Berit Warrelmann
University of Regensburg
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Berit Warrelmann.
Archive | 2016
Julika Loss; Berit Warrelmann; Verena Lindacher
Was ist das Besondere am Ansatz der „Gesundheitsforderung“ – insbesondere im Vergleich zu klassischen Ansatzen der Primarpravention? Wo setzen Interventionen der Gesundheitsforderung an? Welche Rolle spielen aktive Teilhabe (Partizipation), Empowerment und Strukturbildung bei gesundheitsforderlichen Ansatzen?
Evaluation & the Health Professions | 2018
Verena Lindacher; Janina Curbach; Berit Warrelmann; Susanne Brandstetter; Julika Loss
Although empowerment is one of the core principles of the World Health Organization’s approach to health promotion, there are no standards, best practice recommendations, or guidelines for evaluating empowerment within interventions. For the development of effective empowerment promoting interventions, adequate study designs, methods, and indicators for assessing empowerment are essential. In order to better understand which evaluation procedures have been used so far, and which advantages and disadvantages are connected to them, we systematically reviewed empowerment-based health promotion interventions. We included 26 studies, which use a broad variety of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs and various data collection methods; qualitative and mixed-methods designs predominated. The quantitative measurement instruments are heterogeneous: Mainly self-designed or modified scales are applied. All studies consider indicators reflecting individual competencies and motivations, whereas indicators capturing the organizational and political components of empowerment are less common. Involving target group members in the development of evaluation procedures and combining different data sources are mentioned as specific steps to improve the quality of data collection. Given the flexible and context-dependent nature of empowerment approaches, the development of a “gold standard” for its evaluation seems unrealistic. However, the analyzed studies can be used to deduce recommendations that may help to conduct high-quality evaluations of empowerment, for example, mixed-methods designs, participation of target groups, and reflective loops within the research team.
Health Promotion International | 2015
Susanne Brandstetter; Janina Curbach; Verena Lindacher; Jana Rueter; Berit Warrelmann; Julika Loss
Health & Social Care in The Community | 2018
Janina Curbach; Berit Warrelmann; Susanne Brandstetter; Verena Lindacher; Jana Rueter; Julika Loss
Archive | 2017
Helmut Strobl; Julika Loss; Berit Warrelmann; Susanne Tittlbach
Archive | 2016
Helmut Strobl; Susanne Tittlbach; Julika Loss; Berit Warrelmann
Gesundheitswesen | 2016
Berit Warrelmann; Helmut Strobl; Susanne Tittlbach; Julika Loss
Gesundheitswesen | 2016
Berit Warrelmann; Helmut Strobl; Susanne Tittlbach; Julika Loss
Gesundheitswesen | 2016
V Lindacher; J Curbach; Berit Warrelmann; S Brandstetter; Julika Loss
European Journal of Public Health | 2016
Berit Warrelmann; H Strobl; S Tittlbach; Janina Curbach; Julika Loss