Anthony T. Iannacchione

Theory-Based Review of Limitations With Static Gel Strength in Cement/Matrix Characterization

Gases can migrate into the cemented annulus of a wellbore during early gelation when hydrostatic pressure within the cement slurry drops. Different means to describe hydrostatic-pressure reduction have been proposed and reported in the literature. Among them, static gel strength (SGS) is the most widely accepted concept in describing the strength development of hydrating cement. The classic shear-stress theory uses SGS to quantify the hydrostaticpressure reduction in the cement column. Approaches derived from the concept of SGS have contributed to understanding mechanisms of gas migration and methods of minimizing it. Unfortunately, these approaches do not accurately predict gas migration. Although SGS was originally adopted to describe the shear stress at interfaces, it has also been used to estimate the shear resistance required to deform slurry during the hydration period. Before early gelation, the hydrostatic pressure will overcome the formation gas pressure and prevent gas migrations. During gelation, the cement develops enough rigidity to withstand the gas invasion. This critical hydration period is defined as the transition time. API STD 65-2 (API 2010a) provides standards for determining the transition time by use of the concept of SGS. Current industry practice is to reduce the transition time, thereby lowering the potential for invading gas introducing migration pathways in the cemented annulus. This approach, although certainly helpful in reducing the risk for gas migration, does not eliminate its occurrence. Experimental results presented in this study demonstrate that the relationship between SGS and hydrostatic-pressure reduction is not linear. Characteristics of the transition-time endpoints depend on slurry properties and downhole conditions. Moreover, SGS is not able to characterize the gas-tight property of a cement slurry. When slurry gels, the mechanical properties are governed by its growing solid fraction. The gel can deform under shear loading, but gases and other fluids will need to break or fracture the bond between solids and push them aside for pathways to form within the cement/matrix domain at this point. To fully understand this process, the bond strength between solid particles and the compressibility of the cement matrix are needed. The bond strength and compressibility are mechanical properties dependent on the changing rigidity of the gelling cement. However, SGS does not address these important properties and, therefore, SGS is limited in its ability to predict gas-migration potential. A better means to characterize the cement/matrix strength by use of fundamental concepts and variables for replacing SGS is desired.

Gas Outbursts in Coal Seams

Abstract Gas outbursts are sudden, violent blowouts of coal and gas from the solid coal seam into a mine entry. These dangerous incidents have occurred in most coal producing countries, although they have been relatively rare in the U.S., probably due to better mining conditions. Factors affecting the likelihood of a gas outburst are the gassiness and depth of the seam, stress fields in the rock mass, characteristics of the coal such as the permeability, the rate of mining advance, and local geologic structures like faults or clay veins. The most probable location for an outburst is at the working face where the gas pressure gradient, the main driving force, is steepest. Draining gas through boreholes drilled into the seam helps to prevent gas outbursts. This report will highlight the conditions that make a gas outburst likely and the methods used to reduce the chance of an outburst. It will also examine the differences between gas outbursts and coal mine bumps (also called bursts), which are the far more common stress-failure mode in U.S. coal mines.

Determination of velocity correction factors for real-time air velocity monitoring in underground mines

When there are installations of air velocity sensors in the mining industry for real-time airflow monitoring, a problem exists with how the monitored air velocity at a fixed location corresponds to the average air velocity, which is used to determine the volume flow rate of air in an entry with the cross-sectional area. Correction factors have been practically employed to convert a measured centerline air velocity to the average air velocity. However, studies on the recommended correction factors of the sensor-measured air velocity to the average air velocity at cross sections are still lacking. A comprehensive airflow measurement was made at the Safety Research Coal Mine, Bruceton, PA, using three measuring methods including single-point reading, moving traverse, and fixed-point traverse. The air velocity distribution at each measuring station was analyzed using an air velocity contour map generated with Surfer®. The correction factors at each measuring station for both the centerline and the sensor location were calculated and are discussed.