Alexander B. Dagum

The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Tissue expander/implant breast reconstructions by 5 surgeons at a single institution from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively identified and divided into 2 cohorts: use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM, n = 75) versus standard submuscular placement (n = 52). The ADM group had a statistically significant higher rate of infection (28.9% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.022), reoperation (25.0% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.011), expander explantation (19.2% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.020), and overall complications (46.2% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.007). When stratifying by breast size, a higher complication rate was not observed with the use of ADM in breasts less than 600 g, whereas ADM use in breasts larger than 600 g was associated with a statistically significant higher rate of infection when controlling for the occurrence of skin necrosis. The ADM cohort had a significantly higher mean initial tissue expander fill volume (256 mL vs. 74 mL, P < 0.001) and a significantly higher mean initial tissue expander fill ratio (49% vs. 17%, P < 0.001). Further work is needed to define the ideal patient population for ADM use in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Current Management of Acute Cutaneous Wounds

In this article we describe our approach to the management of wounds. Wherever possible, our recommendations are based on randomized trials. However, many of the recommendations are based on small, observational studies or expert opinion; thus, we recognize that there may be disagreement with some of our recommendations. Nevertheless, the approach we advise has been shown to be workable and useful. The primary goal in the management of wounds is to achieve rapid healing with optimal functional and aesthetic results. This is best accomplished by pre- venting infection and further trauma and by providing an environment that opti- mizes healing of the wound. All wounds should be thoroughly cleansed with tap water or normal saline. 6 For heavily contaminated wounds, high-pressure irriga- tion (>7 psi) can be achieved with the use of a 10-to-50-ml syringe and splatter shield (see the video in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at www.nejm.org). 7 The patients tetanus-immunization status should be ascertained, and standard recommendations followed to ensure that the patient is protected against tetanus. A moist environment for the wound accelerates healing by preventing cellular dehydration and stimulating collagen synthesis and angiogenesis, thus improving cosmesis and reducing pain, the risk of infection, and the costs of care. 8-10 A moist environment may be created by covering the wound with a topical antimicrobial agent or by applying an occlusive dressing that reduces the loss of fluid through evaporation. Topical anti microbial agents have been shown to reduce rates of in- fection of traumatic lacerations, 11 although not of wounds caused by elective sur- gery. 12 Occlusive dressings have also been shown to reduce rates of infection. 13 Over-the-counter cyanoacrylate liquid bandages are effective for clean, simple wounds. 14 The choice of dressing depends on the cause, size, depth, location, degree of exudation, and level of contamination of the wound, as well as on cost (Table 1). There is no clinically directive evidence to support the choice of one dressing over another. 15 Occlusive dressings are less painful and more convenient for patients and may speed healing, although they are more expensive than topical antibiotics and gauze dressings. In some circumstances, however, the fact that

Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial.

Background: Intraoperative vascular imaging can assist assessment of mastectomy skin flap perfusion to predict areas of necrosis. No head-to-head study has compared modalities such as laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography and fluorescein dye angiography with clinical assessment. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective clinical trial of tissue expander–implant breast reconstruction with intraoperative evaluation of mastectomy skin flaps by clinical assessment, laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography, and fluorescein dye angiography. Intraoperatively predicted regions of necrosis were photographically documented, and clinical assessment guided excision. Postoperative necrosis was directly compared with each prediction. The primary outcome was all-inclusive skin necrosis. Results: Fifty-one tissue expander–implant breast reconstructions (32 patients) were completed, with 21 cases of all-inclusive necrosis (41.2 percent). Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography and fluorescein dye angiography correctly predicted necrosis in 19 of 21 of cases where clinical judgment had failed. Only six of 21 cases were full-thickness necrosis, and five of 21 required an intervention (9.8 percent). Risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and breast weight greater than 1000 g were statistically significant. Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography and fluorescein dye angiography overpredicted areas of necrosis by 72 percent and 88 percent (p = 0.002). Quantitative analysis for laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography in necrotic regions showed absolute perfusion units less than 3.7, with 90 percent sensitivity and 100 percent specificity. Conclusions: Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography is a better predictor of mastectomy skin flap necrosis than fluorescein dye angiography and clinical judgment. Both methods overpredict without quantitative analysis. Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography is more specific and correlates better with the criterion standard diagnosis of necrosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, I.

Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale.

Background: The authors previously developed a six-item ordinal wound evaluation scale to measure the short-term cosmetic outcome of wounds 1 week after injury. Although it was never intended to measure long-term outcomes, it has been used to assess scars 3 to 12 months after injury. The authors developed and validated a scar evaluation scale specifically aimed at measuring the long-term appearance of scars. Methods: Two plastic surgeons and one emergency physician, blinded to each others assessments, viewed photographs of 50 scars resulting from lacerations or surgical incisions. Scars were assigned 0 or 1 point each for the presence or absence of the following: width greater than 2 mm, elevation or depression, discoloration, suture or staple marks, and overall poor appearance. A total cosmetic score was then calculated by adding the individual scores on each of the five categories ranging from 0 (worst) to 5 (best). Scars were also scored on a validated 100-mm visual analogue scale marked “worst scar” and “best scar” at the low and high ends, respectively. Pairwise interobserver agreement was calculated. Results: Interobserver agreement for the total scores on the scar evaluation scale was 0.73, 0.75, and 0.85 (p < 0.001 for all). Interobserver correlations on the visual analogue scale were 0.83, 0.86, and 0.87 (p < 0.001 for all). Correlations between the total scar evaluation scale and visual analogue scale scores were 0.75, 0.86, and 0.92. Visual analogue scale scores were significantly higher as scar evaluation scale scores increased (analysis of variance, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The authors describe a new long-term scar evaluation scale that is highly reliable and correlated with the cosmetic visual analogue scale, suggesting construct validity.

Salvage after severe lower-extremity trauma: are the outcomes worth the means?

Advances in reconstructive surgery have allowed for impressive salvage after severe lower-extremity trauma but not without complications when compared with immediate below-knee amputation. Several amputation index scores have been developed to help predict successful salvage as defined by a viable rather than a functional extremity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the predictive value of the amputation index scores and to assess prospectively overall health status and specific dysfunction in successful limb salvage and primary and secondary amputation by administering standardized generic and specific outcomes questionnaires (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index). A retrospective chart review identified 55 severe lower-extremity injuries (Gustilo Type IIIB and IIIC) over a 12-year period (1984 to 1996). Forty-six severe open tibial fractures in 45 patients underwent attempted salvage. All required soft-tissue coverage by either local or free flap or vascular repair for leg salvage. The attempted-salvage group was subdivided into successful salvage and secondary amputation. The other nine patients underwent a primary amputation. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of patient demographics or other injuries (Injury Severity Score) in the three groups. Forty-eight of 54 patients with an average 5-year follow-up completed a validated generic and specific outcomes health questionnaire. In the attempted-salvage group, 89 percent of patients had a successful salvage and 11 percent came to a secondary amputation. The amputation index scores correctly predicted an amputation in 32 percent of patients. The magnitude of the amputation index scores did not correlate with the physical outcomes scores and were not found to add any significant value of information to the surgeons decision making. Patients undergoing primary and secondary amputation had a worse physical outcomes score (28 versus 38) than successful salvage (p < 0.007). Even so, the SF-36 (physical component score) outcomes score for this group of injured extremities, regardless as to whether salvaged or amputated, was as low as or lower than that of many serious medical illnesses, suggesting that severe lower-extremity trauma impairs health as much as or more than being seriously ill. The mental component score in this group was comparable to that of a healthy population (49 versus 50), which implies the disability is primarily physical rather than psychological. Ninety-two percent of patients preferred their salvaged leg to an amputation at any stage of their injury, and none would have preferred a primary amputation.

Peripheral nerve regeneration, repair, and grafting.

Peripheral nerve injuries are a major source of chronic disability. Advances in microsurgery and a better understanding of nerve healing have greatly improved the outcomes of nerve repair in the past two decades. This paper reviews the current thoughts on peripheral nerve regeneration and repair. Controversial topics such as the timing of nerve repair, new techniques of nerve repair (fibrin glue, lasers, and tubulization), nerve grafting, and the treatment of neuroma are discussed. A general approach to postoperative care is presented and shown to be governed by an understanding of not only nerve healing but tissue healing in general. A summary of current clinical results of upper extremity nerve repairs is given to provide benchmarks of practice for hand therapy units to achieve and supersede.

Current practice among plastic surgeons of antibiotic prophylaxis and closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction: experience, evidence, and implications for postoperative care.

Background:Despite their widespread use, there are no evidence-based guidelines on the management of closed-suction drains or antibiotics in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to assess consensus and variation in postoperative care among plastic surgeons. Methods:The authors designed and administered a self-reported, anonymous survey to 4669 American Society of Plastic Surgeons and Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons members in October 2009. Results:A total of 650 completed surveys were available for analysis. A majority (>81%) of respondents reported using closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction. Most surgeons (>93%) used a volume criteria for drain removal, most commonly when drain output was ≤30 mL over 24 hours (>86%). Preoperative antibiotic use was nearly universal (98%), usually consisting of intravenous cefazolin (97%). Postoperative care demonstrated less uniformity with outpatient antibiotics administered by 72% of respondents. Surgeons were divided on when to discontinue outpatient antibiotics: 46% preferred concomitant discontinuation with drains, whereas 52% preferred a specific postoperative day. No clear consensus was observed for the number (1 or 2) or type (Jackson-Pratt or Blake) of drains used. Respondents were further divided on the restriction of postoperative showering with drains and the use of acellular dermal matrix. Conclusions:These results demonstrate a consensus for drain use, drain removal, and preoperative antibiotic administration. There was no consensus for number or type of drain used, postoperative antibiotic use, shower restrictions, and use of acellular dermal matrix. Our results further emphasize the need for evidence-based postoperative-care guidelines specific to breast reconstruction.

A systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence?

Background: The literature reports overall complication rates in breast reconstruction to be as high as 60 percent. Infection rates can exceed 20 percent, much higher than anticipated in clean elective surgery. There is no consensus among surgeons regarding the necessary duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines suggest only 24 hours. This systematic review examines antibiotic regimens and associated infection rates in breast reconstruction. Methods: Systematic electronic searches were performed in the PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases using Medical Subject Headings terms for studies reporting antibiotic use and infection in all forms of breast reconstruction. Studies between 1970 and 2011 were reviewed. Included publications were required to report an antibiotic protocol and infection rate. Results: A total of 834 abstracts were identified, 81 of which met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The overall reported infection rates in the included studies varied between 0 and 29 percent (average, 5.8 percent). When comparing combined patient cohorts receiving no antibiotics, less than 24 hours, and greater than 24 hours, the average infection rates were 14.4, 5.8, and 5.8 percent, respectively. Conclusions: There is no consensus on the necessary duration of antibiotic prophylaxis following breast reconstruction. No benefit was found in patients who received more than 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Standardized definitions for antibiotic regimens, unit of analysis reporting, and a new breast reconstruction surgical-site infection grading system are offered to improve standardized outcome documentation. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to best determine an optimal antibiotic regimen. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Use of a new anchoring device for tendon reinsertion in medial canthopexy

This paper describes the use of the Mitek Mini GII Anchor System for tendon reinsertion in medial canthopexy. The system is simple, fast to insert, and easy to use. It allows precise placement with minimal dissection, which is limited to the ipsilateral orbit.

Scapholunate dissociation: An experimental kinematic study of two types of indirect soft tissue repairs

Indirect soft tissue repairs of scapholunate dissociation (SLD) address the pathophysiology but have been criticized for significantly limiting wrist flexion and altering wrist kinematics. This study was designed to analyze and compare the kinematics of a normal cadaveric wrist to those of 2 types of soft tissue repairs performed for SLD. Ten uninjured fresh cadaver arms were evaluated by cineradiography and standard x-rays. The average scapholunate (SL) gap was 0.9 mm, with a SL angle of 50 degrees. A model of SLD was produced by sectioning the SL ligaments resulting in an average SL gap of 3.9 mm and SL angle of 66 degrees. The wrists were randomized to a dorsal capsulodesis repair and a distally based split extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) repair. The average SL gap after repair was 1.0 mm and the average SL angle was 47 degrees. The split ECRL repair and dorsal capsulodesis reduced scaphoid flexion with only a 10 degree and 18 degree decrease in wrist flexion, respectively. Both repairs reduced the SLD and restored normal wrist kinematics.