Apoorva Upadhyay
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Apoorva Upadhyay.
Dalton Transactions | 2014
Apoorva Upadhyay; Navatha Komatireddy; Alberto Ghirri; Floriana Tuna; Stuart K. Langley; Anant Kumar Srivastava; E. Carolina Sañudo; Boujemaa Moubaraki; Keith S. Murray; Eric J. L. McInnes; Marco Affronte; Maheswaran Shanmugam
A linear trimeric cluster of molecular formula [Ni2Gd(L(-))6](NO3) (1) (L(-) = (C14H12NO2) has been isolated with its structure determined via single crystal X-ray diffraction. Magnetic susceptibility measurements of 1 show that the nickel and gadolinium ions are coupled ferromagnetically, with a ground total spin state (S) of 11/2. Best fit spin Hamiltonian parameters obtained for 1 are J(1(Ni-Gd)) = +0.54 cm(-1), g = 2.01. EPR measurements confirm a low magnetic anisotropy (D = -0.135 cm(-1)) for 1. Heat capacity determination of the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) parameters for 1 shows that the change in magnetic entropy (-ΔS(m)) achieves a maximum of 13.74 J kg(-1) K(-1) at 4.0 K, with the ferromagnetic coupling giving a rapid change in low applied fields, confirming the potential of Gd molecular derivatives as coolants at liquid helium temperature.
Chemistry: A European Journal | 2014
Apoorva Upadhyay; Jitendrasingh Rajpurohit; Mukesh Kumar Singh; Richa Dubey; Anant Kumar Srivastava; Ashutosh Kumar; Gopalan Rajaraman; Maheswaran Shanmugam
The homometallic hexameric ruthenium cluster of the formula [Ru(III)6(μ3-O)2(μ-OH)2((CH3)3CCO2)12(py)2] (1) (py = pyridine) is solved by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Magnetic susceptibility measurements performed on 1 suggest that the antiferromagnetic interaction between the Ru(III) centers is dominant, and this is supported by theoretical studies. Theoretical calculations based on density functional methods yield eight different exchange interaction values for 1: J1 = -737.6, J2 = +63.4, J3 = -187.6, J4 = +124.4, J5 = -376.4, J6 = -601.2, J7 = -657.0, and J8 = -800.6 cm(-1). Among all the computed J values, six are found to be antiferromagnetic. Four exchange values (J1, J6, J7 and J8) are computed to be extremely strong, with J8, mediated through one μ-hydroxo and a carboxylate bridge, being by far the largest exchange obtained for any transition-metal cluster. The origin of these strong interactions is the orientation of the magnetic orbitals in the Ru(III) centers, and the computed J values are rationalized by using molecular orbital and natural bond order analysis. Detailed NMR studies ((1)H, (13)C, HSQC, NOESY, and TOCSY) of 1 (in CDCl3) confirm the existence of the solid-state structure in solution. The observation of sharp NMR peaks and spin-lattice time relaxation (T1 relaxation) experiments support the existence of strong intramolecular antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between the metal centers. A broad absorption peak around 600-1000 nm in the visible to near-IR region is a characteristic signature of an intracluster charge-transfer transition. Cyclic voltammetry experiments show that there are three reversible one-electron redox couples at -0.865, +0.186, and +1.159 V with respect to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode, which corresponds to two metal-based one-electron oxidations and one reduction process.
Inorganic Chemistry | 2017
Apoorva Upadhyay; Kuduva R. Vignesh; Chinmoy Das; Saurabh Kumar Singh; Gopalan Rajaraman; Maheswaran Shanmugam
A series of monomeric lanthanide Schiff base complexes with the molecular formulas [Ce(HL)3(NO3)3] (1) and [Ln(HL)2(NO3)3], where LnIII = Tb (2), Ho (3), Er (4), and Lu (5), were isolated and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD). Single-crystal XRD reveals that, except for 1, all complexes possess two crystallographically distinct molecules within the unit cell. Both of these crystallographically distinct molecules possess the same molecular formula, but the orientation of the coordinating ligand distinctly differs from those in complexes 2-5. Alternating-current magnetic susceptibility measurement reveals that complexes 1-3 exhibit slow relaxation of magnetization in the presence of an optimum external magnetic field. In contrast to 1-3, complex 4 shows a blockade of magnetization in the absence of an external magnetic field, a signature characteristic of a single-ion magnet (SIM). The distinct magnetic behavior observed in 4 compared to other complexes is correlated to the suitable ligand field around a prolate ErIII ion. Although the ligand field stabilizes an easy axis of anisotropy, quantum tunnelling of magnetization (QTM) is still predominant in 4 because of the low symmetry of the complex. The combination of low symmetry and an unsuitable ligand-field environment in complexes 1-3 triggers faster magnetization relaxation; hence, these complexes exhibit field-induced SIM behavior. In order to understand the electronic structures of complexes 1-4 and the distinct magnetic behavior observed, ab initio calculations were performed. Using the crystal structure of the complexes, magnetic susceptibility data were computed for all of the complexes. The computed susceptibility and magnetization are in good agreement with the experimental magnetic data [χMT(T) and M(H)] and this offers confidence on the reliability of the extracted parameters. A tentative mechanism of magnetization relaxation observed in these complexes is also discussed in detail.
Journal of Chemical Sciences | 2014
Apoorva Upadhyay; Chinmoy Das; Shaik Nagul Meera; Stuart K. Langley; Keith S. Murray; Maheswaran Shanmugam
AbstractThe reaction of the deprotonated form of the Schiff base ligand; (E)-2-methoxy-6-((phenylimino) methyl)phenol (L) with nickel chloride hydrate results in the formation of the 1-dimentional coordination polymer; Na[Ni(L)2(OMe)(MeOH)]n (1). The structure was determined via single crystal X-ray diffraction measurements. A careful analysis of the complex shows that the polymer exists as a helical structure, where the helicity is brought about by the presence of an alkali metal ion which is observed for the first time. Moreover the helical structure in 1 is maintained predominantly through covalent bond rather than supramolecular interactions. Direct current magnetic susceptibility measurement suggests that complex 1 obeys the Curie law. The fitting of magnetic data using the PHI software package yields parameters of S = 1, g = 2.26 and D = +4.51 (or D = −7.24 cm−1) for 1. Graphical AbstractWe report a 1-D helical chain of Nickel Schiff base complexes whose helicity is brought by a sodium ion in the crystal lattice. Preliminary magnetic behavior suggests that there is no super-exchange interaction between the nickel ions via a closed shell sodium ion.
Chemical Communications | 2014
Apoorva Upadhyay; Saurabh Kumar Singh; Chinmoy Das; Ranajit Mondol; Stuart K. Langley; Keith S. Murray; Gopalan Rajaraman; Maheswaran Shanmugam
Chemical Communications | 2015
Shefali Vaidya; Apoorva Upadhyay; Saurabh Kumar Singh; Tulika Gupta; Subrata Tewary; Stuart K. Langley; James P. S. Walsh; Keith S. Murray; Gopalan Rajaraman; Maheswaran Shanmugam
Chemical Communications | 2015
Chinmoy Das; Apoorva Upadhyay; Shefali Vaidya; Saurabh Kumar Singh; Gopalan Rajaraman; Maheswaran Shanmugam
Chemistry: A European Journal | 2017
Apoorva Upadhyay; Chinmoy Das; Shefali Vaidya; Saurabh Kumar Singh; Tulika Gupta; Ranajit Mondol; Stuart K. Langley; Keith S. Murray; Gopalan Rajaraman; Maheswaran Shanmugam
Polyhedron | 2013
Apoorva Upadhyay; Shefali Vaidya; Vakacharla S. Venkatasai; Prabha Jayapal; Anant Kumar Srivastava; Muralidharan Shanmugam; Maheswaran Shanmugam
Dalton Transactions | 2016
Apoorva Upadhyay; Chinmoy Das; Stuart K. Langley; Keith S. Murray; Anant Kumar Srivastava; Maheswaran Shanmugam