Anelise F. Montagner

Wall-lesion development in gaps: The role of the adhesive bonding material

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the caries wall lesion development in different composite-dentin interfaces to investigate if the presence and location of two bonding materials in the gaps influence wall caries lesion development. METHODS Fourteen volunteers wore a modified occlusal splint containing samples with four different interfaces: perfect bonding/no gap, or with a fixed gap (234±30 μm) with either no bonding material, bonding material (Clearfil Protect Bond-PB and Clearfil SE Bond-SE) on dentin or on composite. Eight times a day, the samples were dipped in 20% sucrose solution for 10 min, during 3 weeks. The samples were imaged with microradiography (T-WIM), and lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML) were measured. The data were analysed with paired t-test. RESULTS The perfect bonding group did not show any caries wall lesion development, whereas all other interfaces did. The interface with bonding on dentin did not show significantly different wall lesion development from the interface with no material. However, when bonding was present on composite, both LD and ML were significantly higher than both other gap conditions (p-values<0.05). A difference between the bonding material was only seen when applied on composite: PB showed less ML than SE (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS The presence of bonding on the composite side of a composite-dentin gap increased wall lesion development in situ. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The presence and location of an adhesive bonding material in the composite-dentin gaps plays a role on the wall caries lesion development.

Secondary Caries Development in in situ Gaps next to Composite and Amalgam.

This in situ study investigated the secondary caries development in dentin in gaps next to composite and amalgam. For 21 days, 14 volunteers wore a modified occlusal splint containing human dentin samples with an average gap of 215 µm (SD = 55 µm) restored with three different materials: Filtek Supreme composite, Clearfil AP-X composite and Tytin amalgam. Eight times a day, the splint with samples was dipped in a 20% sucrose solution for 10 min. Before and after caries development, specimens were imaged with transversal wavelength independent microradiography, and lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML) were calculated. The LD and ML of the three restoration materials were compared within patients using paired t tests (α = 5%). In total 38 composite samples (Filtek n = 19 and AP-X n = 19) and 19 amalgam samples could be used for data analysis. AP-X composite presented the highest mean values of LD and ML of the three restorative materials. Amalgam showed statistically significantly less ML (Δ = 452 µm × vol%) than the combined composite materials (p = 0.036). When comparing amalgam to the separate composite materials, only AP-X composite showed higher ML (Δ = 515 µm × vol%) than amalgam (p = 0.034). Analysis of LD showed the same trends, but these were not statistically significant. In conclusion, amalgam showed reduced secondary caries progression in dentin in gaps compared to composite materials tested in this in situ model.

Failed bonded interfaces submitted to microcosm biofilm caries development

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the dentin wall carious lesion development of different composite-dentin interfaces in the presence of two adhesive bonding materials in the gaps, using a microcosm biofilm model. METHODS Dentin samples were prepared (10.4mm(2)) and restored with a composite resin using two adhesive systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch techniques). Different conditions with respect to composite-dentin interfaces were produced with a 200μm gap: failed bonded without ageing or after mechanical ageing, or non-bonded with or without the presence of adhesive material on the dentin wall. For cariogenic challenge, specimens were subjected to a biofilm microcosm model for 14days to create caries-like wall lesions. Before and after caries development, transverse wavelength-independent microradiography images were taken, and lesion depth and mineral loss were measured. Data were analysed with linear regression models (p<0.05). RESULTS The composite-dentin interface conditions significant influenced the caries development: lesion development was reduced by the presence of the adhesive material on dentin wall, while lesion development was increased by the mechanical ageing (p=0.019). There was no difference between the adhesive materials (p values>0.05). CONCLUSION Different composite-dentin interfaces influence wall lesion development in gaps, with the interfaces submitted to ageing showing less carious protection than those interfaces with the presence of adhesive covering the dentin. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The presence of adhesive bonding material in the gaps plays a role on the wall caries lesion development.

Behavior of failed bonded interfaces under in vitro cariogenic challenge

OBJECTIVE This in vitro study aimed to compare dentin wall caries development at different composite-dentin interfaces. METHODS Dentin samples (10.4 mm(2)) were restored with composite resin using two adhesive systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch techniques). Different composite-dentin interfaces with gaps were produced: (a) failed bonded, which were fractured at interface after being submitted to aging protocols (no aging, mechanical loading or water storage); (b) non-bonded interfaces, both without any adhesive material or with adhesive material applied only on the dentin. Adhesively fractured and non-bonded samples were subjected to a lactic acid gel (pH=5) caries model with a continuous opening/closing movement of the interfacial gap for 10 days. Transverse wavelength-independent microradiographs were taken, and lesion depth and mineral loss were measured. Data were analyzed with linear mixed-effects regression models. RESULTS Caries development differed among the composite-dentin interfaces (p<0.001). The non-bonded interface with adhesive material on the dentin showed less lesion depth than the failed bonded groups, while the non-bonded interface without adhesive on dentin showed the deepest wall lesions. Difference between the adhesive systems was observed only in the non-bonded groups (p=0.003), with the self-etch adhesive applied on the dentin showing more severe lesions. Samples broken after mechanical loading aging showed deeper lesions than those broken after water storage (p<0.001). SIGNIFICANCE Composite-dentin interfaces failed after aging presented different demineralization from interfaces that were never bonded, indicating that the restorative treatment changes the tissue in a way relevant to secondary caries development.

Influence of cariogenic challenge on bond strength stability of dentin.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cariogenic challenge on the microtensile bond strength values (μTBS) of dentin pre-treated with chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) or sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Thirty-six sound molars were selected and randomly assigned to 3 dentin pre-treatments (distilled water - control, 2% CHX and 10% NaOCl) and 4 aging protocols (24h control, biofilm without cariogenic challenge, biofilm with cariogenic challenge, and 18-month water storage). The same etch-and-rinse adhesive system and composite resin were used for all groups (n=30 beams). For the biofilm groups, dental microcosm biofilms originated from saliva of a healthy donor were grown on the samples with a defined medium enriched with mucin, with or without 10% sucrose, according to the group. After the experimental period, the microtensile test was performed. Data were analyzed with ANOVA followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). The pre-treatment did not influence μTBS for all aging conditions (p=0.188), but the type of aging affected the bond strength (p<0.001). Cariogenic challenge and water storage aging affected the bond stability resulting in a decrease of the μTBS, but the pre-treatments did not influence the μTBS.