Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alexander J. Turner is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alexander J. Turner.


Geophysical Research Letters | 2016

A large increase in U.S. methane emissions over the past decade inferred from satellite data and surface observations

Alexander J. Turner; Daniel J. Jacob; Joshua Benmergui; S. C. Wofsy; Joannes D. Maasakkers; A. Butz; Otto P. Hasekamp; Sebastien Biraud

The global burden of atmospheric methane has been increasing over the past decade, but the causes are not well understood. National inventory estimates from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency indicate no significant trend in U.S. anthropogenic methane emissions from 2002 to present. Here we use satellite retrievals and surface observations of atmospheric methane to suggest that U.S. methane emissions have increased by more than 30% over the 2002–2014 period. The trend is largest in the central part of the country, but we cannot readily attribute it to any specific source type. This large increase in U.S. methane emissions could account for 30–60% of the global growth of atmospheric methane seen in the past decade.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2017

Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl

Alexander J. Turner; Christian Frankenberg; Paul O. Wennberg; Daniel J. Jacob

Significance Recent trends in atmospheric methane are not well understood as evidenced by multiple hypotheses proposed to explain the stabilization of methane concentrations in the early 2000s and the renewed growth since 2007. Here we use a multispecies inversion to determine the cause of these decadal trends. The most likely explanation for the renewed growth in atmospheric methane involves a decrease in hydroxyl (OH), the main sink for atmospheric methane, that is partially offset by a decrease in methane emissions. However, we also demonstrate that the problem of attributing methane trends from the current surface observation network, including isotopes, is underdetermined and does not allow unambiguous attribution of decadal trends. Methane is the second strongest anthropogenic greenhouse gas and its atmospheric burden has more than doubled since 1850. Methane concentrations stabilized in the early 2000s and began increasing again in 2007. Neither the stabilization nor the recent growth are well understood, as evidenced by multiple competing hypotheses in recent literature. Here we use a multispecies two-box model inversion to jointly constrain 36 y of methane sources and sinks, using ground-based measurements of methane, methyl chloroform, and the C13/C12 ratio in atmospheric methane (δ13CH4) from 1983 through 2015. We find that the problem, as currently formulated, is underdetermined and solutions obtained in previous work are strongly dependent on prior assumptions. Based on our analysis, the mathematically most likely explanation for the renewed growth in atmospheric methane, counterintuitively, involves a 25-Tg/y decrease in methane emissions from 2003 to 2016 that is offset by a 7% decrease in global mean hydroxyl (OH) concentrations, the primary sink for atmospheric methane, over the same period. However, we are still able to fit the observations if we assume that OH concentrations are time invariant (as much of the previous work has assumed) and we then find solutions that are largely consistent with other proposed hypotheses for the renewed growth of atmospheric methane since 2007. We conclude that the current surface observing system does not allow unambiguous attribution of the decadal trends in methane without robust constraints on OH variability, which currently rely purely on methyl chloroform data and its uncertain emissions estimates.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

Revisiting global fossil fuel and biofuel emissions of ethane

Zitely A. Tzompa-Sosa; Emmanuel Mahieu; Bruno Franco; Christoph A. Keller; Alexander J. Turner; Detlev Helmig; Alan Fried; Dirk Richter; Petter Weibring; James G. Walega; T. I. Yacovitch; Scott C. Herndon; D. R. Blake; Frank Hase; James W. Hannigan; Stephanie Conway; Kimberly Strong; Matthias Schneider; Emily V. Fischer

Recent measurements over the Northern Hemisphere indicate that the long-term decline in the atmospheric burden of ethane (C2H6) has ended and the abundance increased dramatically between 2010 and 2014. The rise in C2H6 atmospheric abundances has been attributed to oil and natural gas extraction in North America. Existing global C2H6 emission inventories are based on outdated activity maps that do not account for current oil and natural gas exploitation regions. We present an updated global C2H6 emission inventory based on 2010 satellite-derived CH4 fluxes with adjusted C2H6 emissions over the U.S. from the National Emission Inventory (NEI 2011). We contrast our global 2010 C2H6 emission inventory with one developed for 2001. The C2H6 difference between global anthropogenic emissions is subtle (7.9 versus 7.2 Tg yr−1), but the spatial distribution of the emissions is distinct. In the 2010 C2H6 inventory, fossil fuel sources in the Northern Hemisphere represent half of global C2H6 emissions and 95% of global fossil fuel emissions. Over the U.S., unadjusted NEI 2011 C2H6 emissions produce mixing ratios that are 14–50% of those observed by aircraft observations (2008–2014). When the NEI 2011 C2H6 emission totals are scaled by a factor of 1.4, the Goddard Earth Observing System Chem model largely reproduces a regional suite of observations, with the exception of the central U.S., where it continues to underpredict observed mixing ratios in the lower troposphere. We estimate monthly mean contributions of fossil fuel C2H6 emissions to ozone and peroxyacetyl nitrate surface mixing ratios over North America of ~1% and ~8%, respectively.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018

2010–2015 methane trends over Canada, the United States, and Mexico observed by the GOSAT satellite: contributions from different source sectors

Jian-Xiong Sheng; Daniel J. Jacob; Alexander J. Turner; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Joshua Benmergui; A. Anthony Bloom; Claudia Arndt; Ritesh Gautam; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Hartmut Boesch; Robert Parker

We use seven years (2010-2016) of methane column observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) to examine trends in atmospheric methane concentrations over North America and infer trends in emissions. Local methane enhancements above background are diagnosed in the GOSAT data on a 0.5◦ × 0.5◦ grid by estimating the local background as the low (10th-25th) percentiles of the deseasonalized frequency distributions of the data for individual years. Trends in methane enhancements on the 0.5◦×0.5◦ grid are then aggregated nationally and for individual source sectors, using 5 information from state-of-science bottom-up inventories. We find that US methane emissions increased by 2.5± 1.4% a−1 (mean ± one standard deviation) over the seven-year period, with contributions from both oil/gas systems (possibly unconventional oil/gas production) and from livestock in the Midwest (possibly swine manure management). Mexican emissions show a decrease that can be attributed to a decreasing cattle population. Canadian emissions show year-to-year variability driven by wetlands emissions and correlated with wetland areal extent. The US emission trends inferred from the GOSAT data account 10 for about 20% of the observed increase in global methane over the 2010-2016 period.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2018

Modulation of hydroxyl variability by ENSO in the absence of external forcing

Alexander J. Turner; Inez Fung; Vaishali Naik; Larry W. Horowitz; R. C. Cohen

Significance The hydroxyl radical (OH) is central to tropospheric chemistry, but current measurements are insufficient to assess its effects on year-to-year changes in atmospheric methane. We use a 6,000-y control simulation in a global coupled chemistry-climate model to study the natural variability of OH. We find that natural OH variability can produce (unforced) methane trends as large as the observed changes in methane over the last few decades. Additionally, we find a link between OH and La Niña. While we cannot directly measure annual global mean OH, we can use what we know about La Niña to improve our understanding of OH. This may, in turn, improve our understanding of recent methane trends. The hydroxyl radical (OH) is the primary oxidant in the troposphere, and the impact of its fluctuations on the methane budget has been disputed in recent years, however measurements of OH are insufficient to characterize global interannual fluctuations relevant for methane. Here, we use a 6,000-y control simulation of preindustrial conditions with a chemistry-climate model to quantify the natural variability in OH and internal feedbacks governing that variability. We find that, even in the absence of external forcing, maximum OH changes are 3.8 ± 0.8% over a decade, which is large in the context of the recent methane growth from 2007–2017. We show that the OH variability is not a white-noise process. A wavelet analysis indicates that OH variability exhibits significant feedbacks with the same periodicity as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). We find intrinsically generated modulation of the OH variability, suggesting that OH may show periods of rapid or no change in future decades that are solely due to the internal climate dynamics (as opposed to external forcings). An empirical orthogonal function analysis further indicates that ENSO is the dominant mode of OH variability, with the modulation of OH occurring primarily through lightning NOx. La Niña is associated with an increase in convection in the Tropical Pacific, which increases the simulated occurrence of lightning and allows for more OH production. Understanding this link between OH and ENSO may improve the predictability of the oxidative capacity of the troposphere and assist in elucidating the causes of current and historical trends in methane.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018

Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales

Alexander J. Turner; Daniel J. Jacob; Joshua Benmergui; Jeremy Brandman; Laurent White; Cynthia A. Randles

Anthropogenic methane emissions originate from a large number of fine-scale and often transient point sources. Satellite observations of atmospheric methane columns are an attractive approach for monitoring these emissions but have limitations from instrument precision, pixel resolution, and measurement frequency. Dense observations will soon be available in both low-Earth and geostationary orbits, but the extent to which they can provide fine-scale information on methane sources has yet to be explored. Here we present an observation system simulation experiment (OSSE) to assess the capabilities of different satellite observing system configurations. We conduct a 1-week WRF-STILT simulation to generate methane column footprints at 1.3× 1.3 km2 spatial resolution and hourly temporal resolution over a 290× 235 km2 domain in the Barnett Shale, a major oil and gas field in Texas with a large number of point sources. We sub-sample these footprints to match the observing characteristics of the recently launched TROPOMI instrument (7× 7 km2 pixels, 11 ppb precision, daily frequency), the planned GeoCARB instrument (2.7× 3.0 km2 pixels, 4 ppb precision, nominal twice-daily frequency), and other proposed observing configurations. The information content of the various observing systems is evaluated using the Fisher information matrix and its eigenvalues. We find that a week of TROPOMI observations should provide information on temporally invariant emissions at ∼ 30 km spatial resolution. GeoCARB should provide information available on temporally invariant emissions∼ 2–7 km spatial resolution depending on sampling frequency (hourly to daily). Improvements to the instrument precision yield greater increases in information content than improved sampling frequency. A precision better than 6 ppb is critical for GeoCARB to achieve fine resolution of emissions. Transient emissions would be missed with either TROPOMI or GeoCARB. An aspirational highresolution geostationary instrument with 1.3× 1.3 km2 pixel resolution, hourly return time, and 1 ppb precision would effectively constrain the temporally invariant emissions in the Barnett Shale at the kilometer scale and provide some information on hourly variability of sources.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2015

Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data

Alexander J. Turner; Daniel J. Jacob; Kevin James Wecht; Joannes D. Maasakkers; E Lundgren; Arlyn E. Andrews; Sebastien Biraud; Hartmut Boesch; Kevin W. Bowman; Nicholas M Deutscher; M. K. Dubey; David W. T. Griffith; Frank Hase; Akihiko Kuze; Justus Notholt; Hirofumi Ohyama; Robert Parker; Vivienne H. Payne; Ralf Sussmann; Colm Sweeney; V. Velazco; Thorsten Warneke; Paul O. Wennberg; Debra Wunch


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016

Ten years of atmospheric methane from ground-based NDACC FTIR observations

Whitney Bader; Benoît Bovy; Stephanie Conway; Kimberly Strong; Dan Smale; Alexander J. Turner; Thomas Blumenstock; C. D. Boone; Ancelin Coulon; Omaira García; David W. T. Griffith; F. Hase; Petra Hausmann; Nicholas Jones; P. B. Krummel; Isao Murata; Isamu Morino; Hideaki Nakajima; Simon O'Doherty; Clare Paton-Walsh; John Robinson; Rodrigue Sandrin; Matthias Schneider; Christian Servais; Ralf Sussmann; Emmanuel Mahieu


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016

Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions

Daniel J. Jacob; Alexander J. Turner; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Jian-Xiong Sheng; Kang Sun; Xiong Liu; Kelly Chance; I. Aben; Jason McKeever; Christian Frankenberg


Environmental Science & Technology | 2016

Gridded National Inventory of U.S. Methane Emissions

Joannes D. Maasakkers; Daniel J. Jacob; Melissa P. Sulprizio; Alexander J. Turner; Melissa Weitz; Tom Wirth; Cate Hight; Mark DeFigueiredo; Mausami Desai; Rachel Schmeltz; Leif Hockstad; A. Anthony Bloom; Kevin W. Bowman; Seongeun Jeong; Marc L. Fischer

Collaboration


Dive into the Alexander J. Turner's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daven K. Henze

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Anthony Bloom

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge