Michael J. Holman

Causes of late graft loss after liver transplantation

The causes of graft loss in liver transplant recipients with a graft functioning for more than 1 year post-transplant were analyzed. Of 500 liver transplants in 434 patients, 362 grafts were functioning for more than 1 year. After 1 year, 42 grafts were later lost (11.6%). Thirty-three grafts were lost by death and 9 retransplants were done with 8 patients. Of the grafts lost by death, 12 had no evidence of dysfunction. The actuarial 2-and 5-year graft survival in liver transplantation recipients with functioning grafts for more than 1 year was 91 and 83%, respectively. The graft loss rate was 3.4 times higher during the 2nd year post-transplant than during 2–5 years post-transplant. The most common causes of graft loss were chronic rejection (26.2%), recurrent hepatitis (23.8%), arterial thrombosis/stenosis (11.9%) and recurrent malignancy (9.5%). No graft was lost from acute rejection. There was no difference in timing of the graft lost between the different causes. The pretransplant diagnosis of hepatitis B, chronic rejection, and malignancy was associated with the highest frequency of late graft lost. In conclusion, long-term graft survival is good after liver transplantation in patients with a functioning graft for more than 1 year. The main causes of graft loss were chronic rejection and recurrent hepatitis. Prevention and treatment for these conditions may further improve the results after liver transplantation.

Peloisis hepatis due to Bartonella henselae in transplantation : a hemato-hepato-renal syndrome

BACKGROUNDnBacillary peliosis hepatis is an uncommon but well recognized disease due to disseminated Bartonella infections occurring predominantly in immunocompromised individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus, type 1. A similar condition in the absence of Bartonella infection when described in organ transplant patients was felt to be secondary to azathioprine and/or cyclosporine.nnnMETHODSnHerein, we report the first case of bacillary peliosis hepatis due to systemic Bartonella henselae infection in a patient after kidney transplant. The patient presented with severe anemia, persistent thrombocytopenia, and hepato-renal syndrome. DNA-based polymerase chain reactions (PCR), which allowed direct detection of both B henselae and quintana DNA in patients peripheral blood and liver tissue, were used. Indirect immunofluorescence assay for Bartonella serology was performed on peripheral blood.nnnRESULTSnHistopathology of the liver biopsy demonstrated peliosis hepatis. Indirect immunofluorescence assay for Bartonella serology was positive, and B henselae DNA was identified by PCR in the peripheral blood and liver tissue. Treatment with a 3-month course of oral erythromycin resulted in an excellent clinical response.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe present case suggests that although various anti-rejection therapies and opportunistic infections are associated with hepatic and renal dysfunction along with bone marrow suppression, the diagnostic evaluation in this situation should include liver biopsy and a careful search for evidence of systemic Bartonella infection, e.g., exposure to cats, Bartonella serology, and Bartonella DNA by PCR. A reduction in immunosuppression and prolonged therapy with antibiotics such as erythromycin will often result in early recovery.

OKT3 rescue for steroid-resistant rejection in adult liver transplantation

The results of OKT3 use for steroid-resistant rejection rescue in adult liver transplantation were analyzed retrospectively from a single transplant center. Comparison was made with concurrent patients who had no rejection (NR) or steroid-responsive rejections (SR). The records of 290 patients who underwent 323 liver transplants from April 1985 to December 1989 were examined. The first technically successful grafts were used for this analysis (265 grafts). Follow-up was a minimum of 1 year, or until death or loss of graft. All patients received triple-drug induction immunosuppression (CsA, Aza, steroids). Initial rejection was treated with 1 g methylprednisolone bolus i.v., followed by a 5-day taper of steroids from 200 mg to 20 mg. No rejection occurred in 108 (40.8%) and SR in 86 (32.4%), and OKT3 was given for persistent rejection in 71 (26.8%). The age, sex distribution, mean follow-up, and preoperative status were similar in all three groups. The preoperative diagnoses were similar, except for fulminant liver failure, in which 19 of 20 patients experienced rejection (P < 0.0001). The median hospitalization stay was 37 days for OKT3, 27 days for SR, and 21 days for NR (P < 0.0001). The median ICU stay was similar in the three groups (OKT3, 4; SR, 4; NR, 3). Infections in the first 6 weeks, and in the period of 6 weeks to 1 year posttransplant, were of similar frequency for all three groups. By the Kaplan-Meier estimation, the graft and patient actuarial survival rates were comparable. At 1 year, the graft survival rate was 79.6% for NR, 79.8% for SR, and 67.6% for OKT3. The 1-year patient survival rate was 85.2% for NR, 83.7% for SR, and 84.5% for OKT3. Following treatment by OKT3, rejection was permanently reversed in 42 patients. A temporary response occurred in 12 patients, 16 patients failed to respond to OKT3, 2 patients died during therapy, and 6 of the nonresponders died within 12 months. Additional OKT3 treatment was attempted in 6 patients for persistent rejection within a 1-month interval from the previous OKT3 course. Of these 6, 4 developed lymphoproliferative disorder, and only 1 survived in response to drastic reduction of immunosuppression. In conclusion, OKT3 was effective as rescue therapy for adult liver transplant steroid-resistant rejection. Because of the associated morbidity and expense, OKT3 should be used in a selective fashion. Failure to respond to OKT3 is a serious complication, and should not be managed by prolonged or repeated courses, but rather by alternative means.

Blood transfusions in liver recipients : A conundrum or a clear benefit in the cyclosporine/tacrolimus era?

Blood transfusions are common in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), and their effects on sensitization, rejection, and liver graft survival are not well known. These effects were examined in 121 recipients of primary liver grafts, surviving > or = 30 days. Ninety-six (79%) patients received transfusions before transplantation. Transfusion recipients had significantly fewer severe or recurrent rejection episodes (18%), compared with patients who did not receive transfusions (42%, P=0.006), if the first transfusion was > or = 90 days before the transplant. Patients with alcoholic ESLD (n=49) had significantly fewer severe rejection episodes when compared with the nonalcoholic (n=72) patients (12% vs. 35%, P=0.004). The transfusion benefit was, however, more apparent and significant in the nonalcoholic (26% vs. 56% in nontransfused, P=0.02) than among the alcoholic recipients (6% vs. 25%, P=0.1). This finding is, most likely, due to a combination of a higher rate of severe rejection and the statistical power of the larger number of recipients in the nonalcoholic group. This finding is further corroborated by a multivariate analysis in which blood transfusions retained their benefit (P<0.05) independent of recipients age and diagnosis. Graft and patient survival were not significantly different in the transfused versus nontransfused groups. Transfusion recipients had a higher panel antibody (11.4+/-23.4 vs. 2.7+/-8.1, P<0.02) but no increased risk of a positive crossmatch. In liver recipients, blood transfusions diminish the risk of rejection independent of recipients age and the cause of ESLD.