Joannes D. Maasakkers
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joannes D. Maasakkers.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2016
Alexander J. Turner; Daniel J. Jacob; Joshua Benmergui; S. C. Wofsy; Joannes D. Maasakkers; A. Butz; Otto P. Hasekamp; Sebastien Biraud
The global burden of atmospheric methane has been increasing over the past decade, but the causes are not well understood. National inventory estimates from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency indicate no significant trend in U.S. anthropogenic methane emissions from 2002 to present. Here we use satellite retrievals and surface observations of atmospheric methane to suggest that U.S. methane emissions have increased by more than 30% over the 2002–2014 period. The trend is largest in the central part of the country, but we cannot readily attribute it to any specific source type. This large increase in U.S. methane emissions could account for 30–60% of the global growth of atmospheric methane seen in the past decade.
Science | 2018
Ramón A. Alvarez; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R. Lyon; David T. Allen; Zachary R. Barkley; Adam R. Brandt; Kenneth J. Davis; Scott C. Herndon; Daniel J. Jacob; Anna Karion; Eric A. Kort; Brian K. Lamb; Thomas Lauvaux; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Anthony J. Marchese; Mark Omara; Stephen W. Pacala; J. Peischl; Allen L. Robinson; Paul B. Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Amy Townsend-Small; Steven C. Wofsy; Steven P. Hamburg
A leaky endeavor Considerable amounts of the greenhouse gas methane leak from the U.S. oil and natural gas supply chain. Alvarez et al. reassessed the magnitude of this leakage and found that in 2015, supply chain emissions were ∼60% higher than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency inventory estimate. They suggest that this discrepancy exists because current inventory methods miss emissions that occur during abnormal operating conditions. These data, and the methodology used to obtain them, could improve and verify international inventories of greenhouse gases and provide a better understanding of mitigation efforts outlined by the Paris Agreement. Science, this issue p. 186 Methane leakage from the U.S. oil and natural gas supply chain is much greater than previously estimated. Methane emissions from the U.S. oil and natural gas supply chain were estimated by using ground-based, facility-scale measurements and validated with aircraft observations in areas accounting for ~30% of U.S. gas production. When scaled up nationally, our facility-based estimate of 2015 supply chain emissions is 13 ± 2 teragrams per year, equivalent to 2.3% of gross U.S. gas production. This value is ~60% higher than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency inventory estimate, likely because existing inventory methods miss emissions released during abnormal operating conditions. Methane emissions of this magnitude, per unit of natural gas consumed, produce radiative forcing over a 20-year time horizon comparable to the CO2 from natural gas combustion. Substantial emission reductions are feasible through rapid detection of the root causes of high emissions and deployment of less failure-prone systems.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Jian-Xiong Sheng; Daniel J. Jacob; Alexander J. Turner; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Joshua Benmergui; A. Anthony Bloom; Claudia Arndt; Ritesh Gautam; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Hartmut Boesch; Robert Parker
We use seven years (2010-2016) of methane column observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) to examine trends in atmospheric methane concentrations over North America and infer trends in emissions. Local methane enhancements above background are diagnosed in the GOSAT data on a 0.5◦ × 0.5◦ grid by estimating the local background as the low (10th-25th) percentiles of the deseasonalized frequency distributions of the data for individual years. Trends in methane enhancements on the 0.5◦×0.5◦ grid are then aggregated nationally and for individual source sectors, using 5 information from state-of-science bottom-up inventories. We find that US methane emissions increased by 2.5± 1.4% a−1 (mean ± one standard deviation) over the seven-year period, with contributions from both oil/gas systems (possibly unconventional oil/gas production) and from livestock in the Midwest (possibly swine manure management). Mexican emissions show a decrease that can be attributed to a decreasing cattle population. Canadian emissions show year-to-year variability driven by wetlands emissions and correlated with wetland areal extent. The US emission trends inferred from the GOSAT data account 10 for about 20% of the observed increase in global methane over the 2010-2016 period.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Yuzhong Zhang; Daniel J. Jacob; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Melissa P. Sulprizio; Jian-Xiong Sheng; Ritesh Gautam; John R. Worden
The hydroxyl radical (OH) is the main tropospheric oxidant and is the largest sink for atmospheric methane. The global abundance of OH has been monitored for the past decades with the methyl chloroform (CH3CCl3) proxy. This approach is becoming ineffective as atmospheric CH3CCl3 concentrations decline. Here we propose that satellite observations of atmospheric methane in the shortwave infrared (SWIR) and thermal infrared (TIR) can provide an effective 15 replacement method. The premise is that the atmospheric signature of the methane sink from oxidation by OH is distinct from that of methane emissions. We evaluate this method in an observing system simulation experiment (OSSE) framework using synthetic SWIR and TIR satellite observations representative of the TROPOMI and CrIS instruments, respectively. The synthetic observations are interpreted with a Bayesian inverse analysis optimizing both gridded methane emissions and global OH concentrations with detailed error accounting, including errors in meteorological fields and in OH distributions. 20 We find that the satellite observations can constrain the global tropospheric OH concentrations with a precision better than 1% and an accuracy of about 3% for SWIR and 7% for TIR. The inversion can successfully separate contributions from methane emissions and OH concentrations to the methane budget and its trend. We also show that satellite methane observations can constrain the interhemispheric difference in OH. The main limitation to the accuracy is uncertainty in the spatial and seasonal distribution of OH. 25 Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-467 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 29 May 2018 c
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2015
Alexander J. Turner; Daniel J. Jacob; Kevin James Wecht; Joannes D. Maasakkers; E Lundgren; Arlyn E. Andrews; Sebastien Biraud; Hartmut Boesch; Kevin W. Bowman; Nicholas M Deutscher; M. K. Dubey; David W. T. Griffith; Frank Hase; Akihiko Kuze; Justus Notholt; Hirofumi Ohyama; Robert Parker; Vivienne H. Payne; Ralf Sussmann; Colm Sweeney; V. Velazco; Thorsten Warneke; Paul O. Wennberg; Debra Wunch
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014
G. C. M. Vinken; K. F. Boersma; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Marcellin Adon; Randall V. Martin
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Daniel J. Jacob; Alexander J. Turner; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Jian-Xiong Sheng; Kang Sun; Xiong Liu; Kelly Chance; I. Aben; Jason McKeever; Christian Frankenberg
Environmental Science & Technology | 2016
Joannes D. Maasakkers; Daniel J. Jacob; Melissa P. Sulprizio; Alexander J. Turner; Melissa Weitz; Tom Wirth; Cate Hight; Mark DeFigueiredo; Mausami Desai; Rachel Schmeltz; Leif Hockstad; A. Anthony Bloom; Kevin W. Bowman; Seongeun Jeong; Marc L. Fischer
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017
Zachary R. Barkley; Thomas Lauvaux; Kenneth J. Davis; Aijun Deng; Natasha L. Miles; Scott J. Richardson; Yanni Cao; Colm Sweeney; Anna Karion; Mackenzie L. Smith; Eric A. Kort; Stefan Schwietzke; Thomas Murphy; Guido Cervone; Douglas K. Martins; Joannes D. Maasakkers
Atmospheric Environment | 2017
Jian-Xiong Sheng; Daniel J. Jacob; Joannes D. Maasakkers; Melissa P. Sulprizio; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Steven P. Hamburg