B. Murray

The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology report of AAPM Task Group 76

This document is the report of a task group of the AAPM and has been prepared primarily to advise medical physicists involved in the external-beam radiation therapy of patients with thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic tumors affected by respiratory motion. This report describes the magnitude of respiratory motion, discusses radiotherapy specific problems caused by respiratory motion, explains techniques that explicitly manage respiratory motion during radiotherapy and gives recommendations in the application of these techniques for patient care, including quality assurance (QA) guidelines for these devices and their use with conformal and intensity modulated radiotherapy. The technologies covered by this report are motion-encompassing methods, respiratory gated techniques, breath-hold techniques, forced shallow-breathing methods, and respiration-synchronized techniques. The main outcome of this report is a clinical process guide for managing respiratory motion. Included in this guide is the recommendation that tumor motion should be measured (when possible) for each patient for whom respiratory motion is a concern. If target motion is greater than 5mm, a method of respiratory motion management is available, and if the patient can tolerate the procedure, respiratory motion management technology is appropriate. Respiratory motion management is also appropriate when the procedure will increase normal tissue sparing. Respiratory motion management involves further resources, education and the development of and adherence to QA procedures.

Dosimetric evaluation of lung tumor immobilization using breath hold at deep inspiration.

PURPOSE To examine the dosimetric benefit of self-gated radiotherapy at deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The relative contributions of tumor immobilization at breath hold (BH) and increased lung volume at deep inspiration (DI) in sparing high-dose lung irradiation (> or = 20 Gy) were examined. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten consecutive patients undergoing radiotherapy for Stage I-IIIB NSCLC who met the screening criteria were entered on this study. Patients were instructed to BH at DI without the use of external monitors or breath-holding devices (self-gating). Computed tomography (CT) scans of the thorax were performed during free breathing (FB) and DIBH. Fluoroscopy screened for reproducible tumor position throughout DIBH, and determined the maximum superior-inferior (SI) tumor motion during both FB and DIBH. Margins used to define the planning target volume (PTV) from the clinical target volume included 1 cm for setup error and organ motion, plus an additional SI margin for tumor motion, as determined from fluoroscopy. Three conformal treatment plans were then generated for each patient, one from the FB scan with FB PTV margins, a second from the DIBH scan with FB PTV margins, and a third from the DIBH scan with DIBH PTV margins. The percent of total lung volume receiving > or = 20 Gy (using a prescription dose of 70.9 Gy to isocenter) was determined for each plan. RESULTS Self-gating at DIBH was possible for 8 of the 10 patients; 2 patients were excluded, because they were not able to perform a reproducible DIBH. For these 8 patients, the median BH time was 23 (range, 19-52) s. The mean percent of total lung volume receiving > or = 20 Gy under FB conditions (FB scan with FB PTV margins) was 12.8%. With increased lung volume alone (DIBH scan with FB PTV margins), this was reduced to 11.0%, tending toward a significant decrease in lung irradiation over FB (p = 0.086). With both increased lung volume and tumor immobilization (DIBH scan with DIBH PTV margins), the mean percent lung volume receiving > or = 20 Gy was further reduced to 8.8%, a significant decrease in lung irradiation compared to FB (p = 0.011). Furthermore, at DIBH, the additional benefit provided by tumor immobilization (i.e., using DIBH instead of FB PTV margins) was also significant (p = 0.006). The relative contributions of tumor immobilization and increased lung volume toward reducing the percent total lung volume receiving > or = 20 Gy were patient specific; however, all 8 of the patients analyzed showed a dosimetric benefit with this DIBH technique. CONCLUSION Compared to FB conditions, at DIBH the mean reduction in percent lung volume receiving > or = 20 Gy was 14.3% with the increase in lung volume alone, 22.1% with tumor immobilization alone, and 32.5% with the combined effect. The dosimetric benefit seen at DIBH was patient specific, and due to both the increased lung volume seen at DI and the PTV margin reduction seen with tumor immobilization.

Held-breath self-gating technique for radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE To examine the feasibility of a held-breath self-gating (HBSG) technique in the radiotherapy of lung cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen consecutive eligible and consenting patients undergoing radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer were accrued for this study. The patients underwent a standardized training session and were then asked to breath hold at four points in the breathing cycle (maximal and end tidal, inspiration and expiration) while under fluoroscopic visualization. Plain films and video imaging with digital image analysis were used to record and measure the movement of the diaphragm, a tumor surrogate, in the superior-inferior axis. These measurements were obtained during and between multiple separate breath holds within one session and between breath holds in sessions held at least one day apart. RESULTS Maximal inspiration and expiration tend to provide the best positional reliability, and the standard deviation of diaphragmatic position ranged from 0.13 to 2.57 mm, with an average of 0.97 mm. During a single breath hold, the diaphragmatic movement averaged 2.62 mm with a standard deviation of 1.28 mm. The day-to-day variation of diaphragmatic positions was less than 5 mm. The held-breath self-gating technique resulted in a reduction of diaphragmatic movement by an average of 11.9 mm when compared to that seen during tidal breathing. CONCLUSION In the radiotherapeutic management of non-small-cell lung cancer, this HBSG technique offers a simple method that provides superior immobilization of the diaphragm compared to tidal breathing. Clinical implementation of this technique should allow for a reduction of treatment margins, thus sparing more normal tissues and facilitating dose escalation.

Patient dosimetry for hybrid MRI-radiotherapy systems

A novel geometry has been proposed for a hybrid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-linac system in which a 6 MV linac is mounted on the open end of a biplanar, low field (0.2 T) MRI magnet on a single gantry that is free to rotate around the patient. This geometry creates a scenario in which the magnetic field vector remains fixed with respect to the incident photon beam, but moves with respect to the patient as the gantry rotates. Other proposed geometries are characterized by a radiation source rotating about a fixed cylindrical magnet where the magnetic field vector remains fixed with respect to the patient. In this investigation we simulate the inherent dose distribution patterns within the two MRI-radiation source geometries using PENELOPE and EGSnrc Monte Carlo radiation transport codes with algorithms implemented to account for the magnetic field deflection of charged particles. Simulations are performed in phantoms and for clinically realistic situations. The novel geometry results in a net Lorentz force that remains fixed with respect to the patient (in the cranial-caudal direction) and results in a cumulative influence on dose distribution for a multiple beam treatment scenario. For a case where patient anatomy is reasonably homogeneous (brain plan), differences in dose compared to a conventional (no magnetic field) case are minimal for the novel geometry. In the case of a lung plan where the inhomogeneous patient anatomy allows for the magnetic field to have significant influence on charged particle transport, larger differences occur in a predictable manner. For a system using a fixed cylindrical geometry and higher magnetic field (1.5 T), differences from the case without a magnetic field are significantly greater.

Thresholding in PET images of static and moving targets

Continued therapeutic gain in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will depend upon our ability to escalate the dose to the primary tumour while minimizing normal tissue toxicity. Both these objectives are facilitated by the accurate definition of a target volume that is as small as possible. To this end, both tumour immobilizations via deep inspiratory breath-hold, along with positron emission tomography (PET), have emerged as two promising approaches. Though PET is an excellent means of defining the general location of a tumour focus, its ability to define exactly the geometric extent of such a focus strongly depends upon selection of an appropriate image threshold. However, in clinical practice, the image threshold is typically not chosen according to consistent, well-established criteria. This study explores the relationship between image threshold and the resultant PET-defined volume using a series of F-18 radiotracer-filled hollow spheres of known internal volumes, both static and under oscillatory motion. The effects of both image threshold and tumour motion on the resultant PET image are examined. Imaging data are further collected from a series of simulated gated PET acquisitions in order to test the feasibility of a patient-controlled gating mechanism during deep inspiratory breath-hold. This study illustrates quantitatively considerable variability in resultant PET-defined tumour volumes depending upon numerous factors, including image threshold, size of the lesion, the presence of tumour motion and the scanning protocol. In this regard, when using PET in treatment planning for NSCLC, the radiation oncologist must select the image threshold very carefully to avoid either under-dosing the tumour or overdosing normal tissues.

Setup reproducibility in radiation therapy for lung cancer: a comparison between T-bar and expanded foam immobilization devices

PURPOSE Physiologic and non-physiologic tumor motion complicates the use of tight margins in three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy. Setup reproducibility is an important non-physiologic cause of tumor motion. The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare patient setup reproducibility using the reusable T-bar and the disposable expanded foam immobilization device (EFID) in radiation therapy for lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two hundred forty-four portal films were taken from 16 prospectively accrued patients treated for lung cancer. Patients were treated with either a pair of anterior and posterior parallel opposing fields (POF), or a combination of POF and a three-field isocentric technique. Each patient was treated in a supine position using either the T-bar setup or EFID. Six patients were treated in both devices over their treatment courses. Field placement analysis was used to evaluate 3D setup reproducibility, by comparing positions of bony landmarks relative to the radiation field edges in digitized simulator and portal images. Anterior-posterior, lateral, and longitudinal displacements, as well as field rotations along coronal and sagittal planes were measured. Statistical analyses of variance were applied to the deviations among portal films of all patients and the subgroup treated with both immobilization methods. RESULTS For the T-bar immobilization device, standard deviations of the setup reproducibility were 5.1, 3.7, and 5.1 mm in the anterior-posterior, lateral, and longitudinal dimensions, respectively. Rotations in the coronal plane and the sagittal plane were 0.9 degrees and 1.0 degrees, respectively. For the EFID, corresponding standard deviations of set up reproducibility were 3.6 mm, 5.3 mm, 5.4 mm, 0.7 degrees and 1.4 degrees, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.22) in the 3D setup reproducibility between T-bar and EFID. Subgroup analysis for the patients who were treated with both immobilization devices did not reveal a difference either. There was no consistent systematic error from simulator to treatment unit identified for either immobilization device. CONCLUSION Although the optimal immobilization technique and patient positioning for thoracic radiotherapy have yet to be determined, this study indicates that T-bar is comparable with EFID in its setup reproducibility. In view of the inherent advantages of T-bar, it has become a standard immobilization device at our institution. The observed range of displacements in field positioning with either immobilization device implies that one cm (two standard deviations [SD] of setup error) will be a more appropriate margin to allow for setup variability in radiation therapy for lung cancer.

Lung dosimetry in a linac-MRI radiotherapy unit with a longitudinal magnetic field.

PURPOSE There is interest in developing linac-MR systems for MRI-guided radiation therapy. To date, the designs for such linac-MR devices have been restricted to a transverse geometry where the static magnetic field is oriented perpendicular to the direction of the incident photon beam. This work extends possibilities in this field by proposing and examining by Monte Carlo simulations, a probable longitudinal configuration where the magnetic field is oriented in the same direction as the photon beam. METHODS The EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport codes with algorithms implemented to account for the magnetic field deflection of charged particles were used to compare dose distributions for linac-MR systems in transverse and longitudinal geometries. Specifically, the responses to a 6 MV pencil photon beam incident on water and lung slabs were investigated for 1.5 and 3.0 T magnetic fields. Further a five field lung plan was simulated in the longitudinal and transverse geometries across a range of magnetic field strengths from 0.2 through 3.0 T. RESULTS In a longitudinal geometry, the magnetic field is shown to restrict the radial spread of secondary electrons to a small degree in water, but significantly in low density tissues such as lung in contrast to the lateral shift in dose distribution seen in the transverse geometry. These effects extend to the patient case, where the longitudinal configuration demonstrated dose distributions more tightly confined to the primary photon fields, which increased dose to the planning target volume (PTV), bettered dose homogeneity within a heterogeneous (in density) PTV, and reduced the tissue interface effects associated with the transverse geometry. CONCLUSIONS Dosimetry issues observed in a transverse linac-MR geometry such as changes to the depth dose distribution and tissue interface effects were significantly reduced or eliminated in a longitudinal geometry on a representative lung plan. Further, an increase in dose to the PTV, resulting from the magnetic field confining electrons to the forward direction, shows potential for a reduction in dose to the surrounding tissues.

Experimental Validation of the Eclipse AAA Algorithm

The present study evaluates the performance of a newly released photon‐beam dose calculation algorithm that is incorporated into an established treatment planning system (TPS). We compared the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) factory‐commissioned with “golden beam data” for Varian linear accelerators with measurements performed at two institutions using 6‐MV and 15‐MV beams. The TG‐53 evaluation regions and criteria were used to evaluate profiles measured in a water phantom for a wide variety of clinically relevant beam geometries. The total scatter factor (TSF) for each of these geometries was also measured and compared against the results from the AAA. At one institute, TLD measurements were performed at several points in the neck and thoracic regions of a Rando phantom; at the other institution, ion chamber measurements were performed in a CIRS inhomogeneous phantom. The phantoms were both imaged using computed tomography (CT), and the dose was calculated using the AAA at corresponding detector locations. Evaluation of measured relative dose profiles revealed that 97%, 99%, 97%, and 100% of points at one institute and 96%, 88%, 89%, and 100% of points at the other institution passed TG‐53 evaluation criteria in the outer beam, penumbra, inner beam, and buildup regions respectively. Poorer results in the inner beam regions at one institute are attributed to the mismatch of the measured profiles at shallow depths with the “golden beam data.” For validation of monitor unit (MU) calculations, the mean difference between measured and calculated TSFs was less than 0.5%; test cases involving physical wedges had, in general, differences of more than 1%. The mean difference between point measurements performed in inhomogeneous phantoms and Eclipse was 2.1% (5.3% maximum) and all differences were within TG‐53 guidelines of 7%. By intent, the methods and evaluation techniques were similar to those in a previous investigation involving another convolution–superposition photon‐beam dose calculation algorithm in another TPS, so that the current work permitted an independent comparison between the two algorithms for which results have been provided. PACS number: 87.53.Dq

TU‐C‐M100F‐01: Development of a Linac‐MRI System for Real‐Time ART

Purpose: To describe the novel design of the coupling an of MRI to a medical linac to provide real‐time tracking of the tumor and healthy tissues during irradiation by the treatment beam Method and Materials: Various embodiments are defined in our patents (Fallone, Carlone, Murray) to avoid mutual interference between the MR and the linac. Our method allows rotation of a linac with respect to the subject to allow irradiation of the subject from any angle without disturbing the magnet homogeneity. Magnetic shielding of the linac prevents disturbance from the MRI. RF signal shielding, modifications the RF‐signal triggering and pulse shaping are used to minimize linac interference of MRI RF read sequences. Various Monte Carlo calculations (EGS4 NRC and Penelope) and finite‐element analyses (Comsol) are performed in all design stages. Results: The initial design for the human system involves a bi‐planar MRI with 65 cm opening to allow rotation of the shoulders within the bore. A short 6 MV waveguide is coupled to one open end of the MR, and a beam‐stop and a projection imaging device (eg, flatpanel) is coupled to the other end. Rotation is provide by two concentric rings, and the permanent‐magnet design is preferred in the initial stage to provide stability and lack of electric wiring in the rotation process. Low fields allows very small fringe fields to minimize linac interference yet with adequate image quality of soft tissue for lungs, prostate, GBM, etc. Mutual interference issues and other issues arising externally are calculated and resolved. Conclusion: We have shown the design to be a practical, viable and realizable within a reasonable time frame. Our other presentations detail resolutions to mutual MRI‐linac interferences.

The development of target-eye-view maps for selection of coplanar or noncoplanar beams in conformal radiotherapy treatment planning.

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy allows the use of tightly conformed, multiple coplanar or noncoplanar beams. However, visualizing the spatial relationships between the target volume and adjacent critical structures is not always obvious or intuitive. Tools such as beams eye view (BEV) have aided in this process and been very useful. In this study, a target-eye-view (TEV) map is developed as a functional extension of BEVs. The TEV map for a critical structure is created by checking the BEVs for all gantries and table rotations. For each possible BEV, the amount of overlap between the planning target volume (PTV) and the organ at risk (OAR) is determined. This information is presented in a Mercator spherical map, where the color tone indicates the amount of overlap between the PTV and the OAR. A composite TEV map is then created by summing the TEV grading scores for all OARs. The composite map shows beam orientations with the most overlap being light and the least overlap being dark, thus simplifying the selection of appropriate beam angles. The accuracy of the TEV maps has been confirmed separately with corresponding BEVs generated by a three-dimensional treatment planning system.