Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Albrecht Kadlec is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Albrecht Kadlec.


languages, compilers, and tools for embedded systems | 2008

Generalized instruction selection using SSA -graphs

Dietmar Ebner; Florian Brandner; Bernhard Scholz; Andreas Krall; Peter Wiedermann; Albrecht Kadlec

Instruction selection is a well-studied compiler phase that translates the compilers intermediate representation of programs to a sequence of target-dependent machine instructions optimizing for various compiler objectives (e.g. speed and space). Most existing instruction selection techniques are limited to the scope of a single statement or a basic block and cannot cope with irregular instruction sets that are frequently found in embedded systems. We consider an optimal technique for instruction selection that uses Static Single Assignment (SSA) graphs as an intermediate representation of programs and employs the Partitioned Boolean Quadratic Problem (PBQP) for finding an optimal instruction selection. While existing approaches are limited to instruction patterns that can be expressed in a simple tree structure, we consider complex patterns producing multiple results at the same time including pre/post increment addressing modes, div-mod instructions, and SIMD extensions frequently found in embedded systems. Although both instruction selection on SSA-graphs and PBQP are known to be NP-complete, the problem can be solved efficiently - even for very large instances. Our approach has been implemented in LLVM for an embedded ARMv5 architecture. Extensive experiments show speedups of up to 57% on typical DSP kernels and up to 10% on SPECINT 2000 and MiBench benchmarks. All of the test programs could be compiled within less than half a minute using a heuristic PBQP solver that solves 99.83% of all instances optimally.


euromicro conference on real-time systems | 2009

Precise Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis for Processors with Timing Anomalies

Raimund Kirner; Albrecht Kadlec; Peter P. Puschner

This paper explores timing anomalies in WCET analysis.Timing anomalies add to the complexity of WCET analysis and make it hard to apply divide-and-conquer strategies to simplify the WCET assessment.So far, timing anomalies have been described as a problem that occurs when the WCET of a control-flow graph is computed from the WCETs of its subgraphs, i.e., from a series decomposition. This paper extends the state of the art by (i) showing that timing anomalies can as well occur in a parallel decomposition of the WCET problem, i.e., when complexity is reduced by splitting the hardware state space and performing a separate WCET analysis for hardware components that work in parallel, (ii) proving that the potential occurrence of parallel timing anomalies makes the parallel decomposition technique unsafe (i.e., one cannot guarantee that the calculated WCET bound does not underestimate the WCET), and (iii) identifying special cases of parallel timing anomalies for which the parallel decomposition technique is safe. The latter provides an important hint to hardware designers on their way to constructing predictable hardware components.


international symposium on object/component/service-oriented real-time distributed computing | 2010

Avoiding Timing Anomalies Using Code Transformations

Albrecht Kadlec; Raimund Kirner; Peter P. Puschner

Divide-and-conquer approaches to worst-case execution-time analysis (WCET analysis) pose a safety risk when applied to code for complex modern processors: Interferences between the hardware acceleration mechanisms of these processors lead to timing anomalies, i.e., a local timing change causes an either larger or inverse change of the global timing. This phenomenon may result in dangerous WCET underestimation. This paper presents intermediate results of our work on strategies for eliminating timing anomalies. These strategies are purely based on the modification of software, i.e., they do not require any changes to hardware. In an effort to eliminate the timing anomalies originating from the processor’s out-of-order instruction pipeline, we explored different methods of inserting instructions in the program code that render the dynamic instruction scheduler inoperative. We explain how the proposed strategies remove the timing anomalies caused by the pipeline. In the absence of working solutions for timing analysis for these complex processors, we chose portable metrics from compiler construction to assess the properties of our algorithms.


Software and Systems Modeling | 2011

Beyond loop bounds: comparing annotation languages for worst-case execution time analysis

Raimund Kirner; Jens Knoop; Adrian Prantl; Markus Schordan; Albrecht Kadlec


worst case execution time analysis | 2008

Towards a Common WCET Annotation Language: Essential Ingredients

Raimund Kirner; Albrecht Kadlec; Adrian Prantl; Markus Schordan; Jens Knoop


worst case execution time analysis | 2009

From Trusted Annotations to Verified Knowledge

Adrian Prantl; Jens Knoop; Raimund Kirner; Albrecht Kadlec; Markus Schordan


worst-case execution time analysis | 2008

WCET 2008 -- Report from the Tool Challenge 2008 -- 8th Intl. Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis

Niklas Holsti; Jan Gustafsson; Guillem Bernat; Clément Ballabriga; Armelle Bonenfant; Roman Bourgade; Hugues Cassé; Daniel Cordes; Albrecht Kadlec; Raimund Kirner; Jens Knoop; Paul Lokuciejewski; Nicholas Merriam; Marianne De Michiel; Adrian Prantl; Bernhard Rieder; Christine Rochange; Pascal Sainrat; Markus Schordan


Archive | 2011

Worst-Case Execution Time Analysis for Processors showing Timing Anomalies ⁄

Raimund Kirner; Albrecht Kadlec; Peter P. Puschner


Computer Systems: Science & Engineering | 2011

Code Transformations to Prevent Timing Anomalies

Albrecht Kadlec; Raimund Kirner; Peter P. Puschner


Archive | 2009

FROM TRUSTED ANNOTA TIONS TO VERIFIED KNOWLEDGE 1

Adrian Prantl; Jens Knoop; Raimund Kirner; Albrecht Kadlec; Markus Schordan

Collaboration


Dive into the Albrecht Kadlec's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Raimund Kirner

University of Hertfordshire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jens Knoop

Vienna University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Adrian Prantl

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Markus Schordan

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter P. Puschner

Vienna University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Krall

Vienna University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernhard Rieder

Vienna University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dietmar Ebner

Vienna University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge