Brian Kiraly
Northwestern University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brian Kiraly.
Science | 2015
Andrew J. Mannix; Xiang-Feng Zhou; Brian Kiraly; Joshua D. Wood; Diego Alducin; Benjamin D. Myers; Xiaolong Liu; Brandon Fisher; Ulises Santiago; Jeffrey R. Guest; Miguel José Yacamán; Arturo Ponce; Artem R. Oganov; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger
Borophene: Boron in two dimensions Although bulk allotropes of carbon and boron differ greatly, small clusters of these elements show remarkable similarities. Boron analogs of two-dimensional carbon allotropes such as graphene have been predicted. Now Mannix et al. report the formation of two-dimensional boron by depositing the elemental boron onto a silver surface under ultrahigh-vacuum conditions (see the Perspective by Sachdev). The graphene-like structure was buckled, weakly bonded to the substrate, and metallic. Science, this issue p. 1513; see also p. 1468 A two-dimensional boron allotrope forms after depositing its elemental vapor on a silver surface in vacuum. [Also see Perspective by Sachdev] At the atomic-cluster scale, pure boron is markedly similar to carbon, forming simple planar molecules and cage-like fullerenes. Theoretical studies predict that two-dimensional (2D) boron sheets will adopt an atomic configuration similar to that of boron atomic clusters. We synthesized atomically thin, crystalline 2D boron sheets (i.e., borophene) on silver surfaces under ultrahigh-vacuum conditions. Atomic-scale characterization, supported by theoretical calculations, revealed structures reminiscent of fused boron clusters with multiple scales of anisotropic, out-of-plane buckling. Unlike bulk boron allotropes, borophene shows metallic characteristics that are consistent with predictions of a highly anisotropic, 2D metal.
Nature Communications | 2015
Robert M. Jacobberger; Brian Kiraly; Matthieu Fortin-Deschênes; Pierre L. Levesque; Kyle M. McElhinny; Gerald J. Brady; Richard Rojas Delgado; Susmit Singha Roy; Andrew J. Mannix; Max G. Lagally; Paul G. Evans; P. Desjardins; Richard Martel; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger; Michael S. Arnold
Graphene can be transformed from a semimetal into a semiconductor if it is confined into nanoribbons narrower than 10 nm with controlled crystallographic orientation and well-defined armchair edges. However, the scalable synthesis of nanoribbons with this precision directly on insulating or semiconducting substrates has not been possible. Here we demonstrate the synthesis of graphene nanoribbons on Ge(001) via chemical vapour deposition. The nanoribbons are self-aligning 3° from the Ge〈110〉 directions, are self-defining with predominantly smooth armchair edges, and have tunable width to <10 nm and aspect ratio to >70. In order to realize highly anisotropic ribbons, it is critical to operate in a regime in which the growth rate in the width direction is especially slow, <5 nm h−1. This directional and anisotropic growth enables nanoribbon fabrication directly on conventional semiconductor wafer platforms and, therefore, promises to allow the integration of nanoribbons into future hybrid integrated circuits.
ACS Nano | 2014
Andrew J. Mannix; Brian Kiraly; Brandon Fisher; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger
Having fueled the microelectronics industry for over 50 years, silicon is arguably the most studied and influential semiconductor. With the recent emergence of two-dimensional (2D) materials (e.g., graphene, MoS2, phosphorene, etc.), it is natural to contemplate the behavior of Si in the 2D limit. Guided by atomic-scale studies utilizing ultrahigh vacuum (UHV), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), and spectroscopy (STS), we have investigated the 2D limits of Si growth on Ag(111). In contrast to previous reports of a distinct sp(2)-bonded silicene allotrope, we observe the evolution of apparent surface alloys (ordered 2D silicon-Ag surface phases), which culminate in the precipitation of crystalline, sp(3)-bonded Si(111) nanosheets. These nanosheets are capped with a √3 honeycomb phase that is isostructural to a √3 honeycomb-chained-trimer (HCT) reconstruction of Ag on Si(111). Further investigations reveal evidence for silicon intermixing with the Ag(111) substrate followed by surface precipitation of crystalline, sp(3)-bonded silicon nanosheets. These conclusions are corroborated by ex situ atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Even at the 2D limit, scanning tunneling spectroscopy shows that the sp(3)-bonded silicon nanosheets exhibit semiconducting electronic properties.
Nano Letters | 2015
Brian Kiraly; Robert M. Jacobberger; Andrew J. Mannix; Gavin P. Campbell; Michael J. Bedzyk; Michael S. Arnold; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger
Epitaxially oriented wafer-scale graphene grown directly on semiconducting Ge substrates is of high interest for both fundamental science and electronic device applications. To date, however, this material system remains relatively unexplored structurally and electronically, particularly at the atomic scale. To further understand the nature of the interface between graphene and Ge, we utilize ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) along with Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to probe interfacial atomic structure and chemistry. STS reveals significant differences in electronic interactions between graphene and Ge(110)/Ge(111), which is consistent with a model of stronger interaction on Ge(110) leading to epitaxial growth. Raman spectra indicate that the graphene is considerably strained after growth, with more point-to-point variation on Ge(111). Furthermore, this native strain influences the atomic structure of the interface by inducing metastable and previously unobserved Ge surface reconstructions following annealing. These nonequilibrium reconstructions cover >90% of the surface and, in turn, modify both the electronic and mechanical properties of the graphene overlayer. Finally, graphene on Ge(001) represents the extreme strain case, where graphene drives the reorganization of the Ge surface into [107] facets. From this work, it is clear that the interaction between graphene and the underlying Ge is not only dependent on the substrate crystallographic orientation, but is also tunable and strongly related to the atomic reconfiguration of the graphene-Ge interface.
Applied Physics Letters | 2016
Brian Kiraly; Andrew J. Mannix; Robert M. Jacobberger; Brandon Fisher; Michael S. Arnold; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger
Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) hold great promise for future electronics because of their edge and width dependent electronic bandgaps and exceptional transport properties. While significant progress toward GNR devices has been made, the field has been limited by difficulties achieving narrow widths, global alignment, and atomically pristine GNR edges on technologically relevant substrates. A recent advance has challenged these limits by using Ge(001) substrates to direct the bottom-up growth of GNRs with nearly pristine armchair edges and widths near ∼10 nm via atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition. In this work, the growth of GNRs on Ge(001) is extended to ultra-high vacuum conditions, resulting in the realization of GNRs with widths narrower than 5 nm. Armchair graphene nanoribbons oriented along Ge 〈110〉 surface directions are achieved with excellent width control and relatively large bandgaps. The bandgap magnitude and electronic uniformity of these sub-5 nm GNRs are well-suited for emerging na...
Nature Reviews Chemistry | 2017
Andrew J. Mannix; Brian Kiraly; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger
Nature Communications | 2013
Brian Kiraly; Erin V. Iski; Andrew J. Mannix; Brandon Fisher; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger
Nano Letters | 2016
Zhuhua Zhang; Andrew J. Mannix; Zhili Hu; Brian Kiraly; Nathan P. Guisinger; Mark C. Hersam; Boris I. Yakobson
Chemistry of Materials | 2015
Brian Kiraly; Andrew J. Mannix; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger
Physical Review Materials | 2018
Gavin P. Campbell; Brian Kiraly; Robert M. Jacobberger; Andrew J. Mannix; Michael S. Arnold; Mark C. Hersam; Nathan P. Guisinger; Michael J. Bedzyk