Axel Wetter

Simultaneous 18F choline positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: initial results.

PurposeThe purposes of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of simultaneous 18F choline positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate and to present the first clinical results of the method. Materials and MethodsFrom March 2012 to October 2012, a total of 15 consecutive patients were examined with simultaneous 18F choline PET/MRI. At the time of the examination, 8 patients had histologically proven prostate cancer, 2 patients had repeated prostate biopsies with negative results, and 5 patients had suspected prostate cancer with an elevated or rising prostate specific antigene level but did not have a prostate biopsy. Sequence protocol comprised T2-weighted high-resolution images and diffusion-weighted images of the prostate in addition to PET imaging. Image quality was assessed by 2 radiologists, and the PET images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. ResultsSimultaneous PET/MRI of the prostate was accomplished successfully in all patients. The method proved to be robust without technical failure, and the image quality was rated to be diagnostic in all examinations except in 1 diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data set that was judged to be nondiagnostic because of susceptibility artifacts. High-resolution T2-weighted images allowed exact correlation of elevated focal or diffuse choline uptake to suspicious T2-weighted lesions of the prostate. A high accordance was found between PET and DWI. However, PET-positive lesions were found in 3 patients wherein DWI did not indicate tumor in suspicious T2-weighted lesions. ConclusionsSimultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate has the advantage of combining high-resolution prostate images, functional studies, and metabolic/molecular imaging. The PET component adds diagnostic confidence to the MRI-based parameters in identifying and localizing tumor in the prostate.

Evaluation of the PET component of simultaneous [ 18 F]choline PET/MRI in prostate cancer: comparison with [ 18 F]choline PET/CT

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the positron emission tomography (PET) component of [18F]choline PET/MRI and compare it with the PET component of [18F]choline PET/CT in patients with histologically proven prostate cancer and suspected recurrent prostate cancer.MethodsThirty-six patients were examined with simultaneous [18F]choline PET/MRI following combined [18F]choline PET/CT. Fifty-eight PET-positive lesions in PET/CT and PET/MRI were evaluated by measuring the maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) using volume of interest (VOI) analysis. A scoring system was applied to determine the quality of the PET images of both PET/CT and PET/MRI. Agreement between PET/CT and PET/MRI regarding SUVmax and SUVmean was tested using Pearson’s product-moment correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsAll PET-positive lesions that were visible on PET/CT were also detectable on PET/MRI. The quality of the PET images was comparable in both groups. Median SUVmax and SUVmean of all lesions were significantly lower in PET/MRI than in PET/CT (5.2 vs 6.1, p < 0.05 and 2.0 vs 2.6, p < 0.001, respectively). Pearson’s product-moment correlation indicated highly significant correlations between SUVmax of PET/CT and PET/MRI (R = 0.86, p < 0.001) as well as between SUVmean of PET/CT and PET/MRI (R = 0.81, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed lower and upper limits of agreement of −2.77 to 3.64 between SUVmax of PET/CT vs PET/MRI and −1.12 to +2.23 between SUVmean of PET/CT vs PET/MRI.ConclusionPET image quality of PET/MRI was comparable to that of PET/CT. A highly significant correlation between SUVmax and SUVmean was found. Both SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly lower in [18F]choline PET/MRI than in [18F]choline PET/CT. Differences of SUVmax and SUVmean might be caused by different techniques of attenuation correction. Furthermore, differences in biodistribution and biokinetics of [18F]choline between the subsequent examinations and in the respective organ systems have to be taken into account.

Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future perspectives.

Fully integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners have been available for a few years. Since then, the number of scanner installations and published studies have been growing. While feasibility of integrated PET/MRI has been demonstrated for many clinical and preclinical imaging applications, now those applications where PET/MRI provides a clear benefit in comparison to the established reference standards need to be identified. The current data show that those particular applications demanding multiparametric imaging capabilities, high soft tissue contrast and/or lower radiation dose seem to benefit from this novel hybrid modality. Promising results have been obtained in whole-body cancer staging in non-small cell lung cancer and multiparametric tumor imaging. Furthermore, integrated PET/MRI appears to have added value in oncologic applications requiring high soft tissue contrast such as assessment of liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors or prostate cancer imaging. Potential benefit of integrated PET/MRI has also been demonstrated for cardiac (i.e., myocardial viability, cardiac sarcoidosis) and brain (i.e., glioma grading, Alzheimers disease) imaging, where MRI is the predominant modality. The lower radiation dose compared to PET/computed tomography will be particularly valuable in the imaging of young patients with potentially curable diseases.However, further clinical studies and technical innovation on scanner hard- and software are needed. Also, agreements on adequate refunding of PET/MRI examinations need to be reached. Finally, the translation of new PET tracers from preclinical evaluation into clinical applications is expected to foster the entire field of hybrid PET imaging, including PET/MRI.

Combined MRI and MR spectroscopy of the prostate before radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate a routine protocol for combined MR and spectroscopic imaging of the prostate for staging accuracy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Fifty patients with biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma were examined with our sequence protocol, which consisted of T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences and a pelvic T1-weighted spin-echo sequence. For spectroscopy, we used a 3D chemical shift imaging (CSI) spin-echo sequence. Image interpretation was performed by two radiologists. The total number of tumor voxels and tumor voxels per slice were counted to estimate the tumor volume in every patient. The potential of MR spectroscopy to differentiate between T2 and T3 tumors, based on the estimated tumor volumes, was compared with the staging performance of MRI. RESULTS The MR measurement time was 19.01 minutes, and the total procedure time averaged 35 minutes. Seventy-six percent of the spectroscopic examinations were successful. Statistically significant differences in the number of tumor voxels per slice and tumor volumes were found between T2 and T3 tumors. The descriptive parameters of MRI and MR spectroscopy did not differ significantly; sensitivity and specificity were 75% and 87%, respectively, for MRI and 88% and 70%, respectively, for MR spectroscopy. The combination of both methods resulted in only a slight improvement in staging performance and was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Combined MRI and MR spectroscopy of the prostate has no diagnostic advantage in staging performance over MRI alone. The mean tumor volumes, estimated by MR spectroscopy, differ statistically significantly between T2 and T3 tumors.

Hybrid [18F]-FDG PET/MRI including non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI): Preliminary results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of non-Gaussian DWI as part of a FDG-PET/MRI protocol in patients with histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS 15 consecutive patients with histologically proven NSCLC (mean age 61 ± 11 years) were included in this study and underwent whole-body FDG-PET/MRI following whole-body FDG-PET/CT. As part of the whole-body FDG-PET/MRI protocol, an EPI-sequence with 5 b-values (0, 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 s/mm(2)) was acquired for DWI of the thorax during free-breathing. Volume of interest (VOI) measurements were performed to determine the maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUV(max); SUV(mean)). A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn around the tumor on b=0 images and then transferred to the corresponding parameter maps to assess ADC(mono), D(app) and K(app). To assess the goodness of the mathematical fit R(2) was calculated for monoexponential and non-Gaussian analysis. Spearmans correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUV values and diffusion coefficients. A Students t-test was performed to compare the monoexponential and non-Gaussian diffusion fitting (R(2)). RESULTS T staging was equal between FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI in 12 of 15 patients. For NSCLC, mean ADC(mono) was 2.11 ± 1.24 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, Dapp was 2.46 ± 1.29 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s and mean Kapp was 0.70 ± 0.21. The non-Gaussian diffusion analysis (R(2)=0.98) provided a significantly better mathematical fitting to the DWI signal decay than the monoexponetial analysis (R(2)=0.96) (p<0.001). SUV(max) and SUV(mean) of NSCLC was 13.5 ± 7.6 and 7.9 ± 4.3 for FDG-PET/MRI. ADC(mono) as well as Dapp exhibited a significant inverse correlation with the SUV(max) (ADC(mono): R=-0.67; p<0.01; Dapp: R=-0.69; p<0.01) as well as with SUV(mean) assessed by FDG-PET/MRI (ADC(mono): R=-0.66; p<0.01; Dapp: R=-0.69; p<0.01). Furthermore, Kapp exhibited a significant correlation with SUV(max) (R=0.72; p<0.05) and SUV(mean) as assessed by FDG-PET/MRI (R=0.71; p<0.005). CONCLUSION Simultaneous PET and non-Gaussian diffusion acquisitions are feasible. Non-Gaussian diffusion parameters show a good correlation with SUV and might provide additional information beyond monoexponential ADC, especially as non-Gaussian diffusion exhibits better mathematical fitting to the decay of the diffusion signal than monoexponential DWI.

Comparative Performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Detection and Characterization of Pulmonary Lesions in 121 Oncologic Patients.

Our objective was to compare 18F-FDG PET/MRI (performed using a contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-suppressed volume-interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]) with 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting and characterizing lung lesions in oncologic patients. Methods: In 121 oncologic patients with 241 lung lesions, PET/MRI was performed after PET/CT in a single-injection protocol (260 ± 58 MBq of 18F-FDG). The detection rates were computed for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI in relation to the CT component of PET/CT. Wilcoxon testing was used to assess differences in lesion contrast (4-point scale) and size between morphologic datasets and differences in image quality (4-point scale), SUVmean, SUVmax, and characterization (benign/malignant) between PET/MRI and PET/CT. Correlation was determined using the Pearson coefficient (r) for SUV and size and the Spearman rank coefficient (ρ) for contrast. Results: The detection rates for MRI, the PET component of PET/CT, and the PET component of PET/MRI were 66.8%, 42.7%, and 42.3%, respectively. There was a strong correlation in size (r = 0.98) and SUV (r = 0.91) and a moderate correlation in contrast (ρ = 0.48). Image quality was better for PET/CT than for PET/MRI (P < 0.001). Lesion measurements were smaller for MRI than for CT (P < 0.001). SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT (P < 0.001 each). There was no significant difference in lesion contrast (P = 0.11) or characterization (P = 0.076). Conclusion: In the detection and characterization of lung lesions 10 mm or larger, 18F-FDG PET/MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT perform comparably. Lesion size, SUV and characterization correlate strongly between the two modalities. However, the overall detection rate of PET/MRI remains inferior to that of PET/CT because of the limited ability of MRI to detect lesions smaller than 10 mm. Thus, thoracic staging with PET/MRI bears a risk of missing small lung metastases.

Combined PET Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Intermediate and High-Risk Primary Prostate Carcinomas with Simultaneous [18F] Choline PET/MRI

Purpose To characterize intermediate and high-risk prostate carcinomas with measurements of standardized uptake values (SUVs) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values by means of simultaneous [18F] choline PET/MRI. Materials and Methods 35 patients with primary prostate cancer underwent simultaneous [18F] choline PET/MRI. From these, 21 patients with an intermediate and high risk constellation who were not under ongoing hormonal therapy were included. Altogether 32 tumor lesions with a focal uptake of [18F] choline could be identified. Average ADC values (ADCaver) minimum ADC values (ADCmin) as well as maximum and mean SUVs (SUVmax, SUVmean) of tumor lesions were assessed with volume-of-interest (VOI) and Region-of-interest (ROI) measurements. As a reference, also ADCaver, ADCmin and SUVmax and SUVmean of non-tumorous prostate tissue were measured. Statistical analysis comprised calculation of descriptive parameters and calculation of Pearson’s product moment correlations between ADC values and SUVs of tumor lesions. Results Mean ADCaver and ADCmin of tumor lesions were 0.94±0.22×10−3 mm2/s and 0.65±0.21×10−3 mm2/s, respectively. Mean SUVmax and SUVmean of tumor lesions were 6.3±2.3 and 2.6±0.8, respectively. These values were in each case significantly different from the reference values (p<0.001). There was no significant correlation between the measured SUVs and ADC values (SUVmax vs. ADCaver: R = −0.24, p = 0.179; SUVmax vs. ADCmin: R = −0.03, p = 0.877; SUVmean vs. ADCaver: R = −0.27, p = 0.136; SUVmean vs. ADCmin: R = −0.08, p = 0.679). Conclusion Both SUVs and ADC values differ significantly between tumor lesions and healthy tissue. However, there is no significant correlation between these two parameters. This might be explained by the fact that SUVs and ADC values characterize different parts of tumor biology.

Optimization of Acquisition time of 68Ga-PSMA-Ligand PET/MRI in Patients with Local and Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Objective The aim of this optimization study was to minimize the acquisition time of 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in patients with local and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) to obtain a sufficient image quality and quantification accuracy without any appreciable loss. Methods Twenty patients with PCa were administered intravenously with the 68Ga-HBED-CC-PSMA ligand (mean activity 99 MBq/patient, range 76–148 MBq) and subsequently underwent PET/MRI at, on average, 168 min (range 77–320 min) after injection. PET and MR imaging data were acquired simultaneously. PET acquisition was performed in list mode and PET images were reconstructed at different time intervals (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min). Data were analyzed regarding radiotracer uptake in tumors and muscle tissue and PET image quality. Tumor uptake was quantified in terms of the maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean) within a spherical volume of interest (VOI). Reference VOIs were drawn in the gluteus maximus muscle on the right side. PET image quality was evaluated by experienced nuclear physicians/radiologists using a five-point ordinal scale from 5–1 (excellent—insufficient). Results Lesion detectability linearly increased with increasing acquisition times, reaching its maximum at PET acquisition times of 4 min. At this image acquisition time, tumor lesions in 19/20 (95%) patients were detected. PET image quality showed a positive correlation with increasing acquisition time, reaching a plateau at 4–6 min image acquisition. Both SUVmax and SUVmean correlated inversely with acquisition time and reached a plateau at acquisition times after 4 min. Conclusion In the applied image acquisition settings, the optimal acquisition time of 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/MRI in patients with local and metastatic PCa was identified to be 4 min per bed position. At this acquisition time, PET image quality and lesion detectability reach a maximum while SUVmax and SUVmean do not change significantly beyond this time point.

Evaluation of a Fast Protocol for Staging Lymphoma Patients with Integrated PET/MRI

Background The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of a fast MR-protocol for whole-body staging of lymphoma patients using an integrated PET/MR system. Methods A total of 48 consecutive lymphoma patients underwent 52 clinically indicated PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI examinations with the use of 18F-FDG. For PET/MR imaging, a fast whole-body MR-protocol was implemented. A radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician interpreted MRI and PET/MRI datasets in consensus and were instructed to identify manifestations of lymphoma on a site-specific analysis. The accuracy for the identification of active lymphoma disease was calculated and the tumor stage for each examination was determined. Furthermore, radiation doses derived from administered tracer activities and CT protocol parameters were estimated and the mean scan duration of PET/CT and PET/MR imaging was determined. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI and MRI alone. The results of PET/CT imaging, all available histopathological samples as well as results of prior examinations and follow-up imaging were used for the determination of the reference standard. Results Active lymphoma disease was present in 28/52 examinations. PET/MRI revealed higher values of diagnostic accuracy for the identification of active lymphoma disease in those 52 examinations in comparison to MRI, however, results of the two ratings did not differ significantly. On a site specific analysis, PET/MRI showed a significantly higher accuracy for the identification of nodal manifestation of lymphoma (p<0.05) if compared to MRI, whereas ratings for extranodal regions did not reveal a significant difference. In addition, PET/MRI enabled correct identification of lymphoma stage in a higher percentage of patients than MRI (94% vs. 83%). Furthermore, SUVs derived from PET/MRI were significantly higher than in PET/CT, however, there was a strong positive correlation between SUVmax and SUVmean of the two imaging modalities (R = 0.91 p<0.001 and R = 0.87, p<0.001). Average scan duration of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations amounted to 17.3±1.9 min and 27.8±3.7 min, respectively. Estimated mean effective-dose for whole-body PET/CT scans were 64.4% higher than for PET/MRI. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET data as a valuable additive to MRI for a more accurate evaluation of patients with lymphomas. With regard to patient comfort related to scan duration and a markedly reduced radiation exposure, fast PET/MRI may serve as a powerful alternative to PET/CT for a diagnostic workup of lymphoma patients.

High and ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis

Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is routinely used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of prostate cancer. However, the routine use of b values higher than 1000 s/mm2 is not clear up to present. Moreover, the complex diffusion behavior of malignant and benign prostate tissues hampers precise predictions of contrast in DWI images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Purpose To quantitatively analyze DWI with different b values in prostate cancer and to identify b values best suitable for cancer detection. Material and Methods Forty-one patients with histologically proven prostate cancer were examined with high resolution T2-weighted imaging and DWI at 3 Tesla. Five different b values (0, 800, 1000, 1500, 2000 s/mm2) were applied. ADC values of tumors and reference areas were measured on ADC maps derived from different pairs of b values. Furthermore, signal intensities of DW images of tumors and reference areas were measured. For analysis, contrast ratios of ADC values and signal intensities of DW images were calculated and compared. Results No significant differences were found between contrast ratios measured on ADC maps of all analyzed b value pairs (P = 0.43). Contrast ratios calculated from signal intensities of DW images were highest at b values of 1500 and 2000 s/mm2 and differed significantly from contrast ratios at b values of 800 and 1000 s/mm2 (P < 0.01). Conclusion Whereas contrast in ADC maps does not significantly change with different b values, contrast ratios of DW images are significantly higher at b-values of 1500 and 2000 s/mm2 in comparison to b values of 800 and 1000 s/mm2. Therefore, diagnostic performance of DWI in prostate cancer might be increased by application of b values higher than 1000 s/mm2.