Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Annabel L. Smith is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Annabel L. Smith.


Trends in Ecology and Evolution | 2013

How does ecological disturbance influence genetic diversity

Sam C. Banks; Geoffrey J. Cary; Annabel L. Smith; Ian D. Davies; Don A. Driscoll; A. Malcolm Gill; David B. Lindenmayer; Rod Peakall

Environmental disturbance underpins the dynamics and diversity of many of the ecosystems of the world, yet its influence on the patterns and distribution of genetic diversity is poorly appreciated. We argue here that disturbance history may be the major driver that shapes patterns of genetic diversity in many natural populations. We outline how disturbance influences genetic diversity through changes in both selective processes and demographically driven, selectively neutral processes. Our review highlights the opportunities and challenges presented by genetic approaches, such as landscape genomics, for better understanding and predicting the demographic and evolutionary responses of natural populations to disturbance. Developing this understanding is now critical because disturbance regimes are changing rapidly in a human-modified world.


PLOS ONE | 2014

The trajectory of dispersal research in conservation biology. Systematic review.

Don A. Driscoll; Sam C. Banks; Philip S. Barton; Karen Ikin; Pia E. Lentini; David B. Lindenmayer; Annabel L. Smith; Laurence E. Berry; Emma Burns; Amanda Edworthy; Maldwyn J. Evans; Rebecca K Gibson; Robert Heinsohn; Brett Howland; Geoff Kay; Nicola T. Munro; Ben C. Scheele; Ingrid A. Stirnemann; Dejan Stojanovic; Nici Sweaney; Nélida R. Villaseñor; Martin J. Westgate

Dispersal knowledge is essential for conservation management, and demand is growing. But are we accumulating dispersal knowledge at a pace that can meet the demand? To answer this question we tested for changes in dispersal data collection and use over time. Our systematic review of 655 conservation-related publications compared five topics: climate change, habitat restoration, population viability analysis, land planning (systematic conservation planning) and invasive species. We analysed temporal changes in the: (i) questions asked by dispersal-related research; (ii) methods used to study dispersal; (iii) the quality of dispersal data; (iv) extent that dispersal knowledge is lacking, and; (v) likely consequences of limited dispersal knowledge. Research questions have changed little over time; the same problems examined in the 1990s are still being addressed. The most common methods used to study dispersal were occupancy data, expert opinion and modelling, which often provided indirect, low quality information about dispersal. Although use of genetics for estimating dispersal has increased, new ecological and genetic methods for measuring dispersal are not yet widely adopted. Almost half of the papers identified knowledge gaps related to dispersal. Limited dispersal knowledge often made it impossible to discover ecological processes or compromised conservation outcomes. The quality of dispersal data used in climate change research has increased since the 1990s. In comparison, restoration ecology inadequately addresses large-scale process, whilst the gap between knowledge accumulation and growth in applications may be increasing in land planning. To overcome apparent stagnation in collection and use of dispersal knowledge, researchers need to: (i) improve the quality of available data using new approaches; (ii) understand the complementarities of different methods and; (iii) define the value of different kinds of dispersal information for supporting management decisions. Ambitious, multi-disciplinary research programs studying many species are critical for advancing dispersal research.


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2013

Successional specialization in a reptile community cautions against widespread planned burning and complete fire suppression

Annabel L. Smith; C. Michael Bull; Don A. Driscoll

Conservation of biodiversity in fire-prone regions depends on understanding responses to fire in animal communities and the mechanisms governing these responses. We collated data from an Australian semi-arid woodland reptile community (4796 individuals captured over 6years) to: (i) determine the ability of commonly used shorter-term (2years) surveys to detect reptile responses to time since fire (TSF) and (ii) investigate whether ecological traits of species reliably predicted their responses to fire. Of 16 reptile species analysed, four had responses to TSF consistent with shorter-term surveys and three showed no response to TSF. Nine species had responses to TSF not detected in previous studies using smaller but substantial subsets of the same data. Among the 13 affected species, times of peak abundance ranged from 1 to 50years after fire. Nocturnal, burrowing species tended to be early successional and leaf-litter dwellers to be late successional, but these were only weak trends.Synthesis and applications. We found only limited support for a generalizable, trait-based model of succession in reptiles. However, our study revealed that the majority of common reptile species in our study region specialize on a post-fire successional stage and may therefore become threatened if homogeneous fire regimes predominate. Our study highlights the importance of interpreting results from time- or sample-limited fire studies of reptiles with the knowledge that many ecological responses may not have been detected. In such cases, an adaptive or precautionary approach to fire management may be necessary.We found only limited support for a generalizable, trait-based model of succession in reptiles. However, our study revealed that the majority of common reptile species in our study region specialize on a post-fire successional stage and may therefore become threatened if homogeneous fire regimes predominate. Our study highlights the importance of interpreting results from time- or sample-limited fire studies of reptiles with the knowledge that many ecological responses may not have been detected. In such cases, an adaptive or precautionary approach to fire management may be necessary.


Environmental Management | 2015

Guidelines for Using Movement Science to Inform Biodiversity Policy

Philip S. Barton; Pia E. Lentini; Erika Alacs; Sana Bau; Yvonne M. Buckley; Emma Burns; Don A. Driscoll; Lydia K. Guja; Heini Kujala; José J. Lahoz-Monfort; Alessio Mortelliti; Ran Nathan; Ross Rowe; Annabel L. Smith

Substantial advances have been made in our understanding of the movement of species, including processes such as dispersal and migration. This knowledge has the potential to improve decisions about biodiversity policy and management, but it can be difficult for decision makers to readily access and integrate the growing body of movement science. This is, in part, due to a lack of synthesis of information that is sufficiently contextualized for a policy audience. Here, we identify key species movement concepts, including mechanisms, types, and moderators of movement, and review their relevance to (1) national biodiversity policies and strategies, (2) reserve planning and management, (3) threatened species protection and recovery, (4) impact and risk assessments, and (5) the prioritization of restoration actions. Based on the review, and considering recent developments in movement ecology, we provide a new framework that draws links between aspects of movement knowledge that are likely the most relevant to each biodiversity policy category. Our framework also shows that there is substantial opportunity for collaboration between researchers and government decision makers in the use of movement science to promote positive biodiversity outcomes.


Molecular Ecology | 2015

Fine-scale refuges can buffer demographic and genetic processes against short-term climatic variation and disturbance: a 22-year case study of an arboreal marsupial

Sam C. Banks; Thibault Lorin; Robyn E. Shaw; Lachlan McBurney; David Blair; Michaela D. J. Blyton; Annabel L. Smith; Jennifer C. Pierson; David B. Lindenmayer

Ecological disturbance and climate are key drivers of temporal dynamics in the demography and genetic diversity of natural populations. Microscale refuges are known to buffer species’ persistence against environmental change, but the effects of such refuges on demographic and genetic patterns in response to short‐term environmental variation are poorly understood. We quantified demographic and genetic responses of mountain brushtail possums (Trichosurus cunninghami) to rainfall variability (1992–2013) and to a major wildfire. We hypothesized that there would be underlying differences in demographic and genetic processes between an unburnt mesic refuge and a topographically exposed zone that was burnt in 2009. Fire caused a 2‐year decrease in survival in the burnt zone, but the population grew after the fire due to immigration, leading to increased expected heterozygosity. We documented a fire‐related behavioural shift, where the rate of movement by individuals in the unburnt refuge to the burnt zone decreased after fire. Irrespective of the fire, there were long‐term differences in demographic and genetic parameters between the mesic/unburnt refuge and the nonmesic/burnt zone. Survival was high and unaffected by rainfall in the refuge, but lower and rainfall‐dependent in the nonmesic zone. Net movement of individuals was directional, from the mesic refuge to the nonmesic zone, suggesting fine‐scale source–sink dynamics. There were higher expected heterozygosity (HE) and temporal genetic stability in the refuge, but lower HE and marked temporal genetic structure in the exposed habitat, consistent with reduced generational overlap caused by elevated mortality and immigration. Thus, fine‐scale refuges can mediate the short‐term demographic and genetic effects of climate and ecological disturbance.


Conservation Genetics Resources | 2011

Primers for novel microsatellite markers in “fire-specialist” lizards ( Amphibolurus norrisi , Ctenotus atlas and Nephrurus stellatus ) and their performance across multiple populations

Annabel L. Smith; Michael G. Gardner; C. Michael Bull; Don A. Driscoll

We developed 45 microsatellite markers for three lizard species with fire-related distributions: Amphibolurus norrisi, Ctenotus atlas and Nephrurus stellatus (17, 12 and 16 markers respectively). To isolate microsatellites we used an enrichment technique for N. stellatus and next-generation sequencing for A. norrisi and C. atlas. Fluorescent tags were attached to primers during PCR for flexible genotyping. All loci were polymorphic with 2–24 alleles and expected heterozygosities of 0.043–0.927. These markers will facilitate studies of post-fire dispersal and recolonisation.


Trends in Ecology and Evolution | 2013

Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes

Don A. Driscoll; Sam C. Banks; Philip S. Barton; David B. Lindenmayer; Annabel L. Smith


Biological Conservation | 2013

Fire severity and landscape context effects on arboreal marsupials

David B. Lindenmayer; Wade Blanchard; Lachlan McBurney; David Blair; Samuel Banks; Don A. Driscoll; Annabel L. Smith; A. M. Gill


Diversity and Distributions | 2014

Complex responses of birds to landscape‐level fire extent, fire severity and environmental drivers

David B. Lindenmayer; Wade Blanchard; Lachlan McBurney; David Blair; Sam C. Banks; Don A. Driscoll; Annabel L. Smith; A. M. Gill


Biodiversity and Conservation | 2012

Reptile responses to fire and the risk of post-disturbance sampling bias

Don A. Driscoll; Annabel L. Smith; Samantha Blight; John H. Maindonald

Collaboration


Dive into the Annabel L. Smith's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David B. Lindenmayer

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sam C. Banks

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip S. Barton

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Blair

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lachlan McBurney

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wade Blanchard

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. M. Gill

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Malcolm Gill

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge