Beatrice Bortesi

EGFR and EML4-ALK gene mutations in NSCLC: A case report of erlotinib-resistant patient with both concomitant mutations

The fusion gene EML4-ALK (echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 gene and the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene) was recently identified as a novel genetic alteration in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EML4-ALK translocations correlate with specific clinical and pathological features, in particular lack of EGFR and K-ras mutations, and may be associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Here, we report a case of a patient with a concomitant EGFR mutation and ALK translocation resistant to erlotinib. Considering this report, ALK status should be investigated in unexplained cases of EGFR-TKI-resistance of EGFR mutated NSCLCs.

ERCC1/BRCA1 expression and gene polymorphisms as prognostic and predictive factors in advanced NSCLC treated with or without cisplatin

Background:The FAST was a factorial trial in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), addressing the role of replacing cisplatin with a non-platinum agent. The prognostic and predictive effect of ERCC1/BRCA1 expression and ERCC1/XPD/XRCC1–3 gene polymorphisms on outcomes of patients was examined.Methods:Patients were randomised to receive treatment with or without cisplatin. ERCC1/BRCA1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. ERCC1 (C8092A, C118T), XPD (Lys751Gln), XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) and XRCC3 (Thr241Met) gene polymorphisms were evaluated on tumour DNA by TaqMan allelic discrimination assay.Results:Tumour samples were available from 110 of 433 patients enrolled: 54.7% were ERCC1 positive and 51.4% were BRCA1 positive. Overall, ERCC1-negative patients had better response rate (P=0.004), progression-free survival (P=0.023) and overall survival (P=0.012) compared with positive ones, with no statistically significant treatment interaction. The BRCA1-positive patients showed numerically better outcomes, although not statistically significant, with no treatment interaction. Among DNA repair gene polymorphisms, only XRCC1 Gln/Gln genotype evidenced a potential prognostic role (P=0.036).Conclusion:This study confirms the prognostic role of ERCC1 expression and XRCC1 (Arg399Gln) polymorphism in advanced NSCLC treated with first-line chemotherapy. None of these biomarkers was shown to be a specific predictive factor of cisplatin efficacy.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Intron-1 Polymorphism Predicts Gefitinib Outcome in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene intron 1 contains a polymorphic single sequence dinucleotide repeat (CA)n whose length has been found to inversely correlate with transcriptional activity. This study was designed to assess the role of (CA)n polymorphism in predicting the outcome of gefitinib treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Blood and tumor tissue from 58 patients with advanced NSCLC submitted to gefitinib were collected. EGFR intron 1 gene polymorphism, along with EGFR gene mutation, gene copy number and immunohistochemistry expression were determined. Moreover, a panel of lung cancer cell lines characterized for EGFR intron 1 polymorphism was also studied. Results: EGFR intron 1 polymorphism showed a statistically significant correlation with the gefitinib response (response rate 25 versus 0%, for patients with a (CA)16 and with a (CA)else genotype, respectively; p = 0.044). Patients with a (CA)16 genotype had a longer survival compared with those with a (CA)else genotype (11.4 versus 4.8 months, respectively; p = 0.037). In addition, cell lines lacking the (CA)16 allele showed a statistically significant higher IC50 compared with cell lines bearing at least one (CA)16 allele (p = 0.003). Conclusions: This study supports a potential role of EGFR intron 1 polymorphism in predicting the outcome of gefitinib treatment in advanced NSCLC.

Correlation between erlotinib pharmacokinetics, cutaneous toxicity and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

OBJECTIVES An association between skin toxicity and outcome has been reported for NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib. Several explanations have been suggested, including pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic variability. The purposes of this study were to characterize erlotinib pharmacokinetic and to correlate drug serum and urine levels to toxicity and outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients. METHODS Patients with stage IV NSCLC consecutively treated with erlotinib in second- or third-line were enrolled. Biological samples (blood, urine and tumor specimens) were collected. Erlotinib levels in serum and urine samples of all patients after 7 (T1) and 30 (T2) days of treatment were quantified by LC-MS/MS analysis, along with urinary 6β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio, as marker of metabolic phenotype of the CYP3A4/5 enzyme. RESULTS 56 patients were recruited and for 46 all samples were available. At T1 erlotinib levels were 3.90 [2.13] μmol/l and 0.37 [2.90]μmol/mol creat in serum and urinary samples, respectively; at T2 drug concentrations were significantly lower (2.02 [4.05] μmol/l and 0.23 [4.47] μmol/mol creat, respectively). Patients with grade 3 skin toxicity showed serum T1 drug levels significantly higher than those with grade 0-2 (6.84 [2.28] vs. 3.08 [1.97] μmol/l, respectively, p=0.004) and had longer progression-free and overall survival. An inverse correlation between erlotinib serum levels and urinary 6β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio was observed in patients with grade 3 skin toxicity. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of erlotinib are related to skin toxicity and may support further studies where erlotinib dosing is tailored according to pharmacokinetic parameters.

Buccal mucosa cells as in vivo model to evaluate gefitinib activity in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer.

Purpose: To evaluate the role of pretreatment and posttreatment expression in buccal mucosa cells of signal transduction proteins activated by epidermal growth factor receptor, including phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (p-EGFR), phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase (p-MAPK), and phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT), in predicting gefitinib activity in advanced non–small cell lung cancer patients. Expression of the same proteins was also assessed on corresponding tissue samples for comparison. Moreover, EGFR gene mutations and copy number were analyzed. Experimental Design: Protein expression was evaluated by standard immunocytochemistry in buccal smears, obtained by scraping immediately before and after 2 weeks of gefitinib treatment, and in the available archival tumor specimens. EGFR gene mutations were evaluated by direct sequencing and gene copy number was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Data were correlated with gefitinib toxicity and objective response. Results: Fifty-eight patients with pretreated advanced non–small cell lung cancer were enrolled and nine of these patients (15%) showed an objective response to gefitinib (including two complete responses). Toxicity (P = 0.025) and baseline p-AKT expression in buccal mucosa cells (P = 0.061) showed a potential predictive role. On the contrary, the probability of achieving an objective response was not affected by pretreatment expression of EGFR, p-EGFR, and p-MAPK, either in buccal mucosa or in tumor tissue. Responders showed a nonstatistically significant trend toward a more pronounced reduction in the expression of p-EGFR, p-MAPK, and p-AKT after gefitinib treatment. Among responders, five of six (83%) tumors showed EGFR gene mutation, whereas none of the tumors from patients with stable or progressive disease did (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Epithelial cells obtained from buccal mucosa may be used to assess the pharmacodynamic effect of EGFR-targeted agents, and pretreatment p-AKT expression may be a possible predictive biomarker of in vivo gefitinib activity.

Epidermal growth factor receptor and Kras gene expression: Reliability of mutational analysis on cytological samples

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kras gene mutations are crucial for discriminating patients responsive to anti‐EGFR drugs in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), respectively. The majority of NSCLCs come to clinical attention at an advanced stage when surgery is no longer recommended and a considerable number of them are diagnosed by cytology only. A large number of metastatic CRCs are also diagnosed by imaging and minimally invasive techniques such as fine‐needle aspiration biopsy. Here, we report our experience in the mutation analysis of EGFR and Kras on cytological material obtained from superficial and deep lesions of NSCLC and CRC. Our series included 63 cytological specimens from primary or metastatic lesions of 42 NSCLCs and 21 CRCs. The cytological material was adequate for the mutation analysis in 39/42 (93%) NSCLCs and in 20/21(95%) CRCs. EGFR and Kras mutations were found in 9 (23%) and 9 (23%) NSCLC cases, respectively. Kras mutations were found in 9/20 (45%) CRC specimens. Histological samples from the primary tumors were available in 9/42 NSCLCs and in 17/21 CRCs. The agreement of EGFR and Kras mutational status in cytological vs. histological samples was 100% for NSCLC and 88% for CRC. Our results suggest that standard cytology provides adequate material for the assessment of EGFR and Kras mutational status in NSCLC and CRC patients and could be specifically indicated in patients not eligible for surgery but candidate to anti‐EGFR therapy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013.

Role of immunoglobulin G fragment C receptor polymorphism-mediated antibody-dependant cellular cytotoxicity in colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab therapy

Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), which is activated by effector cells via immunoglobulin G (IgG) fragment C receptors (FcRs), was proposed as a mechanism of cetuximab efficacy. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 23 healthy donors and 13 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with cetuximab were tested for FcγR polymorphisms and cetuximab-mediated ADCC. ADCC was measured by chromium-51 release on a epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive human colon cancer cell line. Overall, 86 mCRC patients were genotyped for study purposes. PBMCs harbouring the FcγRIIIa 158 V/V genotype had a significantly higher cetuximab-mediated ADCC. No correlation was found between FcγR polymorphisms and response rate or time to progression after cetuximab-based therapy. Despite the in vitro analysis showing that the FcγRIIIa 158 V/V genotype is associated with higher ADCC, clinical data do not support a predictive role of FcγRIIIa polymorphisms in mCRC treated with cetuximab.

Gene mutations in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): Results of a panel of 6 genes in a cohort of Italian patients

BACKGROUND No target therapies are presently available in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We investigated the presence of potentially drugable mutations in the EGFR, c-MET, BRAF, KRAS, PDGFRa and c-KIT genes in a retrospective series of SCLC from 2 Italian Institutions. Correlations with immunohistochemical, clinical and outcome features were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Genes were studied by direct sequencing of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Immunohistochemical expression of TTF-1, p63, chromogranin, synaptophysin, CD56 and bcl-2 was assessed. RESULTS Samples from 113 SCLC patients were analyzed. All cases were wild-type for BRAF, KRAS, PDGFRa and c-KIT (data available for 82 patients). Two (1.8%) patients were EGFR-mutated (exon 19 delE746-A750 and exon 21 L858R); both were females, non-smoker and had limited disease. Overall survival of EGFR-mutated patients was 21 months as compared to 11 months in wild-type. Five (4.4%) patients were c-MET-mutated (4 on exon 14: 2 R988C, 1 D990N, 1 D102Y; 1 on exon 17 R1166Q); all were smokers, 3 were males and 4 had extensive disease. Their OS was comparable to wild-type cases (12 vs. 11 months). EGFR and c-MET mutations were mutually exclusive. Gene mutations did not correlate with immunophenotype. CONCLUSIONS Targetable mutations are uncommon in SCLC. EGFR-mutated patients tended to be female and non-smoker and experienced a prolonged OS suggesting a possible positive prognostic effect. c-MET mutations did not affect survival. Target therapy might be considered in EGFR and c-MET-mutated patients.

A breast cancer patient from Italy with germline mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes

We report the first case in Italy of a non-Ashkenazi double heterozygote for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. This finding is predictably rare, with a maximum frequency of 1/250,000. The proband and her mother were diagnosed with early-onset breast cancer. No other relatives with breast and/or ovarian cancer were observed. The implications of this case in regard to genetic testing and counseling are substantial.

Reliability of EGFR and KRAS mutation analysis on fine-needle aspiration washing in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION Molecular profiling of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become essential for predicting customized medical treatment decision. In light of recent advances in non-invasive diagnostic procedures in NSCLC, we aimed to demonstrate the reliability of assessing molecular tests for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS genes on cytological samples by comparing the molecular profile obtained on cells from scraped smears with that on paired needle washing in a series of NSCLC cases. METHODS Thirty-two cytological specimens obtained by fine-needle aspiration biopsy procedures from primary or metastatic lesions of NSCLCs were Giemsa stained for a rapid on-site evaluation and, in case of an adequate sampling, the cellular material obtained from needle washing was collected into a saline solution. Scraped smears and needle washings were tested for EGFR and KRAS by polymerase chain reaction followed by direct sequencing. RESULTS The concordance between EGFR and KRAS mutational status in 29 paired scraped smears and needle washing was 100%, with 7 paired samples showing the same EGFR mutation (4 L858R mutation, 2 E746_A750 deletion and 1 A767_V769 duplication) and 8 paired samples showing the same KRAS mutations (4 G12D, 1 G12A, 1 G12V and 2 G12C). Three scraped smears, uninformative for poor DNA quality, resulted EGFR mutated on paired needle washings. CONCLUSIONS Needle washing obtained in the course of NSCLC non-invasive fine needle diagnostic procedures allows reliable mutation testing and can be regarded as an additional important source of biological material for molecular profiling of advanced NSCLC.