Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Barbara M. Masser is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Barbara M. Masser.


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2000

Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures

Peter Glick; Susan T. Fiske; Antonio Mladinic; José L. Saiz; Dominic Abrams; Barbara M. Masser; Bolanle E. Adetoun; Johnstone E. Osagie; Adebowale Akande; A. A. Alao; Barbara Annetje; Tineke M. Willemsen; Kettie Chipeta; Benoît Dardenne; Ap Dijksterhuis; Daniël H. J. Wigboldus; Thomas Eckes; Iris Six-Materna; Francisca Expósito; Miguel Moya; Margaret Foddy; Hyun-Jeong Kim; María Lameiras; María José Sotelo; Angelica Mucchi-Faina; Myrna Romani; Nuray Sakalli; Bola Udegbe; Mariko Yamamoto; Miyoko Ui

The authors argue that complementary hostile and benevolent components of sexism exist across cultures. Male dominance creates hostile sexism (HS), but mens dependence on women fosters benevolent sexism (BS)--subjectively positive attitudes that put women on a pedestal but reinforce their subordination. Research with 15,000 men and women in 19 nations showed that (a) HS and BS are coherent constructs that correlate positively across nations, but (b) HS predicts the ascription of negative and BS the ascription of positive traits to women, (c) relative to men, women are more likely to reject HS than BS, especially when overall levels of sexism in a culture are high, and (d) national averages on BS and HS predict gender inequality across nations. These results challenge prevailing notions of prejudice as an antipathy in that BS (an affectionate, patronizing ideology) reflects inequality and is a cross-culturally pervasive complement to HS.


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2003

Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity.

Dominic Abrams; G. Tendayi Viki; Barbara M. Masser; Gerd Bohner

In Studies 1 and 2, after reading an acquaintance-rape but not a stranger-rape scenario, higher benevolent sexist but not hostile sexist participants blamed the victim significantly more. In Study 2, higher hostile sexist but not benevolent sexist male participants showed significantly greater proclivity to commit acquaintance (but not stranger) rape. Studies 3 and 4 supported the hypothesis that the effects of benevolent sexism and hostile sexism are mediated by different perceptions of the victim, as behaving inappropriately and as really wanting sex with the rapist. These findings show that benevolent sexism and hostile sexism underpin different assumptions about women that generate sexist reactions toward rape victims.


Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | 2004

Bad but Bold : Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations

Peter Glick; María Lameiras; Susan T. Fiske; Thomas Eckes; Barbara M. Masser; Chiara Volpato; Anna Maria Manganelli; Jolynn Pek; Li-Li Huang; Nuray Sakallı-Uğurlu; Yolanda Rodríguez Castro; Maria Luiza D'avila Pereira; Tineke M. Willemsen; Annetje Brunner; Iris Six-Materna; Robin Wells

A 16-nation study involving 8,360 participants revealed that hostile and benevolent attitudes toward men, assessed by the Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory (P. Click & S.T. Fiske, 1999), were (a) reliably measured across cultures, (b) positively correlated (for men and women, within samples and across nations) with each other and with hostile and benevolent sexism toward women (Ambivalent Sexism Inventory, P. Click & S.T. Fiske, 1996), and (c) negatively correlated with gender equality in cross-national comparisons. Stereotype measures indicated that men were viewed as having less positively valenced but more powerful traits than women. The authors argue that hostile as well as benevolent attitudes toward men reflect and support gender inequality by characterizing men as being designed for dominance.


British Journal of Social Psychology | 2008

Integrating social identity theory and the theory of planned behaviour to explain decisions to engage in sustainable agricultural practices.

Kelly S. Fielding; Deborah J. Terry; Barbara M. Masser; Michael A. Hogg

The present research integrates core aspects of social identity theory with the theory of planned behaviour to investigate factors influencing engagement in sustainable agricultural practices. Using a two-wave prospective design, two studies were conducted with samples of farmers (N = 609 and N = 259, respectively). At Time 1, a questionnaire survey assessed theory of planned behaviour variables in relation to engaging in riparian zone management (a sustainable agricultural practice). In addition, intergroup perceptions (i.e. relations between rural and urban groups), group norms and group identification were assessed. At Time 2, self-reported behaviour was measured. There was support for the integrated model across both studies. As predicted, past behaviour, attitudes and perceived behavioural control were significant predictors of intentions, and intentions significantly predicted self-reported behaviour. Group norms and intergroup perceptions were also significant predictors of intentions providing support for the inclusion of social identity concepts in the theory of planned behaviour. More supportive group norms were associated with higher intentions, especially for high-group identifiers. In contrast, more negative intergroup perceptions were associated with lower intentions and, unexpectedly, this effect only emerged for low-group identifiers. This suggests that in the context of decisions to engage in riparian zone management, an important sustainable agricultural practice, high identifiers are influenced predominantly by in-group rather than out-group considerations, whereas low identifiers may attend to cues from both the in-group and the out-group when making their decisions.


Group Processes & Intergroup Relations | 2001

Life on the ocean wave: Testing some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting

Rupert Brown; Pamela F. Maras; Barbara M. Masser; James Vivian; Miles Hewstone

A survey (N= 352) was conducted among British passengers of a cross-channel ferry. The survey aimed to test hypotheses drawn from Realistic Group Conflict, Social Identity and Contact theories using mainly a correlational design. However, an intervention by members of the outgroup (French fishermen blockading a port) also allowed a quasi-experimental test of the effects of a direct experience of intergroup conflict. Results supported the hypotheses since conflict and national identification were associated with more negative and with less positive attitudes toward the outgroup, while contact had the reverse effects. In addition, the salience of group membership in the contact relationship weakly moderated the effect of contact.


Transfusion | 2013

Perceived deterrents to being a plasmapheresis donor in a voluntary, nonremunerated environment

Kathleen L. Bagot; Liliana L. Bove; Barbara M. Masser; Timothy C. Bednall; Mark Buzza

BACKGROUND: As demand for plasma‐derived products increases internationally, maintaining a committed plasmapheresis panel membership is critical for blood collection agencies. This study addresses the current lack of knowledge regarding deterrents to the recruitment and retention of plasmapheresis donors in a voluntary nonremunerated environment.


Journal of Interpersonal Violence | 2014

What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived:

Blake M. McKimmie; Barbara M. Masser; Renata Bongiorno

Jurors rely on a range of schemas when evaluating allegations of rape and sexual assault. For example, they may be influenced by the prototypicality of the alleged offense, the stereotypicality of the victim, or gender-related stereotypes. These schemas have often been conflated however, making it difficult to determine the unique impact of each on jurors’ perceptions. To be able to effectively counter any schema-related misconceptions, we must first identify which beliefs are important and when. An experiment (N = 420) examined the independent effects of offense prototypicality and victim stereotypicality on mock jurors’ perceptions. As expected, victim stereotypicality had a greater effect on judgments in the counter-prototypical (acquaintance) assault scenario than in the prototypical (stranger) assault scenario. When the complainant was described as being a counter-stereotypical victim in the acquaintance rape scenario, the defendant was seen as less likely to be guilty and evaluated more positively and the complainant less positively compared with when the complainant was described as being a stereotypical victim. Analysis of the qualitative data suggested a focus on different factors in reaching verdicts in the stranger and acquaintance rape scenarios. Results were interpreted as evidence that jurors “step down” through a hierarchy of schemas in their attempts to determine what happened in cases of rape and sexual assault.


Transfusion | 2014

Asking for something different from our donors: factors influencing persuasion success

Kathleen L. Bagot; Liliana L. Bove; Barbara M. Masser; Katherine M. White

Demand for plasma‐derived products, and consequently plasmapheresis donors, continues to increase. This study aims to identify the factors that facilitate the persuasion success of conversations with whole blood (WB) donors to convert to plasmapheresis donation within a voluntary nonremunerated context.


Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology | 1996

''When would you do it?'' An investigation into the effects of retaliation, seriousness of malpractice and occupation on willingness to blow the whistle

Barbara M. Masser; Rupert Brown

A questionnaire study involving white collar workers (n = 48) investigated the effects of the threat of retaliation, seriousness of malpractice and occupational status of the observer on the likelihood and method of whistle-blowing chosen. In line with previous whistle-blowing and bystander intervention research, the likelihood of whistle-blowing was greater for serious malpractices and where threatened retaliation was low. The effect of retaliation was only significant for serious white collar malpractices and in every situation internal whistle-blowing was more likely than external. The general likelihood of whistle-blowing was positively correlated with the perception that reporting the malpractice would result in change.


Annals of Behavioral Medicine | 2015

Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict a Change in the Type of Blood Product Donated

Kathleen L. Bagot; Barbara M. Masser; Katherine M. White

BackgroundDemand for essential plasma-derived products is increasing.PurposeThis prospective study aims to identify predictors of voluntary non-remunerated whole blood (WB) donors becoming plasmapheresis donors.MethodsSurveys were sent to WB donors who had recently (recent n = 1,957) and not recently donated (distant n = 1,012). Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) constructs (attitude, subjective norm, self-efficacy) were extended with moral norm, anticipatory regret, and donor identity. Intentions and objective plasmapheresis donation for 527 recent and 166 distant participants were assessed.ResultsMulti-group analysis revealed that the model was a good fit. Moral norm and self-efficacy were positively associated while role identity (suppressed by moral norm) was negatively associated with plasmapheresis intentions.ConclusionsThe extended TPB was useful in identifying factors that facilitate conversion from WB to plasmapheresis donation. A superordinate donor identity may be synonymous with WB donation and, for donors with a strong moral norm for plasmapheresis, may inhibit conversion.

Collaboration


Dive into the Barbara M. Masser's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Katherine M. White

Queensland University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kathleen L. Bagot

Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie M. Duck

University of Queensland

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Amanda Thijsen

Australian Red Cross Blood Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tanya E. Davison

Australian Red Cross Blood Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge