Sami U. Khan

The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Tissue expander/implant breast reconstructions by 5 surgeons at a single institution from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively identified and divided into 2 cohorts: use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM, n = 75) versus standard submuscular placement (n = 52). The ADM group had a statistically significant higher rate of infection (28.9% vs. 12.0%, P = 0.022), reoperation (25.0% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.011), expander explantation (19.2% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.020), and overall complications (46.2% vs. 22.7%, P = 0.007). When stratifying by breast size, a higher complication rate was not observed with the use of ADM in breasts less than 600 g, whereas ADM use in breasts larger than 600 g was associated with a statistically significant higher rate of infection when controlling for the occurrence of skin necrosis. The ADM cohort had a significantly higher mean initial tissue expander fill volume (256 mL vs. 74 mL, P < 0.001) and a significantly higher mean initial tissue expander fill ratio (49% vs. 17%, P < 0.001). Further work is needed to define the ideal patient population for ADM use in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.

Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial.

Background: Intraoperative vascular imaging can assist assessment of mastectomy skin flap perfusion to predict areas of necrosis. No head-to-head study has compared modalities such as laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography and fluorescein dye angiography with clinical assessment. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective clinical trial of tissue expander–implant breast reconstruction with intraoperative evaluation of mastectomy skin flaps by clinical assessment, laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography, and fluorescein dye angiography. Intraoperatively predicted regions of necrosis were photographically documented, and clinical assessment guided excision. Postoperative necrosis was directly compared with each prediction. The primary outcome was all-inclusive skin necrosis. Results: Fifty-one tissue expander–implant breast reconstructions (32 patients) were completed, with 21 cases of all-inclusive necrosis (41.2 percent). Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography and fluorescein dye angiography correctly predicted necrosis in 19 of 21 of cases where clinical judgment had failed. Only six of 21 cases were full-thickness necrosis, and five of 21 required an intervention (9.8 percent). Risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and breast weight greater than 1000 g were statistically significant. Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography and fluorescein dye angiography overpredicted areas of necrosis by 72 percent and 88 percent (p = 0.002). Quantitative analysis for laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography in necrotic regions showed absolute perfusion units less than 3.7, with 90 percent sensitivity and 100 percent specificity. Conclusions: Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography is a better predictor of mastectomy skin flap necrosis than fluorescein dye angiography and clinical judgment. Both methods overpredict without quantitative analysis. Laser-assisted indocyanine green dye angiography is more specific and correlates better with the criterion standard diagnosis of necrosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, I.

Effect of contralateral severe stenosis or carotid occlusion on duplex criteria of ipsilateral stenoses: Comparative study of various duplex parameters

PURPOSE This study compares the accuracy of various duplex parameters in grading ipsilateral carotid stenoses in patients with contralateral severe stenoses or occlusion. METHODS Four duplex criteria were correlated to arteriography in 356 carotid arteries in blind fashion: (1) standard criteria: a peak systolic frequency (PSF) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) of > or = 4 kHz was used to diagnose > or = 50% stenosis; (2) new criteria: a PSF of the ICA of > or = 4.5 kHz was used; (3) Fujitani criteria: a PSF of the ICA of > 4.5 kHz and an end-diastolic frequency of < 5.0 kHz was used; (4) internal carotid/common carotid artery (ICA/CCA) PSF ratio of > or = 1.5 was used. RESULTS The standard method overestimated 56 (16%) of 356 stenoses in contrast to 3% for the new method (p < 0.001), and this effect was most evident in the 50% to < 80% stenosis category (30%). The Fujitani method underestimated 97 (27%) of 356 stenoses, and the ICA/CCA ratio overestimated stenoses in 77 (22%) of 356. The overall exact correlation was 94%, 82%, 70%, and 75% for the new, standard, Fujitani, and ICA/CCA ratio, respectively. The kappa statistic and corresponding confidence intervals for the new method (kappa = 0.923, +/- 0.016) are significantly higher (p < 0.001) than those for the standard method (kappa = 0.760, +/- 0.027), the Fujitani method (kappa = 0.608, +/- 0.031), and the ICA/CCA ratio method (kappa = 0.642, +/- 0.051). The overall accuracy in diagnosing > or = 50% ipsilateral stenosis in the whole series was 85% for the standard method, 97% for the new method, 95% for the Fujitani method, and 81% for the ICA/CCA ratio. The new method was superior to the standard and ICA/CCA ratio methods (p < 0.001) and the Fujitani method (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS The presence of significant contralateral stenosis (> or = 50%) can lead to overestimation of ipsilateral stenosis if the standard criteria are used; however, this problem can be avoided by using a PSF of the ICA of > or = 4.5 kHz for the diagnosis of > or = 50% stenosis.

Current practice among plastic surgeons of antibiotic prophylaxis and closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction: experience, evidence, and implications for postoperative care.

Background:Despite their widespread use, there are no evidence-based guidelines on the management of closed-suction drains or antibiotics in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to assess consensus and variation in postoperative care among plastic surgeons. Methods:The authors designed and administered a self-reported, anonymous survey to 4669 American Society of Plastic Surgeons and Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons members in October 2009. Results:A total of 650 completed surveys were available for analysis. A majority (>81%) of respondents reported using closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction. Most surgeons (>93%) used a volume criteria for drain removal, most commonly when drain output was ≤30 mL over 24 hours (>86%). Preoperative antibiotic use was nearly universal (98%), usually consisting of intravenous cefazolin (97%). Postoperative care demonstrated less uniformity with outpatient antibiotics administered by 72% of respondents. Surgeons were divided on when to discontinue outpatient antibiotics: 46% preferred concomitant discontinuation with drains, whereas 52% preferred a specific postoperative day. No clear consensus was observed for the number (1 or 2) or type (Jackson-Pratt or Blake) of drains used. Respondents were further divided on the restriction of postoperative showering with drains and the use of acellular dermal matrix. Conclusions:These results demonstrate a consensus for drain use, drain removal, and preoperative antibiotic administration. There was no consensus for number or type of drain used, postoperative antibiotic use, shower restrictions, and use of acellular dermal matrix. Our results further emphasize the need for evidence-based postoperative-care guidelines specific to breast reconstruction.

A systematic review of antibiotic use and infection in breast reconstruction: what is the evidence?

Background: The literature reports overall complication rates in breast reconstruction to be as high as 60 percent. Infection rates can exceed 20 percent, much higher than anticipated in clean elective surgery. There is no consensus among surgeons regarding the necessary duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines suggest only 24 hours. This systematic review examines antibiotic regimens and associated infection rates in breast reconstruction. Methods: Systematic electronic searches were performed in the PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases using Medical Subject Headings terms for studies reporting antibiotic use and infection in all forms of breast reconstruction. Studies between 1970 and 2011 were reviewed. Included publications were required to report an antibiotic protocol and infection rate. Results: A total of 834 abstracts were identified, 81 of which met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The overall reported infection rates in the included studies varied between 0 and 29 percent (average, 5.8 percent). When comparing combined patient cohorts receiving no antibiotics, less than 24 hours, and greater than 24 hours, the average infection rates were 14.4, 5.8, and 5.8 percent, respectively. Conclusions: There is no consensus on the necessary duration of antibiotic prophylaxis following breast reconstruction. No benefit was found in patients who received more than 24 hours of postoperative antibiotics. Standardized definitions for antibiotic regimens, unit of analysis reporting, and a new breast reconstruction surgical-site infection grading system are offered to improve standardized outcome documentation. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to best determine an optimal antibiotic regimen. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Do Progressive Tension Sutures Really Decrease Complications in Abdominoplasty

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of progressive tension sutures (PTS) in preventing or reducing seroma formation and local wound complications in patients undergoing abdominoplasty. Forty-nine patients who underwent abdominoplasty procedures with the use of PTS were retrospectively compared with a historical control group of 54 patients who underwent standard abdominoplasty. Primary outcomes measured were seroma formation and local wound complications, including hypertrophic scar formation, umbilical distortion, and wound necrosis. Secondary outcomes were all other complications and time to drain removal. Overall complication rates and local wound complication rates were significantly reduced with the addition of PTS to abdominoplasty. Seroma formation and the time to drain removal were reduced in the PTS group, but the findings were not statistically significant.

Factors associated with poor healing and recurrence of venous ulceration.

Background: Plastic surgeons are often approached for wound management and closure of chronic venous ulcers that fail to heal despite multimodal management. The authors present a retrospective analysis of a large series of venous ulcers to determine factors predicting nonhealing and recurrence. Methods: Consecutive patients with chronic venous ulcers (≥2-cm diameter) were examined for the presence of superficial, perforating, or deep venous disease, including reflux and/or obstruction. Treatment included compression, venous ligation, stripping, thermal ablation, sclerotherapy, and local wound care. Ulcers refractory to 6 months of treatment were defined as nonhealing ulcers. Data were analyzed for differences in baseline patient and ulcer characteristics and clinical course of nonhealing ulcers. Data were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum, chi-square, and Fishers exact tests using Sigma Stat and SPSS, with &agr; set at p < 0.05. Results: The authors identified 153 ulcers in 127 patients. Factors associated with ulcer nonhealing included advanced age, increased body mass index, history of deep venous thrombosis, noncompliance with compression therapy, and large ulcer area. One hundred thirty-one of the ulcers (85.6 percent) healed within 6 months and 147 (96 percent) of the ulcers ultimately healed without the need for operative plastic surgical intervention. Conclusions: A thorough understanding of risks and expected clinical course is required for assessment of the nonhealing venous ulcer. The authors recommend identification and correction of underlying venous abnormality and a minimum of at least 6 months of compression and local wound care followed by reassessment of venous function before operative plastic surgical intervention should be considered. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Modeling fade patterns of nipple areola complex tattoos following breast reconstruction.

BackgroundNipple-areolar complex (NAC) tattoos are an effective cosmetic solution for creating a finished look following breast reconstruction procedures. NAC tattoos are prone to significant fading, leading patients to seek revisions. This study was designed to quantify changes in NAC tattoo appearance over time. MethodsA total of 71 images of 39 patients were analyzed for NAC tattoo color and shape by 5 blinded medical student graders using a customized scoring system. Subsequently, each image was analyzed using ColorPic software (Iconico, New York, NY). Red/green/blue and hue/saturation/value color parameters were collected. Color quantities were normalized to the individual patient’s skin tone to control for variability in lighting. Spearman correlations and nonlinear regressions were calculated utilizing GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA). ResultsThe length of time after tattoo placement inversely correlated with color score (P < 0.0001) and shape score (P = 0.0007). The time following tattoo placement was also inversely correlated with all quantitative color parameters. Each color parameter fit a 1-phase exponential decay model. ConclusionsThe decline in qualitative color and shape score agrees with clinical experience of tattoo quality declining over time. The color qualities of the tattoo approach those of the patient’s skin over time, ultimately reaching a plateau. This can be modeled using a 1-phase decay equation. In practice, tattoo colors may be selected that compensate for the predictable changes that will occur. The results of this study will help optimize tattoo color and may alleviate the need for NAC tattoo revisions.

Selective use of segmental Doppler pressures and color duplex imaging in the localization of arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremity

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare the abilities of segmental Doppler pressures (SDP) and color duplex imaging (CDI) to localize arterial stenosis and to assess the ability of CDI to accurately categorize the severity of disease. METHODS We analyzed 134 patients (268 limbs) who underwent all three tests; SDP, CDI, and arteriograms. Results of SDP and CDI were examined to determine their accuracy in localizing high grade (greater than 50%) stenosis at three levels; aortoiliac-common femoral artery (level I), superficial femoral artery (SFA; level II), and popliteal artery (level III). RESULTS The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy for SDP and CDI were as follows: level I, 63%, 88%, 81%, 75%, and 77%; 93%, 99%, 98%, 95%, and 96%, respectively (p < 0.01); level II, 51%, 99%, 99%, 57%, and 70%; 94%, 98%, 99%, 92%, and 96%, respectively (p < 0.01); level III, 55%, 92%, 60%, 90%, and 85%; 78%, 100%, 97%, 95%, and 95%, respectively (p < 0.01). Exact agreement was noted between the CDI and arteriogram in regard to the severity of disease in 88% of the limbs (1170 segments). The presence of SFA disease in patients with level I disease or aortoiliac-common femoral artery disease in patients with level II disease did not significantly alter the ability of SDP to localize the disease. The presence of diabetes significantly affected the accuracy of SDP in localizing SFA and popliteal artery stenosis. An analysis of SDPs ability to detect any segment as abnormal, as confirmed by arteriogram, revealed a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 82%, positive predictive value of 96%, negative predictive value of 60%, and overall accuracy of 87%. The average cost was

Subjective rating of cosmetic treatment with botulinum toxin type A: do existing measures demonstrate interobserver validity?

149 for an SDP and