 7-chlorokynurenic acid were without effect. Ifenprodil, an antagonist at the receptor-coupled polyamine site, showed a significant reduction of the nociceptive response (ED50, 13.8 nmol). The inhibitory effects of APV, CPP, MK-801, and ifenprodil were reversed by co-administration of NMDA. Coadministration of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) or kainate resulted in a marked reduction of CNQX-induced antinociception. The present results suggest that the NMDA receptor plays a key role in spinal nociceptive processing as measured by the capsaicin test in mice. This nociceptive test may be useful for evaluating competitive NMDA antagonists.

Induction of nociceptive responses by intrathecal injection of interleukin-1 in mice.

Intrathecal (i.t.) injection (between lumbar vertebrae 5 and 6) into mice of a markedly low dose of IL-1alpha (3x10(-4) fmol or 5.4 fg in 5 microl per mouse) induced behaviors involving scratching, biting, and licking of non-stimulated hindpaws. The IL-1-induced behaviors appeared within 10 min of the injection of IL-1alpha, peaked at 20-40 min, and had disappeared 60 min after the injection. The IL-1-induced behaviors were similar to the nociceptive responses induced in mice by i.t. injection of substance P (SP) or subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of formalin into the footpad. The IL-1-induced behaviors were suppressed by intraperitoneal morphine, indicating that they are nociceptive responses. The nociceptive responses induced by 3x10(-4) (5.4 fg) of IL-1alpha were almost completely suppressed by co-injection of 0.3 fmol (7.2 pg) of an IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra). An antiserum against substance P, but not an antiserum against somatostatin, suppressed the IL-1-induced nociceptive responses. The nociceptive responses induced by s.c. injection of 2% formalin into the footpad were also inhibited by i.t. injection of 30 pmol (720 ng) of IL-1ra. These results suggest that IL-1 may play a role in hyperalgesia in mice by acting as a factor augmenting pain transmission in the spinal cord at least in part by either directly or indirectly releasing substance P.

The effects of substance P analogues on the scratching, biting and licking response induced by intrathecal injection of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate in mice

1 Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate (NMDA) elicited a dose‐dependent behavioural response consisting of licking, biting and scratching in mice. 2 Repeated i.t. injections of 0.4 nmol NMDA, at 5 min intervals, resulted in the rapid development of desensitization to this NMDA‐induced behavioural phenomenon. 3 The NMDA‐induced response was dose‐dependently inhibited by the simultaneous injection of a selective NMDA‐receptor antagonist, d‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid. 4 The substance P (SP) analogues [d‐Pro2, d‐Trp7,9] SP and [d‐Arg1, d‐Trp7,9, Leu11] SP (spantide) inhibited NMDA‐induced behavioural responses in a dose‐dependent manner. However, [d‐Phe7, d‐His9] SP (6–11), a SP analogue selective for neurokinin1 (NK1) receptors, failed to inhibit NMDA‐induced responses even at a dose of 4.0 nmol. 5 These results indicate that NMDA‐induced behavioural responses are mainly mediated through NMDA receptors without affecting NK1 receptors in the spinal cord.

Intracranial injection of thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) suppresses starvation-induced feeding and drinking in rats

The sites at which TRH produces suppression on feeding and drinking were examined anatomically in the rat brain. This was accomplished by microinjecting nmol concentration of TRH into 6 different brain sites. Intracerebroventricular injection of TRH (25, 50, 100 nmol/rat) suppressed starvation-induced feeding and drinking in a dose related manner. The microinjection in a small amount of TRH (8 nmol/hemisphere) into the medial and lateral hypothalamus produced relatively severe anorexia and adipsia as compared with the other areas including the nucleus accumbens, the substantia nigra, the globus pallidus and the amygdala. It was concluded that the medial hypothalamus is the most sensitive site of TRH-induced anorexia and adipsia and the action of TRH on the lateral hypothalamus is also a possible mechanism mediating the decrease in water intake.

Nociceptin-induced scratching, biting and licking in mice: involvement of spinal NK1 receptors

Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of nociceptin at small doses (fmol order) elicited a behavioural response consisting of scratching, biting and licking in conscious mice. Here we have examined the involvement of substance P‐containing neurons by using i.t. injection of tachykinin neurokinin (NK)1 receptor antagonists and substance P (SP) antiserum. Nociceptin‐induced behavioural response was evoked significantly 5–10 min after i.t. injection and reached a maximum at 10–15 min. Dose‐dependency of the induced response showed a bell‐shaped pattern from 0.375–30.0 fmol, and the maximum effect was observed at 3.0 fmol. The behavioural response elicited by nociceptin (3.0 fmol) was dose‐dependently inhibited by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine. The NK1 receptor antagonists, CP‐96,345, CP‐99,994 and sendide, inhibited nociceptin‐induced behavioural response in a dose‐dependent manner. A significant antagonistic effect of [D‐Phe7, D‐His9]SP (6–11), a selective antagonist for SP receptors, was observed against nociceptin‐induced response. The NK2 receptor antagonist, MEN‐10376, had no effect on the response elicited by nociceptin. Pretreatment with SP antiserum resulted in a significant reduction of the response to nociceptin. No significant reduction of nociceptin‐induced response was detected in mice pretreated with NKA antiserum. The N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, dizocilpine (MK‐801) and D(−)‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid (APV) (D‐APV), and L‐NG‐nitro arginine methyl ester (L‐NAME), a nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor, failed to inhibit nociceptin‐induced behavioural response. The present results suggest that SP‐containing neurons in the mouse spinal cord may be involved in elicitation of scratching, biting and licking behaviour following i.t. injection of nociceptin.

Substance P analogues containing D-histidine antagonize the behavioural effects of intrathecally co-administered substance P in mice

The antagonistic effect of newly synthesized substance P (SP) analogues containing D-histidine was examined on behavioural responses induced in mice by SP, neurokinin (NK) A, physalaemin, eledoisin, somatostatin and bombesin. [D-Pro2,D-Trp7,9]SP (DPDT-SP) and [D-Arg1,D-Trp7,9,Leu11]SP (spantide) were used as references for comparison. When co-administered with SP intrathecally, all the SP analogues used decreased the SP-induced response which consists of scratching, biting and licking. DPDT-SP and spantide attenuated non-specifically the SP-like behavioural responses induced by physalaemin, eledoisin, NK A and somatostatin. In general, the introduction of D-histidine in position 9 of the SP molecule resulted in potent antagonistic activity of the SP derivative on the behavioural responses to SP. Of these SP analogues, [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,4,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP attenuated selectively the behavioural responses produced by NK-1 receptor agonists such as SP and physalaemin. Simultaneous injection of [D-Phe7,D-His9]SP-(6-11) selectively inhibited the SP-induced behavioural response without affecting the other peptide-induced behavioral response. The results suggest that the behavioural antagonism induced by [D-Arg1,D-Pro2,4,D-Phe7,D-His9]SP and [D-Phe7,D-His9]SP-(6-11) is probably due to the specific blockade of spinal NK-1 receptors.

Intrathecally administered big dynorphin, a prodynorphin-derived peptide, produces nociceptive behavior through an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor mechanism.

Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of big dynorphin (1-10 fmol), a prodynorphin-derived peptide consisting of dynorphin A and dynorphin B, to mice produced a characteristic behavioral response, the biting and/or licking of the hindpaw and the tail along with slight hindlimb scratching directed toward the flank, which peaked at 5-15 min after an injection. Dynorphin A produced a similar response, though the doses required were higher (0.1-30 pmol) whereas dynorphin B was practically inactive even at 1000 pmol. The behavior induced by big dynorphin (3 fmol) was dose-dependently inhibited by intraperitoneal injection of morphine (0.125-2 mg/kg) and also dose-dependently, by i.t. co-administration of D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV) (1-4 nmol), a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.25-4 nmol), an NMDA ion-channel blocker, and ifenprodil (2-8 pmol), an inhibitor of the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex interacting with the NR2B subunit and the polyamine recognition site. On the other hand, naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), a non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, 7-chlorokynurenic acid, a competitive antagonist of the glycine recognition site on the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex, [D-Phe(7),D-His(9)]-substance P(6-11), a specific antagonist for substance P (NK1) receptors, and MEN-10376, a tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist, had no effect. These results suggest that big dynorphin-induced nociceptive behavior is mediated through the activation of the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex by acting on the NR2B subunit and/or the polyamine recognition site but not on the glycine recognition site, and does not involve opioid, non-NMDA glutamate receptor mechanisms or tachykinin receptors in the mouse spinal cord.

Pain threshold, learning and formation of brain edema in mice lacking the angiotensin II type 2 receptor

The main biological role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2) has not been established. We made use of targeted disruption of the mouse AT2 gene to examine the functional role of the AT2 receptor in the central nervous system (CNS). We have previously shown that AT2-deficient mice displayed anxiety-like behavior in comparisons with wild-type mice. In the present study, we analyzed the pain threshold, learning behavior and brain edema formation using the tail-flick test, the tail-pinch test, the passive avoidance task and cold injury, respectively. In the passive avoidance task and cold injury, no differences were found between wild-type mice and AT2-deficient mice. In contrast, the pain threshold was significantly lower in AT2-deficient mice, compared with findings in wild-type mice. The immunohistochemical distribution of beta-endorphin in the brain was analyzed quantitatively in AT2-deficient mice and wild-type mice, using microphotometry. The fluorescence intensity of beta-endorphin in the arcuate nucleus of the medial basal hypothalamus (ARC) was significantly lower in AT2-deficient mice, compared with findings in wild-type mice. We found that the AT2 receptor does not influence learning behavior and brain edema formation. As AT2-deficient mice have increased sensitivity to pain and decreased levels of brain beta-endorphin, AT2 receptors may perhaps mediate regulation of the pain threshold.