Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alessandro Dell’Aquila is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alessandro Dell’Aquila.


Archive | 2013

Future Climate Projections

Silvio Gualdi; Samuel Somot; Wilhelm May; Sergio Castellari; Michel Déqué; Mario Adani; Vincenzo Artale; Alessio Bellucci; Joseph S. Breitgand; Adriana Carillo; Richard C. Cornes; Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Clotilde Dubois; Dimitrios Efthymiadis; Alberto Elizalde; Luis Gimeno; C. M. Goodess; Ali Harzallah; Simon O. Krichak; Franz G. Kuglitsch; Gregor C. Leckebusch; Blandine L’heveder; Laurent Li; Piero Lionello; Jürg Luterbacher; Annarita Mariotti; Antonio Navarra; Raquel Nieto; Katrin M. Nissen; Paolo Oddo

In this chapter we show results from an innovative multi-model system used to produce climate simulations with a realistic representation of the Mediterranean Sea. The models (hereafter simply referred to as the “CIRCE models”) are a set of five coupled climate models composed by a high-resolution Mediterranean Sea coupled with a relatively high-resolution atmospheric component and a global ocean, which allow, for the first time, to explore and assess the role of the Mediterranean Sea and its complex, small-scale dynamics in the climate of the region. In particular, they make it possible to investigate the influence that local air-sea feedbacks might exert on the mechanisms responsible for climate variability and change in the European continent, Middle East and Northern Africa. In many regards, they represent a new and innovative approach to the problem of regionalization of climate projections in the Mediterranean region.


Climatic Change | 2015

Testing climate models using an impact model: what are the advantages?

Marc Stéfanon; Nicolas K. Martin-StPaul; Paul W. Leadley; Sophie Bastin; Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Philippe Drobinski; Clemente Gallardo

Global and regional climate model (GCM and RCM) outputs are often used as climate forcing for ecological impact models, and this potentially results in large cumulative errors because information and error are passed sequentially along the modeling chain from GCM to RCM to impact model. There are also a growing number of Earth system modeling platforms in which climate and ecological models are dynamically coupled, and in this case error amplification due to feedbacks can lead to even more serious problems. It is essential in both cases to rethink the organization of evaluation which typically relies on independent validation at each successive step, and to rely more heavily on analyses that cover the full modeling chain and thus require stronger interactions between climate and impact modelers. In this paper, we illustrate the benefits of using impact models as an additional source of information for evaluating climate models. Four RCMs that are part of the HyMeX (Hydrological cycle in Mediterranean EXperiment) and Mediterranean CORDEX projects (MED-CORDEX) were tested with observed climatology and a process-based model of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree growth and forest ecosystem functioning that has been rigorously validated. This two part analysis i) indicates that evaluation of RCMs on climate variables alone may be insufficient to determine the suitability of RCMs for studies of climate-forest interactions and ii) points to areas of improvement in these RCMs that would improve impact studies or behavior in coupled climate-ecosystem models over the spatial domain studied.


Climatic Change | 2016

A mechanistic approach reveals non linear effects of climate warming on mussels throughout the Mediterranean sea

Valeria Montalto; Brian Helmuth; Paolo Michele Ruti; Alessandro Dell’Aquila; A. Rinaldi; Gianluca Sarà

There is a dire need to forecast the ecological impacts of global climate change at scales relevant to policy and management. We used three interconnected models (climatic, biophysical and energetics) to estimate changes in growth, reproduction and mortality risk by 2050, for three commercially and ecologically important bivalves at 51 sites in the Mediterranean Sea. These results predict highly variable responses (both positive and negative) in the time to reproductive maturity and in the risk of lethality among species and sites that do not conform to simple latitudinal gradients, and which would be undetectable by methods focused only on lethal limits and/or range boundaries.


Climate Dynamics | 2018

Simulation of medicanes over the Mediterranean Sea in a regional climate model ensemble: impact of ocean–atmosphere coupling and increased resolution

Miguel Angel Gaertner; Juan Jesús González-Alemán; Raquel Romera; Marta Domínguez; Victoria Gil; Enrique Sánchez; Clemente Gallardo; Mario Marcello Miglietta; Kevin Walsh; Dmitry Sein; Samuel Somot; Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Claas Teichmann; Bodo Ahrens; Erasmo Buonomo; Augustin Colette; Sophie Bastin; Erik van Meijgaard; Grigory Nikulin

Abstract Medicanes are cyclones over the Mediterranean Sea having a tropical-like structure but a rather small size, that can produce significant damage due to the combination of intense winds and heavy precipitation. Future climate projections, performed generally with individual atmospheric climate models, indicate that the intensity of the medicanes could increase under climate change conditions. The availability of large ensembles of high resolution and ocean–atmosphere coupled regional climate model (RCM) simulations, performed in MedCORDEX and EURO-CORDEX projects, represents an opportunity to improve the assessment of the impact of climate change on medicanes. As a first step towards such an improved assessment, we analyze the ability of the RCMs used in these projects to reproduce the observed characteristics of medicanes, and the impact of increased resolution and air-sea coupling on their simulation. In these storms, air-sea interaction plays a fundamental role in their formation and intensification, a different mechanism from that of extra-tropical cyclones, where the baroclinic instability mechanism prevails. An observational database, based on satellite images combined with high resolution simulations (Miglietta et al. in Geophys Res Lett 40:2400–2405, 2013), is used as a reference for evaluating the simulations. In general, the simulated medicanes do not coincide on a case-by-case basis with the observed medicanes. However, observed medicanes with a high intensity and relatively long duration of tropical characteristics are better replicated in simulations. The observed spatial distribution of medicanes is generally well simulated, while the monthly distribution reveals the difficulty of simulating the medicanes that first appear in September after the summer minimum in occurrence. Increasing the horizontal resolution has a systematic and generally positive impact on the frequency of simulated medicanes, while the general underestimation of their intensity is not corrected in most cases. The capacity of a few models to better simulate the medicane intensity suggests that the model formulation is more important than reducing the grid spacing alone. A negative intensity feedback is frequently the result of air-sea interaction for tropical cyclones in other basins. The introduction of air-sea coupling in the present simulations has an overall limited impact on medicane frequency and intensity, but it produces an interesting seasonal shift of the simulated medicanes from autumn to winter. This fact, together with the analysis of two contrasting particular cases, indicates that the negative feedback could be limited or even absent in certain situations. We suggest that the effects of air-sea interaction on medicanes may depend on the oceanic mixed layer depth, thus increasing the applicability of ocean–atmosphere coupled RCMs for climate change analysis of this kind of cyclones.


Climate Dynamics | 2018

Evaluation of simulated decadal variations over the Euro-Mediterranean region from ENSEMBLES to Med-CORDEX

Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Annarita Mariotti; Sophie Bastin; Sandro Calmanti; Leone Cavicchia; Michel Déqué; Vladimir Djurdjevic; Marta Domínguez; Miguel Angel Gaertner; Silvio Gualdi

Med-CORDEX simulations over the period 1979–2011 are evaluated with regard to their capability to represent observed decadal variations over the Euro-Mediterranean region and improve upon previous generation simulations from the ENSEMBLES project in their various experimental set-ups. Such an evaluation is needed to inform the use of these simulations and also future model development. For temperature, both Med-CORDEX and ENSEMBLES simulations tend to provide comparable results: they generally capture the sign and timing of the anomalies but not the amplitude. In general, no clear stratification appears when considering different types of Med-CORDEX regional modeling systems. Rather, it is remarkable that certain periods are poorly represented by all systems with a general underestimation of the observed long-term temperature trend, mostly in the summer season, even with respect to the corresponding global drivers. For precipitation, the Med-CORDEX simulations are closer to observations than the other datasets, with some improvement with respect to ENSEMBLES dataset. In general, all the systems experience difficulties in representing anomalies during specific periods or for specific regions. These appear in part due to limitations in the reanalysis boundary forcing data. For instance, in the second part of 1980s, the spatial patterns of surface air temperature during DJF/MAM are generally poorly represented, as well as the regionally averaged MAM/JJA surface air temperature decadal anomalies. Overall, the evaluation suggests limited improvement in Med-CORDEX simulations compared to ENSEMBLES, and a lack of sensitivity to resolution or coupling configuration, with persisting problems in part likely related to the representation of surface processes that could also affect the viability of future projections (e.g. the estimation of temperature trends). A set of decadal variability evaluation metrics, as applied in this study, could be useful in the context of a broader evaluation framework.


Climate Dynamics | 2010

An atmosphere–ocean regional climate model for the Mediterranean area: assessment of a present climate simulation

Vincenzo Artale; Sandro Calmanti; Adriana Carillo; Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Marine Herrmann; Giovanna Pisacane; Paolo Michele Ruti; Gianmaria Sannino; Maria Vittoria Struglia; Filippo Giorgi; X. Bi; Jeremy S. Pal; Sara A. Rauscher


Climate Dynamics | 2012

Decadal climate variability in the Mediterranean region: roles of large-scale forcings and regional processes

Annarita Mariotti; Alessandro Dell’Aquila


Climate Dynamics | 2007

Intercomparison of the northern hemisphere winter mid-latitude atmospheric variability of the IPCC models

Valerio Lucarini; Sandro Calmanti; Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Paolo Michele Ruti; Antonio Speranza


Climate Dynamics | 2005

Hayashi spectra of the northern hemisphere mid-latitude atmospheric variability in the NCEP-NCAR and ECMWF reanalyses

Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Valerio Lucarini; Paolo Michele Ruti; Sandro Calmanti


Ecological Modelling | 2014

Testing the effects of temporal data resolution on predictions of the effects of climate change on bivalves

Valeria Montalto; Gianluca Sarà; Paolo Michele Ruti; Alessandro Dell’Aquila; Brian Helmuth

Collaboration


Dive into the Alessandro Dell’Aquila's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annarita Mariotti

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sophie Bastin

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grigory Nikulin

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge