Anna French
University of Oxford
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Anna French.
Planta | 1970
B. E. Juniper; Anna French
SummaryWithin the root cap, in maize, the cells believed to be responsible for the perception all possess large well-developed amyloplasts. They also have normal mitochondria and Golgi bodies, normal rough-surfaced ER with a very striking pattern of distribution, few free ribosomes, walls with an abnormal reticulate encrusting material, irregularly distributed plasmodesmata and an as yet unidentified fine quadruple membranous system. All of these features are discussed in relation to the role of the cells in perception.
Planta | 1972
B. E. Juniper; Anna French
SummaryWithin the root cap in maize the cells believed to be responsible for the perception of gravity possess a rough-surfaced ER system with a distinctive pattern of distribution. The ER is found normally parallel to the nuclear membrane and to the walls, and symmetrically distributed. It can be disturbed from its parallel position by moving the root to any horizontal orientation, but it is not displaced by inverting the root into the 180° vertical position. On returning to the normal position of growth the ER rapidly reforms into the original symmetrical position. The implications of this position and movement and the possible role of the ER are discussed.
Cell Stem Cell | 2015
Marli Silva; Laurence Daheron; Hannah Hurley; Kim Bure; Richard Barker; A J Carr; David J. Williams; Hae-Won Kim; Anna French; Peter J. Coffey; Justin J. Cooper-White; Brock Reeve; Mahendra Rao; Evan Y. Snyder; Kelvin S. Ng; Benjamin E. Mead; James A. Smith; Jeffrey M. Karp; David Brindley; Ivan Wall
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the potential to transform drug discovery and healthcare in the 21(st) century. However, successful commercialization will require standardized manufacturing platforms. Here we highlight the need to define standardized practices for iPSC generation and processing and discuss current challenges to the robust manufacture of iPSC products.
Stem Cells Translational Medicine | 2015
Anna French; Christopher Bravery; James Smith; Amit Chandra; Peter R.T. Archibald; Joseph D. Gold; Natalie Artzi; Hae-Won Kim; Richard W. Barker; Alexander Meissner; Joseph C. Wu; Jonathan C. Knowles; David J. Williams; Guillermo García-Cardeña; Doug Sipp; Steve Oh; Jeanne F. Loring; Mahendra S. Rao; Brock Reeve; Ivan Wall; A J Carr; Kim Bure; Glyn Stacey; Jeffrey M. Karp; Evan Y. Snyder; David Brindley
There is a need for physical standards (reference materials) to ensure both reproducibility and consistency in the production of somatic cell types from human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) sources. We have outlined the need for reference materials (RMs) in relation to the unique properties and concerns surrounding hPSC‐derived products and suggest in‐house approaches to RM generation relevant to basic research, drug screening, and therapeutic applications. hPSCs have an unparalleled potential as a source of somatic cells for drug screening, disease modeling, and therapeutic application. Undefined variation and product variability after differentiation to the lineage or cell type of interest impede efficient translation and can obscure the evaluation of clinical safety and efficacy. Moreover, in the absence of a consistent population, data generated from in vitro studies could be unreliable and irreproducible. Efforts to devise approaches and tools that facilitate improved consistency of hPSC‐derived products, both as development tools and therapeutic products, will aid translation. Standards exist in both written and physical form; however, because many unknown factors persist in the field, premature written standards could inhibit rather than promote innovation and translation. We focused on the derivation of physical standard RMs. We outline the need for RMs and assess the approaches to in‐house RM generation for hPSC‐derived products, a critical tool for the analysis and control of product variation that can be applied by researchers and developers. We then explore potential routes for the generation of RMs, including both cellular and noncellular materials and novel methods that might provide valuable tools to measure and account for variation. Multiparametric techniques to identify “signatures” for therapeutically relevant cell types, such as neurons and cardiomyocytes that can be derived from hPSCs, would be of significant utility, although physical RMs will be required for clinical purposes.
Nature Biotechnology | 2014
Mackenna Roberts; Ivan Wall; Ian Bingham; Dominic Icely; Brock Reeve; Kim Bure; Anna French; David Brindley
Will freedom to research and innovate be restricted as the induced pluripotent stem cell field advances toward the clinic, or are concerns premature within a rapidly changing ecosystem?
Journal of Tissue Engineering | 2014
Benjamin Davies; Sarah Rikabi; Anna French; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; Mark E. Morrey; K Wartolowska; Andrew Judge; Robert E. MacLaren; Anthony Mathur; David J. Williams; Ivan Wall; Martin A. Birchall; Brock Reeve; Anthony Atala; Richard W. Barker; Zhanfeng Cui; Dominic Furniss; Kim Bure; Evan Y. Snyder; Jeffrey M. Karp; A J Price; Andrew Carr; David Brindley
There has been a large increase in basic science activity in cell therapy and a growing portfolio of cell therapy trials. However, the number of industry products available for widespread clinical use does not match this magnitude of activity. We hypothesize that the paucity of engagement with the clinical community is a key contributor to the lack of commercially successful cell therapy products. To investigate this, we launched a pilot study to survey clinicians from five specialities and to determine what they believe to be the most significant barriers to cellular therapy clinical development and adoption. Our study shows that the main concerns among this group are cost-effectiveness, efficacy, reimbursement, and regulation. Addressing these concerns can best be achieved by ensuring that future clinical trials are conducted to adequately answer the questions of both regulators and the broader clinical community.
Cytotherapy | 2014
Christopher Bravery; Anna French
The development of cellular therapeutics (CTP) takes place over many years, and, where successful, the developer will anticipate the product to be in clinical use for decades. Successful demonstration of manufacturing and quality consistency is dependent on the use of complex analytical methods; thus, the risk of process and method drift over time is high. The use of reference materials (RM) is an established scientific principle and as such also a regulatory requirement. The various uses of RM in the context of CTP manufacturing and quality are discussed, along with why they are needed for living cell products and the analytical methods applied to them. Relatively few consensus RM exist that are suitable for even common methods used by CTP developers, such as flow cytometry. Others have also identified this need and made proposals; however, great care will be needed to ensure any consensus RM that result are fit for purpose. Such consensus RM probably will need to be applied to specific standardized methods, and the idea that a single RM can have wide applicability is challenged. Written standards, including standardized methods, together with appropriate measurement RM are probably the most appropriate way to define specific starting cell types. The characteristics of a specific CTP will to some degree deviate from those of the starting cells; consequently, a product RM remains the best solution where feasible. Each CTP developer must consider how and what types of RM should be used to ensure the reliability of their own analytical measurements.
Trends in Biotechnology | 2014
Anna French; Jane Y. Suh; Carol Y. Suh; Lee L. Rubin; Richard Barker; Kim Bure; Brock Reeve; David Brindley
The approach to research and development in biomedical science is changing. Increasingly, academia and industry seek to collaborate, and share resources and expertise, by establishing partnerships. Here, we explore the co-development partnership landscape in the field of regenerative medicine, focusing on agreements involving one or more private entities. A majority of the largest biopharmaceutical companies have announced strategic partnerships with a specific regenerative medicine focus, signifying the growth and widening appeal of this emerging sector.
Stem Cells and Development | 2013
David Brindley; Anna French; J Suh; M Roberts; Benjamin Davies; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; K Wartolowska; K Rooke; A Kramm; A Judge; Mark E. Morrey; Amit Chandra; Hannah Hurley; L Grover; I Bingham; B Siegel; M S Rattley; R L Buckler; D McKeon; K Krumholz; L Hook; M May; Sarah Rikabi; R Pigott; M Morys; A Sabokbar; E Titus; Y Laabi; G Lemaitre; R Zahkia
Increased global connectivity has catalyzed technological development in almost all industries, in part through the facilitation of novel collaborative structures. Notably, open innovation and crowd-sourcing-of expertise and/or funding-has tremendous potential to increase the efficiency with which biomedical ecosystems interact to deliver safe, efficacious and affordable therapies to patients. Consequently, such practices offer tremendous potential in advancing development of cellular therapies. In this vein, the CASMI Translational Stem Cell Consortium (CTSCC) was formed to unite global thought-leaders, producing academically rigorous and commercially practicable solutions to a range of challenges in pluripotent stem cell translation. Critically, the CTSCC research agenda is defined through continuous consultation with its international funding and research partners. Herein, initial findings for all research focus areas are presented to inform global product development strategies, and to stimulate continued industry interaction around biomanufacturing, strategic partnerships, standards, regulation and intellectual property and clinical adoption.
Rejuvenation Research | 2014
Anna French; Kim Bure; David Brindley
The high incidence of unmet medical needs in combination with the rising burden of chronic diseases, linked to an increasingly aging population, necessitates new approaches to therapeutic intervention. One potential class of health care innovation that may offer an alternative approach to addressing current shortfalls is stem cell therapies. The CASMI Translational Stem Cell Consortium (CTSCC) was formed to elucidate the key hurdles to the commercialization and clinical adoption of stem cell technologies, with a particular focus on pluripotent stem cell (PSC) technologies. As a global pre-competitive academic-industry consortium, the CTSCC unites thought leaders from a range of sectors and technical specialties in defining and discovering solutions to roadblocks that will impede the field. Targeted toward stakeholder requirements at the delivery end of the translational spectrum, the CTSCC aims to provide mechanisms for multidirectional dialogue and to produce academically rigorous and commercially practicable research outputs to accelerate industry progress. On the 30th and 31st of July, 2013, the CASMI Translational Stem Cell Consortium (CTSCC) held a launch event at the Saint James Club, Paris, France.