Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kim Bure is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kim Bure.


Cell Stem Cell | 2015

Generating iPSCs: translating cell reprogramming science into scalable and robust biomanufacturing strategies.

Marli Silva; Laurence Daheron; Hannah Hurley; Kim Bure; Richard Barker; A J Carr; David J. Williams; Hae-Won Kim; Anna French; Peter J. Coffey; Justin J. Cooper-White; Brock Reeve; Mahendra Rao; Evan Y. Snyder; Kelvin S. Ng; Benjamin E. Mead; James A. Smith; Jeffrey M. Karp; David Brindley; Ivan Wall

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the potential to transform drug discovery and healthcare in the 21(st) century. However, successful commercialization will require standardized manufacturing platforms. Here we highlight the need to define standardized practices for iPSC generation and processing and discuss current challenges to the robust manufacture of iPSC products.


Stem Cells Translational Medicine | 2015

Enabling Consistency in Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Products for Research and Development and Clinical Applications Through Material Standards

Anna French; Christopher Bravery; James Smith; Amit Chandra; Peter R.T. Archibald; Joseph D. Gold; Natalie Artzi; Hae-Won Kim; Richard W. Barker; Alexander Meissner; Joseph C. Wu; Jonathan C. Knowles; David J. Williams; Guillermo García-Cardeña; Doug Sipp; Steve Oh; Jeanne F. Loring; Mahendra S. Rao; Brock Reeve; Ivan Wall; A J Carr; Kim Bure; Glyn Stacey; Jeffrey M. Karp; Evan Y. Snyder; David Brindley

There is a need for physical standards (reference materials) to ensure both reproducibility and consistency in the production of somatic cell types from human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) sources. We have outlined the need for reference materials (RMs) in relation to the unique properties and concerns surrounding hPSC‐derived products and suggest in‐house approaches to RM generation relevant to basic research, drug screening, and therapeutic applications. hPSCs have an unparalleled potential as a source of somatic cells for drug screening, disease modeling, and therapeutic application. Undefined variation and product variability after differentiation to the lineage or cell type of interest impede efficient translation and can obscure the evaluation of clinical safety and efficacy. Moreover, in the absence of a consistent population, data generated from in vitro studies could be unreliable and irreproducible. Efforts to devise approaches and tools that facilitate improved consistency of hPSC‐derived products, both as development tools and therapeutic products, will aid translation. Standards exist in both written and physical form; however, because many unknown factors persist in the field, premature written standards could inhibit rather than promote innovation and translation. We focused on the derivation of physical standard RMs. We outline the need for RMs and assess the approaches to in‐house RM generation for hPSC‐derived products, a critical tool for the analysis and control of product variation that can be applied by researchers and developers. We then explore potential routes for the generation of RMs, including both cellular and noncellular materials and novel methods that might provide valuable tools to measure and account for variation. Multiparametric techniques to identify “signatures” for therapeutically relevant cell types, such as neurons and cardiomyocytes that can be derived from hPSCs, would be of significant utility, although physical RMs will be required for clinical purposes.


Nature Biotechnology | 2014

The global intellectual property landscape of induced pluripotent stem cell technologies

Mackenna Roberts; Ivan Wall; Ian Bingham; Dominic Icely; Brock Reeve; Kim Bure; Anna French; David Brindley

Will freedom to research and innovate be restricted as the induced pluripotent stem cell field advances toward the clinic, or are concerns premature within a rapidly changing ecosystem?


Journal of Tissue Engineering | 2014

Quantitative assessment of barriers to the clinical development and adoption of cellular therapies: A pilot study.

Benjamin Davies; Sarah Rikabi; Anna French; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; Mark E. Morrey; K Wartolowska; Andrew Judge; Robert E. MacLaren; Anthony Mathur; David J. Williams; Ivan Wall; Martin A. Birchall; Brock Reeve; Anthony Atala; Richard W. Barker; Zhanfeng Cui; Dominic Furniss; Kim Bure; Evan Y. Snyder; Jeffrey M. Karp; A J Price; Andrew Carr; David Brindley

There has been a large increase in basic science activity in cell therapy and a growing portfolio of cell therapy trials. However, the number of industry products available for widespread clinical use does not match this magnitude of activity. We hypothesize that the paucity of engagement with the clinical community is a key contributor to the lack of commercially successful cell therapy products. To investigate this, we launched a pilot study to survey clinicians from five specialities and to determine what they believe to be the most significant barriers to cellular therapy clinical development and adoption. Our study shows that the main concerns among this group are cost-effectiveness, efficacy, reimbursement, and regulation. Addressing these concerns can best be achieved by ensuring that future clinical trials are conducted to adequately answer the questions of both regulators and the broader clinical community.


Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery | 2016

Open Access Could Transform Drug Discovery: A Case Study of JQ1.

Zeeshaan Arshad; James Smith; Mackenna Roberts; Wen Hwa Lee; Ben Davies; Kim Bure; Georg A. Holländer; Sue Dopson; C. Bountra; David Brindley

Abstract Introduction: The cost to develop a new drug from target discovery to market is a staggering


Trends in Biotechnology | 2014

Global strategic partnerships in regenerative medicine

Anna French; Jane Y. Suh; Carol Y. Suh; Lee L. Rubin; Richard Barker; Kim Bure; Brock Reeve; David Brindley

1.8 billion, largely due to the very high attrition rate of drug candidates and the lengthy transition times during development. Open access is an emerging model of open innovation that places no restriction on the use of information and has the potential to accelerate the development of new drugs. Areas Covered: To date, no quantitative assessment has yet taken place to determine the effects and viability of open access on the process of drug translation. This need is addressed within this study. The literature and intellectual property landscapes of the drug candidate JQ1, which was made available on an open access basis when discovered, and conventionally developed equivalents that were not are compared using the Web of Science and Thomson Innovation software, respectively. Expert opinion: Results demonstrate that openly sharing the JQ1 molecule led to a greater uptake by a wider and more multi-disciplinary research community. A comparative analysis of the patent landscapes for each candidate also found that the broader scientific diaspora of the publically released JQ1 data enhanced innovation, evidenced by a greater number of downstream patents filed in relation to JQ1. The authors’ findings counter the notion that open access drug discovery would leak commercial intellectual property. On the contrary, JQ1 serves as a test case to evidence that open access drug discovery can be an economic model that potentially improves efficiency and cost of drug discovery and its subsequent commercialization.


Stem Cells and Development | 2013

The implementation of novel collaborative structures for the identification and resolution of barriers to pluripotent stem cell translation.

David Brindley; Anna French; J Suh; M Roberts; Benjamin Davies; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; K Wartolowska; K Rooke; A Kramm; A Judge; Mark E. Morrey; Amit Chandra; Hannah Hurley; L Grover; I Bingham; B Siegel; M S Rattley; R L Buckler; D McKeon; K Krumholz; L Hook; M May; Sarah Rikabi; R Pigott; M Morys; A Sabokbar; E Titus; Y Laabi; G Lemaitre; R Zahkia

The approach to research and development in biomedical science is changing. Increasingly, academia and industry seek to collaborate, and share resources and expertise, by establishing partnerships. Here, we explore the co-development partnership landscape in the field of regenerative medicine, focusing on agreements involving one or more private entities. A majority of the largest biopharmaceutical companies have announced strategic partnerships with a specific regenerative medicine focus, signifying the growth and widening appeal of this emerging sector.


Rejuvenation Research | 2014

CASMI TSCC Launch Event, Paris, France, July 2013: An Assessment of the Key Barriers to the Commercialization and Clinical Adoption of Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies*

Anna French; Kim Bure; David Brindley

Increased global connectivity has catalyzed technological development in almost all industries, in part through the facilitation of novel collaborative structures. Notably, open innovation and crowd-sourcing-of expertise and/or funding-has tremendous potential to increase the efficiency with which biomedical ecosystems interact to deliver safe, efficacious and affordable therapies to patients. Consequently, such practices offer tremendous potential in advancing development of cellular therapies. In this vein, the CASMI Translational Stem Cell Consortium (CTSCC) was formed to unite global thought-leaders, producing academically rigorous and commercially practicable solutions to a range of challenges in pluripotent stem cell translation. Critically, the CTSCC research agenda is defined through continuous consultation with its international funding and research partners. Herein, initial findings for all research focus areas are presented to inform global product development strategies, and to stimulate continued industry interaction around biomanufacturing, strategic partnerships, standards, regulation and intellectual property and clinical adoption.


Frontiers in Genetics | 2016

A Quantitative Assessment of Factors Affecting the Technological Development and Adoption of Companion Diagnostics

Dee Luo; James Smith; Nick Meadows; Anna Schuh; Katie E. Manescu; Kim Bure; Benjamin Davies; Rob Horne; Mike Kope; David L. DiGiusto; David Brindley

The high incidence of unmet medical needs in combination with the rising burden of chronic diseases, linked to an increasingly aging population, necessitates new approaches to therapeutic intervention. One potential class of health care innovation that may offer an alternative approach to addressing current shortfalls is stem cell therapies. The CASMI Translational Stem Cell Consortium (CTSCC) was formed to elucidate the key hurdles to the commercialization and clinical adoption of stem cell technologies, with a particular focus on pluripotent stem cell (PSC) technologies. As a global pre-competitive academic-industry consortium, the CTSCC unites thought leaders from a range of sectors and technical specialties in defining and discovering solutions to roadblocks that will impede the field. Targeted toward stakeholder requirements at the delivery end of the translational spectrum, the CTSCC aims to provide mechanisms for multidirectional dialogue and to produce academically rigorous and commercially practicable research outputs to accelerate industry progress. On the 30th and 31st of July, 2013, the CASMI Translational Stem Cell Consortium (CTSCC) held a launch event at the Saint James Club, Paris, France.


Systematic Reviews | 2017

An assessment of the factors affecting the commercialization of cell-based therapeutics: a systematic review protocol

David Pettitt; Zeeshaan Arshad; Benjamin M. Davies; James Smith; Anna French; Doug Cole; Kim Bure; Sue Dopson; David L. DiGiusto; Jeffrey M. Karp; Brock Reeve; Richard Barker; Georg A. Holländer; David Brindley

Rapid innovation in (epi)genetics and biomarker sciences is driving a new drug development and product development pathway, with the personalized medicine era dominated by biologic therapeutics and companion diagnostics. Companion diagnostics (CDx) are tests and assays that detect biomarkers and specific mutations to elucidate disease pathways, stratify patient populations, and target drug therapies. CDx can substantially influence the development and regulatory approval for certain high-risk biologics. However, despite the increasingly important role of companion diagnostics in the realization of personalized medicine, in the USA, there are only 23 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved companion diagnostics on the market for 11 unique indications. Personalized medicines have great potential, yet their use is currently constrained. A major factor for this may lie in the increased complexity of the companion diagnostic and corresponding therapeutic development and adoption pathways. Understanding the market dynamics of companion diagnostic/therapeutic (CDx/Rx) pairs is important to further development and adoption of personalized medicine. Therefore, data collected on a variety of factors may highlight incentives or disincentives driving the development of companion diagnostics. Statistical analysis for 36 hypotheses resulted in two significant relationships and 34 non-significant relationships. The sensitivity of the companion diagnostic was the only factor that significantly correlated with the price of the companion diagnostic. This result indicates that while there is regulatory pressure for the diagnostic and pharmaceutical industry to collaborate and co-develop companion diagnostics for the approval of personalized therapeutics, there seems to be a lack of parallel economic collaboration to incentivize development of companion diagnostics.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kim Bure's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna French

NHS Blood and Transplant

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey M. Karp

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ivan Wall

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge