Lale Umutlu

Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography

Our objective was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of an all-in-one protocol of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography with the diagnostic accuracy of a multimodality algorithm for initial breast cancer staging. Methods: Forty women (mean age, 58.3 y; range, 30.8–78.4 y; SD, 12 y) with suspected breast cancer were included. For the primary tumor, we compared 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography versus MRI mammography; for axillary lymph node status, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus clinical investigation and ultrasound; and for distant metastases, 18F-FDG PET/CT versus a multimodality staging algorithm. Histopathology and clinical follow-up served as the standard of reference. The Fisher exact test evaluated the significance of differences (P < 0.05). Alterations in patient management caused by 18F-FDG PET/CT were documented. Results: No significant differences were found in the detection rate of breast cancer lesions (18F-FDG PET/CT, 95%; MRI, 100%; P = 1). 18F-FDG PET/CT correctly classified lesion focality significantly more often than did MRI (18F-FDG PET/CT, 79%; MRI, 73%; P < 0.001). MRI correctly defined the T stage significantly more often than did 18F-FDG PET/CT (MRI, 77%; 18F-FDG PET/CT, 54%; P = 0.001). 18F-FDG PET/CT detected axillary lymph node metastases in 80% of cases; clinical investigation/ultrasound, in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.067). Distant metastases were detected with 18F-FDG PET/CT in 100% of cases, and the multimodality algorithm identified distant metastases in 70%. This difference was not statistically significant (P = 1). Three patients had extraaxillary lymph node metastases that were detected only by PET/CT (cervical, retroperitoneal, mediastinal/internal mammary group). 18F-FDG PET/CT changed patient management in 12.5% of cases. Conclusion: Our data suggest that a whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography protocol may be used for staging breast cancer in a single session. This initial assessment of the 18F-FDG PET/CT protocol indicates similar accuracy to MRI for the detection of breast cancer lesions. Although MRI seems to be more accurate when assessing the T stage of the tumor, 18F-FDG PET/CT seems able to more accurately define lesion focality. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT mammography was able to detect axillary lymph node metastases with a high sensitivity, this method cannot soon be expected to replace the combination of clinical examination, ultrasound, and sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary assessment.

[ 18 F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent malignancies of the female pelvis: initial results

PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic potential of PET/MRI with [18F]FDG in recurrent ovarian and cervical cancer in comparison to PET/CT.MethodsA group of 19 patients with suspected recurrence of pelvic malignancies (ovarian cancer, 11 patients; cervical cancer, 8 patients) scheduled for an [18F]FDG PET/CT were subsequently enrolled for a PET/MRI. The scan protocol comprised: (1) a T1-W axial VIBE after contrast agent adminstration, (2) an axial T2-W HASTE, (3) a coronal TIRM, (4) an axial DWI, and dedicated MR sequences of the female pelvis including (5) a T1-W VIBE before contrast agent adminstration, (6) a sagittal T2-W TSE, and (7) a sagittal T1-W dynamic VIBE. The datasets (PET/CT, PET/MRI) were rated separately by two readers regarding lesion count, lesion localization, lesion conspicuity (four-point scale), lesion characterization (benign/malignant/indeterminate) and diagnostic confidence (three-point scale). All available data (histology, prior examinations, PET/CT, PET/MRI, follow-up examinations) served as standard of reference. Median values were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.ResultsMetastatic lesions were present in 16 of the 19 patients. A total of 78 lesions (malignant, 58; benign, 20) were described. Both PET/CT and PET/MRI allowed correct identification of all malignant lesions and provided equivalent conspicuity (3.86 ± 0.35 for PET/CT, 3.91 ± 0.28 for PET/MRI; p > 0.05). Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher for PET/MRI in malignant (p < 0.01) and benign lesions (p < 0.05).ConclusionBoth PET/CT and PET/MRI offer an equivalently high diagnostic value for recurrent pelvic malignancies. PET/MRI offers higher diagnostic confidence in the discrimination of benign and malignant lesions. Considering the reduced radiation dose and superior lesion discrimination, PET/MRI may serve as a powerful alternative to PET/CT in the future.

Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer: A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast for lesion detection and local tumor staging of patients with primary breast cancer in comparison to PET/computed tomography (CT) and MRI. Materials and MethodsThe study was approved by the local institutional review board. Forty-nine patients with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer were prospectively enrolled in our study. All patients underwent a PET/CT, and subsequently, a contrast-enhanced PET/MRI of the breast after written informed consent was obtained before each examination. Two radiologists independently evaluated the corresponding data sets (PET/CT, PET/MRI, and MRI) and were instructed to identify primary tumors lesions as well as multifocal/multicentric and bilateral disease. Furthermore, the occurrence of lymph node metastases was assessed, and the T-stage for each patient was determined. Histopathological verification of the local tumor extent and the axillary lymph node status was available for 30 of 49 and 48 of 49 patients, respectively. For the remaining patients, a consensus characterization was performed for the determination of the T-stage and nodal status, taking into account the results of clinical staging, PET/CT, and PET/MRI examinations. Statistical analysis was performed to test for differences in diagnostic performance between the different imaging procedures. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. ResultsPositron emission tomography/MRI and MRI correctly identified 47 (96%) of the 49 patients with primary breast cancer, whereas PET/CT enabled detection of 46 (94%) of 49 breast cancer patients and missed a synchronous carcinoma in the contralateral breast in 1 patient. In a lesion-by-lesion analysis, no significant differences could be obtained between the 3 imaging procedures for the identification of primary breast cancer lesions (P > 0.05). Positron emission tomography/MRI and MRI allowed for a correct identification of multifocal/multicentric disease in 3 additional patients if compared with PET/CT. For the definition of the correct T-stage, PET/MRI and MRI showed identical results and were correct in significantly more cases than PET/CT (PET/MRI and MRI, 82%; PET/CT, 68%; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of nodal positive patients (n = 18) were 78%, 94%, 88%, 88%, and 88% for PET/CT; 67%, 87%, 75%, 82%, and 80% for MRI; and 78%, 90%, 82%, 88%, and 86% for PET/MRI, respectively. Differences between the imaging modalities were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionsIntegrated PET/MRI does not provide diagnostic advantages for local tumor staging of breast cancer patients in comparison to MRI alone. Positron emission tomography/MRI and MRI enable an improved determination of the local tumor extent in comparison to PET/CT, whereas all 3 imaging modalities offer a comparable diagnostic performance for the identification of axillary disease.

Implementation of FAST-PET/MRI for whole-body staging of female patients with recurrent pelvic malignancies: A comparison to PET/CT

OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic competence of FAST-PET/MRI and PET/CT for whole-body staging of female patients suspect for a recurrence of a pelvic malignancy. METHODS 24 female patients with a suspected tumor recurrence underwent a PET/CT and subsequent PET/MRI examination. For PET/MRI readings a whole-body FAST-protocol was implemented. Two readers separately evaluated the PET/CT and FAST PET/MRI datasets regarding identification of all tumor lesions and qualitative assessment of visual lesion-to-background contrast (4-point ordinal scale). RESULTS Tumor relapse was present in 21 of the 24 patients. Both, PET/CT and PET/MRI allowed for correct identification of tumor recurrence in 20 of 21 cases. Lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of malignant lesions were 82%, 91%, 97%, 58% and 84% for PET/CT and 85%, 87%, 96%, 63% and 86% for PET/MRI, lacking significant differences. Furthermore, no significant difference for lesion-to-background contrast of malignant and benign lesions was found. CONCLUSION FAST-PET/MRI provides a comparably high diagnostic performance for restaging gynecological cancer patients compared to PET/CT with slightly prolonged scan duration, yet enabling a markedly reduced radiation exposure.

Correlation of Standardized Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Integrated Whole-Body PET/MRI of Primary and Recurrent Cervical Cancer

Background To evaluate a potential correlation of the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) in primary and recurrent cervical cancer based on integrated PET/MRI examinations. Methods 19 consecutive patients (mean age 51.6 years; range 30–72 years) with histopathologically confirmed primary cervical cancer (n = 9) or suspected tumor recurrence (n = 10) were prospectively enrolled for an integrated PET/MRI examination. Two radiologists performed a consensus reading in random order, using a dedicated post-processing software. Polygonal regions of interest (ROI) covering the entire tumor lesions were drawn into PET/MR images to assess SUVmax and into ADC parameter maps to determine ADCmin values. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to assess a potential correlation between the mean values of ADCmin and SUVmax. Results In 15 out of 19 patients cervical cancer lesions (n = 12) or lymph node metastases (n = 42) were detected. Mean SUVmax (12.5±6.5) and ADCmin (644.5±179.7×10−5 mm2/s) values for all assessed tumor lesions showed a significant but weak inverse correlation (R = −0.342, p<0.05). When subdivided in primary and recurrent tumors, primary tumors and associated primary lymph node metastases revealed a significant and strong inverse correlation between SUVmax and ADCmin (R = −0.692, p<0.001), whereas recurrent cancer lesions did not show a significant correlation. Conclusions These initial results of this emerging hybrid imaging technique demonstrate the high diagnostic potential of simultaneous PET/MR imaging for the assessment of functional biomarkers, revealing a significant and strong correlation of tumor metabolism and higher cellularity in cervical cancer lesions.

Simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: a comparison to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging alone.

ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) for whole-body staging of patients with recurrent gynecological pelvic malignancies, in comparison to whole-body MRI alone. Materials and MethodsThe study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee. Written informed consent was obtained before each examination. Thirty-four consecutive patients with a suspected recurrence of cervical (n = 18) or ovarian (n = 16) cancer were prospectively enrolled for an integrated PET/MRI examination, which comprised a diagnostic, contrast-enhanced whole-body MRI protocol including dedicated sagittal dynamic imaging of the pelvis. Two radiologists separately evaluated the data sets regarding lesion count, lesion detection, lesion characterization, and diagnostic confidence. Mean and median values were calculated for each rating. Statistical analyses were performed both per-patient and per-lesion bases using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to indicate potential significant differences among PET/MRI and MRI (alone) data sets. ResultsMalignant lesions were present in 25 of the 34 patients. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging offered correct and superior identification of all 25 patients with cancer recurrence, compared with MRI alone (23/25). A total of 118 lesions (malignant, 89; benign, 29) were detected. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging correctly identified 88 (98.9%) of 89 malignant lesions, whereas MRI alone allowed for correct identification of 79 (88.8%) of the 89 malignant lesions. In addition, PET/MRI provided significantly higher lesion contrast and diagnostic confidence in the detection of malignant lesions (P < 0.001) compared with MRI alone. ConclusionsThese first results demonstrate the high diagnostic potential of integrated PET/MRI for the assessment of recurrence of female pelvic malignancies compared with MRI alone.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Renal MRI at 7 Tesla: Preliminary Results

Objective:With the successful implementation of ultra-high-field imaging in neuro- and musculoskeletal imaging, the interest of scientific research expanded toward whole-body applications. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced renal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7 Tesla (T), with optimization and implementation of a dedicated examination protocol. Material and Methods:In vivo dynamic contrast-enhanced high-field examinations were obtained in 10 healthy subjects on a 7 T whole-body MR scanner. A custom-built body transmit/receive reduced radiofrequency (RF) coil suitable for RF shimming was used for image acquisition. The examination protocol included (1) true fast imaging with steady-state precession imaging, (2) T2-weighted turbo spine echo imaging, (3) T1-weighted (T1w) in- and opposed-phase imaging, and (4) a fat-saturated 2D FLASH sequence. For dynamic imaging, gadobutrol was injected intravenously and T1w 3D FLASH images were obtained precontrast and at 20, 70, and 120 seconds delay. Qualitative image analysis was performed by 2 senior radiologists using a 3-point scale (1 = poor, 2 = moderate, 3 = good quality). Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the renal cortex/medulla were measured for all sequences. For statistical analysis, a Wilcoxon Rank Test was used. Results:All examinations were performed successfully and were well tolerated by all subjects without any side effects. Best overall image quality was rated for the T1w 2D FLASH sequence with an average score of 2.57, followed by the contrast-enhanced 3D FLASH sequence in the equilibrium phase (mean, 2.22). T2-weighted turbo spine echo imaging provided the weakest overall image quality score (1.30) and was most impaired by artifacts. Quantitative analysis showed highest CNR between cortex and medulla for arterial phase 3D FLASH imaging (CNR = 12.2), providing a statistically significant difference to all other sequences, except for the in- and opposed-phase and the fat-saturated 2D FLASH sequence. Conversely, equilibrium phase FLASH imaging yielded the weakest CNR score of 3.6. Conclusion:This feasibility study reveals the diagnostic potential and current constraints of ultra-high-field abdominal MRI. Our initial results demonstrate the potential of dedicated dynamic-contrast 7 T renal MRI and the need for further optimization of imaging sequences and RF coil concepts.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI at 7 Tesla utilizing a single-loop coil: a feasibility trial.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultra-high-field breast imaging at 7 Tesla. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 15 subjects, including 5 patients with histologically proven breast cancer, were examined on a 7 Tesla whole-body magnetic resonance imaging system using a unilateral linearly polarized single-loop coil. Subjects were placed in prone position on a biopsy support system, with the coil placed directly below the region of interest. The examination protocol included the following sequences: 1) T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence; 2) six dynamic T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo sequences; and 3) subtraction imaging. RESULTS Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging at 7 Tesla could be obtained at high spatial resolution with short acquisition times, providing good image accuracy and a conclusively good delineation of small anatomical and pathological structures. T2-weighted imaging could be obtained with high spatial resolution at adequate acquisition times. Because of coil limitations, four high-field magnetic resonance examinations showed decreased diagnostic value. CONCLUSIONS This first scientific approach of dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla demonstrates the complexity of ultra-high-field breast magnetic resonance imaging and countenances the implementation of further advanced bilateral coil concepts to circumvent current limitations from the coil and ultra-high-field magnetic strength.

Evaluation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluordesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging ((18)F-FDG PET/MRI) with (18)F-FDG PET/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT), MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-one consecutive patients (age 59.4 ± 11.5 years, range 38.5-76.9 years; 20 female, 1 male) with suspected breast cancer recurrence underwent a clinically indicated (18)F-FDG PET/CT and subsequently a (18)F-FDG PET/MRI examination in a single injection protocol (mean injected activity: 257 ± 44 MBq (18)F-FDG). Each (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, as well as the CT component of PET/CT (CTPET/CT) and MR images of PET/MRI (MRIPET/MRI) were separately evaluated by two radiologists regarding lesion count, lesion localization, and lesion categorization (benign/malignant). The reference standard was based on histopathological results as well as prior and follow-up imaging. A Wilcoxon test assessed differences in SUVmax between (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Correlation of SUVmax between (18)F-FDG PET/MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT was calculated using Pearsons correlation coefficient. Interobserver agreement on dignity ratings was evaluated using Cohens kappa. RESULTS According to the reference standard, 17 patients had breast cancer recurrence. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and MRIPET/MRI correctly identified each of the 17 patients, whereas CTPET/CT correctly identified 15 of the 17 patients. A total of 134 lesions were described (116 malignant, 18 benign). (18)F-FDG PET/MRI detected all 134 lesions, of which (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MRIPET/MRI, and CTPET/CT detected 97.0%, 96.2%, and 74.6%, respectively. (18)F-FDG PET/MRI yielded the highest proportion of correctly categorized lesions (98.5%) compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT (94.8%), MRIPET/MRI (88.1%), and CTPET/CT (57.5%). SUVmax was strongly correlated (r=0.72) but measured significantly higher on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI than on (18)F-FDG PET/CT in corresponding PET-positive lesions (SUVmax: 5.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.8; p=0.001). Interobserver agreement on lesion dignity was substantial with (18)F-FDG PET/MRI (k=0.65; p<0.001) and (18)F-FDG PET/CT (k=0.65; p<0.001). With MRIPET/MRI interobserver analysis yielded a moderate agreement (k=0.56; p<0.001), whereas there was only fair agreement evaluating the CTPET/CT datasets (k=0.31; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS (18)F-FDG PET/MRI offered the highest diagnostic performance compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and CT. Thus, (18)F-FDG PET/MRI should be regarded as a valuable alternative in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer.

Caudal Image Contrast Inversion in MPRAGE at 7 Tesla: Problem and Solution

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The magnetization-prepared rapid-acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence regularly shows caudal image contrast inversion at 7 T and therefore reduced clinical applicability. The investigators report the technical source of this problem and present a practical solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 71 subjects were scanned using a 7-T whole-body magnetic resonance imaging system using a 32-channel transmit/receive head coil. In 39 subjects, 45 high-resolution T1 contrast image data sets were acquired with the standard MPRAGE sequence. A modified sequence with an adiabatic wideband uniform rate smooth truncation pulse for magnetization preparation was used for 45 further scans in 39 subjects. In total, seven subjects underwent scans with both sequences. The homogeneity of T1 contrast and the occurrence of caudal image contrast inversion were evaluated in consensus reading by two neuroradiologists. RESULTS Caudal image contrast inversion was depicted in 19 acquisitions (42.2%) using the standard MPRAGE sequence. Using the adiabatic wideband uniform rate smooth truncation pulse for magnetization preparation, caudal image contrast inversion was depicted in only three acquisitions (6.7%). A χ(2) test showed a significant difference between the two preparation pulses (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Magnetization preparation with an adiabatic wideband uniform rate smooth truncation pulse in the MPRAGE sequence at 7 T can significantly reduce the occurrence of caudal image contrast inversion and improves signal homogeneity.